****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 111 001A1 GENERAL BIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adkison, Gregory P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 3 25.0 Junior 6 50.0 C 2 16.7 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 33.3 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 93.3 0.0 2.9 0.26 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 93.3 0.0 2.9 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 73.3 26.7 0.0 2.3 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 40.0 53.3 6.7 0.0 1.7 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 3.1 0.26 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 46.7 46.7 6.7 2.6 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 33.3 40.0 26.7 0.0 1.9 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 53.3 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 83.3 16.7 0.0 2.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 50.0 37.5 12.5 0.0 1.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 83.3 16.7 0.0 2.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 111 002A1 GENERAL BIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adkison, Gregory P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 22.2 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 4 44.4 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 22.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 44.4 Studies Program 5 55.6 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 3 33.3 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 18.2 0.0 45.5 36.4 3.0 1.10 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 27.3 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 63.6 18.2 9.1 2.3 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 1.23 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 111 003A1 GENERAL BIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adkison, Gregory P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 8 53.3 B 4 28.6 Junior 4 26.7 C 1 7.1 Senior 2 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 2 13.3 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 4 26.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 11.8 35.3 52.9 0.0 2.4 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 11.8 17.6 58.8 11.8 2.7 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 11.8 11.8 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 12.5 56.3 31.3 0.0 2.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 12.5 18.8 56.3 12.5 2.7 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 23.5 35.3 29.4 11.8 2.3 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 31.3 43.8 18.8 2.8 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 17.6 29.4 35.3 17.6 2.5 1.01 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 17.6 17.6 47.1 17.6 2.6 1.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 37.5 37.5 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 11.8 41.2 41.2 5.9 2.4 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 29.4 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 46.2 23.1 30.8 0.0 1.8 0.90 34. Instructor explained expectations 13 15.4 15.4 53.8 15.4 2.7 0.95 35. Instructor helped with my problems 13 15.4 15.4 30.8 38.5 2.9 1.12 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 13 15.4 23.1 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.78 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 81.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 111 004A1 GENERAL BIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adkison, Gregory P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.5 A 13 72.2 Sophomore 9 47.4 B 4 22.2 Junior 7 36.8 C 1 5.6 Senior 1 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 5 26.3 2 hours 1 5.6 Required by my major 11 57.9 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 8 44.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 10.5 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 31.3 37.5 31.3 0.0 2.0 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 10.0 5.0 80.0 5.0 2.8 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 35.0 50.0 15.0 0.0 1.8 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 21.1 57.9 21.1 0.0 2.0 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 10.0 20.0 65.0 5.0 2.7 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 5.0 25.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 20 5.0 5.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 15.0 20.0 55.0 10.0 2.6 0.88 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 10.0 30.0 45.0 15.0 2.7 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 29.4 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 25.0 60.0 15.0 0.0 1.9 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 42.1 42.1 15.8 0.0 1.7 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 25.0 16.7 58.3 0.0 2.3 0.89 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 16.7 41.7 41.7 0.0 2.3 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 50.0 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 50.0 30.0 20.0 0.0 1.7 0.82 34. Instructor explained expectations 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 12.5 12.5 75.0 0.0 2.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 111 005A1 GENERAL BIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adkison, Gregory P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 16.7 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 4 33.3 Junior 2 16.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 7 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 50.0 Studies Program 4 36.4 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 63.6 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 16.7 66.7 16.7 0.0 2.0 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 16.7 33.3 41.7 8.3 2.4 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 25.0 58.3 8.3 8.3 2.0 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 8.3 16.7 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 20.0 50.0 30.0 0.0 2.1 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 58.3 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 58.3 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 16.7 58.3 25.0 0.0 2.1 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 58.3 41.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 33.3 41.7 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 2.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 28.6 71.4 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 1.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L1 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 30.0 Sophomore 7 35.0 B 12 60.0 Junior 9 45.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 4 20.0 D 1 5.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 6 30.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 12 60.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 4.0 4.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 16.7 50.0 29.2 3.0 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 12.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 10.0 45.0 25.0 20.0 2.6 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 16.0 16.0 44.0 24.0 2.8 1.01 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 4.3 17.4 60.9 17.4 2.9 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 12.5 33.3 37.5 16.7 2.6 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 25 8.0 12.0 52.0 28.0 3.0 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 13.6 22.7 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.95 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 14.3 23.8 47.6 14.3 2.6 0.92 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 19.0 23.8 42.9 14.3 2.5 0.98 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 13.0 0.0 52.2 34.8 3.1 0.95 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 29.2 37.5 16.7 2.5 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 24.0 20.0 36.0 20.0 2.5 1.08 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 16.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 2.8 1.09. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 54.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 351 001L1 PLANT KINGDOM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 45.5 Junior 3 27.3 C 1 9.1 Senior 8 72.7 D 1 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 4 36.4 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 7 63.6 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 2 18.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 18.2 18.2 63.6 3.5 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 351 002L1 PLANT KINGDOM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 80.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 4 80.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 102 002L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 66 60.6 A 22 20.6 Sophomore 30 27.5 B 50 46.7 Junior 11 10.1 C 30 28.0 Senior 2 1.8 D 5 4.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 24.3 Studies Program 84 78.5 2 hours 37 34.6 Required by my major 16 15.0 3 hours 22 20.6 Other (e.g. elective) 7 6.5 4 - 5 hours 15 14.0 6 - 7 hours 5 4.7 8 or more hours 2 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 114 0.0 2.6 49.1 48.2 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 114 8.8 20.2 54.4 16.7 2.8 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 114 3.5 8.8 65.8 21.9 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 114 3.5 21.1 53.5 21.9 2.9 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 114 0.9 17.5 59.6 21.9 3.0 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 114 0.9 7.0 56.1 36.0 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 113 0.0 8.8 58.4 32.7 3.2 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 110 9.1 32.7 46.4 11.8 2.6 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 114 2.6 6.1 56.1 35.1 3.2 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 114 0.0 1.8 43.0 55.3 3.5 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 101 1.0 6.9 64.4 27.7 3.2 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 108 0.0 3.7 69.4 26.9 3.2 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 113 8.8 26.5 51.3 13.3 2.7 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 104 10.6 35.6 44.2 9.6 2.5 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 104 0.0 15.4 64.4 20.2 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 110 2.7 26.4 54.5 16.4 2.8 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 106 3.8 34.0 50.9 11.3 2.7 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 113 1.8 8.0 67.3 23.0 3.1 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 114 14.9 41.2 31.6 12.3 2.4 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 111 6.3 14.4 59.5 19.8 2.9 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 111 1.8 18.0 48.6 31.5 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 100 5.0 12.0 68.0 15.0 2.9 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 99 5.1 17.2 63.6 14.1 2.9 0.71 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 94 7.4 17.0 58.5 17.0 2.9 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 51 5.9 17.6 62.7 13.7 2.8 0.73 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 38 7.9 13.2 55.3 23.7 2.9 0.84 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 275 Number of forms scanned = 116 Number of forms with at least one student response = 114 Percent completed = 41.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 102 004L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 100.0 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 83.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 83.3 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 80.0 0.0 20.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 36.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 24 27.0 A 18 20.5 Sophomore 32 36.0 B 40 45.5 Junior 21 23.6 C 29 33.0 Senior 8 9.0 D 1 1.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 12.6 Studies Program 6 6.9 2 hours 23 26.4 Required by my major 68 78.2 3 hours 23 26.4 Other (e.g. elective) 13 14.9 4 - 5 hours 17 19.5 6 - 7 hours 13 14.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 94 0.0 1.1 52.1 46.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 94 1.1 5.3 55.3 38.3 3.3 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 93 0.0 10.8 60.2 29.0 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 93 15.1 19.4 52.7 12.9 2.6 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 93 2.2 6.5 74.2 17.2 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 94 1.1 6.4 57.4 35.1 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 93 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 90 8.9 30.0 52.2 8.9 2.6 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 93 1.1 9.7 49.5 39.8 3.3 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 94 0.0 0.0 28.7 71.3 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 86 0.0 4.7 59.3 36.0 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 94 0.0 3.2 47.9 48.9 3.5 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 91 4.4 18.7 48.4 28.6 3.0 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 89 3.4 18.0 65.2 13.5 2.9 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 77 1.3 20.8 63.6 14.3 2.9 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 91 0.0 11.0 73.6 15.4 3.0 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 84 0.0 20.2 67.9 11.9 2.9 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 94 0.0 8.5 61.7 29.8 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 91 6.6 26.4 51.6 15.4 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 93 2.2 16.1 53.8 28.0 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 93 6.5 9.7 36.6 47.3 3.