1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 299 401L1 SPEC INTRO TOP SOC: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 3 37.5 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 12.5 C 1 11.1 Senior 3 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 9 100.0 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 299 401L1 SPEC INTRO TOP SOC: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 45.8 Sophomore 2 7.7 B 11 45.8 Junior 7 26.9 C 1 4.2 Senior 17 65.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 53.8 Studies Program 2 8.3 2 hours 5 19.2 Required by my major 7 29.2 3 hours 3 11.5 Other (e.g. elective) 15 62.5 4 - 5 hours 3 11.5 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 3.3 3.3 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 18.2 54.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 13.6 36.4 27.3 22.7 2.6 1.01 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 8.0 8.0 60.0 24.0 3.0 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 11.5 11.5 57.7 19.2 2.8 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 20.0 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 8.0 28.0 44.0 20.0 2.8 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 45.8 50.0 3.4 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 24.0 40.0 32.0 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 4.2 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 19.2 57.7 19.2 2.9 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 14.8 74.1 11.1 3.0 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 30.4 65.2 4.3 2.7 0.54 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 8.0 12.0 72.0 8.0 2.8 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 7.1 7.1 46.4 39.3 3.2 0.86 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 299 001L1 SPEC INTRO TOP SOC: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 2 22.2 B 6 66.7 Junior 4 44.4 C 1 11.1 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 4 44.4 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 44.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 299 001L1 SPEC INTRO TOP SOC: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 002L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 25.0 Sophomore 1 2.3 B 27 61.4 Junior 3 6.8 C 5 11.4 Senior 40 90.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 11.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 29.5 Required by my major 12 27.9 3 hours 19 43.2 Other (e.g. elective) 31 72.1 4 - 5 hours 6 13.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 2.0 61.2 36.7 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 0.0 4.1 65.3 30.6 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 49 2.0 2.0 63.3 32.7 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 2.0 10.2 59.2 28.6 3.1 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 12.2 55.1 32.7 3.2 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 49 0.0 2.0 55.1 42.9 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 49 0.0 18.4 61.2 20.4 3.0 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 49 0.0 8.2 51.0 40.8 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 0.0 8.2 44.9 46.9 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 48 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 6.4 48.9 44.7 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 49 0.0 12.2 44.9 42.9 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 49 0.0 2.0 46.9 51.0 3.5 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 49 0.0 4.1 51.0 44.9 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 0.0 8.9 46.7 44.4 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 11.9 61.9 26.2 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 49 0.0 4.1 53.1 42.9 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 49 0.0 28.6 46.9 24.5 3.0 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 48 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 48 0.0 10.4 33.3 56.3 3.5 0.68 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 002L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 57 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 86.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 002L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 21.7 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 10 43.5 B 11 50.0 Junior 5 21.7 C 2 9.1 Senior 3 13.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 50.0 Studies Program 7 31.8 2 hours 10 45.5 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 1 4.5 Other (e.g. elective) 12 54.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 30.8 38.5 26.9 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 23.1 46.2 30.8 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 8.0 16.0 56.0 20.0 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 4.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 4.0 36.0 56.0 3.4 0.77 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 002L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 55.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 20 48.8 Sophomore 1 2.4 B 15 36.6 Junior 6 14.6 C 1 2.4 Senior 34 82.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 12.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 26 63.4 Studies Program 16 39.0 2 hours 9 22.0 Required by my major 6 14.6 3 hours 5 12.2 Other (e.g. elective) 19 46.3 4 - 5 hours 1 2.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 11.4 59.1 29.5 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 4.5 29.5 47.7 18.2 2.8 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 10.0 67.5 22.5 3.1 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 0.0 48.8 51.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 0.0 63.4 36.6 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 2.3 9.3 62.8 25.6 3.1 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 2.6 12.8 59.0 25.6 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 6.8 65.9 27.3 3.2 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 44 0.0 2.3 68.2 29.5 3.3 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 7.0 11.6 67.4 14.0 2.9 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 41 4.9 9.8 65.9 19.5 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 2.4 9.8 63.4 24.4 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 5.6 8.3 61.1 25.0 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 2.3 7.0 67.4 23.3 3.1 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 9.3 23.3 51.2 16.3 2.7 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 4.5 9.1 63.6 22.7 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 0.0 11.4 63.6 25.0 3.1 0.59 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 75.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 85.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 750 401L1 SP TOP IN SOC CHG & DEV: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 750 401L1 SP TOP IN SOC CHG & DEV: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 019L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cole, William D SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 69.4 A 8 22.9 Sophomore 9 25.0 B 21 60.0 Junior 1 2.8 C 6 17.1 Senior 1 2.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 52.8 Studies Program 16 45.7 2 hours 9 25.0 Required by my major 9 25.7 3 hours 6 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 70.3 27.0 3.2 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 5.4 13.5 56.8 24.3 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 8.6 51.4 37.1 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 38 0.0 10.5 55.3 34.2 3.2 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 2.6 2.6 55.3 39.5 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 16.2 48.6 35.1 3.2 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 10.8 59.5 29.7 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 5.7 34.3 37.1 22.9 2.8 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 38 0.0 2.6 44.7 52.6 3.5 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 13.3 56.7 30.0 3.2 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 38 0.0 2.6 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 38 0.0 2.6 52.6 44.7 3.4 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 38 0.0 2.6 63.2 34.2 3.3 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 5.3 65.8 28.9 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 10.8 62.2 27.0 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 2.7 64.9 32.4 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 29.7 45.9 24.3 2.9 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 38 0.0 0.0 65.8 34.2 3.3 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 5.4 37.8 56.8 3.5 0.61 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 019L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cole, William D % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 38 Percent completed = 76.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 435 001L1 POWER & POLITICS SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Collins, Timothy SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 1 8.3 C 1 10.0 Senior 11 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 20.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 8.3 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 1 9.1 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 81.8 4 - 5 hours 1 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 435 001L1 POWER & POLITICS SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Collins, Timothy % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 22 53.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 36.6 Junior 12 29.3 C 2 4.9 Senior 29 70.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 14.6 Studies Program 2 4.9 2 hours 11 26.8 Required by my major 16 39.0 3 hours 16 39.0 Other (e.g. elective) 23 56.1 4 - 5 hours 8 19.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 4.5 6.8 38.6 50.0 3.3 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 44 4.5 2.3 52.3 40.9 3.3 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 2.3 9.1 40.9 47.7 3.3 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 9.1 47.7 43.2 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 44 0.0 11.4 50.0 38.6 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 2.3 11.4 52.3 34.1 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 2.3 45.5 52.3 3.5 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 38 2.6 0.0 50.0 47.4 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 0.0 53.5 46.5 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 6.8 6.8 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 7.9 65.8 26.3 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 0.0 4.9 73.2 22.0 3.2 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 21.6 56.8 21.6 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 2.3 4.7 55.8 37.2 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 4.9 24.4 46.3 24.4 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 2.3 6.8 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 2.3 4.7 39.5 53.5 3.4 0.70 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 735 401L1 TOP SEM WK,GDR,&INEQ: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 735 401L1 TOP SEM WK,GDR,&INEQ: INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 006L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 46.4 A 13 48.1 Sophomore 10 35.7 B 14 51.9 Junior 3 10.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 40.7 Studies Program 25 89.3 2 hours 9 33.3 Required by my major 3 10.7 3 hours 5 18.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 7.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 6.3 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 37.5 46.9 15.6 2.8 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 15.6 65.6 18.8 3.0 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 59.4 40.6 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 65.6 34.4 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 22.6 51.6 25.8 3.0 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 32 0.0 9.4 62.5 28.1 3.2 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 0.0 63.3 36.7 3.4 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 32.0 52.0 16.0 2.8 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 58.1 25.8 16.1 2.6 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 12.5 65.6 21.9 3.1 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 12.5 62.5 21.9 3.0 0.69 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 006L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 65.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 015L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 62.5 A 17 54.8 Sophomore 9 28.1 B 12 38.7 Junior 2 6.3 C 2 6.5 Senior 1 3.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 43.8 Studies Program 22 68.8 2 hours 9 28.1 Required by my major 7 21.9 3 hours 6 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 9.4 4 - 5 hours 3 9.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 5.6 63.9 30.6 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 2.8 2.8 52.8 41.7 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 5.9 29.4 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 2.8 19.4 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 2.8 58.3 38.9 3.4 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 11.4 60.0 28.6 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 28.6 48.6 20.0 2.9 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 13.9 63.9 22.2 3.1 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 13.9 69.4 16.7 3.0 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 25.0 63.9 11.1 2.9 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 50.0 46.7 3.3 2.5 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 5.7 48.6 42.9 2.9 2.4 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 22.9 57.1 20.0 3.0 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 25.7 37.1 37.1 3.1 0.80 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 015L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Emmerich, Robert J % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 0.0 40.9 50.0 9.1 2.7 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 26 0.0 15.4 57.7 26.9 3.1 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 25 0.0 8.0 68.0 24.0 3.2 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 016L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 90.0 A 4 13.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 63.3 Junior 3 10.0 C 5 16.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 2 6.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 40.0 Studies Program 20 69.0 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 4 13.8 3 hours 6 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 17.2 4 - 5 hours 2 6.7 6 - 7 hours 2 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 5.9 55.9 38.2 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 16.0 40.0 28.0 16.0 2.4 0.96 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 18.8 53.1 28.1 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 5.9 17.6 47.1 29.4 3.0 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 8.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 2.9 2.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 9.4 34.4 34.4 21.9 2.7 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 2.9 11.8 52.9 32.4 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 2.9 44.1 52.9 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 18.5 55.6 25.9 3.1 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 2.9 29.4 41.2 26.5 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 20.6 58.8 20.6 3.0 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 36.4 42.4 21.2 2.8 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 14.7 61.8 23.5 3.1 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 5.9 50.0 29.4 14.7 2.5 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 32.4 35.3 32.4 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 2.9 23.5 32.4 41.2 3.1 0.88 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 016L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 018L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 62.9 A 11 31.4 Sophomore 7 20.0 B 18 51.4 Junior 5 14.3 C 5 14.3 Senior 1 2.9 D 1 2.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 40.0 Studies Program 26 76.5 2 hours 16 45.7 Required by my major 7 20.6 3 hours 2 5.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.9 4 - 5 hours 3 8.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 16.1 29.0 45.2 9.7 2.5 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 0.0 8.1 64.9 27.0 3.2 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 13.5 54.1 32.4 3.2 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 56.8 40.5 3.4 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 67.6 32.4 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 37 0.0 21.6 51.4 27.0 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 54.1 45.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 9.1 57.6 33.3 3.2 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 8.1 45.9 43.2 3.3 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 36 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 8.3 52.8 38.9 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 11.4 60.0 25.7 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 8.3 52.8 38.9 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 2.8 25.0 55.6 16.7 2.9 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 2.8 47.2 50.0 3.5 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 5.6 30.6 63.9 3.6 0.60 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 018L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 0.0 78.6 14.3 3.0 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 75.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 1 11.1 C 3 33.3 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 5 62.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM mainframe by typing "VIEW CAMPUS LCINFO". 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 603 001L1 SEM IN TEACHING SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 25.0 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 6 75.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1996 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 603 001L1 SEM IN TEACHING SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations