|
Lab11: WWW Resources and Genome Projects The WWW offers a plethora of resources to molecular biologists, biochemists, geneticists, bioinformaticians, and baseball fans. I would like to draw your attention to some of those resources and how you
might use them efficiently to your advantage. One can spend all day searching the
Internet and looking at very valueless sites. Some resources and my personal guides
to their uses include:
There are online newsgroups on almost any topic, running from alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk to uky.classes.bio520 (ridiculous to sublime). Generally, a newsgroup is just an electronic bulletin board to which e-mails with the appropriate subjects are posted. In theory, informed people will post to the group important questions or brilliant thoughts, and other informed readers of similar interests but different experience will e-mail answers or their own erudite musings. Without pointing any fingers, I suspect that some of these groups are of greater value than others. Some newsgroups likely to be useful include:
Netscape Navigator and Internet Explorer both have NewsReaders, necessary to read and reply to newsgroups. The Biology Microlab, for reasons completely unknown to me, use a different reader. Please determine, with microlab help if needed, how you can read news. This area can be fraught with the dreaded "browser configuration" questions, which you should sort out for yourself. Peruse the listings for an active bionet group, like the yeast biology group (bionet.molbio.yeast). For the last 20 postings, note how many seem relevant to the interest of the group. Many postings are questions followed by answers. Note the percentage of questions answered and the speed with which an answer was received. Now, look over postings for less active groups like bionet.cellbio. I think you will see a larger percentage of irrelevant postings and alot of dead threads. Now, visit the Microsoft site supporting a product like Powerpoint (microsoft.public.powerpoint ) Note the extraordinary activity, ease of search, applicability, etc. When do you use a newsgroup?
Some representative questions I have successfully asked are:
There are obvious net etiquette rules that it may profit you to follow. Don't post questions like, " Tell me what you know about fungi" to the bionet.mycology group. Don't respond by prefacing your comments with, "You ignorant...". Used judiciously, these groups are very interesting. I no longer screen these groups often because of all the junk, but I think I remain convinced that newsgroups represent a unique collaborative learning and research environment enabled by the WWW! There are an extraordinary number of pages that are not much more than lists of URLs. Some are very useful, though many are also very repetitive. Some favorites are:
Electronic Journals/Newsletters The relative roles of print and online media are in flux. Many scientific journals offer online sites, and some journals are available ONLY online (eg. some physics journals.) Online journals are in transition from a "free-use" to "subscription-only" policy. This is extremely frustrating for most users, who would like to have desktop access, but cannot afford all possible subscriptions. Just because people make money does not mean that they are ignorant. Biotechnology companies, biologicals, etc. have extraordinary information stockpiled on their sites. There are many lists of such sites. Try Amos' list! Many of the biological professional societies, such as FASEB, have compiled lots of information about their professions, particularly career information. Many biologists seem to think that the primary function of patents is to hide information. In fact, the purpose of patents is to PUBLICIZE information to encourage industrial development based on technological innovation. Patents protect inventors by granting them license fees. Greedy industries keep traade secrets, not patents. Check out the US patent office. Okay, I know this is a bit hokey, but I want you to prowl some websites and find these. There is no intrinsic value to most of these questions.
Please put each answer on a separate line and either e-mail this to Tom or print it out. Due DECEMBER 4, 1998. IF YOU HAVE NO IDEAS, GET TOGETHER WITH THE FRIENDLIEST PERSON IN THE CLASS AND GIVE IT SOME THOUGHT! |