The scope of the students’ study included a site inventory and analysis of issues concerning the use and future development of downtown Lexington. Areas of study included the evolution of urban form, demographics, land-use, preservation/economic initiatives, transportation, imagery, and imageability of urban form.  Analytical methodology consisted of site inventories, library research, data collection, surveys, and interviews with public officials and private citizens.

To gather public input and opinion on the design of the plaza, the students hosted a public charrette to help determine project opportunities and constraints.  Five design alternatives were developed and presented to the public and members of Lexington’s Urban County Council.  Click here to read a summary of the student's analysis.

Aternative 1. One large unified public open space with a strong focal point along the east/west axis.  In this alternative, Short Street is closed.
Alternative 2.  A large unified and semi-enclosed central space anchored by smaller intimate spaces on either end of the plaza.  In this alternative, Short Street is closed.
Alternative 3.  Two similar plazas linked together by a strong north/south axis between Barr and Main Streets.  In this alternative, Short Street is open.
Alternative 4.  One plaza open and expansive, accommodating large groups or gatherings.  The other occupied by more intimate sub-spaces that accommodates smaller groups and daily activities. In this alternative, Short Street is open.
Alternative 5.  Two similar plazas joined by a transition zone along the east/west axis along Short Street (open).