1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 001L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 46.2 Sophomore 8 30.8 B 13 50.0 Junior 12 46.2 C 1 3.8 Senior 6 23.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 26.9 Studies Program 22 84.6 2 hours 12 46.2 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 19.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 15.4 4 - 5 hours 2 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 16.0 68.0 16.0 3.0 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 8.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 80.8 19.2 3.2 0.40 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 3.8 0.0 65.4 30.8 3.2 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 3.8 15.4 61.5 19.2 3.0 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 72.0 24.0 3.2 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 19.0 81.0 0.0 2.8 0.40 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 76.0 20.0 3.2 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 36.0 48.0 12.0 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 19.2 53.8 26.9 3.1 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.78 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 001L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 0.0 12.0 72.0 16.0 3.0 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 25 0.0 8.0 84.0 8.0 3.0 0.41 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 002L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 35.0 Sophomore 2 10.0 B 12 60.0 Junior 16 80.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 2 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 16 80.0 2 hours 9 45.0 Required by my major 1 5.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 81.8 13.6 3.1 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 0.0 85.7 9.5 3.0 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 9.1 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 9.1 4.5 72.7 13.6 2.9 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 86.4 4.5 3.0 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 86.4 13.6 3.1 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 9.5 76.2 4.8 2.8 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 13.6 13.6 68.2 4.5 2.6 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 4.5 0.0 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 0.34 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 4.5 4.5 77.3 13.6 3.0 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 15.0 25.0 55.0 5.0 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 5.0 5.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 0.0 90.9 4.5 3.0 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 47.6 28.6 4.8 2.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 14.3 76.2 4.8 2.8 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 14.3 57.1 19.0 2.9 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 002L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 25.0 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 11.1 22.2 61.1 5.6 2.6 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 15.0 15.0 65.0 5.0 2.6 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 5.9 5.9 76.5 11.8 2.9 0.66 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 17 5.9 5.9 76.5 11.8 2.9 0.66 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 003L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 50.0 Sophomore 5 23.8 B 8 40.0 Junior 14 66.7 C 2 10.0 Senior 2 9.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 38.1 Studies Program 15 71.4 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 4 19.0 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 22.2 50.0 16.7 2.7 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 31.8 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 81.0 19.0 3.2 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 9.1 36.4 40.9 13.6 2.6 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 22.7 68.2 9.1 2.9 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 18.2 22.7 45.5 13.6 2.5 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 40.9 40.9 13.6 2.6 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 4.5 36.4 36.4 22.7 2.8 0.87 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 003L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 4.5 22.7 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 9.1 13.6 72.7 4.5 2.7 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 22 4.5 13.6 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 004L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 3 27.3 Junior 7 63.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 8 80.0 2 hours 6 54.5 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 2 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 18.2 54.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 004L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 37.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 005L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 7 46.7 Junior 9 56.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 8 53.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.3 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 29.4 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 43.8 31.3 18.8 2.6 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 58.8 23.5 17.6 2.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 005L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 007L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 54.5 Sophomore 6 54.5 B 4 36.4 Junior 4 36.4 C 1 9.1 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 11 100.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 007L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 45.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 008L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 7 58.3 Junior 9 75.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 33.3 Studies Program 10 90.9 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 255 008L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY IN CROSS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 52.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 527 001L1 CHILDREN/FAMILY IN APPAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 55.6 Junior 1 5.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 22.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 1 5.6 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 17 94.4 4 - 5 hours 6 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 26.3 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 35.0 30.0 35.0 3.0 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 10.0 30.0 25.0 35.0 2.9 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 41.2 41.2 3.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 26.3 31.6 31.6 2.8 1.01 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 527 001L1 CHILDREN/FAMILY IN APPAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 525 001L1 APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 80.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 20.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 4 80.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 525 001L1 APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 529 001L1 SURVEY OF MEDICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 1 11.1 B 2 22.2 Junior 1 11.1 C 2 22.2 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 44.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 44.4 4 - 5 hours 5 55.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 22.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 11.1 22.2 22.2 44.4 3.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 529 001L1 SURVEY OF MEDICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 5 27.8 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 10 55.6 Junior 5 27.8 C 2 11.1 Senior 5 27.8 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 12 66.7 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 27.8 4 - 5 hours 6 35.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 26.3 57.9 3.4 0.77 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 57.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 774 001L1 BEHAVIORAL/ECOLOGICAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 12.5 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 3 42.9 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 774 001L1 BEHAVIORAL/ECOLOGICAL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR: ARCHAEOLOGICAL TAPHONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 50.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 4 50.0 8 or more hours 4 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR: ARCHAEOLOGICAL TAPHONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 001L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 10.0 Sophomore 6 60.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 4 40.0 Senior 1 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 50.0 Studies Program 9 90.0 2 hours 3 30.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 7.1 14.3 71.4 7.1 2.8 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 15.4 15.4 61.5 7.7 2.6 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 21.4 28.6 35.7 2.9 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 46.2 30.8 23.1 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 61.5 0.0 2.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 2.8 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 35.7 35.7 21.4 2.7 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 001L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 48.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 004L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 14.3 A 9 32.1 Sophomore 10 35.7 B 16 57.1 Junior 5 17.9 C 3 10.7 Senior 8 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 35.7 Studies Program 14 50.0 2 hours 4 14.3 Required by my major 5 17.9 3 hours 11 39.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.6 6 - 7 hours 2 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 0.0 69.0 31.0 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 6.9 75.9 17.2 3.1 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 10.3 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 10.7 53.6 32.1 3.1 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 16.0 56.0 28.0 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 24.1 44.8 31.0 3.1 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 004L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 96.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 005L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 9 42.9 Sophomore 9 42.9 B 10 47.6 Junior 4 19.0 C 2 9.5 Senior 6 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 47.6 Studies Program 19 90.5 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 66.7 29.2 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.28 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 82.6 13.0 3.1 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 4.2 75.0 16.7 3.0 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 12.5 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 39.1 56.5 0.0 2.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 4.5 4.5 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 8.7 21.7 60.9 8.7 2.7 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 16.7 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 8.3 4.2 54.2 33.3 3.1 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 005L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 006L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 20.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 2 40.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 4 80.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 006L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 17.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 007L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 7.4 A 10 37.0 Sophomore 15 55.6 B 12 44.4 Junior 7 25.9 C 4 14.8 Senior 3 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 40.7 Studies Program 20 74.1 2 hours 9 33.3 Required by my major 5 18.5 3 hours 6 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.4 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 10.7 67.9 21.4 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 3.6 53.6 42.9 3.4 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 25.9 44.4 29.6 3.0 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 10.7 60.7 25.0 3.1 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 10.7 60.7 25.0 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 37.0 44.4 14.8 2.7 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 18.5 59.3 18.5 2.9 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD