****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 503 001L1 TOPS ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bradshaw, David H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 1 12.5 C 1 12.5 Senior 2 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 12.5 Pass or Audit 1 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 25.0 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 3 37.5 8 or more hours 2 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 22.2 11.1 66.7 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 22.2 0.0 66.7 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 22.2 11.1 66.7 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 513 001L1 19TH CENTURY PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Breazeale, James D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 75.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 12.5 Pass or Audit 1 16.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 4 50.0 8 or more hours 4 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 592 001L1 AESTHETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bruzina, Ronald C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 31.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 12.5 Senior 6 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 56.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 2 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 8 53.3 3 hours 7 43.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 40.0 4 - 5 hours 5 31.3 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 5.6 5.6 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 11.8 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 27.8 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.90 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 20.0 13.3 60.0 3.3 1.03 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 13.3 33.3 46.7 3.2 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 6.7 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.88 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 22.2 22.2 16.7 38.9 2.7 1.23 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 23.5 41.2 29.4 2.9 0.90 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 17.6 29.4 17.6 35.3 2.7 1.16 14. Encouraged class participation 17 17.6 0.0 52.9 29.4 2.9 1.03 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 1.11 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 20.0 6.7 40.0 33.3 2.9 1.13 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 21.4 28.6 21.4 28.6 2.6 1.16 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 17.6 17.6 23.5 41.2 2.9 1.17 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 29.4 17.6 23.5 29.4 2.5 1.23 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 23.5 23.5 17.6 35.3 2.6 1.22 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 25.0 18.8 12.5 43.8 2.8 1.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 715 001S1 SEM IN RECENT PHILOSOPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bruzina, Ronald C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 4 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 530 001L1 ETHICAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Callahan, Joan C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 60.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 33.3 16.7 50.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 100 001L1 INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Force, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 9 42.9 B 9 42.9 Junior 5 23.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 23.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 16 76.2 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 2 9.5 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 3 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 20.0 76.0 3.7 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 4.0 24.0 72.0 3.7 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 8.0 16.0 76.0 3.7 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 16.0 16.0 68.0 3.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 20.0 44.0 36.0 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 25.0 70.8 3.7 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 12.5 33.3 54.2 3.4 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 12.5 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 12.5 62.5 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 317 001L1 EXISTENTIALIST THGT/LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Force, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.3 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 6 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 2 13.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 1 6.7 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 14 93.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 0.0 41.2 52.9 3.4 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 0.0 38.9 55.6 3.4 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 007L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Frank, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 21.4 A 4 28.6 Sophomore 11 78.6 B 9 64.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 7.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 13 92.9 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 45.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 260 001L1 HIS PHI I:GRK BEGINNINGS TO THE MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Frank, Daniel ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 16.7 A 2 8.3 Sophomore 13 54.2 B 14 58.3 Junior 5 20.8 C 7 29.2 Senior 2 8.3 D 1 4.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 25.0 Studies Program 14 58.3 2 hours 9 37.5 Required by my major 2 8.3 3 hours 7 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 33.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 16.7 37.5 41.7 3.2 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 3.7 22.2 44.4 29.6 3.0 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 14.8 59.3 25.9 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 11.1 22.2 37.0 29.6 2.9 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 18.5 48.1 33.3 3.1 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 25.0 54.2 20.8 3.0 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 3.3 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 14.8 18.5 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.06 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 68 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 39.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 515 001L1 CONTEMP PHI:ANALYT TURN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Goldberg, Sanford ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 83.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 5 83.3 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 3 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 001L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 100.0 A 2 13.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 6 40.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 6.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 8 53.3 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 21.4 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 6.3 12.5 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 33.3 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 37.5 43.8 12.5 2.6 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 64.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 130 004L1 INTRO PHI:MORALIT/SOCIET INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 11.1 A 1 11.1 Sophomore 6 66.7 B 3 33.3 Junior 2 22.2 C 5 55.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 8 100.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 2.6 0.96 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 23.1 38.5 30.8 7.7 2.2 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 25.0 16.7 50.0 8.3 2.4 1.00 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 15.4 15.4 61.5 7.7 2.6 0.87 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 15.4 23.1 53.8 7.7 2.5 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 15.4 7.7 46.2 30.8 2.9 1.04 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 13 15.4 0.0 53.8 30.8 3.0 1.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 15.4 7.7 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.93 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 58.3 8.3 16.7 2.3 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 13 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 2.6 0.96 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 15.4 38.5 23.1 23.1 2.5 1.05 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 15.4 53.8 15.4 15.4 2.3 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 15.4 15.4 46.2 23.1 2.8 1.01 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 25.0 50.0 16.7 8.3 2.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 23.1 38.5 23.1 15.4 2.3 1.03 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 23.1 7.7 46.2 23.1 2.7 1.11. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 48.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 305 001L1 HEALTH CARE ETHICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 50.0 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 4 33.3 Junior 5 41.7 C 2 16.7 Senior 3 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 4 40.0 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 7.7 23.1 46.2 23.1 2.8 0.90 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 3.0 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 3.0 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 56.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 350 001L1 DEATH/DYING/QUAL OF LIFE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hale, Frank B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 15.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 21 45.7 Junior 10 21.3 C 12 26.1 Senior 37 78.7 D 2 4.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 2 4.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 39.1 Studies Program 30 63.8 2 hours 12 26.1 Required by my major 7 14.9 3 hours 12 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 10 21.3 4 - 5 hours 3 6.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 3.8 5.8 67.3 23.1 3.1 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 51 17.6 43.1 33.3 5.9 2.3 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 18.6 30.2 39.5 11.6 2.4 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 11.5 17.3 59.6 11.5 2.7 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 15.4 17.3 57.7 9.6 2.6 0.87 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 11.9 14.3 57.1 16.7 2.8 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 3.8 9.6 71.2 15.4 3.0 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 48 10.4 39.6 39.6 10.4 2.5 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 19.2 21.2 48.1 11.5 2.5 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 7.7 3.8 61.5 26.9 3.1 0.79 11. Was available for consultation 43 7.0 0.0 69.8 23.3 3.1 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 11.5 7.7 61.5 19.2 2.9 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 51 21.6 23.5 45.1 9.8 2.4 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 51 5.9 5.9 60.8 27.5 3.1 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 50 6.0 16.0 60.0 18.0 2.9 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 48 8.3 27.1 47.9 16.7 2.7 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 10.6 31.9 48.9 8.5 2.6 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 51 7.8 9.8 60.8 21.6 3.0 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 23.1 30.8 34.6 11.5 2.3 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 52 17.3 23.1 48.1 11.5 2.5 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 23.1 21.2 38.5 17.3 2.5 1.04. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 7.1 85.7 0.0 2.8 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 16.7 16.7 58.3 8.3 2.6 0.90 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 76 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 100 007L1 INTRO PHI:KNOWL/REALITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holcomb III, Harmon R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 4 20.0 Sophomore 17 85.0 B 12 60.0 Junior 1 5.0 C 4 20.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 17 89.5 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.3 4 - 5 hours 6 30.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 8.7 87.0 4.3 3.0 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 8.7 30.4 56.5 4.3 2.6 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 21.7 47.8 26.1 4.3 2.1 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 31.8 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 78.3 17.4 3.1 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 4.3 56.5 34.8 4.3 2.4 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 8.7 39.1 47.8 4.3 2.5 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 26.1 47.8 17.4 8.7 2.1 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 8.7 21.7 60.9 8.7 2.7 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 47.8 34.8 13.0 4.3 1.7 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 39.1 47.8 13.0 2.7 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 61.9 28.6 9.5 2.5 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 26.1 52.2 17.4 2.8 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 43.5 43.5 4.3 8.7 1.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 30.4 39.1 26.1 4.3 2.0 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 34.8 39.1 17.4 8.7 2.0 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 62.5 25.0 0.0 2.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 69.2 23.1 0.0 2.2 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 30.8 69.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 545 001L1 PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leaman, Oliver ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 2 33.3 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 16.7 Senior 4 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 66.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 33.3 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 14.3 0.0 14.3 71.4 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 43.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 270 001L1 HIS PHI II:RENAISSANCE TO PRESENT ERA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Manns, James W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 56.3 Sophomore 5 29.4 B 6 37.5 Junior 6 35.3 C 1 6.3 Senior 6 35.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 4 23.5 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 8 47.1 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 29.4 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 0.0 42.1 52.6 3.4 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 10.5 15.8 42.1 31.6 2.9 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 21.1 15.8 31.6 31.6 2.7 1.15 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 21.1 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 18.8 43.8 31.3 3.0 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 22.2 33.3 38.9 3.1 0.94 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 22.2 11.1 33.3 33.3 2.8 1.17 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 31.6 21.1 36.8 2.8 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 15.8 31.6 42.1 3.1 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Philosophy FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PHI 320 001L1 SYMBOLIC LOGIC I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Manns, James W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 76.5 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 4 23.5 Junior 7 41.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 47.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.9 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 76.5 Studies Program 10 58.8 2 hours 1 5.9 Required by my major 3 17.6 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4 23.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 14.3 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 33.3 33.3 28.6 2.9 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 21.1 36.8 36.8 5.3 2.3 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 65.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLA