1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PSY 552 001L1 ANIMAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 26.7 Junior 1 6.7 C 1 6.7 Senior 13 86.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 11 73.3 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 4 26.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 0.0 70.0 20.0 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 11.8 17.6 52.9 17.6 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PSY 552 001L1 ANIMAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 67.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 6.8 A 24 32.9 Sophomore 34 45.9 B 39 53.4 Junior 21 28.4 C 8 11.0 Senior 13 17.6 D 1 1.4 Graduate 1 1.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 35.6 Studies Program 8 11.0 2 hours 22 30.1 Required by my major 42 57.5 3 hours 23 31.5 Other (e.g. elective) 23 31.5 4 - 5 hours 2 2.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 78 0.0 0.0 44.9 55.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 77 1.3 10.4 36.4 51.9 3.4 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 76 0.0 1.3 63.2 35.5 3.3 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 78 2.6 5.1 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 78 1.3 5.1 43.6 50.0 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 77 0.0 3.9 49.4 46.8 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 78 0.0 2.6 39.7 57.7 3.6 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 59 8.5 39.0 30.5 22.0 2.7 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 78 0.0 2.6 42.3 55.1 3.5 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 78 0.0 1.3 37.2 61.5 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 68 0.0 1.5 60.3 38.2 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 77 0.0 1.3 50.6 48.1 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 78 0.0 5.1 55.1 39.7 3.3 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 78 1.3 5.1 62.8 30.8 3.2 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 69 0.0 8.7 66.7 24.6 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 72 0.0 12.5 63.9 23.6 3.1 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 68 0.0 23.5 60.3 16.2 2.9 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 78 0.0 1.3 56.4 42.3 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 78 2.6 20.5 48.7 28.2 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 77 1.3 1.3 39.0 58.4 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 76 1.3 2.6 32.9 63.2 3.6 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 109 Number of forms scanned = 79 Number of forms with at least one student response = 78 Percent completed = 71.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 009L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 82.4 A 3 17.6 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 8 47.1 Junior 2 11.8 C 5 29.4 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 7 41.2 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 8 47.1 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 11.1 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 11.1 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 6.3 0.0 50.0 43.8 3.3 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 5.6 38.9 50.0 3.3 0.84 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 009L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 14.3 7.1 42.9 35.7 3.0 1.04 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 35. Instructor helped with my problems 13 15.4 30.8 38.5 15.4 2.5 0.97 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 010L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 83.3 A 2 16.7 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 8 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 16.7 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 66.7 Studies Program 10 83.3 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 22.2 33.3 11.1 33.3 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 14.3 28.6 50.0 3.2 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 28.6 50.0 14.3 2.7 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 0.0 35.7 57.1 3.4 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 010L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 56.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 011L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 71.4 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 2 14.3 B 6 42.9 Junior 1 7.1 C 3 21.4 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 10 76.9 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 7.1 71.4 14.3 2.9 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 80.0 20.0 0.0 2.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 12 8.3 0.0 91.7 0.0 2.8 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 16.7 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 011L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 9.1 81.8 0.0 2.7 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 56.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 012L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 84.2 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 12 63.2 Junior 1 5.3 C 2 10.5 Senior 1 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 14 77.8 2 hours 5 26.3 Required by my major 3 16.7 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 85.7 14.3 0.0 2.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 58.8 35.3 5.9 2.5 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 31.6 52.6 10.5 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 012L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 92.9 0.0 2.9 0.27 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 73.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 013L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 85.7 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 6 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 5 35.7 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 90.9 9.1 3.1 0.30 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 013L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 56.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 014L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 81.3 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 10 62.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 12.5 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 014L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 65.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 015L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 58.8 A 1 5.9 Sophomore 5 29.4 B 9 52.9 Junior 2 11.8 C 7 41.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 41.2 Studies Program 10 58.8 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 5 29.4 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 13.3 26.7 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 11.8 58.8 23.5 3.0 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 45.5 36.4 18.2 2.7 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 25.0 68.8 0.0 2.6 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 29.4 58.8 3.5 0.72 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 015L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 12.5 25.0 62.5 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 30.0 10.0 60.0 0.0 2.3 0.95 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 016L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 84.6 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 5 38.5 Junior 1 7.7 C 6 46.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 10 76.9 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 15.4 0.0 61.5 23.1 2.9 0.95 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 15.4 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.99 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 15.4 38.5 30.8 2.8 1.07 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 15.4 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.99 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 016L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 52.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 456 001L1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 36.4 Sophomore 1 3.0 B 17 51.5 Junior 6 18.2 C 3 9.1 Senior 25 75.8 D 1 3.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 24.2 Required by my major 27 81.8 3 hours 14 42.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 18.2 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 1 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 11.1 52.8 36.1 3.3 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 2.8 2.8 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 0.0 63.9 36.1 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 11.1 41.7 47.2 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 2.8 11.1 25.0 61.1 3.4 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 5.6 2.8 16.7 75.0 3.6 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 5.6 30.6 63.9 3.6 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 44.8 51.7 3.5 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 2.9 20.0 77.1 3.7 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 2.9 5.7 14.3 77.1 3.7 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 2.9 0.0 25.7 71.4 3.7 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 5.7 20.0 74.3 3.7 0.58 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 456 001L1 BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barron, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 28.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 85.7 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 7 36.8 B 9 47.4 Junior 6 31.6 C 3 15.8 Senior 3 15.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 36.8 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 9 47.4 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 47.4 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 5.6 72.2 11.1 2.8 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 30.0 45.0 25.0 3.0 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 26.3 47.4 26.3 3.0 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 27.8 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 35.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 69.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 428 001L1 RES METHS DEVELOP PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 11.1 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 22.2 66.7 0.0 2.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 428 001L1 RES METHS DEVELOP PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 002L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 5.7 A 48 45.7 Sophomore 65 61.3 B 51 48.6 Junior 24 22.6 C 6 5.7 Senior 11 10.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 18.4 Studies Program 9 8.7 2 hours 45 43.7 Required by my major 46 44.7 3 hours 23 22.3 Other (e.g. elective) 48 46.6 4 - 5 hours 12 11.7 6 - 7 hours 4 3.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 112 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 112 0.0 0.0 33.0 67.0 3.7 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 106 0.0 0.9 36.8 62.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 112 0.0 3.6 38.4 58.0 3.5 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 112 0.0 1.8 38.4 59.8 3.6 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 100 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 111 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 75 0.0 21.3 30.7 48.0 3.3 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 112 0.0 0.0 24.1 75.9 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 112 0.0 0.0 13.4 86.6 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 107 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 112 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 112 0.0 0.9 20.5 78.6 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 112 0.0 1.8 25.9 72.3 3.7 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 110 0.0 1.8 33.6 64.5 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 108 0.0 0.9 38.0 61.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 101 0.0 2.0 39.6 58.4 3.6 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 111 0.0 0.0 31.5 68.5 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 111 0.0 3.6 40.5 55.9 3.5 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 110 0.0 0.0 19.1 80.9 3.8 0.39 21. Overall quality of teaching 109 0.0 0.9 6.4 92.7 3.9 0.31 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 002L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 161 Number of forms scanned = 112 Number of forms with at least one student response = 112 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 003L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 66.7 Sophomore 10 55.6 B 4 22.2 Junior 5 27.8 C 2 11.1 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 13 72.2 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 22.2 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 003L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 001L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 28.6 Sophomore 1 2.9 B 13 37.1 Junior 12 34.3 C 8 22.9 Senior 22 62.9 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 34.3 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 9 25.7 Required by my major 6 17.1 3 hours 9 25.7 Other (e.g. elective) 28 80.0 4 - 5 hours 3 8.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 2.5 52.5 45.0 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 0.0 7.5 55.0 37.5 3.3 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 12.5 45.0 42.5 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 2.5 15.0 50.0 32.5 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 10.3 56.4 33.3 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 2.5 5.0 52.5 40.0 3.3 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 7.5 65.0 27.5 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 2.7 5.4 51.4 40.5 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 2.5 2.5 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 2.5 35.0 62.5 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 5.0 52.5 42.5 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 5.0 12.5 57.5 25.0 3.0 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 7.5 65.0 27.5 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 15.2 66.7 18.2 3.0 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 5.4 67.6 27.0 3.2 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 38 2.6 31.6 47.4 18.4 2.8 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 2.5 17.5 47.5 32.5 3.1 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 12.8 48.7 38.5 3.3 0.68 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 001L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 401L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 32.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 44.0 Junior 3 12.0 C 6 24.0 Senior 21 84.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 28.0 Required by my major 10 40.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 15 60.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 76.0 16.0 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 17.4 73.9 8.7 2.9 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 12.5 79.2 8.3 3.0 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 33.3 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 15.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 15.8 73.7 5.3 2.8 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 47.8 47.8 4.3 2.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 20.8 70.8 8.3 2.9 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 12.5 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 401L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. S