1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 43.1 A 41 82.0 Sophomore 15 29.4 B 6 12.0 Junior 2 3.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 21.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.0 Pass or Audit 3 6.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 66.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 20.0 Required by my major 3 6.3 3 hours 2 4.0 Other (e.g. elective) 45 93.8 4 - 5 hours 4 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 0.0 30.9 69.1 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 55 1.8 9.1 56.4 32.7 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 56 0.0 1.8 62.5 35.7 3.3 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 56 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 56 0.0 0.0 26.8 73.2 3.7 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 56 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 56 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 55 0.0 0.0 47.3 52.7 3.5 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 56 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 56 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 55 0.0 0.0 23.6 76.4 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 1.8 34.5 63.6 3.6 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 56 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 54 0.0 1.9 48.1 50.0 3.5 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 51 0.0 3.9 54.9 41.2 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 49.1 50.9 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 54 0.0 5.6 46.3 48.1 3.4 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 56 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 56 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.33 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 68 Number of forms scanned = 56 Number of forms with at least one student response = 56 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 200 8.7 A 1,063 46.7 Sophomore 268 11.7 B 934 41.0 Junior 569 24.8 C 229 10.1 Senior 941 41.0 D 17 0.7 Graduate 294 12.8 E/Fail 4 0.2 Professional 9 0.4 I 1 0.0 Other 16 0.7 Pass or Audit 28 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 543 23.7 Studies Program 133 5.8 2 hours 662 28.9 Required by my major 1,662 72.5 3 hours 492 21.5 Other (e.g. elective) 496 21.6 4 - 5 hours 309 13.5 6 - 7 hours 131 5.7 8 or more hours 153 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,431 0.6 2.8 50.3 46.2 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,815 6.3 16.1 48.9 28.8 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,295 1.5 6.6 55.2 36.7 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,003 1.5 6.5 50.1 41.8 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,372 2.2 7.0 49.1 41.7 3.3 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,319 1.9 5.5 52.7 39.9 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,349 3.9 6.6 47.2 42.3 3.3 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,268 2.1 10.6 52.9 34.4 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,411 2.0 9.4 44.7 44.0 3.3 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,403 0.3 1.0 32.3 66.4 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 2,296 0.5 2.4 45.8 51.2 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,413 1.0 4.2 43.6 51.2 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,404 2.4 12.8 41.7 43.1 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 2,395 0.8 5.8 44.6 48.7 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,079 1.2 7.7 58.4 32.7 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,342 1.0 7.2 55.0 36.8 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,247 1.7 10.6 56.5 31.2 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,406 0.8 4.1 50.3 44.8 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,367 3.6 18.8 46.6 31.0 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,416 2.4 11.4 40.1 46.2 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,411 2.8 11.3 31.8 54.1 3.4 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 154 1.3 12.3 64.3 22.1 3.1 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 184 1.6 10.3 62.5 25.5 3.1 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 165 2.4 12.7 58.2 26.7 3.1 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 84 1.2 13.1 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 111 5.4 17.1 50.5 27.0 3.0 0.81 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 52 3.8 5.8 51.9 38.5 3.3 0.74 28. Guided student report preparation 57 5.3 12.3 50.9 31.6 3.1 0.81 29. Students free to express opinions 64 0.0 3.1 39.1 57.8 3.5 0.56 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 66 0.0 6.1 42.4 51.5 3.5 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 53 0.0 7.5 58.5 34.0 3.3 0.59 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 593 1.9 7.4 49.7 41.0 3.3 0.69 33. Amount of work appropriate 598 3.5 8.4 53.3 34.8 3.2 0.73 