****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 152 001L1 REGIONAL GEO OF WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 61.1 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 4 22.2 B 10 58.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.9 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 29.4 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 15.8 10.5 52.6 21.1 2.8 0.98 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 36.8 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 36.8 31.6 26.3 2.8 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 31.6 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 5.6 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 22.2 44.4 27.8 2.9 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 27.8 38.9 33.3 3.1 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 152 002L1 REGIONAL GEO OF WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 55.3 A 7 18.4 Sophomore 6 15.8 B 21 55.3 Junior 7 18.4 C 10 26.3 Senior 4 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 10.5 Studies Program 26 70.3 2 hours 14 36.8 Required by my major 8 21.6 3 hours 14 36.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 8.1 4 - 5 hours 4 10.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 1 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 56.4 43.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 2.6 56.4 41.0 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 38 0.0 13.2 63.2 23.7 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 2.6 23.1 46.2 28.2 3.0 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 7.7 20.5 48.7 23.1 2.9 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 7.9 63.2 28.9 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 0.0 10.3 66.7 23.1 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 5.4 29.7 51.4 13.5 2.7 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 0.0 59.0 41.0 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 39 7.7 12.8 53.8 25.6 3.0 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 0.0 64.1 35.9 3.4 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 2.6 12.8 59.0 25.6 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 2.6 18.4 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 5.7 37.1 42.9 14.3 2.7 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 2.6 7.9 60.5 28.9 3.2 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 7.9 39.5 36.8 15.8 2.6 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 2.6 21.1 47.4 28.9 3.0 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 0.0 13.2 50.0 36.8 3.2 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 21 9.5 19.0 52.4 19.0 2.8 0.87 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 26 3.8 19.2 57.7 19.2 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 73.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 565 002L1 TOPICS IN GEOGRAPHY: TOURISM AND RECREATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 22.2 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 44.4 D 1 11.1 Graduate 4 44.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 2 22.2 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 40.0 10.0 50.0 3.1 0.99 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 40.0 10.0 50.0 3.1 0.99 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 3.2 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G001L1 INTRO TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Francis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 2 33.3 C 2 33.3 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 3 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 160 401L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, Jeffery ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 19.7 A 36 55.4 Sophomore 19 28.8 B 24 36.9 Junior 20 30.3 C 4 6.2 Senior 14 21.2 D 1 1.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 34 52.3 Studies Program 58 87.9 2 hours 17 26.2 Required by my major 5 7.6 3 hours 9 13.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 4.5 4 - 5 hours 2 3.1 6 - 7 hours 3 4.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 68 0.0 0.0 55.9 44.1 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 57 3.5 21.1 54.4 21.1 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 49 2.0 12.2 63.3 22.4 3.1 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 68 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 68 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 7.1 53.6 39.3 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 66 0.0 6.1 48.5 45.5 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 47 4.3 23.4 51.1 21.3 2.9 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 68 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 68 0.0 1.5 50.0 48.5 3.5 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 64 0.0 4.7 59.4 35.9 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 6.0 3.0 50.7 40.3 3.3 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 67 0.0 11.9 56.7 31.3 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 66 0.0 9.1 57.6 33.3 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 64 3.1 12.5 56.3 28.1 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 60 3.3 26.7 48.3 21.7 2.9 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 66 1.5 4.5 68.2 25.8 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 64 3.1 25.0 51.6 20.3 2.9 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 68 4.4 5.9 57.4 32.4 3.2 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 67 0.0 4.5 44.8 50.7 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 46 2.2 17.4 60.9 19.6 3.0 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 52 1.9 5.8 75.0 17.3 3.1 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 40 2.5 7.5 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 53 1.9 5.7 64.2 28.3 3.2 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 34 0.0 5.9 73.5 20.6 3.1 0.50 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 71 Number of forms scanned = 69 Number of forms with at least one student response = 68 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 160 402L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, Jeffery ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 10.6 A 25 53.2 Sophomore 21 44.7 B 17 36.2 Junior 13 27.7 C 4 8.5 Senior 4 8.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 57.4 Studies Program 38 82.6 2 hours 11 23.4 Required by my major 4 8.7 3 hours 4 8.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 8.7 4 - 5 hours 4 8.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 50 2.0 2.0 66.0 30.0 3.2 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 0.0 12.8 56.4 30.8 3.2 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 51 3.9 0.0 45.1 51.0 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 50 2.0 2.0 46.0 50.0 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 2.6 2.6 66.7 28.2 3.2 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 50 2.0 2.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 6.5 25.8 48.4 19.4 2.8 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 51 2.0 5.9 56.9 35.3 3.3 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 51 2.0 0.0 37.3 60.8 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 43 2.3 4.7 53.5 39.5 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 51 2.0 0.0 52.9 45.1 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 49 2.0 16.3 49.0 32.7 3.1 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 51 2.0 9.8 60.8 27.5 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 50 2.0 8.0 62.0 28.0 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 46 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 22.0 65.9 12.2 2.9 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 50 2.0 4.0 66.0 28.0 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 4.1 32.7 49.0 14.3 2.7 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 50 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 26 0.0 3.8 84.6 11.5 3.1 0.39 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 36 0.0 2.8 75.0 22.2 3.2 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 35 0.0 0.0 62.9 37.1 3.4 0.49 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 56 Number of forms scanned = 51 Number of forms with at least one student response = 51 Percent completed = 91.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G401L1 INTRO TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 11.1 Senior 7 77.8 D 1 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 22.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 5 55.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 10.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 2.5 0.97 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 465 001L1 SPEC TOPS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY:INTRO TO GIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 1 10.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 70.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 3 30.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 70.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 310 001L1 QUANTITATIVE TECH IN GEO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leinbach, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 72.7 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 81.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 27.3 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 23.1 53.8 3.3 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 13 7.7 7.7 30.8 53.8 3.3 0.95 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 0.0 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 8.3 50.0 25.0 2.8 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 33.3 25.0 25.0 2.6 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 15.4 7.7 30.8 46.2 3.1 1.12 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 16.7 16.7 58.3 3.3 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 545 001L1 TRANSPORTATION GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leinbach, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 3 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 75.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 5 41.7 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 58.3 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 27.3 0.0 45.5 27.3 2.7 1.19 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 3.1 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 8.3 75.0 8.3 2.8 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 16.7 8.3 75.0 0.0 2.6 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 16.7 8.3 41.7 33.3 2.9 1.08 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 130 002L1 EARTH'S PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Phillips, Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 20.0 A 8 20.0 Sophomore 10 25.0 B 26 65.0 Junior 13 32.5 C 6 15.0 Senior 9 22.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 30.0 Studies Program 18 45.0 2 hours 14 35.0 Required by my major 14 35.0 3 hours 6 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 20.0 4 - 5 hours 6 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 2.2 2.2 76.1 19.6 3.1 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 47 2.1 12.8 61.7 23.4 3.1 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 46 6.5 13.0 65.2 15.2 2.9 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 6.4 25.5 51.1 17.0 2.8 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 47 4.3 6.4 70.2 19.1 3.0 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 45 2.2 2.2 68.9 26.7 3.2 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 47 0.0 2.1 59.6 38.3 3.4 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 9.5 35.7 45.2 9.5 2.5 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 6.4 14.9 53.2 25.5 3.0 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 0.0 40.4 59.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 0.0 69.8 30.2 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 46 2.2 0.0 69.6 28.3 3.2 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 10.9 21.7 50.0 17.4 2.7 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 45 4.4 24.4 57.8 13.3 2.8 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 9.4 15.6 68.8 6.3 2.7 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 10.5 7.9 71.1 10.5 2.8 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 11.1 11.1 72.2 5.6 2.7 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 8.7 8.7 63.0 19.6 2.9 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 15.2 39.1 37.0 8.7 2.4 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 6.4 19.1 55.3 19.1 2.9 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 8.7 13.0 37.0 41.3 3.1 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 5.0 10.0 75.0 10.0 2.9 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 67.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 365 001L1 SPEC TOPS REG GEOGRAPHY: FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Phillips, Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 63.6 Junior 2 18.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 72.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 6 54.5 Required by my major 5 45.5 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 5 45.5 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 54.5 18.2 9.1 2.2 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 707 001S1 SEM DEVEL OF GEO THOUGHT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pickles, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 10 83.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 15.4 53.8 3.2 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 92.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 490G001L1 AMERICAN LANDSCAPES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Raitz, K B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 2 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 38.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 16.7 Pass or Audit 2 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 5.9 Required by my major 8 44.4 3 hours 9 52.9 Other (e.g. elective) 10 55.6 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 260 001L1 THIRD WORLD DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roberts, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.9 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 7 41.2 Junior 5 29.4 C 4 23.5 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 52.9 Studies Program 7 41.2 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 8 47.1 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 22.2 50.0 22.2 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 22.2 27.8 44.4 3.1 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 62.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 723 001S1 TOP SEM GEO 3RD WLD: THEORIES OF DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roberts, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 13 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 7.7 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 12 92.3 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 5 38.5 8 or more hours 5 38.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 14.3 78.6 3.7 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 172 001L1 HUMAN GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 31.0 A 11 39.3 Sophomore 6 20.7 B 16 57.1 Junior 7 24.1 C 1 3.6 Senior 7 24.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 32.1 Studies Program 14 50.0 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 10 35.7 3 hours 7 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.3 4 - 5 hours 4 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 8.6 57.1 34.3 3.3 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 11.4 60.0 28.6 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 8.6 60.0 28.6 3.1 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 8.8 50.0 38.2 3.2 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 5.7 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 5.9 55.9 35.3 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 5.7 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 5.7 31.4 62.9 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 2.9 57.1 40.0 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 11.4 51.4 34.3 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 35 5.7 8.6 62.9 22.9 3.0 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 11.4 65.7 22.9 3.1 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 19.4 54.8 22.6 3.0 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 5.7 62.9 31.4 3.3 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 5.7 25.7 48.6 20.0 2.8 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 2.9 5.9 61.8 29.4 3.2 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 2.9 5.9 35.3 55.9 3.4 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.87 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 59.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 717 001S1 URBAN GEOGRAPHY: HISTORY URBAN GEOGRAPHIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 10 90.9 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 3 27.3 8 or more hours 4 36.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 001L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Secor, Anna ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 4.2 A 15 31.3 Sophomore 29 60.4 B 18 37.5 Junior 14 29.2 C 13 27.1 Senior 3 6.3 D 2 4.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/