The Rural Blog
Issues, trends, events, ideas and journalism from the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues
Monday, Feb. 28,
2005
Journalists challenged to help
improve health in Central Appalachia
More than 50 journalists, health-care professionals
and interested citizens from Appalachian states shared ideas
about the region's health, and how to cover and improve it,
on Friday in Hazard, Ky., at a conference sponsored by the
Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues.
The institute's director and the health professionals
challenged the region's news outlets to devote more attention
to medical issues in one of the least healthy regions of the
nation. "The news media in Appalachia could play a key
role in improving the region's health. But all too often,
most of the health care information some outlets carry is
advertising from providers looking for patients," interim
director Al Cross said.
The University of Kentucky Center
for Rural Health hosted the gathering. Its
director, Judy Jones Owens, told the audience, "Rural
communities are very dependent on the local news media to
act as their advocates. It's imperative in this age that someone
provide a voice for people living in these rural communities.
Reporters really should be that voice."
Roger Alford of The Associated Press
interviewed
Cross and Pat Lay, publisher of the Harlan (Ky.) Daily
Enterprise, which had a reporter at the conference.
Lay told Alford that newspapers in the region recognize the
importance of educating the public about health issues, and
that some devote sections to health and medical news. She
said her newspaper routinely runs columns on health issues
written by physicians. Lay said schools also play a key role
in educating children about healthy lifestyles, and that health
care organizations also need to step up their efforts to reach
adults. Lay said, "I think we're a partner in helping
educate residents, but we are only one of many partners."
Wayne Myers, former head of the U.S.
Office of Rural Health Policy, told the conference
that poverty crosses all racial and ethnic bounds in central
Appalachia and is at the root of its health problems. He said
the region's health care is no worse than anywhere else, but
he and others noted that its cancer-death rates among people
35 to 64 are disproportionately higher, reflecting a shortage
of screening -- which Cross said could be addressed by feature
stories about cancer victims who survived because they were
screened.
Cross also suggested that newspapers play up
health-oriented news, citing a front-page story and editorial
from the Greenup County (Ky.)
News-Times about an anti-obesity grant to the local schools. He also
suggested that newspapers could use their ability to "sample
copy" every household in their counties to reach non-subscribers
with health information, and cover the cost with ads from
health-care providers.
A more detailed report on the conference appears here.
Bill Gates urges restructuring
high schools; governors seek tougher standards
Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill
Gates told the nation's governors and leaders of the educational
community that U. S. high schools are obsolete and need radical
restructuring to raise graduation rates, prepare students
for college and train a workforce that faces growing competition
in the global economy. Governors of states with more than
one-third of the nation's students said they are forming a
coalition to improve high schools by adopting higher standards,
more rigorous courses and tougher examinations.
Gates said, "Our high schools were designed
50 years ago to meet the needs of another age. Until we design
them to meet the needs of this century, we will keep limiting,
even ruining, the lives of millions of Americans every year,"
writes
Dan Balz of The Washington Post. Gates was
the keynoter for a two-day education summit linked to the
National Governors Association meeting in
Washington. It highlighted the problem of dropout rates among
high school students and the schools' failure to give students
adequate preparation for college, and to developing an agenda
for action in the states.
Gates put his money where his mouth was. He
offered $15 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation -- which already helps hundreds of high
schools -- to help states improve high schools. Five other
foundations made offers, for a total of $23 million. Gates
and others cited alarming statistics to back up their argument
that high schools are failing students, particularly low-income
or minority children.
The U.S. is16th among 20 developed nations in
the percentage of students who complete high school and 14th
among the top 20 in college graduation rates, writes Balz.
Just 18 of 100 students entering high school go on to complete
their college degree within six years, and the nation has
slipped from first to fifth internationally in the percentage
of young people who hold a college degree. Math and science
education poses a particular challenge, with most American
students gradually slipping behind the rest of the world.
The message sent by the governors was that "Unless
the nation takes drastic measures on high schools, the United
States will lose its competitive position in the world economy,"
writes
Robert Pear of The New York Times. The 13
states in the coalition to improve high schools are are Arkansas,
Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan,
New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Texas.
Other states are expected to join in the next few weeks.
Oregon property-rights
law spurring conflict with anti-sprawl forces
Oregon’s new property-rights law, approved
as Measure 37 by voters last fall, is creating a paradox for
the state as it sets out on the cutting edge of controlling
urban sprawl, reports The Washington Post.
The law says the government must pay cash to
longtime property owners when land-use restrictions reduce
their property value, writes
Blaine Harden. If the government can’t pay, the owners
are allowed to develop their property as they wish. But there
is little or no money to pay landowners, so the law collides
with smart-growth laws that have defined living patterns,
land prices, and protected the state’s open spaces.
Dale Riddle, vice president for legal affairs
at Seneca Jones Timber Co., the largest donor
to the campaign for Measure 37, told the paper, "If you
are going to restrict what someone can do with his land, then
you have to pay for it.”
Land-use restrictions triggered a nationwide
backlash in the early 1990s when Florida, Texas, Louisiana
and Mississippi passed property-rights laws to protect owners
from monetary losses from zoning. A nearly identical bill
to the Oregon law has been introduced in the Montana legislature,
and Washington is working to put a similar initiative on its
ballot.
Mountain goes to Muhammad?
No, Mt. Sinai goes to the Supreme Court
The deeply contentious debate over government-sponsored
displays of The Ten Commandments, which Exodus says were given
to Moses on Mount Sinai millennia ago, reaches the summit
of the nation’s legal system this week – The
U. S. Supreme Court.
In cases to be argued on Wednesday, involving
two rural counties in Kentucky and the Texas state government,
the basic question for the justices will be: What does it
mean for the government to display a copy of the Ten Commandments?
So writes
Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times, adding:
"To those who seek removal of the displays
-- a six-foot red granite monument that has sat since 1961
on the grounds of the Texas Capitol, and framed copies of
the Ten Commandments that were hung five years ago on the
walls of two Kentucky courthouses - the meaning is as obvious
as it is impermissibly sectarian."
Erwin Chemerinsky of Duke University
Law School wrote in his brief for Thomas Van Orden,
an Austin resident who has so far been unsuccessful in his
challenge to the Texas monument, "There is no secular
purpose in placing on government property a monument declaring
'I am the Lord thy God.' " The Texas display is one of
thousands placed around the country in the 1950's and 1960's
by the Fraternal Order of Eagles with the
support of Cecil B. DeMille, the director the movie, "The
Ten Commandments."
Douglas Laycock, a professor and associate dean
at the University of Texas School of Law,
said in a discussion of the cases Thursday sponsored by the
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, "The
government is not supposed to be for religion or against religion.
You don't put up a sign you disagree with, and the government
doesn't disagree with these," she writes.
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American
Center for Law and Justice, a law firm established
by the Rev. Pat Robertson, said the Ten Commandments have
acquired secular as well as religious meaning, and have come
to be "uniquely symbolic of law." Sekulow noted
the marble frieze in the courtroom of the Supreme Court building
depicts Moses, holding the tablets, in a procession of "great
lawgivers of history." (The 17 other figures in the frieze
include Hammurabi, Confucius, Justinian, Napoleon, Chief Justice
John Marshall and Muhammad, who holds the Koran.) Sekulow
said, "Does the Supreme Court now issue an opinion that
requires a sandblaster to come in? I think not," Greenhouse
writes.
NFU says ag-market concentration
keeps rising, calls for more competition
The National Farmers Union
reported that concentration in agricultural markets has continued
to rise, according to a study the NFU commissioned from Mary
Hendrickson and William Heffernan from the University
of Missouri Department of Rural Sociology. The NFU
reported
the results at its 103rd anniversary convention in Lexington,
Ky.
