****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 311 001L1 LEARNING AND COGNITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 39 62.9 Sophomore 1 1.6 B 19 30.6 Junior 28 43.8 C 3 4.8 Senior 34 53.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.6 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 29.0 Studies Program 1 1.6 2 hours 25 40.3 Required by my major 50 80.6 3 hours 15 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 11 17.7 4 - 5 hours 3 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 67 0.0 1.5 29.9 68.7 3.7 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 67 1.5 3.0 46.3 49.3 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 67 0.0 1.5 23.9 74.6 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 67 0.0 1.5 29.9 68.7 3.7 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 67 0.0 0.0 35.8 64.2 3.6 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 67 0.0 0.0 29.9 70.1 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 59 1.7 10.2 49.2 39.0 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 1.5 0.0 23.9 74.6 3.7 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 1.5 0.0 20.9 77.6 3.7 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 60 0.0 0.0 31.7 68.3 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 1.5 0.0 26.9 71.6 3.7 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 65 1.5 3.1 29.2 66.2 3.6 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 67 0.0 0.0 22.4 77.6 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 63 1.6 0.0 47.6 50.8 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 65 0.0 3.1 38.5 58.5 3.6 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 63 0.0 6.3 49.2 44.4 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 65 0.0 1.5 35.4 63.1 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 0.0 9.2 41.5 49.2 3.4 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 1.5 1.5 32.8 64.2 3.6 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 67 1.5 0.0 20.9 77.6 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 77 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 565 001L1 ADV TOPICS NEUROSCI: MOTIVATION AND REWARD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 37.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 629 001O1 INTRO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOG INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 710 401S1 TOP SEM IN CLINICAL PSY: DIALETICAL BEHAV THERAP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 91.7 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 627 001S1 PROSEM PHYSIOLOG PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 7 58.3 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 41.7 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 75.0 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 8.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 8.3 Pass or Audit 1 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 4 33.3 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 66.7 4 - 5 hours 3 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 710 001S1 TOP SEM IN CLINICAL PSY: NEUROPSYCH ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 14 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 10 71.4 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 21.4 64.3 3.5 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 002L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 9.0 A 34 50.7 Sophomore 38 56.7 B 26 38.8 Junior 10 14.9 C 7 10.4 Senior 11 16.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.5 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 49.3 Studies Program 25 37.3 2 hours 14 20.9 Required by my major 24 35.8 3 hours 16 23.9 Other (e.g. elective) 18 26.9 4 - 5 hours 4 6.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 73 0.0 0.0 53.4 46.6 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 72 8.3 8.3 59.7 23.6 3.0 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 49 0.0 12.2 63.3 24.5 3.1 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 72 1.4 1.4 58.3 38.9 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 73 0.0 0.0 56.2 43.8 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 48 4.2 6.3 50.0 39.6 3.3 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 67 0.0 1.5 43.3 55.2 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 5.7 28.6 37.1 28.6 2.9 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 73 1.4 6.8 50.7 41.1 3.3 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 73 1.4 0.0 43.8 54.8 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 63 0.0 1.6 54.0 44.4 3.4 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 73 0.0 1.4 54.8 43.8 3.4 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 72 1.4 15.3 51.4 31.9 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 73 0.0 1.4 46.6 52.1 3.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 65 1.5 9.2 60.0 29.2 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 68 0.0 14.7 55.9 29.4 3.1 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 62 0.0 21.0 53.2 25.8 3.0 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 69 0.0 5.8 50.7 43.5 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 68 1.5 35.3 38.2 25.0 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 72 1.4 13.9 48.6 36.1 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 72 2.8 13.9 36.1 47.2 3.3 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 20 5.0 15.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.88 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 126 Number of forms scanned = 73 Number of forms with at least one student response = 73 Percent completed = 57.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 460 001L1 PROCESSES OF PSYCH DEV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 45.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 20 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 40.0 Required by my major 20 100.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 25.0 70.0 3.7 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 5.0 15.0 75.0 3.6 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 5.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 5.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 637 001A1 PRAC PSY ASSESSMENT AND INTERVENTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Tamara ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 60.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.4 A 13 18.6 Sophomore 41 56.9 B 43 61.4 Junior 18 25.0 C 14 20.0 Senior 12 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 24.6 Studies Program 11 15.5 2 hours 24 34.8 Required by my major 39 54.9 3 hours 18 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 21 29.6 4 - 5 hours 9 13.0 6 - 7 hours 1 1.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 0.0 0.0 44.3 55.7 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 79 1.3 2.5 51.9 44.3 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 68 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 78 1.3 5.1 59.0 34.6 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 78 0.0 2.6 44.9 52.6 3.5 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 68 0.0 2.9 54.4 42.6 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 77 0.0 1.3 36.4 62.3 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 0.0 35.7 47.6 16.7 2.8 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 79 0.0 0.0 32.9 67.1 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 79 0.0 0.0 17.7 82.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 75 0.0 0.0 50.7 49.3 3.5 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 80 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 78 1.3 1.3 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 79 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 77 0.0 2.6 62.3 35.1 3.3 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 76 1.3 1.3 64.5 32.9 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 73 1.4 9.6 61.6 27.4 3.2 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 77 1.3 0.0 51.9 46.8 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 77 1.3 14.3 53.2 31.2 3.1 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 78 1.3 2.6 47.4 48.7 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 78 0.0 2.6 26.9 70.5 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 140 Number of forms scanned = 94 Number of forms with at least one student response = 80 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 312 001L1 BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fillmore, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 28 57.1 Sophomore 1 2.0 B 18 36.7 Junior 28 54.9 C 3 6.1 Senior 22 43.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 24.0 Studies Program 1 2.0 2 hours 15 30.0 Required by my major 40 80.0 3 hours 15 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 18.0 4 - 5 hours 7 14.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 55 0.0 1.8 45.5 52.7 3.5 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 55 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 55 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 54 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 14.3 40.0 42.9 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 55 0.0 1.8 38.2 60.0 3.6 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 55 0.0 0.0 29.1 70.9 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 50 0.0 0.0 42.0 58.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 5.5 41.8 52.7 3.5 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 54 1.9 1.9 46.3 50.0 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 6.5 60.9 32.6 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 5.8 55.8 38.5 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 49 0.0 10.2 57.1 32.7 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 54 0.0 1.9 50.0 48.1 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 54 1.9 13.0 50.0 35.2 3.2 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 73 Number of forms scanned = 65 Number of forms with at least one student response = 55 Percent completed = 75.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 001L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Giancola, Peter ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 42.5 Sophomore 2 5.1 B 18 45.0 Junior 15 38.5 C 4 10.0 Senior 18 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 7.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.6 Pass or Audit 1 2.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 28.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 35.9 Required by my major 22 57.9 3 hours 8 20.5 Other (e.g. elective) 16 42.1 4 - 5 hours 5 12.8 6 - 7 hours 1 2.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 0.0 0.0 29.3 70.7 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 0.0 0.0 41.5 58.5 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 0.0 0.0 36.6 63.4 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 41 0.0 0.0 36.6 63.4 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 26.8 73.2 3.7 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 0.0 0.0 24.4 75.6 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 14.6 85.4 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 2.6 26.3 71.1 3.7 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 2.4 22.0 75.6 3.7 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 0.0 0.0 24.4 75.6 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 0.0 5.7 48.6 45.7 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 0.0 34.1 65.9 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 0.0 0.0 26.8 73.2 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 0.0 0.0 14.6 85.4 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 69.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 033L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 72.7 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 4 18.2 B 10 45.5 Junior 1 4.5 C 3 13.6 Senior 1 4.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 27.3 Studies Program 15 71.4 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 8.7 47.8 39.1 4.3 2.4 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 14.3 78.6 0.0 2.7 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 22.7 63.6 13.6 2.9 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 26.1 56.5 17.4 2.9 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 4.3 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 85.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 034L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 62.5 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 8 50.0 Junior 2 12.5 C 3 18.8 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 11 68.8 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 3 18.8 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 41.2 41.2 5.9 2.4 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 38.5 23.1 30.8 2.8 1.01 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 22.2 72.2 3.7 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 55.6 22.2 11.1 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 62.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 035L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 70.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 1 10.0 C 2 20.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 8 80.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 10.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 2.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 50.0 12.5 25.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 2.9 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 35.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 036L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 66.7 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 33.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 8 66.7 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 16.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 1.17 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 48.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 037L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 47.8 A 5 21.7 Sophomore 9 39.1 B 13 56.5 Junior 1 4.3 C 5 21.7 Senior 2 8.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 52.2 Studies Program 16 69.6 2 hours 6 26.1 Required by my major 3 13.0 3 hours 1 4.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 17.4 4 - 5 hours 4 17.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 18.2 27.3 27.3 27.3 2.6 1.09 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 8.0 28.0 64.0 3.6 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 8.7 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 27.8 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 4.0 0.0 36.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 12.0 40.0 48.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 24 4.2 8.3 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 12.5 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 4.0 56.0 36.0 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 17.4 47.8 30.4 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 20.0 40.0 36.0 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 8.0 28.0 64.0 3.6 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 23 0.0 26.1 47.8 26.1 3.0 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 92.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 038L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 23 85.2 A 12 44.4 Sophomore 3 11.1 B 11 40.7 Junior 1 3.7 C 4 14.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or