34. Instructor explained expectations 594 1.3 8.4 50.7 39.6 3.3 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 570 1.8 7.9 51.2 39.1 3.3 0.68 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 522 1.7 5.4 54.4 38.5 3.3 0.65 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 39 0.0 5.1 33.3 33.3 28.2 3.8 0.90 38. Question 38 39 2.6 5.1 33.3 28.2 30.8 3.8 1.03 39. Question 39 39 20.5 2.6 23.1 28.2 25.6 3.4 1.44 40. Question 40 39 5.1 10.3 30.8 23.1 30.8 3.6 1.18 41. Question 41 37 10.8 10.8 24.3 35.1 18.9 3.4 1.24 42. Question 42 38 0.0 5.3 34.2 26.3 34.2 3.9 0.95 43. Question 43 38 7.9 13.2 18.4 28.9 31.6 3.6 1.28 44. Question 44 38 0.0 10.5 28.9 28.9 31.6 3.8 1.01 45. Question 45 35 8.6 28.6 25.7 22.9 14.3 3.1 1.21 46. Question 46 20 0.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 3.5 0.95 47. Question 47 20 10.0 25.0 20.0 35.0 10.0 3.1 1.21 48. Question 48 19 10.5 36.8 31.6 15.8 5.3 2.7 1.06 49. Question 49 19 21.1 0.0 42.1 31.6 5.3 3.0 1.20 Number of forms preslugged = at least 3047 Number of forms scanned = 2445 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2439 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6,854 29.1 A 9,085 39.1 Sophomore 5,274 22.4 B 9,818 42.3 Junior 4,711 20.0 C 3,377 14.5 Senior 5,296 22.5 D 424 1.8 Graduate 1,163 4.9 E/Fail 63 0.3 Professional 26 0.1 I 10 0.0 Other 229 1.0 Pass or Audit 442 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5,540 23.7 Studies Program 8,536 36.8 2 hours 6,134 26.2 Required by my major 10,229 44.1 3 hours 5,697 24.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4,426 19.1 4 - 5 hours 4,002 17.1 6 - 7 hours 1,210 5.2 8 or more hours 821 3.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25,301 0.6 2.9 52.8 43.6 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24,363 5.4 12.6 51.4 30.6 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24,163 1.9 9.1 55.7 33.3 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24,188 2.7 8.6 50.5 38.1 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25,159 2.2 7.7 51.5 38.7 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24,101 1.3 5.3 55.4 38.0 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24,857 1.7 7.0 51.4 39.9 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 22,776 3.9 16.9 48.5 30.7 3.1 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25,381 2.9 10.5 45.3 41.4 3.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25,488 0.5 1.6 36.6 61.3 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 23,199 0.7 2.8 50.6 46.0 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25,235 1.4 5.7 46.7 46.2 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25,037 5.6 17.6 41.8 35.1 3.1 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 24,984 2.2 10.8 44.9 42.1 3.3 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20,825 2.0 10.7 58.4 28.9 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23,702 2.0 11.3 56.7 30.1 3.1 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21,838 2.6 16.7 54.1 26.6 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24,741 1.7 6.0 57.2 35.1 3.3 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24,083 8.7 30.0 39.1 22.2 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25,269 3.9 15.0 45.9 35.3 3.1 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 25,179 3.7 11.9 34.3 50.1 3.3 0.82 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5,751 3.8 15.4 57.8 23.1 3.0 0.73 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7,320 3.5 14.6 59.2 22.7 3.0 0.72 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6,698 4.0 11.3 58.4 26.3 3.1 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3,876 2.8 10.6 54.4 32.2 3.2 0.72 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2,905 3.5 12.9 55.9 27.6 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1,206 3.0 9.0 49.3 38.7 3.2 0.73 28. Guided student report preparation 1,182 2.5 9.3 50.7 37.6 3.2 0.72 29. Students free to express opinions 1,413 1.6 3.9 43.8 50.7 3.4 0.65 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1,412 2.4 4.6 46.2 46.8 3.4 0.69 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1,185 4.3 13.0 49.0 33.7 3.1 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4,590 3.4 10.2 49.4 36.9 3.2 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 4,640 3.9 8.1 52.7 35.3 3.2 0.74 34. Instructor explained expectations 4,645 2.5 7.3 48.7 41.6 3.3 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4,444 3.0 9.4 50.1 37.5 3.2 0.73 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2,950 4.2 7.6 51.1 37.1 3.2 0.76 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 34 23.5 44.1 8.8 5.9 17.6 2.5 1.40 38. Question 38 35 22.9 28.6 37.1 5.7 5.7 2.4 1.09 39. Question 39 7 42.9 0.0 14.3 42.9 0.0 2.6 . 40. Question 40 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 25.0 3.5 . 41. Question 41 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 42. Question 42 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 . 