“The study showed the top four beef packers
now dominate 83.5 percent of the market, four pork packers
control 64 percent of that market, and the top four poultry
companies process 56 percent of the broilers in the United
States,” said the organization. NFU President Dave Frederickson
said that ethanol production was the only sector where concentration
has steadily decreased, saying it was a direct relationship
to the high number of farmer-owned ethanol cooperatives in
the country.
Frederickson also said the results were more
proof that Congress needs to immediately pass legislation
to restore competition for U.S. farmers and ranchers. “Independent
producers cannot succeed in the absence of protection from
unfair and anti-competitive practices,” he said. “We
need comprehensive agricultural competition and concentration
policies to restore balance in the marketplace.”
Some Southern Kentucky
tobacco farmers not up to speed on buyout
Tobacco farmers in many Kentucky counties don’t
understand the nature of the federal tobacco buyout or how
to get buyout payments, reports the Bowling Green
(Ky.) Daily News.
Sign-up for the money runs March 14 through
June 17, writes
Greg Wells. Prior to the sign-up period, quota holders
and producers should get a letter explaining the program and
including Farm Service Agency records of
poundage for the past years, Wells writes.
Karen Evans of the Butler County FSA office,
told Wells, “It’s really sad, we have people coming
into the office still wanting to lease their tobacco bases
this year. I’m really concerned that some of the elderly
quota owners or the out-of-town property owners may not get
signed up.” Logan County farmers also have questions,
said Winston Woodward, that county’s FSA director. “We’re
getting quite a lot of questions and can’t tell them
yet how it’s going to operate,” he said. “We’ve
also had to explain to quite a few that there are no tobacco
leases anymore.” The FSA is sending direct mailings
in Warren and Edmonson counties to tell what days producers
can come to register, Wells writes.
All of the questions are a result of the passage
of last year’s Fair and Equitable Tobacco Reform Act,
which ended the tobacco marketing quota and price support
programs. Quota holders will be eligible for payments if they
owned a farm on Oct. 22, to which a quota was assigned. Producers
will receive payments per pound, based on production for crops
from 2002, 2003 or 2004.
Johnstown's
hard times turn to hope; ‘diamond in the rust,’
paper says
With such a bleak history, it might seem as
if Johnstown, Pa. had nothing left but to become another old,
depressed steel town, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
But, says the newspaper, the city that was built on the backs
of laborers from 23 countries has become known as a high-tech
corridor.
"With its biomedical research, information
technology and military subcontractors leading the new-job
revolution, Johnstown developers are bringing in more needed
manufacturing jobs," writes
Paula Reed. "Nestled in the heart of the Laurel Mountains,
Johnstown rightly earned itself a reputation as the heart
of the American industrial revolution." With coal mining
and steelmaking, the city hit its peak in the 1950s, when
more than 40,000 people worked daily in those industries.
But, Reed says the bottom fell out in the early 1980s, when
interest rates climbed to 21 percent and unemployment hit
levels seen only during the Great Depression. A population
that once stood at 63,000 plummeted to 28,000.
Now, writes Reed, the city has embraced diversification
in economic development. "It may be a catchword these
days, but for the Johnstown region, diversification means
everything. Economic leaders rely on it to help stimulate
their economy, and to keep existing jobs in place,”
she writes.
Linda R. Thomson, president of Johnstown
Area Regional Industries, a local economic development
agency, brags about recent announcements. Gamesa,
a windmill manufacturing facility, is coming in. Conemaugh
Health System is planning to turn a brownfield into
a high-tech park. In a few months, International Steel
Group is expected to announce a coke plant that could
produce up to 800 jobs between mining and the plant. Over
the next two years, Reed notes, the Johnstown area will need
2,000 people to fill new positions. Thomson tells her, "I
think that's the most positive thing we've seen."
Influx of black bears
leads to calls for hunting season in Kentucky
Bunches of black bears are pawing at porches,
rooting through garbage and menacing pets in Central Appalachia,
reports The Associated Press. Enough black
bears have migrated into the hills of Eastern Kentucky that
some think it's time to start hunting them down again.
"Outdoor enthusiasts believe the move would
be good for hunters and would give the bears a fear of humans
that would keep the animals away from homes, writes
Roger Alford. Ronnie Wells, president of the Kentucky
League of Sportsmen told AP, "It would make
them stay wild. That's the philosophy behind it. They've been
coming right down into people's porches and yards."
As recently as a century ago, bears thrived
in Kentucky's mountain region, before overhunting led to their
disappearance, Alford writes. But over the past 20 years,
they've been venturing back through the forest of Virginia
and West Virginia, once again giving Eastern Kentucky a self-sustaining
bear population that has been increasingly butting up against
residents.
A Whitesburg resident was ordered to pay a $250
fine for shooting a 270-pound bear that was eating from his
garbage cans and frightening his dogs and horse. Neighboring
Virginia and West Virginia have had bear hunts for years,
but Kentucky officials say it would be premature for them
to restart one because they don't yet know how many black
bears live in the state.
Wild horses in the West
run risk of slaughter; advocates rally to revive ban
After more than 30 years of roaming federal
lands free of any threat of the slaughterhouse, wild mustangs,
can now be sold and butchered for meat if the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) cannot sell them, reports
The Washington Post.
"In December, Congress repealed a 34-year
prohibition on the slaughter of wild horses, which have become
synonymous with the spirit and heart of the American West,
and required the government to sell the unwanted ones. Many
ranchers complain that the horses are eating up forage needed
for their cattle," writes
Kimberly Edds.
More than 37,000 burros and wild horses, whose
ancestors once sped Pony Express riders to their destinations,
roam federal lands in 10 Western states. Arguing that the
wild mustangs would starve on crowded federal lands or languish
in cramped pens after being captured in government roundups
aimed at thinning the population, Sen. Conrad Burns (R-Mont.)
attached an amendment to the omnibus appropriations bill signed
by President Bush in December, she writes.
Under the Burns amendment, BLM, must sell animals
older than 10 and those that have been unsuccessfully offered
for adoption at least three times. About 8,400 animals would
be for sale. Betty Kelly, co-founder of the advocacy group
Wild Horse Spirit in Virginia City, Nev.
Told Edds, "It's an atrocity. They really don't care
about these horses. They just want them off public lands."
Road builder seems to
lead ‘tangled alliance’
for Kentucky truck bill
Before the Kentucky House voted to legalize
overweight gravel trucks on the state's roads, joining the
overweight coal trucks already allowed, lawmakers heard again
dire warnings of the death of the coal and trucking industries
if the higher loads are not allowed reports the Lexington
Herald-Leader.
“The legislature must pass a bill to broaden
the exemption in the 40-ton weight limit so it covers not
only coal, but all other natural resources, such as gravel,
sand, oil and natural gas,” writes
John Cheves. But, because of a Pike County lawsuit filed by
a jealous gravel trucker, Cheves notes, a judge is ready to
kill the weight exemption for coal trucks.
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Howard Cornett, R-Whitesburg,
said, "They can't make a living at 80,000 pounds! Shut
down the coal industry, and we'll shut the state down!"
Trade groups representing the coal and trucking industries
don't support Cornett's bill. Some non-coal truckers shudder
at the idea of driving through the Appalachian Mountains at
60 tons, he writes. Roy Bruner, a trucker in London, said
"Putting an 'overweight' decal on your windshield won't
help you brake any faster with that kind of load."
Backing the fight for heavier trucks on both
fronts is Leonard Lawson of Mountain Enterprises,
the politically connected road builder who depends on gravel,
and Terry McBrayer, lobbyist and former chairman of the Kentucky
Democratic Party, writes Cheves The gravel-trucking firm that
sued the state over the coal exemption, D.R.T. Trucking,
hauls for Lawson's various road-paving companies. It's represented
in court by McBrayer's Lexington law firm.
Hollywood’s roots
reach to Kansas farmer and wife; from figs came fame
Hollywood’s plumage was in full bloom
last night as it picked from its crop those to be anointed
with ‘Oscar” accolades, but its world famous film-empire
name might be for naught if it weren’t for the choice
of a fig farmer from the Sunflower State and more importantly
his wife's fancy for names.
“No star exists for (that fig farmer )
H.H. Wilcox (nor for his wife) on Hollywood's Walk of Fame.
In Topeka, where he began his fortune, no plaque bears his
name. No statue bears his image,” writes
Eric Adler in The Kansas City Star. Don Chubb,
a leader of the Shawnee County Historical Society,
told Adler, “I'd say you'd be lucky to find 10 people
in the entire town who have ever heard of him,” said.
“I thought I knew a lot about local history. I didn't
know anything about him.”
In the shadow of the 77th Academy Awards ceremony,
Adler writes, "Here is what there is to know: In 1883,
51-year-old Harvey Henderson Wilcox — a crippled Kansan
who had made a bundle in Topeka rental property — set
out for California. There, in 1886, he bought a fig orchard
and 120 acres of undeveloped farmland with the idea of creating
his own God-fearing community. It was his wife, Daeida, who
gave the place a name: Hollywood.” (Your
bloggers note that Hollywood is criticized for not giving
'a fig' for the aforementioned principle upon which the farm
was founded.)
Saturday special,
Feb. 26, 2005
Publishers of The Mountain
Eagle receive award named for them
Tom and Pat Gish, publishers
of The Mountain Eagle in Whitesburg, Ky.,
accepted on Friday the first Gish Award, which the Institute
for Rural Journalism and Community Issues will give to rural
journalists who demonstrate courage, tenacity and integrity
often needed to render public service through journalism.
The award was presented at the
Institute's first conference for journalists, on covering
health care and health in Central Appalachia, at the University
of Kentucky's Center for Rural Health in
Hazard, Ky. (A report on the conference will appear later
in The Rural Blog and remain on the Institute Web site.)
The following article is adapted
from the tribute to the Gishes at the presentation of the
award.

Tom and Pat Gish spoke in October at an
event announcing the establishment of the award.
By Rudy Abramson, Advisory
Board Chairman, Institute for Rural Journalism and Community
Issues
On November 22, 1956, The Mountain Eagle
carried a front page story reporting that W. P. Nolan and
his wife Martha had sold the newspaper they had published
since 1938 to Tom and Pat Gish.
Tom was a Whitesburg boy who had made good.
Ever since graduating from journalism school at the University
of Kentucky he had worked for the old United Press,
mostly covering the state capital of Frankfort. Pat, a Paris,
Ky., girl, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of UK and a former editor
of the Kentucky Kernel, had been a reporter
for the old Lexington Leader, covering a variety of beats
for eight years.
The Mountain Eagle purchased by the Gishes was
an unremarkable, fairly typical weekly paper. Its masthead
accurately proclaimed it “A Friendly Non-Partisan Weekly
Newspaper Published Every Thursday.” To give you its
flavor, I will read you the lead from its story at the top
of Page 1 not long before Tom and Pat bought it:
“On Thursday, March 4, the Kiwanis Club
of Jenkins has the pleasure of presenting Mr. P.L. McElroy,
vice president of Consolidation Coal Company,
Pittsburgh, Pa., who will deliver a lecture entitled, ‘The
Future of Coal.’ . . . Mr. McElroy is well versed on
all phases of the coal industry and is thoroughly qualified
to speak on all aspects of our most abundant natural resource.”
There was no reason for folks
in Whitesburg to expect that new ownership at the Eagle portended
great change. But that’s exactly what was in store.
The Gishes had put out just two issues of their
paper when Whitesburg, Hazard, and other communities were
devastated by the worst flooding in a generation. Their coverage
was fantastic. It equaled that of the Lexington and Louisville
papers and it followed up on the story long after the city
papers had forgotten it.
But notwithstanding the natural disaster, there
was not a lot of obvious breaking news in Whitesburg and Letcher
County in the late 1950s, and the so the Gishes turned to
seriously covering the business of public agencies. They had
not bought the Eagle with a strategy of launching crusades,
but they quickly found themselves in an inevitable role of
crusaders.
In those days in Whitesburg, as in many if not
most small towns of Appalachia and elsewhere, public business
was conducted with little public knowledge. Tom and Pat surprised
city and county officials by showing up for their meetings.
They surprised them even more when they began to report what
was said and done, and this went against the grain of a lot
of them.
The county school board, for instance, was the
biggest public employer in the county. It had its meetings
in a little room with seating space only for its members.
Citizens who had business with the board were called in one
at a time. Often they were dismissed with their issue left
to be addressed by the board in private. No doubt to the astonishment
of board members, Pat Gish began standing in a corner through
these meetings and reporting the proceedings in the Eagle.
It didn’t take long for the board to adopt
a resolution saying press coverage of its meeting was not
permitted, and it didn’t take long for other public
agencies to follow suit.
But this outrage was only the beginning. There
followed, as most of you know, efforts to drive the Gishes
out of business with advertising boycotts, competition, and
eventually even arson.
The doctor who delivered Tom Gish into the
world was the school board chairman and the political boss
of Letcher County, and he put out word that school board employees
were not to buy the Mountain Eagle. Along Main Street in Whitesburg,
word was spread that Tom was a Communist. The Eagle lost for
all time its major advertiser, an automobile dealer, which
had been largely responsible for keeping the paper’s
books in the black.
All of this took place at an extraordinary
time. Appalachia’s wartime and post-war coal boom had
collapsed. Throughout the fifties, families left Whitesburg
and Letcher County in droves. The population had fallen by
half, and thriving communities, such as Seco where Tom Gish
grew up, withered away.
Mechanization of the mines not only threw tens
of thousands of miners out of work, it brought environmental
havoc to the mountains.
The Gishes’ Mountain Eagle, having replaced
its “Friendly Bipartisan Newspaper” label with
the defiant slogan, “It Screams,” became perhaps
the country’s most defiant, most consistent, and most
compelling voice against strip and auger mining in Appalachia.
The Eagle pulled no punches.
In 1960, its editorial leveled scathing criticism
at Bert Combs, a mountain neighbor who would long be regarded
as one of Kentucky’s most progressive governors, for
failing to take a stronger stand against strip mining and
for doing too little to address the economic distress of the
mountains.
There were times when anarchy and insurrection
loomed. The National Guard had to be sent in to prevent violence
in the coal fields; The Eagle reported meetings in which citizens
seriously suggested withdrawing from the state.
One Mountain Eagle editorial opined, “If
five or ten thousand Letcher county residents went to Frankfort
and pitched tents on the governor’s lawn and stayed
until he put in an appearance, Combs might pay some attention
to us.” Perhaps anyone who presumes
to teach journalism in Appalachia ought to require a reading
of editorials in The Mountain Eagle during the bad old days
of the Sixties.
It quickly became one of the first news organizations
to charge the federal government itself — specifically,
the Tennessee Valley Authority — with
being one of the major causes of strip mining.
With the publication of Harry Caudill’s
Night Comes to the Cumberlands in
1963, the ravages of strip mining, mountain poverty, and the
condition of schools became national news stories, and Whitesburg
became a frequent destination for magazine and newspaper reporters
and television crews.
Readers of the Mountain Eagle were already familiar
with places such as Beefhide Creek, which Caudill made famous.
They already knew about TVA coal contracts that accelerated
the spread of strip mining across Appalachia. They already
knew about the deplorable condition of schools. Letcher County
had nearly 70 one and two room schools when the Gishes began
writing about the system, and The Eagle called most of them
unfit for human habitation. Tom bitingly observed that Albert
Einstein would have lacked qualification to teach algebra
at Whitesburg High School.
In November 1963, shortly after the publication
of Caudill’s book, Pulitzer Prize-winning New
York Times reporter Homer Bigart traveled the hollows
and mountain roads of Eastern Kentucky and wrote that Christmas
would find many citizens facing serious hunger. His article
brought an outpouring of food and clothing from across the
country and became a landmark as the federal government considered
an economic aid program for Appalachia. Interestingly, four
years before Bigart’s article, a piece in the Mountain
Eagle had begun with almost the same sentence: “ Many
Letcher County homes will miss a visit from Santa Claus this
year unless some of Santa’s helpers get to work immediately.
Some may even do without a Christmas Day.”
As the national press, the White House, and
Congress discovered Appalachian poverty, Tom Gish and Harry
Caudill became the most prominent spokesmen for the region.
Caudill’s law office and the Gishes’ newspaper
office became the places outside reporters went first for
tips, for information, and for quotes.
Bill Bishop, a 1970s Mountain Eagle reporter
who now writes for the Austin American Statesman,
remembers the day after the 1976 Scotia mine disaster when
a New York Times reporter arrived in Whitesburg on deadline.
The pages for the next day’s Mountain Eagle were already
made up and were about to be loaded into Tom’s car and
taken to the press. The Timesman grabbed and phone and dictated
a story directly from the article written for the next day’s
Eagle.
Not surprisingly, a great many local people
deeply resented the national spotlight, and some blamed Gish
and Caudill for negative portrayals. One local official threatened
a BBC film crew filming citizens lined up to receive government
food handouts. Later, a producer for a Canadian television
crew was shot to death.
Through it all the Gishes remained stubbornly
undaunted. Jim Branscome, who was the point man in pressuring
TVA to open its board meetings when he was a young stringer
in Knoxville for the Eagle, still recalls arriving in Whitesburg
the day after an arsonist hired by a Whitesburg policeman
had torched the newspaper’s offices. He went to the
Gishes’ house and there sat Tom on the porch hunched
over a typewriter, composing a story for the next issue. The
issue appeared on schedule, with a famously altered motto
on its masthead: "It still screams."
“Here he was not far away from his heart
attack, having quit a five pack a day habit,” Branscome
recalled recently. “And here he was determined to get
out a few pages, just to let all the bastards know the Eagle
was still screaming. Was it an incredible act of courage,
commitment, or just plain mountain stubbornness? I still haven’t
figured out the proportions of these three things, but I am
leaning toward the last one as explaining a lot.”
It should also be said that The Mountain Eagle
has done much more than fight for open access, expose strip
mining, and expose corruption.
Every reporter and editor who came to work
at the paper was instructed that the community columns by
Siller Brown, Mabel Kiser and the other columnists who reported
the illnesses, doings, and deaths from Millstone, Neon, and
elsewhere around the county were not to be touched. Community
columns continue to be an Eagle mainstay even though Mabel
and others who first worked for the Gishes have gone to their
rewards.
It’s very hard to sum up Tom and Pat.
I have not even touched upon the things they’ve done
outside the Eagle, the fine family they have reared, or their
contributions such as Tom’s work on behalf of education
in Kentucky, including a term on the state school board.
Others who presented awards to them have talked
of many of the same things I have mentioned here. But the
most cogent statement I have seen was sent to me last week
by Tom Bethell, another fine editor and journalist who worked
at the Eagle during the turbulent sixties, and I would like
to quote him:
“They have produced week after week, nearly
3,000 times so far, a living, breathing, working definition
of what good rural journalism is all about. They have always
paid close attention to what could be described, wrongly,
as the small stuff. In the pages of the Eagle you can count
on knowing when the redbuds are blossoming and how the mist
looks on Pine Mountain, who has come home for the holidays,
who owes back taxes, and who has died.”
Recalling how the Eagle covered TVA, the War
on Poverty, the Vietnam War, and the Watergate caper, Bethell
went on: “One of the many reasons why Tom and Pat are
great journalists is that they have always understood that
there is almost no such thing as a strictly local story, and
they have been willing to follow the story wherever it takes
them. That, surely, should be a model and a mantra for rural
journalists wherever they are.”
Over the past several years, the Gish team
has received awards from professional associations, universities,
civic organizations, and other publications, and national
honors named for people from Helen Thomas to Elijah Lovejoy.
Now, the fledgling Institute for Rural Journalism and Community
Issues institutes an award — maybe we should call it
a Prize — named for the Gishes.
From time to time, it will be bestowed upon
a person or persons considered to have demonstrated the courage
and tenacity that have made Tom and Pat icons of community
journalism, and that are often necessary to render public
service through journalism in rural America.
Frankly, I think this overlooks an even more
important Gish trait — integrity. It has been their
personal integrity that has made their courage, commitment,
and tenacity so meaningful.
And so, I am honored to present the first Tom
and Pat Gish Award to its namesakes — two great journalists,
two fine people, and two sterling citizens of Appalachia and
the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Friday, Feb. 25, 2005
Panel backs case directed
at tobacco firms; wants youth education reinstated
A group of former high-ranking public health
officials who served presidents of both major parties stepped
into the government's racketeering case against the tobacco
industry yesterday, asking the judge to reinstate an education
program that cigarette companies once financed, reports The
New York Times.
“The request came from the Citizens'
Commission to Protect the Truth, a group of 21 former
surgeons general, secretaries of health and human services
and directors of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention dating to the Johnson administration,"
writes
Michael Janofsky. The group was formed last year to protect
antismoking educational programs that had been required under
a 1998 settlement that ended litigation between the companies
and 46 states over health-care costs from smoking.
Commission chairman Joseph A. Califano Jr.,
who served as heath secretary under President Jimmy Carter,
old The Times the commission's request satisfied a recent
appeals-court decision. The court blocked the government's
request for $280 billion from the companies, calling it a
"backward looking" remedy that was not permitted
under civil statutes of the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO. The ruling said
that if the government did prevail in the case, any other
remedy should "prevent and restrain" future illegal
acts, not punish the companies for acts in the past.
Califano told the newspaper, "If you want
to focus on future conduct, this is one thing the industry
can do." Under the 1998 settlement, the four leading
American tobacco companies - Philip Morris,
Lorillard, R. J. Reynolds
and Brown & Williamson - were required
to pay for education programs for five years.
Tobacco tradition is
bid farewell, but officials say auction is not the last
Tobacco warehouse officials in Somerset, Kentucky,
protested that yesterday’s tobacco auction was not the
town’s last, reports The Commonwealth Journal.
Co-owner and manager of Peoples Tobacco
Warehouse, William Shotwell, told the paper, "We'll
be open next season, we'll have buyers, we'll sell tobacco."
A warehouse partner, Glenn Martin, also objects to reports
that this is the final season for the auctions. He pointed
out that the Tobacco buyout bill only ends the price support
system, writes Bill Mardis, the editor emeritus of the Commonwealth
Journal. The bill, which was signed into law last October,
also removes restrictions on growing the crop. Any grower
can produce as much tobacco as he wants, but must also find
a buyer, the paper explains.
Big tobacco companies have been contracting
with farmers to buy the crop, drastically reducing the amount
sold at auctions. The executive director of the Farm
Service Agency, Lewis Colver, said that prior to
yesterday’s sale, 1,817, 493 pounds of burley were sold
this season at Peoples Tobacco Warehouse and Farmers
Tobacco Warehouse. Growers made an average of $195.86
per hundredweight, Mardis writes. Figures on the sales from
yesterday’s auction were not available at presstime,
the Journal writes.
In a separate editorial, Mardis talked about
what the price support system meant to tobacco farmers: “If
a basket of tobacco fails to bring a penny more than the support
price for that particular grade the basket goes to the 'pool.'
In other words, the support price makes sure growers get a
fair pay for their leaf.”
That system and the money it brought farmers
were essential to Somerset, Mardis writes, saying, “It
made the mortgage payment on the farm. The money bought Christmas
presents for the family. Golden burley was the chief cash
crop in Pulaski County and across the Burley Belt.”
