PS 473: THE NORMATIVE BASES OF PUBLIC
OPINION:
(Warning: this is a
“bare-bones” outline of class discussions, not a substitute for
taking notes)
I. Democratic
reform as a 2,500 year-old debate: Historical Examples of Democracy in
Ancient
A. Direct democracy of
Greek city-state of
B. Sparta: members of the
Council elected by a method called The Shout:
C. Plato’s The
Cave.
D. Which is closest to our democracy? Why?
II. Classical Representative Democratic Theory ( Mill,
Locke, Jefferson, Dewey)
A. Background:
Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence; John Dewey’s update
in 20th Cent.
B. Values: Popular
sovereignty, political equality, liberty, public deliberation.
C. Role of elites:
Delegates
D. Role of masses: Politically
sophisticated, active
E. View of Human Nature:
High potential for self-rule and reason, “enlightenment” through
mass education and participation.
F. Consequences for Government:
Selection of representatives, delegate representation,
responsiveness, potential for electoral mandates.
III. Democratic Elitist/Guardian
Democratic Theory (e.g., Plato, Framers, Lippmann)
A. Background:
Plato, Framers’ distrust of public, Lippmann’s Public Opinion
and experiences in 20th Century)
B. Values:
Minimal choice in elections, stability, elite deliberation.
C. Role of Elites:
Guardians, trustee representation
D. Role of Masses:
Politically unsophisticated, passive
E. View of Human Nature:
Masses inherently unsophisticated, inattentive, anti-democratic/authoritarian,
and human nature is immutable, fixed.
F. Consequences for
Government: Trustee representation, competition of elites in
elections, barriers to limit public opinion.
IV. Topics for Further Discussion
A. The democratic dialogue, the
democratic dilemma and the USA Patriot Act
B. Pros and cons of
deliberative democracy (see HTM, chs 7-8)
C. Lippmann versus Dewey
D. Lindsey Rogers versus George Gallup
E. Pros and cons of elite guardianship