****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 401L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: JURY RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 36.4 Sophomore 1 4.5 B 11 50.0 Junior 12 54.5 C 2 9.1 Senior 9 40.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 59.1 Studies Program 1 4.5 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 2 9.1 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 19 86.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 76.2 14.3 3.0 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 8.3 66.7 20.8 3.0 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 12.5 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 8.3 58.3 29.2 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 12.5 50.0 29.2 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 51.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 1 11.1 B 6 66.7 Junior 3 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 55.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 2 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 7 77.8 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 12.5 37.5 37.5 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 23.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 1 4.3 B 12 54.5 Junior 6 26.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 65.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 26.1 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 9 39.1 Required by my major 6 26.1 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 16 69.6 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 19.2 46.2 34.6 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 3.8 11.5 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 11.5 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 0.0 53.8 42.3 3.3 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 3.8 11.5 50.0 34.6 3.2 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 3.8 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 11.5 84.6 3.8 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 3.8 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 12.0 40.0 48.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 20.8 29.2 50.0 3.3 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 12.0 48.0 40.0 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 7.7 23.1 65.4 3.5 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 002L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 48.0 Junior 3 12.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 22 88.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 36.0 Studies Program 1 4.0 2 hours 9 36.0 Required by my major 5 20.0 3 hours 6 24.0 Other (e.g. elective) 19 76.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 26.9 46.2 26.9 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 72.0 24.0 3.2 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 7.7 7.7 57.7 26.9 3.0 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 11.5 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 23.1 73.1 3.7 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 011L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 59.5 A 10 27.0 Sophomore 9 24.3 B 17 45.9 Junior 4 10.8 C 10 27.0 Senior 2 5.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 35.1 Studies Program 25 69.4 2 hours 14 37.8 Required by my major 3 8.3 3 hours 7 18.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 22.2 4 - 5 hours 1 2.7 6 - 7 hours 1 2.7 8 or more hours 1 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 38 0.0 7.9 71.1 21.1 3.1 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 5.4 8.1 67.6 18.9 3.0 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 6.1 18.2 57.6 18.2 2.9 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 5.3 21.1 60.5 13.2 2.8 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 13.2 63.2 23.7 3.1 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 15.2 15.2 57.6 12.1 2.7 0.89 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 38 2.6 34.2 55.3 7.9 2.7 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 9.1 45.5 39.4 6.1 2.4 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 10.5 39.5 39.5 10.5 2.5 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 2.6 68.4 28.9 3.3 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 81.3 15.6 3.1 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 5.3 18.4 57.9 18.4 2.9 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 26.3 44.7 23.7 5.3 2.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 37 21.6 56.8 18.9 2.7 2.0 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 2.9 14.7 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 5.6 33.3 44.4 16.7 2.7 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 12.5 43.8 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 5.3 23.7 55.3 15.8 2.8 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 28.9 34.2 26.3 10.5 2.2 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 18.4 34.2 42.1 5.3 2.3 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 38 23.7 28.9 42.1 5.3 2.3 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 73 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 52.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 439 001L1 SP TOP CRIM/DELINQUENCY: SOCIOLOGY OF LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 66.7 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 7 33.3 Junior 4 19.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 16 76.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 1 4.8 2 hours 14 66.7 Required by my major 7 33.3 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 13 61.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 0.0 26.1 69.6 3.6 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 4.5 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 4.3 0.0 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 0.0 13.0 82.6 3.7 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 0.0 26.1 69.6 3.6 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 4.3 0.0 26.1 69.6 3.6 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 4.3 0.0 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 4.3 0.0 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 4.3 0.0 26.1 69.6 3.6 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 0.0 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 4.3 0.0 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 8.7 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 4.3 34.8 56.5 3.4 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 17.4 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 65.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 90.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 6 54.5 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 72.7 3.5 0.93 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 9.1 81.8 3.6 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 004L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Halbert, Christy Lynn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 34.1 A 7 17.1 Sophomore 21 51.2 B 21 51.2 Junior 4 9.8 C 11 26.8 Senior 2 4.9 D 1 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 29.3 Studies Program 31 75.6 2 hours 12 29.3 Required by my major 7 17.1 3 hours 11 26.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 7.3 4 - 5 hours 5 12.2 6 - 7 hours 1 2.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 2.2 4.3 54.3 39.1 3.3 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 47 2.1 4.3 55.3 38.3 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 14.3 8.6 54.3 22.9 2.9 0.94 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 8.5 17.0 55.3 19.1 2.9 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 4.4 8.9 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 9.4 15.6 59.4 15.6 2.8 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 0.0 0.0 37.0 63.0 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 22.6 41.9 29.0 6.5 2.2 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 2.1 23.4 42.6 31.9 3.0 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 2.1 53.2 44.7 3.4 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 39 0.0 5.1 64.1 30.8 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 0.0 2.1 42.6 55.3 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 10.6 12.8 55.3 21.3 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 6.4 44.7 48.9 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 0.0 6.7 71.1 22.2 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 2.2 17.8 64.4 15.6 2.9 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 10.5 31.6 55.3 2.6 2.5 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 47 2.1 10.6 70.2 17.0 3.0 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 47 10.6 44.7 36.2 8.5 2.4 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 8.5 23.4 59.6 8.5 2.7 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 8.5 17.0 46.8 27.7 2.9 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 4.2 16.7 66.7 12.5 2.9 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 28 3.6 14.3 67.9 14.3 2.9 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 15.4 0.0 69.2 15.4 2.8 0.90 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 50.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 62.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 006L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Halbert, Christy Lynn ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 31.8 A 12 27.3 Sophomore 21 47.7 B 22 50.0 Junior 9 20.5 C 10 22.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 18.2 Studies Program 34 79.1 2 hours 20 45.5 Required by my major 3 7.0 3 hours 11 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 14.0 4 - 5 hours 5 11.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 47 0.0 0.0 61.7 38.3 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 0.0 6.5 52.2 41.3 3.3 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 19.4 55.6 25.0 3.1 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 0.0 17.4 63.0 19.6 3.0 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 2.2 2.2 67.4 28.3 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 2.7 16.2 51.4 29.7 3.1 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 0.0 48.8 51.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 7.4 48.1 29.6 14.8 2.5 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 0.0 8.5 61.7 29.8 3.2 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 0.0 42.6 57.4 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 44 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 0.0 0.0 57.4 42.6 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 2.1 17.0 46.8 34.0 3.1 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 47 0.0 2.1 46.8 51.1 3.5 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 2.2 4.3 65.2 28.3 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 2.2 13.3 57.8 26.7 3.1 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 4.8 26.2 50.0 19.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 2.2 2.2 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 4.4 42.2 42.2 11.1 2.6 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 46 0.0 15.2 58.7 26.1 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 46 0.0 10.9 45.7 43.5 3.3 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 74 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 63.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 380 001L1 DEVEL NON-WEST SOCIETIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 74.2 Sophomore 3 9.7 B 7 22.6 Junior 16 51.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 38.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 77.4 Studies Program 16 51.6 2 hours 5 16.1 Required by my major 2 6.5 3 hours 1 3.2 Other (e.g. elective) 13 41.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 6.1 0.0 69.7 24.2 3.1 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 9.4 34.4 43.8 12.5 2.6 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 15.6 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 3.0 66.7 30.3 3.3 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 3.0 0.0 69.7 27.3 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 3.1 0.0 68.8 28.1 3.2 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 3.0 15.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 3.0 72.7 24.2 3.2 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 9.1 42.4 30.3 18.2 2.6 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 29 3.4 10.3 65.5 20.7 3.0 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 3.0 6.1 69.7 21.2 3.1 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 18.2 24.2 39.4 18.2 2.6 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 33 3.0 15.2 51.5 30.3 3.1 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 3.1 12.5 62.5 21.9 3.0 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 6.1 27.3 45.5 21.2 2.8 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 7.1 42.9 35.7 14.3 2.6 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 6.1 21.2 51.5 21.2 2.9 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 21.9 28.1 37.5 12.5 2.4 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 18.2 18.2 42.4 21.2 2.7 1.02 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 3.0 45.5 33.3 18.2 2.7 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 70.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 682 001L1 SPEC TOP IN ADV SOC METH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 1 4.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 4 16.0 C 2 8.0 Senior 20 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 8.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 48.0 Studies Program 8 32.0 2 hours 8 32.0 Required by my major 5 20.0 3 hours 3 12.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 48.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 3.7 7.4 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 3.7 7.4 51.9 37.0 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 11.1 29.6 59.3 3.5 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 14.8 40.7 44.4 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 3.7 3.7 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 3.7 29.6 66.7 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 21.7 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 63.0 37.0 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 33.3 51.9 11.1 2.7 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 11.1 59.3 25.9 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 18.5 40.7 40.7 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 58.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 002L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 33.3 Junior 8 22.2 C 1 2.8 Senior 28 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 25.0 Studies Program 7 20.0 2 hours 14 38.9 Required by my major 12 34.3 3 hours 6 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 16 45.7 4 - 5 hours 5 13.9 6 - 7 hours 2 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 16.2 51.4 29.7 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 5.6 63.9 30.6 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 8.1 51.4 40.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 13.5 43.2 43.2 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 2.7 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 8.1 54.1 37.8 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 0.0 10.8 56.8 32.4 3.2 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 8.1 54.1 37.8 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 61.8 38.2 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 5.4 27.0 45.9 21.6 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 2.7 54.1 43.2 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 5.7 65.7 28.6 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 5.9 67.6 26.5 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 2.7 62.2 35.1 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 8.1 32.4 37.8 21.6 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 10.8 62.2 27.0 3.2 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 8.1 54.1 37.8 3.3 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 63.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 141 75.4 A 72 38.5 Sophomore 32 17.1 B 88 47.1 Junior 10 5.3 C 23 12.3 Senior 4 2.1 D 3 1.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 12.3 Studies Program 115 62.5 2 hours 49 26.2 Required by my major 39 21.2 3 hours 59 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 30 16.3 4 - 5 hours 43 23.0 6 - 7 hours 9 4.8 8 or more hours 4 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 196 0.5 3.6 44.4 51.5 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 196 2.0 6.1 63.8 28.1 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 193 1.0 12.4 67.4 19.2 3.0 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 194 3.6 5.7 52.6 38.1 3.3 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 192 1.0 4.7 60.9 33.3 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 191 2.1 11.0 56.5 30.4 3.2 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 189 3.7 21.7 58.7 15.9 2.9 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 135 5.9 36.3 46.7 11.1 2.6 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 196 2.0 4.1 53.1 40.8 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 195 0.5 2.1 37.4 60.0 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 172 1.7 4.1 59.9 34.3 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 192 1.6 0.5 49.0 49.0 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 194 3.1 8.2 53.1 35.6 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 187 4.8 17.1 57.2 20.9 2.9 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 190 1.6 5.8 64.2 28.4 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 195 1.5 7.7 65.6 25.1 3.1 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 186 2.2 16.7 62.9 18.3 3.0 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 195 1.0 3.6 66.7 28.7 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 194 5.7 28.9 50.5 14.9 2.7 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 196 0.0 12.2 61.2 26.5 3.1 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 196 1.5 7.7 44.9 45.9 3.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 127 0.0 7.1 72.4 20.5 3.1 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 129 0.0 13.2 67.4 19.4 3.1 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 128 3.9 12.5 69.5 14.1 2.9 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 99 0.0 11.1 70.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 90 2.2 8.9 74.4 14.4 3.0 0.57 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 52 0.0 7.7 75.0 17.3 3.1 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 51 0.0 0.0 80.4 19.6 3.2 0.40 29. Students free to express opinions 55 0.0 1.8 74.5 23.6 3.2 0.46 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 56 0.0 1.8 80.4 17.9 3.2 0.42 31. Developed abil to conduct research 52 0.0 9.6 75.0 15.4 3.1 0.50 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 30 0.0 3.3 76.7 20.0 3.2 0.46 33. Amount of work appropriate 32 0.0 3.1 78.1 18.8 3.2 0.45 34. Instructor explained expectations 30 0.0 3.3 83.3 13.3 3.1 0.40 35. Instructor helped with my problems 28 0.0 3.6 82.1 14.3 3.1 0.42 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 28 7.1 7.1 71.4 14.3 2.9 0.72 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 298 Number of forms scanned = 196 Number of forms with at least one student response = 196 Percent completed = 65.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 399 001O1 FLD BASED/COMM BASED EDU INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 6 100.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 50.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 83.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 435 001L1 POWER & POLITICS SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 70.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 18.5 Junior 11 40.7 C 1 3.7 Senior 16 59.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 48.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 25.9 Required by my major 7 25.9 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 20 74.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 3.1 6.3 65.6 25.0 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 9.4 56.3 34.4 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 3.2 3.2 41.9 51.6 3.4 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 3.1 3.1 46.9 46.9 3.4 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 6.5 64.5 29.0 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 6.3 6.3 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 3.1 28.1 68.8 3.7 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 12.5 40.6 46.9 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 32 3.1 3.1 46.9 46.9 3.4 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 9.4 40.6 50.0 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 51.6 41.9 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 6.5 54.8 35.5 3.2 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 3.2 45.2 51.6 3.5 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 3.3 40.0 56.7 3.5 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 645 401L1 TOPS IN POLITCAL SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 16.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 452G401L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 45.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 36.4 Junior 1 4.5 C 3 13.6 Senior 21 95.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 4.5 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 21 95.5 3 hours 6 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 2 9.1 6 - 7 hours 2 9.1 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 9.1 45.5 40.9 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 13.6 27.3 54.5 3.3 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 40.9 31.8 27.3 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 28.6 38.1 33.3 3.0 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 36.4 31.8 22.7 2.7 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.72. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------