And while the sales may continue, Mardis says, the tradition
surrounding it “is a thing of the past.”
Smokers forced outdoors,
toxic cigarette butts pile up, befoul environment
As bans on smoking in public places proliferate,
laws are passed and more smokers are forced outdoors to light
up, questions about the growing problem of cigarette butts
piling up outside those establishments and their environmental
and health impact are being asked by The Herald-Dispatch
in a special report.
“Cigarette butts roll off smokers’
fingers, down roads and drains ...They’re scattered
over parking lots at shopping centers. They line walking paths,”write
Jim Waymer of Florida Today and Crystal Quarles
of the Huntington, W.Va. newspaper. And there may be even
more of them because of bans on smoking in restaurants, many
workplaces and public places. It’s the unintended environmental
fallout of those defiant acts that has scientists worried,
Waymer and Quarles write. Kathleen Register, an adjunct professor
of environmental sciences at Longwood University
in Virginia told the two reporters, "It’s growing
in visibility as more and more people are outdoors smoking.
I think people are angry that they need to go out and smoke,
so it’s almost a defiant act to litter."
The full effect is poorly understood, especially
at the base of the food chain. The more visible consequences
higher up the chain are obvious when field biologists witness
them. Wildlife rehabilitators, for example, routinely find
cigarette butts in the intestines of dead sea turtles or see
them on X-rays of sick ones, write Waymer and Quarles. The
cigarette butts absorb the chemicals that burnt tobacco emits,
including high concentrations of nicotine and nitrogen. Some
biologists suspect even trace amounts of those chemicals,
especially nicotine -- a natural pesticide -- may have harmful
effects. The toxins can accumulate in higher concentrations
in larger animals as they move up the food chain, they write.
FedEx halts East Kentucky
drug deliveries; addicts try to skirt restrictions
FedEx has stopped delivering
packages from online pharmacies to portions of Eastern Kentucky
where prescription drug abuse has become widespread, and where
addicts have been using the service to skirt restrictions
and regulation, reports The Associated Press.
"Drug dealers and abusers have increasingly
turned to ordering prescriptions from unlicensed Internet
pharmacies since law enforcement agencies began cracking down
on local doctors, sending some to prison for prescribing pills
without legitimate medical reasons," writes
Alford.
The problem has become so pervasive that state
legislators are pushing a bill aimed at regulating online
sales of prescription drugs. Attorney General Greg Stumbo
called prescription drug abuse a cancer in Kentucky, he writes.
The legislation would make it a felony, punishable by up to
10 years in prison, to distribute drugs shipped into Kentucky
by unlicensed Internet pharmacies, and would allow authorities
to seize prescriptions ordered from unlicensed online pharmacies.
FedEx spokesman Ryan Furby told AP he doesn't
know when the company will resume drug deliveries. He said
the deliveries were stopped "because of the sensitivities
of where they're originating and the possible contents of
the packages." People who order drugs online must now
get them at a FedEx station.
Letcher County Sheriff Danny Webb told AP drivers
for companies like FedEx and UPS could have
dangerous jobs in parts of Eastern Kentucky if addicts think
they're hauling drugs from online pharmacies. "I've had
reports of at least 10 people gathered around a UPS truck
picking up their packages. If a driver goes up one of these
hollows and comes up on six or eight people who know he has
drugs on there, they may decide to take them," he said.
Tennessee congressman
has bill to clean up after meth labs, study health effects
U.S. Rep. Lincoln Davis of Pall Mall, Tenn.,
is pushing legislation to require the Environmental
Protection Agency to formulate regulations to safeguard
residents from environmental and health hazards created by
the production of illegal methamphetamine, reports
The Tullahoma News.
Davis, whose Middle Tennessee district is one
of the antion's most rural, is a co-sponsor of a bill that
calls for the development of health-based guidelines in cleaning
up meth labs, which have become an epidemic in rural areas
nationwide. The Methamphetamine Remediation Act would require
EPA to set up the health-based guidelines,
fund field-test kits to help law enforcement detect labs,
and fund a study on long-term health effects from the labs
on children and law enforcement officers, the paper reports.
In a recent meth-lab bust in Smyrna, Ga., federal
agents told nearby residents to not eat apples from trees
in their yards because of poisonous run-off from the lab,
raising considerable health and environmental concerns. In
2004, Tennessee accounted for 75 percent of meth lab seizures
in the Southeast.
Man tries to hide arrest
for meth, buys up local newspapers, paper prints more
Jack William Pacheco of Chowchilla, Calif.,
was arrested for meth possession on Feb. 17. The next morning,
he decided the best way to keep it secret was to buy up every
copy of The Chowchilla News.
He estimated he bought 500-600 copies of the
paper. By that afternoon, the circulation department reports
there were no copies available anywhere in town, but 500 additional
copies were printed that night, reports
the News. The weekly paper costs 50 cents a copy. Pacheco
denied the meth-possession charge, saying it was an embarrassment
to him and to his family.
UMW head arrested near
Massey plant protesting pensions, health, jobs loss
Ten United Mine Workers union
members, including UMW President Cecil Roberts, were arrested
yesterday after a peaceful sit-in near a Massey Energy
cleaning plant in Smithers, W. Va.
“Another 200 miners and supporters lined
both sides of the road as the 10 men sat in the cold rain
near an entrance to the old Cannelton Coal cleaning plant
on the Kanawha River. When the 10 moved onto the main road,
dozens of other protestors stood near them until Kanawha County
sheriff’s deputies arrived to arrest them,” writes
Paul J. Nyden of The Charleston Gazette..
Some held signs that said, “Why Won’t Massey Hire
Union Miners?” Those arrested also included William
“Bolts” Willis, president of Cannelton UMW Local
8843; Donnie Samms, deputy director of UMW Region II in Charleston;
and Bob Phalen, former UMW District 17 president, writes Nyden.
Each person arrested faces a misdemeanor charge of impeding
the flow of traffic. All were arraigned in Kanawha County
Magistrate Court and released.
Roberts told the newspaper, “We chose
to rally at the Cannelton cleaning plant because of what happened
to UMWA members at this operation last year is a perfect example
of the harmful economic impact America’s federal bankruptcy
laws can have on good, honest, hard-working people.”
Massey Energy bought the Cannelton mining complex
from bankrupt Horizon Natural Resources last
summer. They bought it after U.S. Bankruptcy Judge William
Howard nullified the UMW contract at the mine, ending health-care
benefits the contract promised miners for the rest of their
lives. More than 1,000 miners, as well as 4,000 retired miners
and spouses, lost their health benefits when Howard issued
his ruling. The UMW is also upset that Massey reopened the
mine as a non-union operation.
Cost analysis of 'No
Child' law backed; Va. study aims toward withdrawal
Virginia lawmakers want to know how much the
state is paying to implement the No Child Left Behind education
law, and how much Virginia would lose in federal funds if
it left the law behind, reports The Washington
Post, a law that has strapped many smaller rural
school districts with costly requirements.
"They need the information, they said,
before they can consider the dramatic step of withdrawing
from the federal program next year. It also signals of how
seriously they take the state Board of Education's effort
to win more flexibility on the law from the federal government,"
writes
Rosaline S. Helderman.
Del. James H. Dillard II, R-Fairfax, chairman
of the Virginia House's Education Committee and one of the
assembly's most vocal critics of the law told Helderman, "It's
going to cost us a whole lot more to stay in then to get out."
The Board of Education voted last month to seek waivers from
10 detailed requirements of No Child Left Behind, citing a
provision of the law that allows the U.S. education secretary
to exempt states from any of its strictures. State Superintendent
Jo Lynne DeMary told the newspaper there has been a meeting
with federal regulators since that vote but that they have
yet to comment on the their request.
Dillard told Helderman, "We have to stand
up and assert our rightful prerogative to control education
in the state." Negotiations now occur against a backdrop
of escalating rhetoric about the law's impact on education,
nationally and in Virginia, she writes.
Minnesota bill asks more
flexibility on 'No Child Left Behind' testing
Minnesota should be granted the flexibility
to reach the goals of the No Child Left Behind law the way
it sees fit or it will opt out of the federal program, leaving
federal public school funding behind as well, under a proposal
introduced yesterday by a state senator, reports the Pioneer
Press
State Senator Steve Kelley, DFL-Hopkins, “also
wants the (Minnesota) legislature to pass a resolution asking
Congress to amend the No Child Left Behind law by adopting
the recommendations of the National Conference of
State Legislatures' task force,”
writes Toni Coleman of the Minneapolis – St. Paul,
Minnesota newspaper.
Kelley, chairman of the Senate Education Committee,
told the newspaper, "I personally believe it's a moral
and economic imperative to close the achievement gap. But
we also believe that states and local districts know best
how to accomplish the goal set out in No Child Left Behind
and that the federal government has gone too far in prescribing
the methods by which states and schools would achieve those
goals."
Bill Walsh, Minnesota Department of
Education spokesman, told the newspaper, "We
certainly agree that No Child Left Behind needs some tweaking.
We're working every day to get more flexibility out of the
federal government and we're having success." Unless
the federal Education Department agrees to
changes in the implementation of the federal education law
by July 1, 2006, the state would opt out and forgo up to $250
million a year in federal funding, under Kelley's proposal,
writes Coleman.
Democratic strategists still fussing
about how to appeal to rural voters
"More
than a few Democrats are suggesting that, just as the party
informally decided to downplay the gun issue after their 2000
loss, Dems should now do the same with abortion (because)
it might help them win downscale, small-town and rural voters
who have been defecting from the party with increasing frequency,"
nonpartisan political analyst Charles Cook writes in his latest
National Journal column.
"Others warn that the abortion/choice issue has become
so ingrained in the Democratic Party doctrine that to suddenly
clam up would be seen as politically craven and actually counterproductive."
Cook
lays out the debate among Democratic pollsters, beginning
with Brad Bannon, who says the party should "emphasize
an agenda of economic populism over social issues," because
while conservatives outnumber liberals, "There are more
populists than elitists." He notes that John Kerry won
by only 1 percentage point among voters with annual household
incomes between $30,000 and $50,000, showing that "the
traditional Democratic message of economic populism just didn't
penetrate with this struggling group of voters, whom he describes
as 'barely middle class' and who make up just over a fifth
of the electorate," Cook writes. Our guess is that a
disproportionate share of those voters are rural.
On
the other side is Kerry pollster Mark Mellman, who argued
in a memo to a women's group that supports abortion rights
that the issue "played little role in the election, though
to the extent that the issue was engaged, it appears to have
been a net positive for Democrats," Cook says. Mellman
also argues that "moral values" were not a key factor
in the race, "that this conventional wisdom is an incorrect
interpretation of flawed wording in an exit-poll question,"
and that a majority of Americans support some abortion rights.
"More
intriguing," Cook continues, "Mellman suggests that
'the country is moving from a class-based political alignment
to an alignment based on culture' . . . that the lines are
increasingly drawn between those who have a more traditional
cultural stance (who are aligning more with Republicans),
and those who are more progressive in terms of cultural values
(who are siding with Democrats)." Mellman's memo says
"cultural progressives tend to be pro-choice, while traditionalists
are often anti-choice," but "there is no evidence
that the issue of choice itself caused the cultural alignment
or that changing positions on choice would undo the current
alignment."
Pollster
Mark Blumenthal tells Cook that abortion is a "double-edged
sword," because "there were certainly gains (for
Democrats) during the 1990's in non-southern, upscale suburbs"
and "long-term losses in rural areas." Another pollster
who "preferred to go unnamed" told Cook that "a
party should not have a position on abortion -- it is a personal
decision and when a candidate has a personal conviction, our
party should not have a litmus test for support. This pollster
said "many urban and suburban voters lean pro-choice,
but not militantly," and "abhor extremism in politics
from either side, but they are more concerned with privacy
than rural voters" Most voters, he says, don't want to
talk about the issue.
A
fifth pollster, also anonymous, told Cook that "a cluster
of social issues" such as abortion, gay rights and gun
control have mobilized liberal Democratic activists "and,
along with opposition to the Iraq War, define "progressive"
politics." This pollster says Sen. Hillary Clinton has
the perfect position for a "pro-choice" Democrat:
"Stay pro-choice but speak to those in the middle who
want abortion to remain legal as it is now, but have strong
moral qualms."
Gun-control
debate has taken a breather, reports Minnesota newspaper
The national debate over gun rights, for decades
among the most searing and divisive of political issues, appears
to be all but over in Congress, reports Matt Stearns of The
Kansas City Star.
That means that the assault weapons ban, a signature
achievement of gun control advocates that expired last year,
probably will not resurface anytime soon. Conversely, congressional
leaders and the Bush administration haven't put a priority
on efforts to expand gun rights, Stears writes
from Washington.
Saul Cornell, a historian who is director of
the Second Amendment Research Center at The Ohio State
University, told Stearns, “There's a perception
that Washington is not the place to take the debate at this
moment.” Cornell said politicians on both sides see
little advantage in pressing the issue. Stearns notes that
“Democrats, desperate to regain their appeal to middle
America, are moving away from the party's long identification
with gun control, much to the relief of many beleaguered Democrats
in states like Missouri.”
Missouri Democratic Rep. Ike Skelton said of
the issue, “It's a loser. Many in the Democratic leadership
know that small-town and rural America is very pro-gun. It's
part of our rural society, and people have to respect that.
I think Democratic leadership is understanding that and reflecting
that obligation to respect rural values,” he told Stearns.
Republicans, however, have become wary of boasting
about their long and profitable alliance with the National
Rifle Association, the nation's leading gun rights
group, he writes. In the 2004 election cycle, the NRA's political
action committee spent more than $12 million, mostly to aid
Republicans. Included was $1.2 million backing President Bush
and more than $1.5 million against Democratic nominee John
Kerry.
Untaxed cell towers multiply;
county fails to collect property levies on structures
Richland County, S.C., has a problem that many
other rural counties might share. It could be missing out
on hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax revenue because
property taxes haven’t been collected on dozens of cell
phone towers, reports The State newspaper
of Columbia..
“County officials know of 105 existing
or planned cell phone towers in unincorporated Richland County.
But only about 40 are being taxed, said Harry Huntley, Richland
County auditor. There could be even more untaxed towers, county
officials acknowledge,” writes
Gina Smith.
Because the county doesn’t know for sure
how many towers are untaxed, it’s not clear how much
money — revenue that could go to schools, libraries,
the Sheriff’s Department and other county agencies —
has been lost, she writes. An $84,000 tower, which Huntley
cited as a typical example, would bring the county $3,200
in personal property taxes annually. Towers can cost between
$75,000 and $300,000 to build.
Jonathon Yates, a Charleston attorney who represents
Cingular Wireless, told the newspaper he
was surprised to hear the county hadn’t taxed some towers.
Yates told Smith it would be hard for a company to skirt the
county’s process. He said Cingular is being taxed.
Virginia community newspaper
group switches editors for 'fresh perspectives'
Three of the six editors at Community
Newspapers of Southwest Virginia will be moving on
to other roles, announced the newspaper group this week, as
part of its plan to better utilize the editors’ strengths
and freshen the papers' outlook, reports
the Smyth County News & Messenger.
The editor of the Wytheville Enterprise,
Stephanie Porter-Nichols; the editor of the News & Messenger,
Dan Kegley; and the editor of the Washington County
News, Mark Sage, will take on new roles, said the
newspaper group’s publisher, Samuel Cooper. Porter-Nichols
will become editor of the News & Messenger, Kegley will
become general manager and editor of the County News, and
Sage will take over editorial responsibilities at the Enterprise,
Cooper said.
