1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 002L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 14.3 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 4 57.1 B 5 71.4 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 28.6 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 5 71.4 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 28.6 28.6 28.6 14.3 2.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 33.3 16.7 50.0 0.0 2.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 28.6 14.3 57.1 0.0 2.3 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 002L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 30.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 003L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.9 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 9 52.9 B 7 43.8 Junior 6 35.3 C 2 12.5 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 15 93.8 2 hours 10 58.8 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 10.0 5.0 65.0 20.0 3.0 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 5.3 78.9 10.5 2.9 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 0.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 15.0 10.0 70.0 5.0 2.7 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 15.0 5.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 5.0 0.0 90.0 5.0 3.0 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 16.7 22.2 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.92 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 50.0 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 2.4 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 17 5.9 0.0 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 5.0 0.0 75.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 15.0 35.0 40.0 10.0 2.5 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 55.6 27.8 16.7 2.6 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 10.5 42.1 42.1 3.2 0.85 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 27.8 44.4 22.2 2.8 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 13.3 26.7 46.7 13.3 2.6 0.91 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 38.9 38.9 5.6 2.3 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 15.0 30.0 40.0 15.0 2.6 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 20.0 40.0 30.0 10.0 2.3 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 003L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 31.8 A 10 43.5 Sophomore 9 40.9 B 10 43.5 Junior 5 22.7 C 2 8.7 Senior 1 4.5 D 1 4.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 34.8 Studies Program 23 100.0 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 4.5 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 8.7 65.2 21.7 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 20.8 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 12.5 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 12.5 25.0 45.8 16.7 2.7 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 24 4.2 37.5 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 36.4 45.5 13.6 2.7 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 50.0 33.3 11.1 2.5 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 8.7 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 4.2 41.7 41.7 12.5 2.6 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 33.3 41.7 20.8 2.8 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 13.0 26.1 39.1 21.7 2.7 0.97 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.7 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 7 53.8 B 4 30.8 Junior 4 30.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 53.8 Studies Program 12 100.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 2.8 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 16.7 16.7 58.3 8.3 2.6 0.90 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 53.8 30.8 7.7 2.4 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 15.4 46.2 23.1 15.4 2.4 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 15.4 38.5 30.8 15.4 2.5 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 33.3 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 30.8 46.2 23.1 2.9 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 16.7 33.3 25.0 25.0 2.6 1.08 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 2.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 12.5 0.0 75.0 12.5 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 33.3 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 6 40.0 B 10 66.7 Junior 4 26.7 C 1 6.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 64.3 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 3.1 0.25 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 7.1 28.6 50.0 14.3 2.7 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 36.4 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 3.1 0.25 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 13.3 33.3 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 26.7 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 50.0 41.7 8.3 2.6 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 37.5 31.3 6.3 2.2 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 37.5 50.0 6.3 2.6 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 50.0 43.8 6.3 2.6 0.63 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 008L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 31.6 A 11 55.0 Sophomore 7 36.8 B 8 40.0 Junior 5 26.3 C 1 5.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 20 95.2 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 4.5 9.1 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 22.7 59.1 18.2 3.0 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 33.3 47.6 14.3 2.7 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 38.1 47.6 14.3 2.8 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 81.8 13.6 3.1 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 21.1 68.4 10.5 2.9 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 31.3 56.3 6.3 2.6 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 31.8 40.9 18.2 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 27.3 50.0 18.2 2.8 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 27.3 50.0 22.7 3.0 0.72 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 160 008L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott-Jamieson, Susan % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 001L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 20.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 3 60.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 60.0 Studies Program 5 100.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 001L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 20.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 002L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.1 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 10 55.6 B 6 33.3 Junior 3 16.7 C 1 5.6 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 50.0 Studies Program 16 88.9 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.1 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 9.5 61.9 23.8 3.0 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 4.8 71.4 19.0 3.0 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 23.8 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 25.