|
|
|
|
| At
this point in the lab, you have many diverse sets of data and you are
asked to
combine them. These data sets include: |
|
a.) Percent
sand, silt, and clay to estimate soil textural class |
|
b.) CEC
for size fractions and whole soil |
|
c.) Soil
organic matter (total C and N, E4/E6 on humic
acid) |
|
d.) pH,
lime requirement, soil solution chemistry |
|
e.) Oxalate-Fe
and Mn |
|
f.) Zn
sorption isotherms on whole soil and soil fractions |
|
g.) Sorption
kinetics for phosphorus |
| |
h.) Nitrification
studies |
|
| You
are expected to consider soil characteristics (a-e) in the
interpretation of
reactivity data (f-h). For example, if
your soil pH was ~3.0 and Zn sorption was low, then I would expect you
to
provide an explanation for this finding. On
the other hand, if Zn sorption was high at a soil pH of
3.0, then
other factors may be important. In
writing the report, you can approach the Introduction by introducing
the soil
and its physical and chemical properties followed by objectives of the
lab
exercises. Alternatively, the processes
studied in the reactivity experiments (f-h) could be introduced and
developed
using the literature and then defining the objectives.
Because of the variety of processes involved
in f-h, I am more concerned with your interpretations of the data (in
light of
the literature included) in the results and discussion section. Where appropriate, inclusion of MINEQL+ data
could strengthen your paper. Tables and
Figures can be included in the body of the text or at the end of the
References. |
|
|
|
|
Written
Reports: Due December
9, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Format:
|
|
|
Abstract
(250 word max) |
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
Materials
and Methods |
|
|
Results
and Discussion |
|
|
Conclusions |
|
|
References
(I will check these) |
|
|
|
|
Oral reports: December
9, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|