This rubric is for Historical FictionWebQuest.
| Beginning | Emerging | Accomplished | Comments |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Detective I.M.Cool | Question sheet completed with 8 or fewer questions and /or questions do not relate to topic. | Question sheet completed with 8-12 questions.More than half of the questions relate to each topic. | Question sheet completed with at least 12 questions (2 per area). Questions relate well to each topic. | |
| Scott O'Dell | Less than 4 statements on the press release. Statements do not reflect understanding of genre pros and cons. | 4-5 statements on press release. Statements and definition reflect an understanding of genre pros and cons. | 6 statements on press release. Statements and definition reflect understanding of genre pros and cons, and help audience to understand as well. | |
| Karana | Less than 6 instances of comparison or contrast between the novel's story elements and fact. Definiton missing or unclear. | 6-8 instances of comparison or contrast between the novel's story elements and fact. Definition present and clear. | 9-10 instances of comparison or contrast between the novel's story elements and fact. Definition clear, and/or relates to pros or cons of genre. | |
| News Conference
(Group)
|
Panel members act
inappropriately or are unprepared to present information in a clear way. No discussionof pros or cons of historical fiction genre. |
Panel members assume roles in
appropriate manner, and present information with some reference to notes. At least 2 points are established either supporting or discouraging use of historical fiction. |
Panel members assume roles with real flair. They are well versed in area of expertise, and are able to expand on points ad lib. At least 2 points are established either supporting or discouraging use of historical fiction. |
Written by Janet Lanham
Return
Home