Cooper said the changes are to allow "fresh
perspectives and approaches," to make a news product
that is more responsive to its readers. “Every few years
an organization needs to rethink how it does business and
then reinvent itself in a way that will show progress. We
think this is what we’ve done,” Cooper said.
Porter-Nichols told the paper, “Words
can’t express how much I will miss working with the
people of Wythe County. I have come to believe that its community
members are all part of my extended family ... I’ve
had the chance to observe many exciting opportunities that
Smyth County is pursuing and I look forward to learning more
about those and getting to know the people that make it a
unique community.”
Thursday, Feb. 24,
2005
Bank regulators propose
new requirements for community lending
A little over six months ago, The Rural Blog
published its first story, about a proposed change in federal
rules that would exempt most banks from strict requirements
that they support their communities through local lending
and direct financial support of local causes. This week, the
two big bank regulators offered a new Community Reinvestment
Act (CRA) plan that affordable-housing advocates found more
palatable.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
(FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
(OCC) announced
that the threshhold for a "small bank," the type
that have less stringent regulations, would be raised to $1
billion from $250 million. In some states, most of them rural,
that would apply to all or almost all banks. Banks getting
this break would have a new "community development test"
allowing them to "allocate their resources for CRA purposes
among community development loans, investments and services
based on the needs of their community," the two agencies'
joint press release said.
"The proposal would also expand the definition
of community development to include activities such as affordable
housing in underserved rural areas and designated disaster
areas." the release continued. "The agencies seek
comment on the best way to identify 'underserved' rural areas
to ensure that CRA activities are targeted to the rural communities
and persons in those communities most in need of community
development and affordable housing."
“Small” banks are examined only
for their record of making loans in the areas that they serve,
while “large” banks undergo a stricter, more complex
test of their patterns of providing service and investment
in those areas. Banks say the current rules are too costly
and thus inhibit investment.
The National Association of Affordable
Housing Lenders, which was critical of various regulators'
plan to raise the small-bank threshhold to $1 billion, said
the new plan "is a much-improved proposal and an important
first step toward updating CRA regulations." It said
the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates
national banks and had expressed concern about the original
plan's effect on rural areas, is expected to follow suit,
and called on the Office of Thrift Supervision,
which regulates savings banks, to do likewise. OTS raised
its small-bank threshhold to $1 billion last summer withour
adding a new test.
The Independent Community Bankers of
America contains banks of all sizes and charter types,
dedicated to the interests of community banking, the group
says. The ICBA President and CEO, Camden R. Fine, issued a
statement praising the FDIC/OCC CRA small
bank proposal.
Fine said,
"Relieving larger community banks of unnecessarily burdensome
data collection, and expanding the definition of community
development to foster needed rural economic and infrastructure
development, will allow community banks to refocus their efforts
on meeting local needs." For more see ICBA website.
Broad, bipartsan group
of state officials seek change in No Child Left Behind
A bipartisan group representing 50 state legislatures
has called for major changes in President Bush's landmark
education initiative which it lambasted as "unconstitutional
and impractical," reports The Washington Post.
Many smaller rural communities find themselves especially
hard-pressed to meet the 'No Child Left Behind' requirement
to have a qualified teacher in the subject in every classroom.
"The ... report from the National
Conference on State Legislatures "reflected
widespread local unhappiness with the ... law, which sets
out federal requirements designed to ensure every student
is proficient in reading and math by 2014," writes
Michael Dobbs. The report also said states should be given
much greater latitude in interpreting the law and opting out
of provisions that undermine local initiatives. Republican
state Sen. Steve Saland of New York, who co-chaired a task
force that took 10 months to review implementation of the
intiative, said the law imposes an impractical "one size
fits all" education accountability system across the
country that stifles local initiatives, Dobbs writes.
The report complained the federal government
provides less than 8 percent of the nation's education funds
and seeks to impose an "unworkable accountability system
in return." The task force said the federal government's
role has become "excessively intrusive" in an areas
states have traditionally controlled. The report contends
the law leads to lower academic standards, has increased segregation,
and has driven away top teachers from needy schools. It alleges
the government is violating the Constitution by coercing state
compliance.
The Washington Times reports
the Utah Legislature is poised to repudiate the law and spurn
$116 million in federal aid tied to it because state policy-makers
are fed up with federal control of education and dictates.
State Rep. Margaret Dayton, a Republican and mother of 12
who has led the rebellion to make Utah the first state to
opt out of the law, told writer George Archibald, "This
is not a partisan issue; this is a states' rights issue. We
share the same passion President Bush has for quality education,
but there is not one opponent [to opting out] in the entire
Legislature, which is 2-to-1 Republican." Her bill and
another giving primacy to state education standards, won unanimous
House approval last week.
Subsidy debate reveals
a truth: Much farming is a government enterprise
The
big political and economic questions about President Bush's
proposal to cut farm subsidies continue to get much attention
in major mainstream media. Adam Nossiter of The
Associated Press writes:
"If
there is a more loyal group of Bush supporters than Louisiana's
cotton farmers, it is unknown. Perhaps to a man, they supported
him in the recent election, say those who know," and
their votes were "in line with the President's overwhelming
rural vote across the nation. That's why news that Bush
is seeking the most radical cuts in payments to farmers
in years is provoking not only anguish across Louisiana's
cotton and rice belts. You can hear the hurt as well."
"None use the word betrayal," Nossiter continues.
"And all proclaim patriotic willingness to do their
bit for deficit reduction, suck it up, and 'take the hit,'
as one farmer put it. . . . But the pain is real. These
farmers feel that, collectively, they have become a convenient
whipping-boy, sacrificed for a public that doesn't understand
and politicians looking to score points.
"I'm not happy," farmer John Rife told Nossiter. "I
voted for George Bush. I know the Red States got him in
there." Rife says "I'm a broke son-of-a-bitch," and
says he's not alone. " Like others, he is irked by
the popular notion that farmers like himself sit back taking
government checks, getting rich all the while," Nossiter
writes. "It goes against the grain, apart from being
wrong. A study three years ago found 37,000 Louisiana farms
received $590 million a year from the government -- most
of them small operations getting less than $50,000, but
three took in more than $1 million."
"Cotton is the king of subsidy-dependent American agribusiness,"
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working
Group, told Tim Egan for a story
in The New York Times. EWG " advocates
an overhaul of the farm subsidy system and publishes
a list of every payment in every county."
Egan,
writing from California, the No. 1 agriculture state, takes
a broader, national look: "Why the federal government
rewards one grower and ignores the other has long been one
of the more contentious arguments in rural America. But
now that Mr. Bush has proposed a curb on billions of dollars
in subsidy payments for crops like cotton and rice over
the next decade, the question has roiled the industry, setting
off a lobbying struggle in Washington and threatening to
pit one type of farmer against the other."
Egan's
point of departure is fruit grower Joan Lundquist, an example
of those "who grow fruits, nuts and vegetables -- nearly
half of all American crops -- (and) generally get little
or nothing from the government, because they have been viewed
as self-sustaining. But growers of wheat, corn, cotton,
rice, soybeans -- the big commodity crops in the world market
-- received the bulk of more than $130 billion given to
farmers in the last nine years, a record. The rationale
for the payments has been to keep domestic agriculture,
or at least one segment of it, stable and competitive."
Critics
such as EWG say that sustains megafarms "at the expense
of the family farm. The administration has now proposed
a cap of $250,000 a year per farmer on government payments,
and wants to close loopholes that let hundreds of individual
farmers get more than a million dollars a year in subsidies
while claiming ownership in multiple operations. In response,
some of the big growers are threatening to enter the unsubsidized
segment, possibly driving down prices for those farmers."
Nossiter
says the outcry "points up an unacknowledged truth:
American farming is essentially a government enterprise.
Of course that runs counter to the mythic notion of farmer
as rugged individualist. . . . But other societies have
decided that protecting national agriculture is a cultural
necessity. You can easily find villages in rural France
that would be depopulated shells if the state had not, for
practical purposes, taken over the farming sector. An entire
economy and way of life has been preserved, thanks to the
taxpayers. That country would be much the poorer without
it. American farmers say no different in defending their
government checks (though they rarely make the connection
directly)."
From catfish and shrimp to grass
seed, tobacco alternatives yield mixed results
A number of Kentucky tobacco farmers have been preparing
for years for the end of the tobacco price support program,
but are finding their efforts somewhat offset by market
forces they could not predict and over which they have little
control, reports The Courier-Journal.
The Louisville newspaper’s Jim Malone profiles several
farmers who have put their economic eggs into new production
baskets; alternative crops for cash and co-ops for market
safety in numbers. Some have found how frail family farming
is in world competition, while others are finding modest
success.
"Joey Green believes fish will play a big role in
the future of his family's tobacco farm, but netting a profit
has proved elusive so far. The Graves County grower and
other tobacco farmers in far Western Kentucky dug ponds
and established the Purchase Area Aquaculture Cooperative
five years ago to fatten, harvest and market catfish,"
Malone writes. Green told
Malone, "There have been days when I ask myself, 'Why
did I do it -- and how can I get out of it?' " Green
has spent about $34,000 to dig and equip his pond, bought
26,000 young fish for $3,640, and this year he will use
15 tons of feed costing $4,800.
Dan Bonk, a marketing manager, told Malone a consultant
has recommended drastic changes in the way his catfish co-op
does business, including doubling pond acreage, obtaining
$4 million to $5 million in additional financing and overhauling
the board of directors. But the recommendation to dig more
ponds comes at a time when the state, demanding more stringent
budget and financial controls, has balked at pumping in
more money," writes Malone. So the catfish farmers
are in a holding pattern.
Another farmer told Malone he will raise about 25 acres
of tobacco this year, but has made money on some vegetable
crops nearly every year, investing about $25,000 to $50,000
to buy equipment, build an irrigation pond and upgrade housing
for migrant workers who harvest the crops. He told the newspaper
he has recovered his investment and overall has made a profit,
enough to keep going and expand this year.
State officials told the C-J the 36 members of the Roundstone
Native Seed LLC co-op in Upton have made money
by growing and marketing grass seed native to Kentucky.
Randy Seymour, 62, told Malone, "Our co-op has been
profitable from day one." Seymour told Malone the co-op
had about $1.25 million in sales last year, and is the largest
native seed producer in the Southeast.
N.C. Senate leader
wants oyster hatcheries at aquariums to boost fishing trade
The leader of the North Carolina Senate has
said he would support a program to build hatcheries at one
of the state's three aquariums to help revive the flagging
oyster population, a move experts say would boost the state's
entire fishing industry, reports The Associated
Press.
"A century ago, 1.8 million bushels of
oysters each year were harvested from North Carolina's waters.
By 1988, the harvest had fallen to 138,000 bushels. In more
recent years, the harvest has measured about 40,000 bushels,
writes
AP. Marc Basnight, D-Dare, said during an oyster summit
in Raleigh, "The Carolina oyster needs a comeback.
The aquariums have the expertise, and it would mean that
the people could see it." Marine biologists believe
that a healthy oyster population encourages the health of
other fish species and improves water quality. More oysters
would also improve the economy of some coastal communities.
Nevada town sets up its own department
store when a national chain leaves
When J.C. Penney closed its store in Ely, Nev., a town
of 5,000 pretty much in the middle of nowhere, folks in
the area were "faced with the prospect of a vacant
storefront on Main Street, a hole in the local economy,
and a 200-mile drive to buy socks and underwear," so
they got busy, Tom Rowley writes in his latest column
for the Rural Policy Research Institute.
"When big chain retailers said the market was just
too small, they decided to set up their own shop. With help
from a similar effort in Powell, Wyoming, citizens formed
a community-owned corporation, sold shares in it at $500
a pop, raised the $400,000 start-up capital needed, and
opened their own store--Garnet Mercantile," and hired
the former Penney's manager to run it, Rowley writes.
"The Mercantile employs eight people, keeps shopping
dollars in the community, helps other local businesses by
bringing shoppers past their doors, and generates much-needed
tax revenues. On top of all that, the mere presence of the
store makes Ely a more attractive place to live and work,"
Rowley says. Oh, yes, the store is making money, and investors
are still buying shares.
Dan Leoni, the manager, told Rowley that a big reason Penney’s
left was that the company made too many decisions at headquarters,
leading to a “cookie-cutter approach” that doesn't
fit small, rural stores -- "a situation thrust on small
rural towns time and time again by governments and corporations
far removed from local reality," Rowley contends. "As
a result, his little Ely location was forced to buy too
much inventory and then sell the excess at huge discounts
just to get rid of it."
Kentucky town sees
little change after four years of alcohol in restaurants
"Little has changed," read the headline
in the Georgetown News-Graphic, over stories
about the Kentucky town's experience with alcohol sales
limited to restaurants, under a state law passed in 2000.
"Like modern-day Chicken Littles,"
both sides forecast "monumental changes" in the
town just north of Lexington, reporter Kevin Hall wrote.
"Supporters of alcohol sales in restaurants foretold
a boom in the food industry," but only two restaurant
openings "can be directly traced to the vote"
of residents to allow alcohol sales in establishments that
seat at least 100 and get at least half their income from
food.
Likewise, forecasts of more drunken driving
do not seem to have panned out, Erica Osborne wrote.
There was a spike in DUI arrests in 2001, but they have
declined each year since, and last year were at their lowest
level in at least eight years. "The statistics also
reflect harsher DUI penalties," Osborne reports.
The package, which dominated the top half
of Sunday's front page, was accompanied by a color photograph
of fraternity brothers from Georgetown College, a Baptist
institution, drinking beer at Applebee's, one of the restaurants
that came to town as a result of the partial lifting of
prohibition.
About 60 Kentucky localities have voted on
limited alcohol sales at restaurants, golf courses and wineries
since the legislature authorized such referenda in 2000,
and about 40 have voted for sales. "Before the law
changed in 2000, most votes on alcohol sales had to include
entire cities or counties, and the question residents faced
was whether to allow allow a full range of sales, including
package stores and taverns. That was a tough sell in many
places," Bill Estep of the Lexington Herald-Leader
reported
last fall.
Complaint filed against
Social Security for failure to comply with FOIA
An ethics group has filed a complaint against the Social
Security Administration for failing to comply with
Freedom of Information Act requests, which asked for any
records related to contracts between SSA and public relations
firms.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics
in Washington filed a request in January after learning
that the Department of Education had paid
Armstrong Williams to promote the No Child Left Behind Act.
CREW wants to know if SSA has hired any other public relations
firms to help promote social security reform. So far CREW
has filed requests with 22 agencies for copies of contracts
with PR firms, including Fleischman-Hillard. For a complete
copy of the complaint, click here.
CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan said
“although we know that the Social Security Administration
has been actively promoting the idea that Social Security
is facing a crisis and we know that SSA has paid Fleischman-Hillard
nearly $1.8 million since September 2003, we don’t
know what role, if any, Fleischman-Hillard has played in
manufacturing that crisis. This is what we first tried to
learn by filing the FOIA request and what we are now trying
to learn by filing a lawsuit.”
Wednesday, Feb. 23,
2005
Series on rural growth
from new sewer devices wins Tenn. paper big award
Brian
Harville's stories for The Lebanon Democrat on
the
impact of decentralized sewer service in rural areas of fast-growing
Middle Tennessee won
him and his newspaper the award for small-circulation papers
in the American Planning Association’s
Journalism Awards Competition. “Little
Pink Houses,” a three-day series in December, focused
on Wilson, Williamson and Rutherford counties, the paper