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 72 1.4 12.5 68.1 18.1 3.0 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 72 1.4 13.9 65.3 19.4 3.0 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 71 5.6 12.7 64.8 16.9 2.9 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 31 9.7 22.6 61.3 6.5 2.6 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 32 3.1 9.4 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 167 Number of forms scanned = 94 Number of forms with at least one student response = 94 Percent completed = 56.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 208 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF MICROBIO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.7 A 12 20.7 Sophomore 12 20.3 B 29 50.0 Junior 27 45.8 C 17 29.3 Senior 14 23.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 3.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.7 I 0 0.0 Other 2 3.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 13.6 Studies Program 1 1.7 2 hours 16 27.1 Required by my major 51 86.4 3 hours 16 27.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 11.9 4 - 5 hours 16 27.1 6 - 7 hours 1 1.7 8 or more hours 2 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 62 1.6 0.0 50.0 48.4 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 62 4.8 9.7 59.7 25.8 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 62 1.6 9.7 59.7 29.0 3.2 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 62 11.3 30.6 38.7 19.4 2.7 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 62 0.0 8.1 64.5 27.4 3.2 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 62 1.6 0.0 67.7 30.6 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 62 0.0 1.6 48.4 50.0 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 60 6.7 25.0 55.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 62 0.0 11.3 61.3 27.4 3.2 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 62 0.0 0.0 40.3 59.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 57 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 60 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 61 3.3 23.0 54.1 19.7 2.9 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 61 1.6 19.7 59.0 19.7 3.0 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 49 0.0 18.4 69.4 12.2 2.9 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 60 0.0 6.7 70.0 23.3 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 58 0.0 12.1 63.8 24.1 3.1 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 62 0.0 4.8 72.6 22.6 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 60 8.3 31.7 48.3 11.7 2.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 62 0.0 14.5 56.5 29.0 3.1 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 62 1.6 12.9 48.4 37.1 3.2 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 62 Number of forms with at least one student response = 62 Percent completed = 46.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 560 001L1 ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Birge, Wesley J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 25.0 Required by my major 1 25.0 3 hours 2 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 45.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 001L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 35.7 Sophomore 1 3.6 B 12 42.9 Junior 20 71.4 C 5 17.9 Senior 7 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 3.6 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 14.3 Required by my major 19 67.9 3 hours 5 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 13 46.4 6 - 7 hours 2 7.1 8 or more hours 2 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 3.1 18.8 62.5 15.6 2.9 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 68.8 28.1 3.3 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 0.0 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 7.4 11.1 70.4 11.1 2.9 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 25.8 35.5 35.5 3.0 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 21.9 46.9 28.1 3.0 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 30.0 43.3 26.7 3.0 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 3.1 6.3 56.3 34.4 3.2 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 12.9 54.8 29.0 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 3.1 6.3 68.8 21.9 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 9.4 31.3 43.8 15.6 2.7 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 22.6 45.2 32.3 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 26.7 30.0 40.0 3.1 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 54 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 59.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L2 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bush, L P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 26.1 Sophomore 6 26.1 B 10 43.5 Junior 13 56.5 C 5 21.7 Senior 4 17.4 D 2 8.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 39.1 Studies Program 7 30.4 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 15 65.2 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 3.8 3.8 73.1 19.2 3.1 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 26.9 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 17.4 78.3 0.0 2.7 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 7.7 19.2 69.2 3.8 2.7 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 11.5 61.5 26.9 3.2 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 47.6 42.9 9.5 2.6 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 15.4 34.6 46.2 3.8 2.4 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 4.0 12.0 72.0 12.0 2.9 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 15.4 38.5 34.6 11.5 2.4 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 26 3.8 19.2 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 10.5 15.8 63.2 10.5 2.7 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 9.5 14.3 61.9 14.3 2.8 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 8.3 4.2 66.7 20.8 3.0 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 20.8 33.3 33.3 12.5 2.4 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 23.1 30.8 34.6 11.5 2.3 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 15.4 30.8 42.3 11.5 2.5 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 56.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 573 001L1 MYCOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 22.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 77.8 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 430G001L1 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 60.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 001S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR: LIFE HISTORY STRATEGIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crowley, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 2 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 50.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .