![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Program Presentation: Sections:
Program Presentation: Supporting Documents General Supporting Documents: Locations Index to Supporting Documents on the Web: |
Background:The University of Kentucky School of Library and Information Science offers MSLS and MA degrees through a program of study accredited by the Office for Accrediation at the American Library Association. The School is scheduled for an accrediation program review in the spring of 2004. This site has been created to facilitate access to our program presentation for both our reviewers and the public at large. Review Timeline:
Review Panel:
Review Process SummaryPreparing for accreditation review has been a continual process for the past few years. A more formal re-view of the master's program began as early as fall 2002, during a faculty retreat that focused on curricu-lum review and reconsideration of the school mission statement. During the May 2003 meeting of the school council, the general structure of the accreditation review was discussed and a plan for developing a Program Presentation was presented. Faculty members were appointed to study teams generally defined by elements of the Standards for Accreditation of Master's Programs in Library & Information Studies. The study teams were: Introduction.: Andrews (Chair), White, (Sineath) During the summer, the director sent a letter to the members of the school advisory council, to advise them of the forthcoming review and to solicit their comments and suggestions. At the first fall meeting of the school council, in August 2003, the standards and accreditation review were addressed again in greater detail, and a plan was devised to prepare the Program Presentation. A timeline was developed for completing and reviewing drafts of the various sections, and for preparing and reviewing final versions of the sections. Student and alumni members were identified for each study team. During September and October, members of each team collected data, and drafts were distributed and subsequently discussed in detail at weekly school council meetings. Following discussion of a draft section at a school council meeting,
the draft was revised to reflect agreed-upon changes, and the section
was then forwarded to the Program Presentation editor, whose role it was
to achieve consistent format. As the editor completed a section, it was
made available to faculty for review, following which the editor made
any required changes. On Friday, November 21, the draft Pro-gram Presentation
was delivered to Dean David Johnson, for his review and comments. On Monday,
De-cember 1, Dean Johnson's comments were incorporated; the draft Program
Presentation was duplicated and bound; and copies were sent to the Office
for Accreditation, to External Review Panel Chair Hiram Davis, and to
the nine members of the school's advisory council. On December 10 comments
were re-ceived from a member of the advisory council. On December 18 Director
Sineath participated in a con-ference call to discuss the draft Program
Presentation with Office for Accreditation Director Ann O'Neill and ERP
chair Davis. Revisions were then made to prepare the final Program Presentation
for delivery early in February 2004. It is this program presentation that
is presented here. Advisory CouncilThe School would like to thank our Advisory Board for their valuable input during this process. Arne Almquist Craig Buthod Kimber L. Fender (Kim) Judith Gibbons Paul Lanata, Director
Hannelore Rader Marie Robertson (Missy) Miko Patti
Revision date 2/18/04 |
|||||||