Discussion Questions for Approaches and Methods

 

        I.  Approaches and Methods:  How Can Public Opinion Be Measured and Studied?

 

  1. Donald Kinder. “Attitude and Action in the Realm of Politics.” In Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske and Gardner Lindzey, (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., pp. 778-867. Skim for broad trends and topics in the study of political behavior. We’ll refer to the summaries of various topics in later weeks. (1643)
  2. Donald Kinder, “On Behalf of an Experimental Political Science” in Donald Kinder and Thomas R. Palfrey (Eds.), Experimental Foundations of Political Science, 1993, pp. 1-39.
  3. David Sears. 1988. “College sophomores in the laboratory:  Influences of a narrow data base on psychologists' views of human nature.”  In Letita Peplau, et al. (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology.
  4. John Zaller and Stanley Feldman. 1992. "A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions or Revealing Preferences?" American Journal of Political Science, 36(3): 579-616. (Focus on the theory and the Summary & Discussion; skim the analysis [pp. 587-606]).
  5. Kuklinski and Cobb. 1998. “When White Southerners Converse About Race”. In Perception and Prejudice: Race and Politics in the United States, eds. Jon Hurwitz and Mark Peffley. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  6. Explore examples of web-based survey experiments that manipulate video as well as textual messages at TESS: http://www.experimentcentral.org/ . Skim the following and examine stimulus materials at the end of the papers:
           “The Limits of the Norm of Racial Equality: Gender, Partisanship, and Support for Confederate Symbols” by Vincent Hutchings et al. 
           “Race, Skin Color, and Candidate Preference” by Vesla Weaver. 
  7. Robert Axelrod. 2008. Political Science and Beyond: Presidential Address to the American Political Science Association. Perspectives on Politics, March 2008, Vol. 6 (1): 3-9. (Skim)

 

Donald Kinder. “Attitude and Action in the Realm of Politics.”

1.   Kinder’s Handbook chapter is a useful summary of broader trends and questions in the study of public opinion and political behavior and will be useful as a review when we take up various topics in more detail later the course. Note the social psychological bent of Kinder’s perspective, and the more limited treatment of self-interest or rational choice perspectives in his summary of the literature. One might ask, Why is it that rational choice models appear less useful as the analysis becomes more micro?  When might rational choice models be more useful, even necessary, in explaining political behavior?   

Donald Kinder, “On Behalf of an Experimental Political Science”

2.   According to Kinder and Palfrey, what is “triangulation across multiple methods” and what are some of its advantages? What are some of the strengths of experimental research, as well as some of its disadvantages?  (Note that experiments are one way to achieve calls for greater “causal inference” in political science, and field experiments are increasingly used to evaluate policies and study ways to “get out the vote.”)  In what ways might the study of political behavior (defined broadly) benefit from increased reliance on experiments?  How might it suffer? What about your specific area of interest? Which method do you think is more likely to help advance knowledge in your field of interest?

3.   More recently, Kinder has said, in the study of framing: “Enough already with the experiments!” in “Curmudgeonly Advice,” Journal of Communication 57 (2007) 155–162. What’s up with that, do you think?

David Sears. 1988. “College sophomores in the laboratory…”

4.   According to Sears, a social psychologist who uses survey data, what are some of the problems associated with the heavy reliance on experiments in social psychology? Is the problem Sears is addressing due more to the subject population, or the method of experimental research? Are the problems more or less severe or are they different for political scientists who study political behavior (e.g., racial attitudes, media influence, etc.)?

5.   To turn Sears’ analysis around, how does an exclusive reliance on survey research limit the theories and explanations that can be developed in political behavior?

 

Zaller and Feldman, "A Simple Theory of the Survey Response…”

 

6.     This is a classic and heavily cited article that seeks to provide a new theory of the survey response and, in the process, provides something of a compromise between two views on response stability by Converse (errors are in respondents) and Achen (errors are in measures). In developing their theory of the survey response, Zaller and Feldman distinguish between explanations of response instability by Converse and Achen.  What are the differences between these two explanations and the problems with each? In what ways does the Zaller and Feldman’s model agree with and yet depart from each of these two explanations?

7.     What are the three axioms of Zaller and Feldman’s theory of the survey response and where do they come from?

8.     What are some of the broader implications of the theory for the way public opinion should be studied, for studying response stability, persuasion, and democracy? Are survey responses “real,” or just epiphenomenal constructions? How malleable or fixed is public opinion?

9.     Interestingly, some analysts have taken Z&F’s theory of the survey response as a model of how citizens form their opinions in the real world, not just in an interview. Is this reasonable? How does the model help to put the political environment and “politics” back into the study of public opinion? 

10. Questions to ponder now and later:

a)    Pick an issue on which public opinion has moved or hasn’t moved and do your best to apply this theory to explain public opinion on this issue.

b)    How might you critique this theory? Does it have enough axioms? Do the deductions follow directly from the axioms?  Can it be tested rigorously? Can it be falsified?  

c)   How does the model help explanation issue framing by elites? What implications does the model have for the fluidity of building coalitions of support or opposition among the public? What implications does the model have for helping to explain media influence on public opinion?

d)    The model, which is admittedly sparse, borrows selectively from theories of information processing, attitude change, framing and so on.  If one advantage of the model is parsimony, what are some of the costs of relying on this more abbreviated model? More generally, what are some of the major problems with the model, as you see them, both theoretically and in its application?

Kuklinski and Cobb. 1998. “When White Southerners Converse About Race.”

11. What concerns and issues about survey research does the selection by Kuklinski and Cobb raise? Do you agree with the authors in their explanation of the problem? How pervasive is this concern likely to be for other areas of survey research?

12. After this week’s readings, do you have any confidence whatsoever in social scientists’ ability to measure political attitudes and behavior?

 

    TESS, Hutchings, Weaver

13. How cool are these studies, anyway?

14. What innovations do web-based surveys afford the study of political behavior? What are their limitations, compared with traditional lab experiments?

15. If you had the opportunity to participate in a TESS study, what web-based survey would you like to include?

 

Innovations in theory and substance have often followed trends in the availability of data and methods for exploiting them.

a)   Traditional cross-sectional survey

i)    Its strengths

ii)   Its weaknesses.

a)   Internal validity: stronger assumptions of causal modeling, panel designs, more control in experiments and variations (survey experiments, web-based experiments).

b)   Ignore social context: focus groups, experiments, surveys with context data added, snowball samples and network analysis, multilevel analysis.

c)   Superficial responses: focus groups, Q methodology, open-ended questions, depth interviews

(1)           Focus on product versus process of thinking.

d)   Unnatural setting:

e)   Response biases in survey research:

(1)           Examples: yea-saying, acquiescence response, question wording effects, order effects, race of interviewer bias, social desirability bias, random and non-random measurement errors.

(2)           Solutions: better question design, multiple formats, “format” experiments,

b)   Panel design

c)   Field research

d)   Quasi-experimental design