****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 280 001L1 ISSUES IN PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 16.7 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 3 50.0 Junior 2 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 433G001L1 POL INTERNTNL ECON RELAT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 36.0 Sophomore 2 8.0 B 12 48.0 Junior 6 24.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 15 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 8.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 8.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 14 56.0 3 hours 10 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 11 44.0 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 4 16.7 8 or more hours 3 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 0.0 3.7 18.5 77.8 3.7 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 33.3 63.0 3.6 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 3.7 11.1 85.2 3.8 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 8.7 17.4 73.9 3.7 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 3.7 7.4 29.6 59.3 3.4 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 3.7 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 3.7 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 467G001L1 THE U.S. SUPREME COURT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 27.6 Sophomore 3 10.7 B 13 44.8 Junior 12 42.9 C 7 24.1 Senior 13 46.4 D 1 3.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 13.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 23 82.1 3 hours 8 27.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 17.9 4 - 5 hours 4 13.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 1 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 3.3 0.0 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 6.7 70.0 23.3 3.2 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 6.9 13.8 51.7 27.6 3.0 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 6.9 13.8 58.6 20.7 2.9 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 16.7 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 86.2 13.8 3.1 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 6.7 66.7 23.3 3.1 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 0.0 40.0 56.7 3.5 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 3.4 0.0 55.2 41.4 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 10.0 63.3 23.3 3.1 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 20.7 62.1 13.8 2.9 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 11.1 70.4 18.5 3.1 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 23.3 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 13.8 55.2 27.6 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 68.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 428G001L1 LATIN AMER GOVT/POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 57.1 Sophomore 2 7.7 B 12 42.9 Junior 14 53.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 26.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 11.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 22.2 Studies Program 5 19.2 2 hours 6 22.2 Required by my major 17 65.4 3 hours 11 40.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 15.4 4 - 5 hours 3 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 3.3 6.7 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 10.0 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 6.7 0.0 43.3 50.0 3.4 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 10.7 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 10.0 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 6.7 43.3 50.0 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 17.2 37.9 41.4 3.2 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 7.7 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 25.0 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 6.7 13.3 56.7 23.3 3.0 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 13.3 40.0 43.3 3.2 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 620 401S1 COMPAR POL:THRY & METHOD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 80.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 010L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 53.8 A 2 16.7 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 7 58.3 Junior 2 15.4 C 3 25.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 50.0 Studies Program 9 75.0 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 15.4 30.8 38.5 15.4 2.5 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 69.2 15.4 15.4 2.5 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 30.8 69.2 0.0 2.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 58.3 41.7 0.0 2.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 46.2 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 46.2 23.1 23.1 2.6 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 18.2 27.3 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 35. Instructor helped with my problems 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 56.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 671 001S1 STRATGS OF INQUIRY IN PS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 3 50.0 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 430G001L1 CONDUCT AMER FOREIGN REL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gibler, Douglas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 50.0 Sophomore 2 7.7 B 11 45.8 Junior 6 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 42.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 26.9 E/Fail 1 4.2 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 29.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 8.3 Required by my major 19 76.0 3 hours 10 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 24.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 7.4 25.9 66.7 3.6 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 29.6 70.4 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 27 3.7 0.0 29.6 66.7 3.6 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 3.7 22.2 74.1 3.7 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 3.8 15.4 76.9 3.7 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 3.7 29.6 66.7 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 61.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 470G001L1 AMERIC POLITICAL PARTIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 9 50.0 Junior 6 33.3 C 2 11.1 Senior 11 61.1 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 44.4 Required by my major 14 77.8 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 22.2 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 0.0 52.6 42.1 3.3 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 5.3 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 10.5 36.8 47.4 3.3 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 5.3 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 55.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PS 101 013L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Haist, Margaret ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 61.9 A 11 26.2 Sophomore 12 28.6 B 15 35.7 Junior 3 7.1 C 14 33.3 Senior 1 2.4 D 2 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 31.0 Studies Program 28 66.7 2 hours 10 23.8 Required by my major 8 19.0 3 hours 13 31.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 14.3 4 - 5 hours 5 11.9 6 - 7 hours 1 2.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 2.2 4.4 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 45 4.4 11.1 71.1 13.3 2.9 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 6.7 17.8 66.7 8.9 2.8 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 6.7 15.6 62.2 15.6 2.9 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 4.4 4.4 60.0 31.1 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 4.5 2.3 54.5 38.6 3.3 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 6.7 6.7 57.8 28.9 3.1 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 2.2 2.2 64.4 31.1 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 11.4 25.0 43.2 20.5 2.7 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 2.2 0.0 48.9 48.9 3.4 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 44 2.3 0.0 59.1 38.6 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 2.2 2.2 55.6 40.0 3.3 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 11.1 31.1 33.3 24.4 2.7 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 43 7.0 25.6 51.2 16.3 2.8 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 6.8 4.5 68.2 20.5 3.0 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 7.3 19.5 53.7 19.5 2.9 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 11.4 28.6 51.4 8.6 2.6 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 9.1 11.4 50.0 29.5 3.0 0.89 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 20.5 38.6 29.5 11.4 2.3 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 6.8 25.0 56.8 11.4 2.7 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 9.1 22.7 43.2 25.0 2.8 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 10.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 5.9 41.2 52.9 0.0 2.5 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 5.9 0.0 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 72 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 439G001L1 CONTEMP INTERNATL PROBS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kaufman, Stuart ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 33.3 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 12 57.1 Junior 9 42.9 C 2 9.5 Senior 9 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 9.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 3 13.6 Required by my major 15 68.2 3 hours 11 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 27.3 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 4 18.2 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 8.0 20.0 44.0 28.0 2.9 0.91 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 12.0 60.0 28.0 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 4.2 25.0 41.7 29.2 3.0 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 12.5 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.83 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 20.0 44.0 36.0 3.2 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 25 8.0 20.0 24.0 48.0 3.1 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 16.7 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 9.1 18.2 27.3 45.5 3.1 1.02. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 65.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 479 001L1 WOMEN AND POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 47.6 Sophomore 4 19.0 B 11 52.4 Junior 6 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 47.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 14 66.7 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 33.3 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 2 9.5 8 or more hours 2 9.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 4.0 28.0 68.0 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 8.0 28.0 64.0 3.6 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 75.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 711 005S1 TOP SEM IN PS:PUBLIC OPINION/POLITICAL COMMUN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffley, Mark A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 20.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PS 491 003L1 SP TOP IN PS: NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 84.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 16.0 Junior 6 24.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 32.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 44.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 13 52.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 48.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 8.0 48.0 44.0 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 8.0 92.0 3.9 0.28 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 4.0 96.0 4.0 0.20. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 86.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 545 001L1 AMERIC POLITICAL THOUGHT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reid, Herbert G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 3 37.5 C 1 12.5 Senior 3 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 25.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 10.0 10.0 30.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 20.0 10.0 40.0 30.0 2.8 1.14 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 20.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 3.0 1.25 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 1.15 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 20.0 40.0 30.0 2.9 0.99 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 20.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 2.5 1.08 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 30.0 20.0 30.0 20.0 2.4 1.17 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 40.0 10.0 30.0 20.0 2.3 1.25 14. Encouraged class participation 10 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 2.3 1.16 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 2.9 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 2.9 0.88 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 20.0 30.0 30.0 20.0 2.5 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 20.0 30.0 40.0 10.0 2.4 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 45.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 463G001L1 AMERICA JUDICIAL PROCESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Riggle, Ellen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 37.5 Sophomore 5 15.6 B 11 34.4 Junior 8 25.0 C 5 15.6 Senior 16 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 6.3 Pass or Audit 4 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.6 Studies Program 7 21.9 2 hours 11 34.4 Required by my major 12 37.5 3 hours 9 28.1 Other (e.g. elective) 13 40.6 4 - 5 hours 5 15.6 6 - 7 hours 2 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 5.9 61.8 32.4 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 17.6 67.6 14.7 3.0 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 8.8 61.8 29.4 3.2 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 15.2 63.6 21.2 3.1 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 0.0 5.9 67.6 26.5 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 9.7 32.3 45.2 12.9 2.6 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 2.9 8.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 85.7 10.7 3.1 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 6.1 69.7 21.2 3.1 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 5.9 20.6 64.7 8.8 2.8 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 17.6 55.9 26.5 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 4.0 20.0 68.0 8.0 2.8 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 18.5 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 25.0 66.7 4.2 2.7 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 6.1 6.1 66.7 21.2 3.0 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 12.5 18.8 50.0 18.8 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 2.9 20.6 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 8.8 14.7 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 72.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 472G001L1 POL CAMPAIGNS & ELECTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Riggle, Ellen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 40.0 Sophomore 2 8.0 B 15 60.0 Junior 12 48.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 44.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 13 52.0 3 hours 9 36.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 48.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 6.7 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 13.3 63.3 23.3 3.1 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 10.0 66.7 23.3 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 27.6 55.2 13.8 2.8 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 10.0 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 3.4 0.0 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 6.9 10.3 58.6 24.1 3.0 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 10.0 66.7 20.0 3.0 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 14.3 71.4 10.7 2.9 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 7.1 7.1 71.4 14.3 2.9 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 6.9 6.9 65.5 20.7 3.0 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 3.3 16.7 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 6.9 13.8 48.3 31.0 3.0 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 65.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 101 014L1 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roeder, Phillip W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 69.4 A 9 25.7 Sophomore 6 16.7 B 24 68.6 Junior 4 11.1 C 2 5.7 Senior 1 2.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 11.8 Studies Program 22 61.1 2 hours 11 32.4 Required by my major 9 25.0 3 hours 12 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 13.9 4 - 5 hours 6 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 2.6 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 10.7 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 13.5 67.6 18.9 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 11.4 54.3 34.3 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 5.3 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 38 0.0 2.6 42.1 55.3 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 37.8 62.2 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 8.8 11.8 58.8 20.6 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 18.9 59.5 21.6 3.0 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 55.3 42.1 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 2.8 8.3 58.3 30.6 3.2 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 37 2.7 18.9 51.4 27.0 3.0 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 14.7 70.6 14.7 3.0 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 46.7 36.7 16.7 2.7 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 2.6 60.5 36.8 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 24.3 59.5 16.2 2.9 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 2.7 16.2 48.6 32.4 3.1 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 5.4 10.8 51.4 32.4 3.1 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 13.0 73.9 13.0 3.0 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 24 4.2 12.5 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 74 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 50.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****