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 27.8 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 15.0 25.0 45.0 15.0 2.6 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 14.3 61.9 23.8 3.1 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 002L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 003L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 27.3 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 4 18.2 B 7 31.8 Junior 9 40.9 C 2 9.1 Senior 2 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 54.5 Studies Program 18 81.8 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 13.6 36.4 50.0 3.4 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 14.3 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 4.5 36.4 59.1 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 0.0 65.0 30.0 3.2 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 23.8 9.5 52.4 14.3 2.6 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 42.1 42.1 15.8 2.7 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 14.3 33.3 33.3 19.0 2.6 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 27.3 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 003L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 3.1 1.00 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 0.0 19.0 42.9 38.1 3.2 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 005L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 27.8 A 14 82.4 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 3 17.6 Junior 6 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 14 82.4 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 75.0 20.8 3.1 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 20.8 62.5 8.3 2.7 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 8.3 12.5 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 0.0 54.2 41.7 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 8.3 16.7 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 12.5 62.5 20.8 3.0 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 0.0 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.71 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 0.0 75.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 39.1 34.8 17.4 2.6 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 4.2 79.2 12.5 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 37.5 37.5 8.3 2.4 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 8.3 20.8 58.3 12.5 2.8 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 12.5 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.61 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 005L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 10.0 25.0 50.0 15.0 2.7 0.86 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 5.0 15.0 55.0 25.0 3.0 0.79 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 007L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 28.6 A 12 60.0 Sophomore 4 19.0 B 7 35.0 Junior 8 38.1 C 1 5.0 Senior 3 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 55.0 Studies Program 20 100.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 15.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 73.9 21.7 3.2 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 22.7 40.9 36.4 3.1 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 17.4 43.5 39.1 3.2 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 4.3 60.9 26.1 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 17.4 47.8 34.8 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 33.3 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 34.8 39.1 21.7 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 21.7 39.1 39.1 3.2 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 007L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 008L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 16.7 A 9 50.0 Sophomore 9 50.0 B 5 27.8 Junior 4 22.2 C 4 22.2 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 52.9 Studies Program 16 94.1 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 17.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 41.2 41.2 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 5.3 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 11.1 16.7 27.8 44.4 3.1 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 11.8 41.2 35.3 3.0 1.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 15.8 42.1 31.6 2.9 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 31.6 31.6 36.8 3.1 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 10.5 36.8 47.4 3.3 0.87 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 008L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 30.0 20.0 50.0 3.2 0.92 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 90.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 470G001L1 REG AMERICAN ETHNOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 1 16.7 B 3 60.0 Junior 2 33.3 C 1 20.0 Senior 2 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 16.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 16.7 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 50.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 33.3 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 470G001L1 REG AMERICAN ETHNOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 40.0 Sophomore 6 30.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 9 45.0 C 4 20.0 Senior 5 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 30.0 Required by my major 16 84.2 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 9.1 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 73.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 350 002L1 TOPICS IN ANT: BIOCULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 88.9 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 44.4 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 350 002L1 TOPICS IN ANT: BIOCULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Debra % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 651 001L1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 5 83.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 0.0 83.3 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 651 001L1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 004L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 15.4 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 3 23.1 B 7 53.8 Junior 3 23.1 C 4 30.8 Senior 4 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 50.0 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 15.4 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 53.8 38.5 0.0 2.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 9.1 27.3 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 18.2 45.5 36.4 0.0 2.2 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 92.3 0.0 2.9 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 23.1 38.5 38.5 0.0 2.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 7.7 84.6 0.0 2.8 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 004L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 54.5 36.4 0.0 2.3 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 005L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 17.4 A 14 60.9 Sophomore 12 52.2 B 7 30.4 Junior 5 21.7 C 2 8.7 Senior 2 8.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 22 95.7 2 hours 7 30.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 4 17.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 0.0 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 8.3 4.2 66.7 20.8 3.0 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 12.5 45.8 41.7 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 8.3 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 20.8 75.0 3.7 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 8.3 4.2 54.2 33.3 3.1 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 22 13.6 22.7 59.1 4.5 2.5 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 13.6 36.4 40.9 9.1 2.5 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 4.2 0.0 62.5 33.3 3.3 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 16.7 45.8 20.8 2.7 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 12.5 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 12.5 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 005L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 41.7 0.0 50.0 8.3 2.3 1.14 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 15.8 0.0 52.6 31.6 3.0 1.00 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 4.5 4.5 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.80 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 22.2 0.0 55.6 22.2 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations