****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 481G001L1 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adams, David R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 37.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 37.5 Senior 4 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 362 001L1 ELEM MODERN ALGEBRA II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beidleman, James C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 2 25.0 C 4 50.0 Senior 6 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 3 37.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 561 001L1 MODERN ALGEBRA I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beidleman, James C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 90.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 37.5 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 4 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 2.8 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 10.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 2.5 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 0.0 81.8 9.1 2.9 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 261 001L1 INTRO TO NUMBER THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brennan, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 5 33.3 Junior 5 35.7 C 2 13.3 Senior 8 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 13.3 20.0 66.7 3.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 65.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 007L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 66.7 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 2 33.3 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 16.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 33.3 16.7 50.0 0.0 2.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 38. Question 38 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 4.0 . 39. Question 39 4 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . 40. Question 40 4 50.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 25.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 008L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 100.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 40.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 60.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 1.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 1.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 3.3 . 38. Question 38 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 40. Question 40 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.7 . Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 17.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 009L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 83.3 A 5 27.8 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 6 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 5 27.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 2 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 2 11.1 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 16 88.9 3 hours 5 27.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 10.5 68.4 15.8 2.9 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 10.5 21.1 52.6 15.8 2.7 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 10.5 52.6 26.3 10.5 2.4 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 15.8 42.1 26.3 15.8 2.4 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 31.6 42.1 10.5 15.8 2.1 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 19 10.5 31.6 47.4 10.5 2.6 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 10.5 26.3 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 10.5 10.5 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 15.8 10.5 57.9 15.8 2.7 0.93 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 21.1 63.2 5.3 10.5 2.1 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 44.4 22.2 22.2 2.6 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 5.6 27.8 5.6 50.0 11.1 3.3 1.19 38. Question 38 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 35.3 41.2 4.1 0.93 39. Question 39 18 11.1 22.2 16.7 38.9 11.1 3.2 1.25 40. Question 40 18 11.1 16.7 5.6 44.4 22.2 3.5 1.34 Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 82.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 213 003L1 CALCULUS III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carey, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 20.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 5 50.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 30.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 10 100.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 27.3 27.3 45.5 3.2 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 36.4 27.3 18.2 2.5 1.04 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 213 004L1 CALCULUS III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carey, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 50.0 Sophomore 18 81.8 B 9 40.9 Junior 2 9.1 C 2 9.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.5 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 4.5 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 8.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 13.6 63.6 22.7 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 31.8 50.0 18.2 2.9 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 12.0 32.0 40.0 16.0 2.6 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 8.0 32.0 60.0 3.5 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 0.0 65.0 30.0 3.2 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 17.4 56.5 26.1 3.1 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 48.0 28.0 16.0 2.5 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 25 12.0 32.0 44.0 12.0 2.6 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 10.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 2.7 0.98 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 4.2 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 8.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 41.7 29.2 20.8 2.6 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 24.0 52.0 24.0 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 8.0 40.0 28.0 24.0 2.7 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 341 002L1 TOPICS IN GEOMETRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carey, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 6.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 66.7 Junior 9 60.0 C 4 26.7 Senior 6 40.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 13.3 Required by my major 15 100.0 3 hours 9 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 6.3 31.3 62.5 0.0 2.6 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 93.8 0.0 2.9 0.25 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 43.8 56.3 0.0 2.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 18.8 43.8 25.0 12.5 2.3 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 62.5 31.3 6.3 2.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 23.1 15.4 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.97 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 25.0 62.5 6.3 2.7 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 31.3 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 37.5 43.8 12.5 2.6 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 56.3 12.5 6.3 2.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 25.0 31.3 31.3 12.5 2.3 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 56.3 31.3 12.5 2.6 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 110 002L1 ANALYTIC GEOMETRY AND TRIGONOMETRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 73.7 A 11 64.7 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 3 17.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 11.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 21.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 4 25.0 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 11 68.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 6 37.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 0.0 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 37.5 37.5 18.8 2.7 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 16.7 27.8 55.6 3.4 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 27.8 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 17 23.5 29.4 17.6 29.4 2.5 1.18 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 35.7 42.9 21.4 2.9 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 26.7 33.3 20.0 20.0 2.3 1.11 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 71.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 110 004L1 ANALYTIC GEOMETRY AND TRIGONOMETRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 90.5 A 4 19.0 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 11 52.4 Junior 1 4.8 C 5 23.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 22.7 Studies Program 5 23.8 2 hours 4 18.2 Required by my major 11 52.4 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 23.8 4 - 5 hours 4 18.2 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 28.6 52.4 9.5 2.6 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 27.3 50.0 22.7 3.0 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 18.2 31.8 45.5 4.5 2.4 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 22 13.6 40.9 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 11.1 77.8 5.6 2.8 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 9.1 77.3 9.1 2.9 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 86.4 9.1 3.0 0.38 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 81.8 13.6 3.1 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 27.3 54.5 4.5 2.5 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 9.1 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 27.3 40.9 27.3 2.9 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 68.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 351 001L1 ELEMENTARY TOPOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 8 61.5 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 69.2 D 1 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 38.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 8 61.5 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 38.5 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 21.4 35.7 35.7 3.0 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 15.4 46.2 23.1 2.8 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 58.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 109 001L1 COLLEGE ALGEBRA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Coen, Patrick ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 89.3 A 8 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 42.9 Junior 1 3.6 C 6 21.4 Senior 1 3.6 D 1 3.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 3.6 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 17.9 Studies Program 16 59.3 2 hours 7 25.0 Required by my major 10 37.0 3 hours 6 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.7 4 - 5 hours 7 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 7.1 8 or more hours 1 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 3.6 17.9 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 3.6 53.6 42.9 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 14.3 39.3 46.4 3.3 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 14.3 53.6 32.1 3.2 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 17.9 21.4 60.7 3.4 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 14.3 53.6 28.6 3.1 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 3.0 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 20.8 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 10.7 64.3 25.0 3.1 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 14.3 50.0 32.1 3.1 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 18.2 36.4 31.8 13.6 2.4 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 11.1 59.3 29.6 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 7.4 29.6 63.0 3.6 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 109 003L1 COLLEGE ALGEBRA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Coen, Patrick ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 72.0 A 11 42.3 Sophomore 5 20.0 B 12 46.2 Junior 1 4.0 C 3 11.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 12.0 Studies Program 15 62.5 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 9 37.5 3 hours 5 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 12.0 6 - 7 hours 4 16.0 8 or more hours 1 4.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 73.1 23.1 3.2 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 19.2 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 39.1 43.5 13.0 2.7 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 0.0 46.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 123 404L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooley, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 37.5 A 12 52.2 Sophomore 7 29.2 B 9 39.1 Junior 1 4.2 C 1 4.3 Senior 4 16.7 D 1 4.3 Graduate 2 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 17.4 Studies Program 3 13.0 2 hours 4 17.4 Required by my major 18 78.3 3 hours 9 39.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 3 13.0 6 - 7 hours 3 13.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 10.7 60.7 28.6 3.2 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 3.6 32.1 64.3 3.6 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 3.6 28.6 67.9 3.6 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 20.8 41.7 37.5 3.2 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 7.1 32.1 60.7 3.5 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 3.6 21.4 75.0 3.7 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 13.0 39.1 43.5 3.2 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 3.6 28.6 67.9 3.6 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 11.1 48.1 37.0 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 46.4 50.0 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 40.9 27.3 27.3 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 17.9 46.4 35.7 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 3.6 0.0 32.1 64.3 3.6 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 90.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 123 405L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooley, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 50.0 A 6 37.5 Sophomore 6 37.5 B 6 37.5 Junior 2 12.5 C 4 25.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 8 50.0 2 hours 10 62.5 Required by my major 7 43.8 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 23.5 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 5.9 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 41.2 29.4 11.8 2.4 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 58.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 014L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cox, Raymond H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 92.9 A 7 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 13.3 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 13.3 26.7 60.0 3.5 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 20.0 46.7 26.7 6.7 2.2 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 46.7 33.3 20.0 2.7 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 40.0 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 21.4 28.6 28.6 21.4 2.5 1.09 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 26.7 33.3 33.3 6.7 2.2 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 42.9 21.4 35.7 2.9 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 18.2 27.3 0.0 27.3 27.3 3.2 1.60 38. Question 38 11 0.0 18.2 9.1 18.2 54.5 4.1 1.22 39. Question 39 11 9.1 18.2 18.2 18.2 36.4 3.5 1.44 40. Question 40 11 18.2 18.2 0.0 18.2 45.5 3.5 1.69 Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RAT