UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 27.2 A 35 38.5 Sophomore 23 25.0 B 14 15.4 Junior 17 18.5 C 1 1.1 Senior 27 29.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 41 45.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 36 39.1 Studies Program 1 1.1 2 hours 21 22.8 Required by my major 6 6.5 3 hours 17 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 85 92.4 4 - 5 hours 9 9.8 6 - 7 hours 3 3.3 8 or more hours 6 6.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 95 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 78 0.0 5.1 32.1 62.8 3.6 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 86 0.0 2.3 37.2 60.5 3.6 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 0.0 1.1 28.7 70.1 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 90 0.0 3.3 27.8 68.9 3.7 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 88 0.0 0.0 30.7 69.3 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 86 0.0 0.0 25.6 74.4 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 84 0.0 2.4 21.4 76.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 96 0.0 5.2 27.1 67.7 3.6 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 96 0.0 1.0 21.9 77.1 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 96 0.0 0.0 22.9 77.1 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 95 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 96 1.0 5.2 22.9 70.8 3.6 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 95 0.0 2.1 23.2 74.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 94 0.0 2.1 34.0 63.8 3.6 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 93 0.0 5.4 32.3 62.4 3.6 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 91 0.0 3.3 33.0 63.7 3.6 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 95 0.0 1.1 30.5 68.4 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 94 0.0 10.6 26.6 62.8 3.5 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 95 0.0 2.1 26.3 71.6 3.7 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 96 1.0 3.1 25.0 70.8 3.7 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 119 Number of forms scanned = 102 Number of forms with at least one student response = 97 Percent completed = 81.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 219 9.4 A 1,242 53.4 Sophomore 268 11.5 B 863 37.1 Junior 568 24.3 C 189 8.1 Senior 958 41.0 D 13 0.6 Graduate 294 12.6 E/Fail 1 0.0 Professional 7 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 20 0.9 Pass or Audit 19 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 634 27.2 Studies Program 261 11.3 2 hours 677 29.0 Required by my major 1,545 66.7 3 hours 525 22.5 Other (e.g. elective) 512 22.1 4 - 5 hours 262 11.2 6 - 7 hours 85 3.6 8 or more hours 150 6.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,520 0.3 1.5 49.2 49.1 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,919 4.1 15.1 51.0 29.8 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,383 0.8 5.0 55.5 38.6 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,165 0.7 4.0 49.6 45.6 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,461 1.1 4.3 48.1 46.4 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,409 0.9 4.5 51.0 43.6 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,409 1.7 5.9 49.4 43.0 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,348 1.3 8.8 51.1 38.8 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,504 1.6 6.9 45.0 46.4 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,519 0.4 1.7 33.3 64.6 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 2,407 0.3 2.0 46.0 51.7 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,516 0.9 3.6 43.5 52.1 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,502 2.5 9.5 43.9 44.1 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 2,505 0.8 5.0 43.3 50.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,237 1.2 6.8 56.3 35.8 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,451 1.1 5.4 53.3 40.2 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,363 1.3 8.5 53.7 36.5 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,503 0.7 2.6 50.7 45.9 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,449 3.2 16.7 46.5 33.6 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,513 1.6 9.0 41.7 47.8 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,502 2.1 7.5 33.2 57.3 3.5 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 331 1.2 11.2 57.7 29.9 3.2 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 368 0.8 9.5 56.3 33.4 3.2 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 344 2.3 4.9 53.2 39.5 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 215 2.3 8.4 54.0 35.3 3.2 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 245 4.1 9.0 55.1 31.8 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 95 1.1 5.3 40.0 53.7 3.5 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 94 0.0 5.3 41.5 53.2 3.5 0.60 29. Students free to express opinions 98 0.0 2.0 29.6 68.4 3.7 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 95 1.1 3.2 38.9 56.8 3.5 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 87 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 450 2.0 7.1 52.4 38.4 3.3 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 458 2.6 7.9 55.2 34.3 3.2 0.69 34. Instructor explained expectations 457 1.8 7.0 53.0 38.3 3.3 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 437 1.4 6.2 54.2 38.2 3.3 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 405 1.7 4.7 54.1 39.5 3.3 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 37 8.1 43.2 18.9 18.9 10.8 2.8 1.17 38. Question 38 39 2.6 28.2 17.9 33.3 17.9 3.4 1.16 39. Question 39 35 2.9 5.7 5.7 57.1 28.6 4.0 0.92 40. Question 40 29 31.0 20.7 13.8 27.6 6.9 2.6 1.38 41. Question 41 36 5.6 22.2 8.3 50.0 13.9 3.4 1.16 42. Question 42 35 2.9 2.9 17.1 57.1 20.0 3.9 0.87 43. Question 43 35 2.9 2.9 22.9 40.0 31.4 3.9 0.97 44. Question 44 37 0.0 2.7 10.8 54.1 32.4 4.2 0.73 45. Question 45 37 0.0 8.1 13.5 45.9 32.4 4.0 0.90 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3208 Number of forms scanned = 2570 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2533 Percent completed = 79.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6,219 29.7 A 8,719 42.2 Sophomore 4,917 23.5 B 8,386 40.6 Junior 4,076 19.5 C 2,735 13.2 Senior 4,309 20.6 D 383 1.9 Graduate 1,136 5.4 E/Fail 41 0.2 Professional 25 0.1 I 6 0.0 Other 243 1.2 Pass or Audit 398 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4,852 23.3 Studies Program 7,078 34.3 2 hours 5,537 26.6 Required by my major 9,530 46.2 3 hours 5,269 25.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4,026 19.5 4 - 5 hours 3,382 16.3 6 - 7 hours 1,031 5.0 8 or more hours 722 3.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23,058 0.9 3.5 52.4 43.2 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22,172 4.3 12.3 51.7 31.7 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22,008 2.1 9.4 55.5 33.0 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21,773 3.0 8.9 49.9 38.2 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22,825 2.0 7.2 51.0 39.7 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22,016 1.3 4.9 54.9 38.8 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22,558 1.7 6.1 51.0 41.2 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 20,655 4.5 18.6 46.8 30.1 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22,937 3.3 10.7 45.2 40.9 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22,997 0.6 2.2 37.1 60.1 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 21,013 0.7 3.0 51.4 44.9 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22,848 1.6 6.3 46.2 45.8 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22,661 5.7 18.4 40.5 35.4 3.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 22,600 2.4 10.7 45.4 41.5 3.3 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19,568 2.0 11.0 57.4 29.7 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21,915 2.1 11.3 56.1 30.5 3.2 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20,536 2.5 17.1 53.3 27.1 3.1 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22,707 1.9 6.3 56.9 34.9 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22,285 8.7 28.3 39.1 23.9 2.8 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22,872 4.2 15.0 45.7 35.1 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 22,784 4.4 12.4 34.3 48.9 3.3 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5,599 3.0 15.3 59.9 21.8 3.0 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6,691 3.1 15.5 60.1 21.3 3.0 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5,884 2.9 11.6 61.5 24.0 3.1 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3,677 3.3 10.6 56.9 29.2 3.1 0.72 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2,761 3.5 11.9 59.1 25.4 3.1 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1,511 2.1 8.1 50.0 39.9 3.3 0.70 28. Guided student report preparation 1,533 2.0 8.6 51.2 38.2 3.3 0.69 29. Students free to express opinions 1,789 1.3 3.8 43.5 51.4 3.5 0.63 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1,775 1.9 5.1 45.7 47.2 3.4 0.67 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1,577 2.4 12.0 50.7 34.9 3.2 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4,316 4.6 11.0 50.9 33.5 3.1 0.78 33. Amount of work appropriate 4,381 5.8 8.4 54.3 31.5 3.1 0.78 34. Instructor explained expectations 4,367 3.5 8.9 51.5 36.2 3.2 0.74 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4,183 3.8 11.8 51.3 33.1 3.1 0.76 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3,065 4.1 9.2 57.3 29.4 3.1 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1,649 3.3 7.5 10.8 38.6 39.9 4.0 1.05 38. Question 38 1,662 1.2 2.7 10.5 34.7 51.0 4.3 0.86 39. Question 39 1,640 3.4 8.0 14.4 35.8 38.5 4.0 1.07 40. Question 40 1,656 4.0 6.2 14.3 36.1 39.4 4.0 1.07 41. Question 41 1,027 0.9 1.6 15.1 36.1 46.3 4.3 0.83 42. Question 42 1,030 4.5 9.4 24.4 36.8 25.0 3.7 1.08 43. Question 43 1,024 1.5 4.2 16.5 39.8 38.0 4.1 0.92 44. Question 44 1,024 3.3 5.9 16.6 36.7 37.5 4.0 1.04 45. Question 45 1,026 8.5 19.2 56.8 11.8 3.7 2.8 0.88 46. Question 46 979 58.8 23.8 7.2 6.4 3.8 1.7 1.09 47. Question 47 39 15.4 10.3 7.7 17.9 48.7 3.7 1.53 48. Question 48 35 14.3 14.3 5.7 17.1 48.6 3.7 1.54 49. Question 49 40 25.0 12.5 5.0 15.0 42.5 3.4 1.71 Number of forms preslugged = at least 36385 Number of forms scanned = 26395 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23375 Percent completed = 64.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 117 1.8 A 3,219 49.8 Sophomore 881 13.5 B 2,580 39.9 Junior 1,788 27.4 C 562 8.7 Senior 2,944 45.1 D 53 0.8 Graduate 744 11.4 E/Fail 3 0.0 Professional 18 0.3 I 2 0.0 Other 42 0.6 Pass or Audit 49 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1,788 27.5 Studies Program 270 4.2 2 hours 2,082 32.1 Required by my major 5,389 83.1 3 hours 1,527 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 825 12.7 4 - 5 hours 764 11.8 6 - 7 hours 212 3.3 8 or more hours 118 1.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6,977 0.6 2.2 51.4 45.8 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6,592 4.3 12.8 52.7 30.2 3.1 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6,731 1.2 6.1 53.5 39.1 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6,772 1.6 5.8 49.4 43.2 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6,922 1.2 4.5 49.9 44.4 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6,695 1.1 4.3 53.0 41.6 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6,885 0.7 3.1 48.3 47.9 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 6,356 2.5 18.8 49.2 29.5 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6,966 2.7 9.0 43.5 44.8 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6,975 0.5 1.7 35.6 62.3 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 6,480 0.6 2.2 48.1 49.2 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6,942 1.2 5.3 46.4 47.2 3.4 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6,913 4.1 15.6 43.1 37.2 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 6,916 1.5 7.8 44.8 45.9 3.4 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5,920 1.7 10.9 59.5 27.9 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6,821 1.2 6.7 57.4 34.7 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6,731 1.4 8.3 57.0 33.2 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6,908 1.1 4.3 55.7 39.0 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6,786 5.3 24.6 44.7 25.4 2.9 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6,928 2.5 10.3 47.1 40.1 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 6,914 3.4 10.1 33.2 53.3 3.4 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 262 2.7 11.5 61.8 24.0 3.1 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 312 3.2 9.3 63.5 24.0 3.1 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 284 2.8 8.1 63.4 25.7 3.1 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 167 3.0 14.4 50.3 32.3 3.1 0.76 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 157 1.3 5.7 59.2 33.8 3.3 0.62 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 116 0.0 3.4 52.6 44.0 3.4 0.56 28. Guided student report preparation 114 0.0 3.5 53.5 43.0 3.4 0.56 29. Students free to express opinions 122 0.0 4.9 42.6 52.5 3.5 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 122 0.0 3.3 42.6 54.1 3.5 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 115 0.9 7.8 47.0 44.3 3.3 0.66 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 142 0.0 4.2 49.3 46.5 3.4 0.58 33. Amount of work appropriate 143 0.7 1.4 49.0 49.0 3.5 0.57 34. Instructor explained expectations 138 0.0 4.3 50.7 44.9 3.4 0.57 35. Instructor helped with my problems 136 0.0 5.9 47.8 46.3 3.4 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 99 1.0 3.0 50.5 45.5 3.4 0.60 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 51 25.5 2.0 11.8 54.9 5.9 3.1 1.36 38. Question 38 33 3.0 0.0 24.2 72.7 0.0 3.7 0.65 39. Question 39 32 3.1 6.3 21.9 68.8 0.0 3.6 0.76 40. Question 40 33 3.0 0.0 27.3 69.7 0.0 3.6 0.65 41. Question 41 33 3.0 0.0 21.2 75.8 0.0 3.7 0.64 42. Question 42 30 3.3 10.0 33.3 53.3 0.0 3.4 0.81 43. Question 43 33 9.1 0.0 48.5 42.4 0.0 3.2 0.87 44. Question 44 32 3.1 12.5 40.6 43.8 0.0 3.3 0.80 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 10520 Number of forms scanned = 7044 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6997 Percent completed = 66.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 328 12.0 A 1,492 55.2 Sophomore 516 18.9 B 1,028 38.0 Junior 663 24.3 C 165 6.1 Senior 870 31.9 D 12 0.4 Graduate 344 12.6 E/Fail 3 0.1 Professional 1 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 9 0.3 Pass or Audit 2 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 635 23.4 Studies Program 807 30.1 2 hours 851 31.4 Required by my major 1,369 51.0 3 hours 648 23.9 Other (e.g. elective) 506 18.9 4 - 5 hours 382 14.1 6 - 7 hours 114 4.2 8 or more hours 78 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,016 0.6 3.0 43.1 53.3 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,819 4.4 11.6 44.8 39.1 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3,011 2.0 8.1 49.8 40.1 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,445 1.5 6.1 47.4 45.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,014 1.7 7.6 46.7 44.0 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3,019 1.3 6.9 49.4 42.3 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,013 1.4 5.6 47.8 45.1 3.4 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,990 1.4 6.9 46.2 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,028 1.5 8.5 40.9 49.1 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,030 0.3 1.4 32.2 66.1 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 2,838 0.6 3.2 43.2 53.0 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,018 1.0 4.6 41.2 53.2 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,999 3.5 13.6 36.7 46.2 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 3,004 1.0 4.4 37.7 56.9 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,791 0.7 6.8 51.8 40.7 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,925 1.2 7.6 49.2 42.1 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,744 1.3 12.6 49.6 36.5 3.2 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,007 0.7 4.0 49.0 46.3 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,940 6.0 21.9 38.7 33.4 3.0 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,991 2.6 10.1 39.8 47.4 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,983 2.8 9.0 29.6 58.6 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 473 5.3 25.2 48.4 21.1 2.9 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 715 2.4 10.6 58.7 28.3 3.1 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 708 3.1 9.9 57.8 29.2 3.1 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 265 3.4 15.5 51.7 29.4 3.1 0.76 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 229 3.1 16.2 54.1 26.6 3.0 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 122 0.0 6.6 50.0 43.4 3.4 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 121 0.8 8.3 47.1 43.8 3.3 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 126 0.8 4.0 29.4 65.9 3.6 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 128 0.8 3.9 42.2 53.1 3.5 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 117 0.9 13.7 44.4 41.0 3.3 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 52 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.54 33. Amount of work appropriate 55 3.6 5.5 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.68 34. Instructor explained expectations 53 0.0 13.2 58.5 28.3 3.2 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 51 0.0 7.8 64.7 27.5 3.2 0.57 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 51 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.55 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3832 Number of forms scanned = 3388 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3039 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 77 2.8 A 2,061 74.6 Sophomore 256 9.2 B 594 21.5 Junior 527 18.9 C 60 2.2 Senior 937 33.6 D 3 0.1 Graduate 911 32.7 E/Fail 1 0.0 Professional 38 1.4 I 5 0.2 Other 43 1.5 Pass or Audit 40 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 885 31.9 Studies Program 63 2.3 2 hours 644 23.2 Required by my major 2,080 75.2 3 hours 540 19.5 Other (e.g. elective) 624 22.6 4 - 5 hours 363 13.1 6 - 7 hours 116 4.2 8 or more hours 224 8.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,970 0.3 1.9 37.4 60.4 3.6 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,589 3.0 8.3 43.8 44.9 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,838 1.0 4.5 44.6 49.9 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,300 1.1 5.3 40.0 53.7 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,814 0.8 3.9 40.8 54.5 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,856 1.0 4.1 43.6 51.3 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,787 0.8 4.1 39.9 55.2 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,703 1.0 6.5 39.5 53.0 3.4 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,962 1.4 5.9 37.8 54.9 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,979 0.3 1.3 28.8 69.6 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 2,801 0.4 1.5 39.4 58.7 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,968 0.9 3.3 35.6 60.2 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,966 2.1 7.0 37.6 53.3 3.4 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 2,968 0.5 1.8 31.8 65.9 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,707 0.7 4.0 44.1 51.2 3.5 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,819 0.9 4.8 42.5 51.9 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,740 1.1 7.7 43.3 47.9 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,937 0.6 2.3 40.1 56.9 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,856 2.8 13.5 38.2 45.6 3.3 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,955 1.3 7.4 35.5 55.8 3.5 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,942 1.8 7.2 28.6 62.5 3.5 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 116 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 142 4.2 4.2 45.1 46.5 3.3 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 132 1.5 3.0 45.5 50.0 3.4 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 94 1.1 6.4 44.7 47.9 3.4 0.66 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 94 0.0 8.5 38.3 53.2 3.4 0.65 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 167 0.6 4.2 37.7 57.5 3.5 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 172 0.6 4.1 43.0 52.3 3.5 0.61 29. Students free to express opinions 190 0.0 3.2 31.6 65.3 3.6 0.55 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 191 0.0 3.7 36.6 59.7 3.6 0.57 31. Developed abil to conduct research 161 0.6 9.9 39.8 49.7 3.4 0.69 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 96 0.0 1.0 36.5 62.5 3.6 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 97 2.1 0.0 39.2 58.8 3.5 0.61 34. Instructor explained expectations 95 1.1 2.1 38.9 57.9 3.5 0.60 35. Instructor helped with my problems 94 1.1 2.1 39.4 57.4 3.5 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 86 0.0 2.3 34.9 62.8 3.6 0.54 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 12.5 43.8 6.3 12.5 25.0 2.9 1.48 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 4.4 0.62 39. Question 39 16 12.5 87.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.34 40. Question 40 15 13.3 6.7 80.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.72 41. Question 41 16 0.0 6.3 0.0 37.5 56.3 4.4 0.81 42. Question 42 16 56.3 31.3 0.0 0.0 12.5 1.8 1.33 43. Question 43 16 56.3 25.0 6.3 0.0 12.5 1.9 1.36 44. Question 44 16 6.3 0.0 25.0 43.8 25.0 3.8 1.05 45. Question 45 13 53.8 30.8 0.0 7.7 7.7 1.8 1.28 46. Question 46 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 0.0 2.5 0.88 47. Question 47 12 41.7 41.7 8.3 8.3 0.0 1.8 0.94 48. Question 48 13 38.5 23.1 23.1 15.4 0.0 2.2 1.14 49. Question 49 13 15.4 69.2 0.0 15.4 0.0 2.2 0.90 Number of forms preslugged = at least 3663 Number of forms scanned = 3026 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2989 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 623 12.8 A 2,336 48.5 Sophomore 570 11.7 B 1,842 38.2 Junior 1,059 21.8 C 479 9.9 Senior 2,002 41.2 D 59 1.2 Graduate 566 11.6 E/Fail 8 0.2 Professional 9 0.2 I 1 0.0 Other 33 0.7 Pass or Audit 91 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 900 18.6 Studies Program 126 2.6 2 hours 855 17.6 Required by my major 4,018 83.0 3 hours 1,161 23.9 Other (e.g. elective) 697 14.4 4 - 5 hours 1,084 22.4 6 - 7 hours 460 9.5 8 or more hours 388 8.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5,257 1.3 5.8 61.6 31.3 3.2 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4,776 6.9 14.4 53.6 25.1 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5,229 2.3 8.5 58.9 30.2 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4,816 2.8 8.9 57.0 31.4 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5,243 3.0 8.9 57.4 30.7 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5,245 2.3 7.7 60.3 29.7 3.2 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5,195 4.3 10.0 56.3 29.5 3.1 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 5,070 5.5 23.5 50.7 20.4 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5,257 5.3 15.3 50.9 28.5 3.0 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5,275 0.9 3.3 48.3 47.5 3.4 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 4,883 1.8 6.3 56.2 35.8 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5,214 2.6 8.5 55.7 33.2 3.2 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5,208 7.4 20.6 47.4 24.6 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 5,138 4.4 15.7 53.9 26.0 3.0 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4,101 3.1 14.7 61.7 20.5 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5,104 2.4 8.9 61.3 27.4 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5,108 2.4 9.6 60.2 27.8 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5,196 2.3 7.1 61.7 28.9 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5,088 8.3 26.8 45.0 19.9 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5,248 5.8 17.4 48.7 28.1 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 5,227 6.9 16.7 41.0 35.4 3.0 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 265 5.3 11.7 51.7 31.3 3.1 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 289 6.2 13.8 49.1 30.8 3.0 0.83 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 233 5.2 11.2 47.6 36.1 3.1 0.81 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 186 5.4 14.5 41.9 38.2 3.1 0.85 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 179 3.9 10.6 45.8 39.7 3.2 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 184 2.7 9.2 51.6 36.4 3.2 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 173 5.8 9.8 45.7 38.7 3.2 0.83 29. Students free to express opinions 206 4.4 5.8 51.0 38.8 3.2 0.75 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 197 3.6 6.1 50.3 40.1 3.3 0.73 31. Developed abil to conduct research 184 3.8 12.0 45.7 38.6 3.2 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 571 7.0 15.1 53.8 24.2 3.0 0.82 33. Amount of work appropriate 578 10.4 17.6 51.9 20.1 2.8 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 583 7.7 14.2 54.2 23.8 2.9 0.83 35. Instructor helped with my problems 575 7.0 12.9 56.0 24.2 3.0 0.81 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 543 7.9 12.5 56.2 23.4 3.0 0.82 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1,238 1.5 3.1 19.6 46.5 29.2 4.0 0.87 38. Question 38 1,237 1.6 4.9 19.6 45.7 28.2 3.9 0.90 39. Question 39 1,235 2.0 6.4 19.8 45.4 26.3 3.9 0.94 40. Question 40 1,077 2.2 7.1 21.1 44.8 24.9 3.8 0.96 41. Question 41 946 2.2 8.9 20.7 43.4 24.7 3.8 0.98 42. Question 42 726 2.5 5.9 22.7 46.6 22.3 3.8 0.93 43. Question 43 615 2.4 5.7 23.7 45.7 22.4 3.8 0.93 44. Question 44 411 2.4 6.3 23.4 45.7 22.1 3.8 0.94 45. Question 45 272 2.6 5.5 22.8 45.2 23.9 3.8 0.94 46. Question 46 171 5.3 11.7 25.1 42.7 15.2 3.5 1.05 47. Question 47 85 1.2 4.7 16.5 55.3 22.4 3.9 0.83 48. Question 48 46 2.2 2.2 15.2 60.9 19.6 3.9 0.80 49. Question 49 7 14.3 0.0 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.9 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 7700 Number of forms scanned = 5412 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5351 Percent completed = 69.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 133 7.2 A 1,011 55.4 Sophomore 307 16.7 B 667 36.5 Junior 470 25.5 C 123 6.7 Senior 760 41.3 D 9 0.5 Graduate 161 8.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 9 0.5 Pass or Audit 16 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 597 32.6 Studies Program 209 11.4 2 hours 559 30.5 Required by my major 1,307 71.1 3 hours 361 19.7 Other (e.g. elective) 321 17.5 4 - 5 hours 168 9.2 6 - 7 hours 64 3.5 8 or more hours 81 4.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,031 0.9 3.3 53.4 42.3 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,809 3.0 8.6 51.8 36.5 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,952 1.9 7.2 58.6 32.4 3.2 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,751 2.9 9.7 51.1 36.3 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,985 2.2 7.4 51.4 39.0 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,987 1.5 6.3 55.0 37.2 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,974 4.0 9.4 51.1 35.6 3.2 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,869 3.1 19.4 48.1 29.4 3.0 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,021 3.7 10.8 48.6 36.9 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,021 0.9 3.1 41.8 54.2 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 1,818 1.1 4.8 53.9 40.2 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,014 2.1 5.4 51.0 41.6 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,008 4.9 14.7 45.8 34.6 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 2,005 2.0 8.1 49.5 40.4 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,843 1.1 9.5 57.8 31.5 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,947 1.6 9.9 58.4 30.1 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,853 2.3 13.8 56.3 27.7 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,014 1.4 4.6 56.5 37.5 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,980 4.8 20.2 48.0 27.0 3.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,016 4.3 13.9 46.2 35.7 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,003 4.7 12.7 39.4 43.2 3.2 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 146 1.4 18.5 51.4 28.8 3.1 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 189 2.1 8.5 58.7 30.7 3.2 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 183 2.2 5.5 59.0 33.3 3.2 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 113 1.8 8.8 54.0 35.4 3.2 0.68 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 78 0.0 6.4 57.7 35.9 3.3 0.58 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 54 0.0 9.3 51.9 38.9 3.3 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 53 3.8 7.5 47.2 41.5 3.3 0.76 29. Students free to express opinions 73 0.0 1.4 39.7 58.9 3.6 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 70 2.9 4.3 40.0 52.9 3.4 0.71 31. Developed abil to conduct research 50 4.0 18.0 42.0 36.0 3.1 0.84 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 62 6.5 12.9 58.1 22.6 3.0 0.79 33. Amount of work appropriate 64 1.6 6.3 65.6 26.6 3.2 0.61 34. Instructor explained expectations 63 9.5 12.7 54.0 23.8 2.9 0.87 35. Instructor helped with my problems 63 11.1 27.0 44.4 17.5 2.7 0.89 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 57 10.5 7.0 54.4 28.1 3.0 0.89 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 2953 Number of forms scanned = 2056 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2038 Percent completed = 69.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 228 73.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 80 25.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 1.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 310 98.1 E/Fail 1 0.3 Professional 2 0.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 38 12.1 Studies Program 39 12.5 2 hours 61 19.4 Required by my major 228 72.8 3 hours 92 29.3 Other (e.g. elective) 46 14.7 4 - 5 hours 78 24.8 6 - 7 hours 28 8.9 8 or more hours 17 5.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 338 0.6 1.8 42.9 54.7 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 281 3.6 11.0 45.2 40.2 3.2 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 335 1.8 4.8 52.8 40.6 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 239 2.5 5.9 47.7 43.9 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 321 1.6 6.2 44.2 48.0 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 334 2.4 3.3 46.7 47.6 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 327 0.3 3.4 44.0 52.3 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 310 1.9 10.3 47.1 40.6 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 338 2.4 12.4 46.7 38.5 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 341 0.9 1.8 28.4 68.9 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 308 1.3 3.9 41.9 52.9 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 339 2.1 4.7 44.0 49.3 3.4 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 337 3.6 11.6 43.3 41.5 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 339 2.7 5.6 42.2 49.6 3.4 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 294 1.7 5.1 54.8 38.4 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 338 1.2 7.1 47.6 44.1 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 329 1.8 9.7 50.2 38.3 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 338 1.5 5.9 48.5 44.1 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 332 4.5 17.5 47.3 30.7 3.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 339 3.8 12.4 38.1 45.7 3.3 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 332 3.3 11.4 34.6 50.6 3.3 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 72 0.0 4.2 38.9 56.9 3.5 0.58 28. Guided student report preparation 74 0.0 9.5 48.6 41.9 3.3 0.64 29. Students free to express opinions 75 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.47 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 75 0.0 0.0 45.3 54.7 3.5 0.50 31. Developed abil to conduct research 71 1.4 2.8 38.0 57.7 3.5 0.63 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 418 Number of forms scanned = 341 Number of forms with at least one student response = 341 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 18.8 A 45 93.8 Sophomore 19 39.6 B 2 4.2 Junior 13 27.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 14.6 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 56.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 14.6 Required by my major 4 8.5 3 hours 10 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 43 91.5 4 - 5 hours 2 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 2.0 22.4 75.5 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 0.0 4.4 42.2 53.3 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 0.0 2.0 20.4 77.6 3.8 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 6.1 20.4 73.5 3.7 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 2.3 34.1 63.6 3.6 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 4.2 22.9 72.9 3.7 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 0.0 9.5 35.7 54.8 3.5 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 0.0 6.1 28.6 65.3 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 2.1 4.2 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 2.1 22.9 75.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 2.3 48.8 48.8 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 2.4 36.6 61.0 3.6 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 2.0 0.0 30.6 67.3 3.6 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 8.7 8.7 32.6 50.0 3.2 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 2.0 4.1 24.5 69.4 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 49 0.0 8.2 24.5 67.3 3.6 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 64 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 76.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 0.5 A 554 68.7 Sophomore 16 2.0 B 234 29.0 Junior 103 12.6 C 15 1.9 Senior 168 20.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 521 63.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 3 0.4 Pass or Audit 3 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 143 17.7 Studies Program 48 6.0 2 hours 170 21.0 Required by my major 695 86.3 3 hours 158 19.5 Other (e.g. elective) 62 7.7 4 - 5 hours 151 18.6 6 - 7 hours 60 7.4 8 or more hours 128 15.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 861 0.8 3.3 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 701 3.4 7.8 44.9 43.8 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 852 0.8 4.5 47.7 47.1 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 669 2.4 4.2 45.1 48.3 3.4 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 833 1.0 5.9 45.0 48.1 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 858 0.5 3.6 46.3 49.7 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 845 0.5 2.7 42.4 54.4 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 830 1.1 7.7 42.5 48.7 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 862 2.2 8.6 38.6 50.6 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 866 0.2 1.7 31.6 66.4 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 784 0.9 4.0 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 865 0.7 4.2 38.6 56.5 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 858 1.6 9.1 38.8 50.5 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 868 0.5 2.4 34.4 62.7 3.6 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 819 0.4 4.0 48.4 47.3 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 849 0.5 5.5 45.8 48.2 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 829 0.5 8.7 46.8 44.0 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 858 0.2 4.0 45.0 50.8 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 839 1.9 13.5 42.9 41.7 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 855 2.3 9.1 33.5 55.1 3.4 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 857 2.7 11.0 25.3 61.0 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 4.3 0.0 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 35 0.0 8.6 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 35 2.9 2.9 42.9 51.4 3.4 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 60 0.0 3.3 46.7 50.0 3.5 0.57 28. Guided student report preparation 69 0.0 10.1 49.3 40.6 3.3 0.65 29. Students free to express opinions 81 0.0 6.2 28.4 65.4 3.6 0.61 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 80 0.0 6.3 33.8 60.0 3.5 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 58 0.0 6.9 46.6 46.6 3.4 0.62 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1041 Number of forms scanned = 922 Number of forms with at least one student response = 869 Percent completed = 83.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************