43. Question 43 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 3.0 . 44. Question 44 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 2.3 . 45. Question 45 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 4.2 . 46. Question 46 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 0.0 50.0 3.8 . 47. Question 47 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 0.0 28.6 3.1 . 48. Question 48 6 33.3 0.0 16.7 16.7 33.3 3.2 . 49. Question 49 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 16.7 33.3 3.5 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 38283 Number of forms scanned = 28336 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25698 Percent completed = 67.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 127 2.0 A 2,928 45.9 Sophomore 816 12.7 B 2,657 41.7 Junior 1,759 27.4 C 667 10.5 Senior 2,794 43.6 D 53 0.8 Graduate 834 13.0 E/Fail 8 0.1 Professional 22 0.3 I 1 0.0 Other 62 1.0 Pass or Audit 59 0.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1,327 20.7 Studies Program 324 5.1 2 hours 1,887 29.4 Required by my major 5,093 79.8 3 hours 1,712 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 969 15.2 4 - 5 hours 1,013 15.8 6 - 7 hours 272 4.2 8 or more hours 198 3.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6,713 0.4 2.2 52.9 44.6 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6,568 3.7 11.9 54.9 29.5 3.1 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6,543 1.2 6.8 54.5 37.5 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6,500 1.6 7.4 51.2 39.9 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6,677 1.5 5.6 51.3 41.6 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6,496 1.0 5.1 55.1 38.8 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6,649 0.5 3.1 50.1 46.3 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 6,187 2.6 19.3 51.5 26.6 3.0 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6,714 3.2 11.7 45.2 39.8 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6,717 0.5 2.1 37.7 59.8 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 6,170 0.4 2.4 49.9 47.2 3.4 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6,703 1.7 6.8 46.9 44.6 3.3 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6,642 4.6 17.6 43.6 34.3 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 6,679 1.4 7.1 45.9 45.6 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5,510 1.6 11.5 62.5 24.4 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6,524 1.5 7.8 58.5 32.1 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6,371 1.8 10.2 58.4 29.6 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6,648 1.3 4.9 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6,505 6.7 27.1 43.6 22.5 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6,683 2.6 12.8 48.3 36.4 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 6,671 3.8 12.9 34.9 48.4 3.3 0.83 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 246 4.5 19.1 57.3 19.1 2.9 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 297 3.4 17.5 60.9 18.2 2.9 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 280 3.2 13.2 64.3 19.3 3.0 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 126 3.2 16.7 54.8 25.4 3.0 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 127 3.9 11.8 59.8 24.4 3.0 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 102 2.0 6.9 43.1 48.0 3.4 0.70 28. Guided student report preparation 109 2.8 7.3 47.7 42.2 3.3 0.72 29. Students free to express opinions 123 1.6 1.6 43.1 53.7 3.5 0.62 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 121 1.7 8.3 43.8 46.3 3.3 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 108 2.8 10.2 44.4 42.6 3.3 0.76 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 160 1.9 10.0 56.3 31.9 3.2 0.68 33. Amount of work appropriate 157 1.9 5.1 63.1 29.9 3.2 0.62 34. Instructor explained expectations 157 3.2 8.9 56.1 31.8 3.2 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 151 1.3 11.9 56.3 30.5 3.2 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 83 2.4 7.2 57.8 32.5 3.2 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 22 4.5 0.0 18.2 68.2 9.1 3.8 0.81 38. Question 38 22 0.0 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 3.6 0.79 39. Question 39 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 68.2 9.1 3.9 0.56 40. Question 40 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 50.0 9.1 3.6 0.73 41. Question 41 22 4.5 0.0 18.2 63.6 13.6 3.8 0.85 42. Question 42 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 59.1 9.1 3.7 0.70 43. Question 43 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 59.1 9.1 3.8 0.61 44. Question 44 21 4.8 9.5 23.8 57.1 4.8 3.5 0.93 45. Question 45 2 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 46. Question 46 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 47. Question 47 3 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 9489 Number of forms scanned = 6756 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6750 Percent completed = 71.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 253 10.3 A 1,165 48.2 Sophomore 507 20.5 B 1,063 43.9 Junior 508 20.6 C 165 6.8 Senior 727 29.5 D 13 0.5 Graduate 456 18.5 E/Fail 3 0.1 Professional 4 0.2 I 2 0.1 Other 13 0.5 Pass or Audit 8 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 538 21.9 Studies Program 780 32.3 2 hours 769 31.2 Required by my major 1,099 45.5 3 hours 619 25.2 Other (e.g. elective) 537 22.2 4 - 5 hours 351 14.3 6 - 7 hours 103 4.2 8 or more hours 81 3.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,661 0.6 3.8 49.6 45.9 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,453 3.9 12.8 51.1 32.2 3.1 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,629 1.7 9.7 52.4 36.1 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,906 2.6 6.8 50.6 40.0 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,588 3.1 10.7 50.2 36.1 3.2 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,620 2.3 7.2 53.0 37.5 3.3 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,570 2.3 8.4 52.6 36.7 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,526 3.4 12.1 45.5 39.0 3.2 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,666 3.0 9.6 43.6 43.9 3.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,663 0.6 1.8 35.3 62.3 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 2,458 0.9 4.3 45.6 49.3 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,647 1.8 6.8 44.6 46.8 3.4 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,644 5.0 16.8 37.9 40.3 3.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 2,653 1.5 6.1 42.3 50.1 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,377 1.7 7.5 56.1 34.6 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,523 1.7 8.6 52.8 36.8 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,304 2.5 14.9 51.0 31.6 3.1 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,615 1.6 5.0 51.6 41.8 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,541 7.1 27.4 37.1 28.4 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,651 3.2 12.0 41.1 43.6 3.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,637 4.1 11.3 32.2 52.4 3.3 0.83 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 391 5.6 29.2 45.8 19.4 2.8 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 653 2.1 10.1 61.9 25.9 3.1 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 632 3.5 10.4 60.6 25.5 3.1 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 157 5.1 12.1 53.5 29.3 3.1 0.79 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 143 4.2 11.2 53.1 31.5 3.1 0.76 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 171 0.6 7.0 49.7 42.7 3.3 0.64 28. Guided student report preparation 188 2.7 4.8 50.5 42.0 3.3 0.69 29. Students free to express opinions 201 0.5 3.0 35.3 61.2 3.6 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 199 0.5 8.0 35.7 55.8 3.5 0.66 31. Developed abil to conduct research 169 3.0 9.5 47.9 39.6 3.2 0.74 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 101 5.9 10.9 52.5 30.7 3.1 0.81 33. Amount of work appropriate 102 2.9 11.8 55.9 29.4 3.1 0.72 34. Instructor explained expectations 102 5.9 10.8 53.9 29.4 3.1 0.80 35. Instructor helped with my problems 100 8.0 14.0 48.0 30.0 3.0 0.88 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 63 1.6 6.3 55.6 36.5 3.3 0.65 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 7.7 46.2 46.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.65 38. Question 38 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 15.4 7.7 3.2 0.80 39. Question 39 12 25.0 25.0 33.3 16.7 0.0 2.4 1.08 40. Question 40 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 23.1 7.7 3.2 0.90 41. Question 41 12 25.0 25.0 33.3 8.3 8.3 2.5 1.24 42. Question 42 13 38.5 38.5 15.4 7.7 0.0 1.9 0.95 43. Question 43 13 30.8 15.4 23.1 30.8 0.0 2.5 1.27 44. Question 44 13 7.7 61.5 23.1 7.7 0.0 2.3 0.75 45. Question 45 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 7.7 7.7 3.2 0.69 46. Question 46 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 33.3 8.3 3.5 0.67 47. Question 47 13 0.0 46.2 53.8 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 48. Question 48 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 33.3 8.3 3.5 0.67 49. Question 49 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3333 Number of forms scanned = 2678 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2675 Percent completed = 80.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 153 4.5 A 2,603 77.9 Sophomore 278 8.2 B 617 18.5 Junior 568 16.7 C 60 1.8 Senior 1,227 36.1 D 10 0.3 Graduate 1,099 32.3 E/Fail 1 0.0 Professional 43 1.3 I 10 0.3 Other 32 0.9 Pass or Audit 40 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1,113 33.0 Studies Program 66 1.9 2 hours 770 22.8 Required by my major 2,437 71.8 3 hours 671 19.9 Other (e.g. elective) 890 26.2 4 - 5 hours 463 13.7 6 - 7 hours 171 5.1 8 or more hours 184 5.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,591 0.8 2.6 39.8 56.8 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3,045 4.0 8.7 46.0 41.3 3.2 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3,372 1.1 5.5 48.6 44.8 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,957 0.9 4.1 45.0 50.0 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,451 1.2 3.7 42.5 52.7 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3,403 1.1 4.3 46.2 48.3 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,429 1.8 6.3 40.8 51.1 3.4 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 3,240 1.4 8.7 41.6 48.4 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,582 2.0 7.3 40.0 50.8 3.4 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,600 0.6 1.9 29.6 67.9 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 3,286 0.8 2.6 41.3 55.2 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,589 1.2 3.5 38.7 56.6 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3,579 2.5 8.5 38.3 50.6 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 3,578 1.0 2.6 33.3 63.2 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3,170 1.2 4.6 50.0 44.2 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3,291 1.5 5.9 47.6 45.0 3.4 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3,180 1.8 7.6 48.9 41.7 3.3 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,510 1.1 2.8 45.2 51.0 3.5 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3,374 3.1 15.5 42.9 38.5 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 3,581 2.5 8.9 36.4 52.3 3.4 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 3,565 2.2 8.2 29.7 59.9 3.5 0.74 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 81 0.0 6.2 54.3 39.5 3.3 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 112 3.6 4.5 48.2 43.8 3.3 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 106 0.0 5.7 50.0 44.3 3.4 0.59 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 71 0.0 5.6 46.5 47.9 3.4 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 67 3.0 3.0 43.3 50.7 3.4 0.70 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 124 1.6 4.8 35.5 58.1 3.5 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 128 1.6 9.4 35.9 53.1 3.4 0.73 29. Students free to express opinions 146 0.7 1.4 30.8 67.1 3.6 0.55 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 147 3.4 3.4 38.1 55.1 3.4 0.72 31. Developed abil to conduct research 113 3.5 4.4 46.9 45.1 3.3 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 73 0.0 6.8 43.8 49.3 3.4 0.62 33. Amount of work appropriate 75 1.3 1.3 46.7 50.7 3.5 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 72 0.0 4.2 44.4 51.4 3.5 0.58 35. Instructor helped with my problems 70 1.4 7.1 41.4 50.0 3.4 0.69 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 69 1.4 4.3 44.9 49.3 3.4 0.65 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 6 50.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 38. Question 38 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 3.7 . 39. Question 39 6 33.3 16.7 16.7 0.0 33.3 2.8 . 40. Question 40 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 3.8 . 41. Question 41 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.8 . 42. Question 42 4 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 43. Question 43 4 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 44. Question 44 4 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 45. Question 45 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 46. Question 46 4 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 47. Question 47 4 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 48. Question 48 4 75.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 2.0 . 49. Question 49 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 0.0 2.6 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 4355 Number of forms scanned = 3641 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3613 Percent completed = 83.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 480 9.5 A 2,325 46.7 Sophomore 628 12.4 B 1,866 37.5 Junior 1,089 21.5 C 621 12.5 Senior 2,346 46.4 D 69 1.4 Graduate 479 9.5 E/Fail 15 0.3 Professional 3 0.1 I 5 0.1 Other 32 0.6 Pass or Audit 73 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 701 13.9 Studies Program 103 2.0 2 hours 892 17.7 Required by my major 4,154 82.6 3 hours 1,147 22.8 Other (e.g. elective) 773 15.4 4 - 5 hours 1,268 25.2 6 - 7 hours 518 10.3 8 or more hours 506 10.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5,321 1.6 5.0 59.9 33.6 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4,961 8.2 17.0 51.9 22.9 2.9 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5,210 2.5 8.3 56.4 32.8 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4,784 3.7 9.2 53.9 33.2 3.2 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5,281 4.2 9.8 54.6 31.4 3.1 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5,255 2.4 6.2 59.7 31.7 3.2 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5,213 3.7 9.6 56.3 30.4 3.1 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 5,049 6.6 24.8 49.0 19.7 2.8 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5,315 4.6 15.3 49.3 30.8 3.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5,319 1.7 3.4 44.2 50.7 3.4 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 4,982 2.6 5.8 54.0 37.6 3.3 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5,241 3.4 9.1 53.4 34.1 3.2 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5,262 7.4 19.0 46.4 27.3 2.9 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 5,152 4.5 15.8 50.3 29.4 3.0 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3,828 3.4 15.2 60.9 20.4 3.0 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5,089 2.4 8.6 61.7 27.4 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5,090 2.6 9.4 59.9 28.1 3.1 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5,196 2.4 6.7 60.8 30.1 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5,053 8.1 25.6 46.3 20.0 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5,295 5.5 16.4 47.9 30.2 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 5,273 7.1 16.8 39.2 36.9 3.1 0.90 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 136 2.2 11.8 55.9 30.1 3.1 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 152 7.2 14.5 55.3 23.0 2.9 0.82 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 130 3.8 8.5 58.5 29.2 3.1 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 92 2.2 15.2 51.1 31.5 3.1 0.74 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 86 3.5 14.0 53.5 29.1 3.1 0.75 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 126 1.6 16.7 56.3 25.4 3.1 0.70 28. Guided student report preparation 124 2.4 13.7 62.9 21.0 3.0 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 136 2.9 5.9 67.6 23.5 3.1 0.63 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 137 2.9 8.8 65.7 22.6 3.1 0.65 31. Developed abil to conduct research 127 3.9 17.3 59.1 19.7 2.9 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 673 3.1 9.1 57.7 30.2 3.1 0.70 33. Amount of work appropriate 684 7.7 12.9 55.0 24.4 3.0 0.83 34. Instructor explained expectations 682 3.4 11.1 56.2 29.3 3.1 0.73 35. Instructor helped with my problems 671 2.8 9.7 55.3 32.2 3.2 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 634 3.8 10.4 57.1 28.7 3.1 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 24 4.2 12.5 12.5 29.2 41.7 3.9 1.21 38. Question 38 23 21.7 13.0 21.7 21.7 21.7 3.1 1.47 39. Question 39 18 11.1 38.9 27.8 16.7 5.6 2.7 1.08 40. Question 40 20 20.0 40.0 25.0 15.0 0.0 2.4 0.99 41. Question 41 23 39.1 17.4 21.7 17.4 4.3 2.3 1.29 42. Question 42 23 34.8 13.0 30.4 17.4 4.3 2.4 1.27 43. Question 43 22 36.4 27.3 31.8 4.5 0.0 2.0 0.95 44. Question 44 19 26.3 21.1 36.8 10.5 5.3 2.5 1.17 45. Question 45 22 22.7 18.2 27.3 27.3 4.5 2.7 1.24 46. Question 46 21 23.8 4.8 38.1 19.0 14.3 3.0 1.36 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 7782 Number of forms scanned = 7520 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5423 Percent completed = 69.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 109 5.5 A 1,010 51.4 Sophomore 354 17.9 B 733 37.3 Junior 502 25.3 C 195 9.9 Senior 807 40.7 D 17 0.9 Graduate 189 9.5 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 8 0.4 I 0 0.0 Other 14 0.7 Pass or Audit 10 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 553 28.0 Studies Program 303 15.4 2 hours 574 29.0 Required by my major 1,301 66.0 3 hours 441 22.3 Other (e.g. elective) 368 18.7 4 - 5 hours 241 12.2 6 - 7 hours 67 3.4 8 or more hours 101 5.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,111 0.9 3.4 55.3 40.3 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,967 5.1 10.4 52.9 31.6 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,004 4.0 13.0 54.2 28.7 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,966 5.1 12.8 51.1 31.0 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,051 3.3 9.8 53.4 33.6 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,014 2.6 9.7 53.7 34.0 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,049 3.5 10.0 52.7 33.9 3.2 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,904 5.0 19.4 47.1 28.5 3.0 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,093 5.2 14.4 47.3 33.1 3.1 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,101 0.9 2.0 44.0 53.2 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 1,874 1.6 4.6 52.9 40.9 3.3 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,085 2.5 7.0 51.3 39.2 3.3 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,076 5.9 19.3 43.0 31.8 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 2,070 2.1 8.2 50.1 39.5 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,846 2.0 9.9 60.5 27.7 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,981 2.8 13.3 56.9 27.0 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,852 3.3 19.8 53.3 23.5 3.0 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,075 2.0 5.7 58.7 33.6 3.2 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,053 7.0 25.5 43.1 24.4 2.8 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,093 6.4 16.6 42.9 34.1 3.0 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,084 6.2 16.0 37.5 40.3 3.1 0.89 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 331 5.4 26.9 55.0 12.7 2.7 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 416 3.6 16.8 60.3 19.2 3.0 0.71 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 381 7.9 18.1 53.3 20.7 2.9 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 224 8.0 12.5 58.0 21.4 2.9 0.81 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 202 7.4 11.4 58.9 22.3 3.0 0.80 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 66 1.5 10.6 39.4 48.5 3.3 0.73 28. Guided student report preparation 66 4.5 15.2 42.4 37.9 3.1 0.84 29. Students free to express opinions 92 0.0 2.2 46.7 51.1 3.5 0.54 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 91 3.3 4.4 49.5 42.9 3.3 0.71 31. Developed abil to conduct research 70 5.7 25.7 41.4 27.1 2.9 0.87 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 68 2.9 19.1 58.8 19.1 2.9 0.71 33. Amount of work appropriate 70 5.7 8.6 62.9 22.9 3.0 0.74 34. Instructor explained expectations 67 4.5 10.4 59.7 25.4 3.1 0.74 35. Instructor helped with my problems 66 1.5 16.7 57.6 24.2 3.0 0.69 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 59 0.0 18.6 54.2 27.1 3.1 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 41. Question 41 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 45. Question 45 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3278 Number of forms scanned = 2144 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2126 Percent completed = 64.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 140 53.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 120 45.5 Junior 1 0.4 C 4 1.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 247 91.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 11 4.1 I 0 0.0 Other 10 3.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 10.8 Studies Program 14 5.3 2 hours 56 20.9 Required by my major 205 77.1 3 hours 66 24.6 Other (e.g. elective) 47 17.7 4 - 5 hours 68 25.4 6 - 7 hours 24 9.0 8 or more hours 25 9.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 306 0.7 2.9 50.7 45.8 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 230 2.2 11.3 56.5 30.0 3.1 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 292 0.7 8.2 60.3 30.8 3.2 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 238 1.3 9.7 56.3 32.8 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 304 3.3 9.5 55.3 31.9 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 306 1.3 6.2 58.2 34.3 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 307 2.0 8.8 49.5 39.7 3.3 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 301 3.7 11.0 54.2 31.2 3.1 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 306 3.6 12.4 54.2 29.7 3.1 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 310 1.0 1.9 36.1 61.0 3.6 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 293 3.1 5.5 47.8 43.7 3.3 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 307 1.3 7.5 49.5 41.7 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 309 2.9 14.2 49.8 33.0 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 304 1.0 4.3 41.4 53.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 266 1.5 5.6 60.2 32.7 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 307 2.3 9.4 54.7 33.6 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 296 2.4 12.8 58.1 26.7 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 310 1.6 8.1 54.2 36.1 3.2 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 305 5.9 18.4 48.9 26.9 3.0 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 308 1.9 19.2 42.5 36.4 3.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 305 5.6 12.5 34.8 47.2 3.2 0.88 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 42 2.4 7.1 45.2 45.2 3.3 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 45 2.2 20.0 48.9 28.9 3.0 0.77 29. Students free to express opinions 46 0.0 8.7 23.9 67.4 3.6 0.65 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 44 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.64 31. Developed abil to conduct research 40 2.5 15.0 42.5 40.0 3.2 0.79 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 358 Number of forms scanned = 319 Number of forms with at least one student response = 311 Percent completed = 86.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 24.2 A 39 62.9 Sophomore 10 16.1 B 19 30.6 Junior 17 27.4 C 1 1.6 Senior 18 29.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.6 Pass or Audit 3 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 47.5 Studies Program 2 3.3 2 hours 17 27.9 Required by my major 4 6.6 3 hours 11 18.0 Other (e.g. elective) 55 90.2 4 - 5 hours 4 6.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 63 0.0 0.0 39.7 60.3 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 53 0.0 5.7 62.3 32.1 3.3 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 60 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 63 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 62 0.0 1.6 48.4 50.0 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 61 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 63 0.0 6.3 36.5 57.1 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 0.0 0.0 66.0 34.0 3.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 63 0.0 7.9 47.6 44.4 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 63 0.0 1.6 33.3 65.1 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 63 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 63 0.0 1.6 42.9 55.6 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 63 1.6 4.8 50.8 42.9 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 62 0.0 3.2 40.3 56.5 3.5 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 53 1.9 5.7 62.3 30.2 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 60 0.0 5.0 58.3 36.7 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 53 0.0 5.7 58.5 35.8 3.3 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 62 0.0 0.0 53.2 46.8 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 60 1.7 16.7 48.3 33.3 3.1 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 62 0.0 8.1 35.5 56.5 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 62 0.0 4.8 35.5 59.7 3.5 0.59 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 75 Number of forms scanned = 71 Number of forms with at least one student response = 63 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 0.7 A 1,049 71.7 Sophomore 43 2.9 B 381 26.0 Junior 187 12.5 C 29 2.0 Senior 333 22.2 D 2 0.1 Graduate 910 60.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 6 0.4 I 1 0.1 Other 8 0.5 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 231 15.6 Studies Program 66 4.5 2 hours 359 24.3 Required by my major 1,145 77.7 3 hours 363 24.6 Other (e.g. elective) 262 17.8 4 - 5 hours 215 14.5 6 - 7 hours 71 4.8 8 or more hours 239 16.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,571 1.3 4.3 38.0 56.4 3.5 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,275 5.1 10.2 43.3 41.4 3.2 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,528 1.9 5.0 49.1 44.0 3.4 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,141 2.8 6.0 46.5 44.7 3.3 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,503 2.3 5.1 44.0 48.6 3.4 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,536 1.4 4.6 45.4 48.6 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,489 3.8 7.1 42.9 46.1 3.3 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,458 2.7 7.8 41.9 47.7 3.3 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,556 3.4 7.6 39.6 49.4 3.4 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,561 1.0 1.7 29.9 67.3 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 1,398 1.4 3.5 41.6 53.4 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,566 2.0 4.0 37.7 56.3 3.5 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,556 2.8 8.0 38.0 51.2 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 1,562 1.1 2.6 34.2 62.2 3.6 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,505 1.3 3.3 46.2 49.2 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,545 1.7 5.6 44.8 47.8 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,510 1.8 7.2 46.6 44.4 3.3 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,554 1.6 3.6 43.6 51.2 3.4 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,532 3.4 12.3 42.6 41.7 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,555 3.0 9.7 32.9 54.4 3.4 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,538 4.0 9.0 27.8 59.2 3.4 0.82 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 73 1.4 9.6 54.8 34.2 3.2 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 89 2.2 6.7 59.6 31.5 3.2 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 84 6.0 9.5 45.2 39.3 3.2 0.84 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 62 0.0 8.1 51.6 40.3 3.3 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 56 1.8 7.1 50.0 41.1 3.3 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 101 1.0 7.9 37.6 53.5 3.4 0.68 28. Guided student report preparation 99 1.0 3.0 40.4 55.6 3.5 0.61 29. Students free to express opinions 117 0.9 0.9 28.2 70.1 3.7 0.54 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 113 0.9 3.5 34.5 61.1 3.6 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 85 1.2 16.5 34.1 48.2 3.3 0.78 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 34. Instructor explained expectations 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 35. Instructor helped with my problems 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 1825 Number of forms scanned = 1578 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1577 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO".