****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 651 001L1 COMMUNICATION THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anyaegbunam, Chike ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 5 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 0.0 20.0 70.0 3.5 0.97 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.8 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 619 001L1 PROSEM IN INTERNATIONAL/ INTERCULTURAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Boyd, Douglas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 90.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 3 27.3 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 6 54.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 601 401S1 PROSEM IN COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hertog, James K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 92.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 92.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 23.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 9 69.2 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 6 46.2 6 - 7 hours 4 30.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 630 401S1 PROSEM IN MASS MEDIA LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moore, Roy L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 775 001L1 SEM HEALTH COMM CAMPGNS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Palmgreen, Philip C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 11.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 003L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 14.3 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 7 33.3 Junior 5 23.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 47.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 42.9 Studies Program 17 81.0 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 8.7 13.0 60.9 17.4 2.9 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 4.5 72.7 18.2 3.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 9.1 13.6 63.6 13.6 2.8 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 86.4 13.6 3.1 0.35 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 18.2 27.3 50.0 4.5 2.4 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 13.0 69.6 13.0 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 004L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.3 A 19 82.6 Sophomore 10 43.5 B 3 13.0 Junior 12 52.2 C 1 4.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 43.5 Studies Program 18 78.3 2 hours 11 47.8 Required by my major 3 13.0 3 hours 2 8.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 3.4 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 25.0 70.8 3.6 0.71 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 13.0 34.8 43.5 3.1 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 8.7 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 0.0 80.0 10.0 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 012L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 75.0 A 13 65.0 Sophomore 3 15.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 2 10.0 C 2 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 40.0 Studies Program 12 63.2 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 6 31.6 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.3 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 45.0 50.0 3.4 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 15.0 35.0 45.0 3.2 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 15.8 26.3 52.6 3.3 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 40.0 45.0 15.0 2.8 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 449 001L1 SOCIAL PROCESSES/EFFECTS OF MASS COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Armendarez, Jennifer ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 3 15.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 17 85.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 60.0 Required by my major 17 85.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 0.0 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 9.5 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 28.6 66.7 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 9.5 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 5.0 35.0 55.0 3.4 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 20.0 25.0 55.0 3.4 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 482 001L1 PERSUASION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baseheart, John R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 52.4 Junior 1 4.8 C 3 14.3 Senior 20 95.2 D 1 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 15 71.4 3 hours 6 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 28.6 4 - 5 hours 3 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 21.7 56.5 13.0 2.7 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 21.7 30.4 39.1 8.7 2.3 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 13.0 34.8 39.1 13.0 2.5 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 21.7 39.1 34.8 4.3 2.2 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 18.2 36.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 21.7 52.2 17.4 8.7 2.1 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 13.0 56.5 26.1 3.0 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 26.1 39.1 26.1 8.7 2.2 0.94 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 26.1 39.1 26.1 8.7 2.2 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 22 22.7 18.2 50.0 9.1 2.5 0.96 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 25.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 14.3 28.6 52.4 4.8 2.5 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 42.9 52.4 4.8 2.6 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 13.6 27.3 54.5 4.5 2.5 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 50.0 31.8 4.5 2.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 22.7 40.9 31.8 4.5 2.2 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 45.5 22.7 27.3 4.5 1.9 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 007L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 19.0 A 18 85.7 Sophomore 2 9.5 B 3 14.3 Junior 2 9.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 61.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 16 76.2 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 31.8 63.6 3.6 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 22.7 36.4 40.9 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 22.7 45.5 31.8 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 008L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 17.6 A 13 76.5 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 4 23.5 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 10 62.5 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 18.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 89.5 10.5 3.1 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 30.0 60.0 5.0 2.7 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 001L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 8.7 A 14 60.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 34.8 Junior 5 21.7 C 1 4.3 Senior 16 69.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 26.1 Studies Program 11 47.8 2 hours 2 8.7 Required by my major 11 47.8 3 hours 3 13.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 9 39.1 6 - 7 hours 2 8.7 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 8.3 45.8 37.5 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 12.5 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 16.7 45.8 37.5 3.2 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 20.8 33.3 45.8 3.3 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 16.7 29.2 54.2 3.4 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 16.7 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 20.8 37.5 25.0 2.7 1.04 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 13.6 13.6 31.8 40.9 3.0 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 33.3 16.7 0.0 50.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 002L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 81.8 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 3 13.6 Junior 8 36.4 C 1 4.5 Senior 8 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 8 38.1 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 8 38.1 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 23.8 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 8.7 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 281 004L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 64.3 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 5 35.7 Junior 9 64.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 6 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 27.8 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 325 401L1 BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 57.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 42.1 Junior 2 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 18 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 20.0 Studies Program 8 40.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 10 50.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 10.5 31.6 57.9 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 21.1 68.4 3.6 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 10.5 15.8 68.4 3.5 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 5.3 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 26.3 31.6 42.1 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 001L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 34 50.7 A 20 30.8 Sophomore 27 40.3 B 29 44.6 Junior 3 4.5 C 12 18.5 Senior 3 4.5 D 3 4.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.5 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 32.3 Studies Program 24 37.5 2 hours 21 32.3 Required by my major 23 35.9 3 hours 7 10.8 Other (e.g. elective) 17 26.6 4 - 5 hours 15 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 0.0 1.3 35.4 63.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 79 8.9 15.2 31.6 44.3 3.1 0.97 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 78 2.6 6.4 46.2 44.9 3.3 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 79 0.0 1.3 31.6 67.1 3.7 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 80 1.3 1.3 38.8 58.8 3.6 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 78 1.3 1.3 34.6 62.8 3.6 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 78 1.3 11.5 46.2 41.0 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 77 5.2 15.6 45.5 33.8 3.1 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 78 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 79 0.0 0.0 15.2 84.8 3.8 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 78 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 79 1.3 0.0 21.5 77.2 3.7 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 79 0.0 1.3 17.7 81.0 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 78 0.0 1.3 28.2 70.5 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 78 0.0 1.3 38.5 60.3 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 77 0.0 5.2 37.7 57.1 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 74 0.0 8.1 43.2 48.6 3.4 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 79 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 76 0.0 1.3 34.2 64.5 3.6 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 78 0.0 1.3 14.1 84.6 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 78 1.3 1.3 11.5 85.9 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 25 0.0 8.0 56.0 36.0 3.3 0.61 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 31 0.0 6.5 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 3.2 6.5 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 104 Number of forms scanned = 102 Number of forms with at least one student response = 80 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 002L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 38 50.7 A 34 45.9 Sophomore 10 13.3 B 30 40.5 Junior 16 21.3 C 9 12.2 Senior 11 14.7 D 1 1.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 39 52.7 Studies Program 30 40.0 2 hours 20 27.0 Required by my major 29 38.7 3 hours 10 13.5 Other (e.g. elective) 16 21.3 4 - 5 hours 3 4.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 87 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 85 11.8 9.4 29.4 49.4 3.2 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 83 3.6 2.4 50.6 43.4 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 1.1 2.3 27.6 69.0 3.6 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 88 1.1 6.8 34.1 58.0 3.5 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 88 0.0 1.1 40.9 58.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 88 4.5 13.6 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 87 3.4 17.2 44.8 34.5 3.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 88 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 88 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 78 1.3 2.6 32.1 64.1 3.6 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 87 0.0 0.0 25.3 74.7 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 88 0.0 1.1 15.9 83.0 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 88 0.0 1.1 25.0 73.9 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 87 0.0 1.1 33.3 65.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 87 0.0 2.3 34.5 63.2 3.6 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 84 1.2 4.8 39.3 54.8 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 88 0.0 4.5 22.7 72.7 3.7 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 88 1.1 2.3 28.4 68.2 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 86 0.0 3.5 14.0 82.6 3.8 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 86 0.0 0.0 11.6 88.4 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 32 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 118 Number of forms scanned = 95 Number of forms with at least one student response = 88 Percent completed = 74.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 453 001L1 MASS COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 28.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 16 64.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 23 92.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 24.0 Required by my major 14 56.0 3 hours 12 48.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 44.0 4 - 5 hours 6 24.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 14.8 81.5 3.8 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 6.3 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 7.4 92.6 3.9 0.27 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 3.7 96.3 4.0 0.19 11. Wa