1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 40.0 A 49 87.5 Sophomore 11 20.0 B 5 8.9 Junior 8 14.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 25.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 40 74.1 Studies Program 1 1.8 2 hours 9 16.7 Required by my major 3 5.5 3 hours 4 7.4 Other (e.g. elective) 51 92.7 4 - 5 hours 1 1.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 54 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 0.0 10.2 51.0 38.8 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 55 0.0 0.0 29.1 70.9 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 55 0.0 0.0 23.6 76.4 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 0.0 0.0 25.5 74.5 3.7 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 0.0 0.0 21.2 78.8 3.8 0.41 8. Graded assignments included comments 50 0.0 2.0 28.0 70.0 3.7 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 56 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 56 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 54 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 56 0.0 0.0 17.9 82.1 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 56 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.41 14. Encouraged class participation 56 0.0 0.0 19.6 80.4 3.8 0.40 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 53 0.0 1.9 49.1 49.1 3.5 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 54 0.0 1.9 44.4 53.7 3.5 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 54 0.0 5.6 40.7 53.7 3.5 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 30.9 69.1 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 54 0.0 9.3 33.3 57.4 3.5 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 54 0.0 0.0 20.4 79.6 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies DEPARTMENT = ROTC % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 62 Number of forms scanned = 57 Number of forms with at least one student response = 56 Percent completed = 90.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 174 55.8 Sophomore 12 3.8 B 119 38.1 Junior 84 26.8 C 18 5.8 Senior 197 62.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 6.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.3 Pass or Audit 1 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 103 32.9 Studies Program 1 0.3 2 hours 89 28.4 Required by my major 177 57.3 3 hours 80 25.6 Other (e.g. elective) 131 42.4 4 - 5 hours 34 10.9 6 - 7 hours 6 1.9 8 or more hours 1 0.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 321 0.0 4.4 51.1 44.5 3.4 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 260 5.8 20.0 45.0 29.2 3.0 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 314 1.6 7.0 49.4 42.0 3.3 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 272 0.4 3.3 49.3 47.1 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 318 0.6 6.0 48.4 45.0 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 318 1.6 5.0 50.3 43.1 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 318 0.3 2.5 49.4 47.8 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 313 1.6 8.9 47.6 41.9 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 323 2.8 9.3 39.9 48.0 3.3 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 323 1.2 3.1 30.0 65.6 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 309 0.6 0.6 42.7 56.0 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 322 0.9 6.5 37.6 55.0 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 322 2.5 13.4 39.1 45.0 3.3 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 322 0.0 3.1 41.3 55.6 3.5 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 299 1.0 5.7 56.9 36.5 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 317 0.6 6.0 50.2 43.2 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 307 0.7 8.8 48.5 42.0 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 319 1.3 4.1 47.0 47.6 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 314 2.5 18.2 40.1 39.2 3.2 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 317 2.8 12.3 37.9 47.0 3.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 315 3.8 9.5 27.6 59.0 3.4 0.82 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 41 0.0 4.9 24.4 70.7 3.7 0.57 33. Amount of work appropriate 41 0.0 4.9 41.5 53.7 3.5 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 41 0.0 7.3 39.0 53.7 3.5 0.64 35. Instructor helped with my problems 40 0.0 0.0 42.5 57.5 3.6 0.50 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 40 0.0 7.5 35.0 57.5 3.5 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 381 Number of forms scanned = 324 Number of forms with at least one student response = 323 Percent completed = 84.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 88.5 Sophomore 1 3.8 B 2 7.7 Junior 6 23.1 C 1 3.8 Senior 8 30.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 42.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 23.1 Required by my major 22 84.6 3 hours 2 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 15.4 4 - 5 hours 2 7.7 6 - 7 hours 8 30.8 8 or more hours 6 23.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 4.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 16.0 44.0 40.0 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 0.0 20.8 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 11.5 42.3 42.3 3.2 0.82 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 29. Students free to express opinions 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 30 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agronomy SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 33 14.3 A 137 61.2 Sophomore 20 8.7 B 67 29.9 Junior 38 16.5 C 16 7.1 Senior 66 28.6 D 3 1.3 Graduate 74 32.0 E/Fail 1 0.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 97 42.9 Studies Program 3 1.3 2 hours 37 16.4 Required by my major 175 77.8 3 hours 37 16.4 Other (e.g. elective) 47 20.9 4 - 5 hours 19 8.4 6 - 7 hours 18 8.0 8 or more hours 18 8.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 258 0.0 1.2 46.5 52.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 111 4.5 15.3 48.6 31.5 3.1 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 221 0.9 5.4 51.6 42.1 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 166 0.6 10.2 45.8 43.4 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 244 1.6 5.7 45.1 47.5 3.4 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 222 2.3 5.0 48.2 44.6 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 239 3.8 5.9 42.3 48.1 3.3 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 223 1.8 8.1 50.7 39.5 3.3 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 253 1.6 7.1 41.1 50.2 3.4 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 258 0.4 0.0 27.1 72.5 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 250 0.4 1.2 39.6 58.8 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 250 0.8 2.0 39.6 57.6 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 257 1.2 11.7 35.8 51.4 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 255 1.2 6.3 40.8 51.8 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 212 0.5 3.3 52.4 43.9 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 247 1.2 2.8 50.6 45.3 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 232 2.2 5.6 53.4 38.8 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 258 1.9 3.1 39.5 55.4 3.5 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 253 3.2 14.2 43.1 39.5 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 254 2.0 7.1 35.4 55.5 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 252 1.2 8.7 30.2 59.9 3.5 0.71 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agronomy % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 20 10.0 15.0 55.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 28. Guided student report preparation 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 22 4.5 18.2 45.5 31.8 3.0 0.84 31. Developed abil to conduct research 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 51 3.9 9.8 45.1 41.2 3.2 0.79 33. Amount of work appropriate 50 20.0 14.0 32.0 34.0 2.8 1.12 34. Instructor explained expectations 51 2.0 3.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.61 35. Instructor helped with my problems 48 4.2 4.2 60.4 31.3 3.2 0.70 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 37 2.7 2.7 62.2 32.4 3.2 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 321 Number of forms scanned = 258 Number of forms with at least one student response = 258 Percent completed = 80.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Animal Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 91 21.0 A 205 47.9 Sophomore 22 5.1 B 168 39.3 Junior 96 22.1 C 48 11.2 Senior 162 37.3 D 3 0.7 Graduate 53 12.2 E/Fail 2 0.5 Professional 1 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 9 2.1 Pass or Audit 2 0.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 88 20.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 123 28.4 Required by my major 300 69.6 3 hours 96 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 131 30.4 4 - 5 hours 69 15.9 6 - 7 hours 36 8.3 8 or more hours 21 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 451 0.2 1.3 42.6 55.9 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 302 2.6 11.6 46.0 39.7 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 425 1.2 4.9 51.5 42.4 3.4 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 424 1.2 5.4 46.5 46.9 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 450 3.3 8.7 44.7 43.3 3.3 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 435 0.5 3.9 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 442 1.8 5.2 45.7 47.3 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 435 0.9 11.7 50.8 36.6 3.2 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 451 1.8 7.5 43.9 46.8 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 452 0.0 0.9 30.1 69.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 427 0.0 2.3 41.2 56.4 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 450 1.1 2.7 39.8 56.4 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 443 1.8 9.9 38.8 49.4 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 442 0.9 5.2 40.5 53.4 3.5 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 405 1.0 8.1 54.3 36.5 3.3 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 442 0.9 6.1 48.4 44.6 3.4 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 420 0.7 8.3 50.2 40.7 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 436 0.7 2.8 42.7 53.9 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 429 2.6 15.2 39.4 42.9 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 449 1.1 9.1 34.7 55.0 3.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 448 2.5 7.6 28.8 61.2 3.5 0.74 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Animal Sciences % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 5.0 0.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.72 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 163 1.2 0.6 55.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 33. Amount of work appropriate 165 4.2 15.2 46.7 33.9 3.1 0.81 34. Instructor explained expectations 163 0.0 5.5 53.4 41.1 3.4 0.58 35. Instructor helped with my problems 161 0.6 8.7 51.6 39.1 3.3 0.65 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 161 0.0 3.7 55.3 41.0 3.4 0.56 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 534 Number of forms scanned = 461 Number of forms with at least one student response = 452 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Biosystems and Ag Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 9.7 A 100 66.2 Sophomore 9 5.8 B 44 29.1 Junior 18 11.6 C 6 4.0 Senior 92 59.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 12.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.6 Pass or Audit 1 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 30 19.2 Studies Program 2 1.3 2 hours 31 19.9 Required by my major 123 78.8 3 hours 20 12.8 Other (e.g. elective) 31 19.9 4 - 5 hours 41 26.3 6 - 7 hours 15 9.6 8 or more hours 19 12.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 158 1.3 3.2 53.8 41.8 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 130 7.7 15.4 43.1 33.8 3.0 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 151 1.3 5.3 58.9 34.4 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 125 3.2 7.2 51.2 38.4 3.2 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 160 1.3 8.1 45.6 45.0 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 155 1.3 10.3 55.5 32.9 3.2 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 147 3.4 16.3 46.3 34.0 3.1 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 151 1.3 9.9 60.9 27.8 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 160 1.3 13.1 55.0 30.6 3.2 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 160 0.6 0.6 42.5 56.3 3.5 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 157 0.6 5.1 49.0 45.2 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 159 1.3 3.1 50.3 45.3 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 159 4.4 11.3 46.5 37.7 3.2 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 158 0.0 3.8 52.5 43.7 3.4 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 126 1.6 11.9 61.9 24.6 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 151 1.3 3.3 53.6 41.7 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 152 0.7 3.3 57.2 38.8 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 155 1.3 3.9 52.3 42.6 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 149 4.7 24.8 47.7 22.8 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 162 1.2 15.4 48.1 35.2 3.2 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 162 2.5 11.1 38.3 48.1 3.3 0.77 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Biosystems and Ag Engineering % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 22 4.5 27.3 36.4 31.8 3.0 0.90 34. Instructor explained expectations 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 185 Number of forms scanned = 164 Number of forms with at least one student response = 162 Percent completed = 87.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Entomology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 4.0 A 70 41.2 Sophomore 16 9.2 B 75 44.1 Junior 57 32.9 C 21 12.4 Senior 60 34.7 D 4 2.4 Graduate 29 16.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 2.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 19.3 Studies Program 22 12.8 2 hours 61 35.7 Required by my major 105 61.0 3 hours 42 24.6 Other (e.g. elective) 45 26.2 4 - 5 hours 24 14.0 6 - 7 hours 7 4.1 8 or more hours 4 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 184 0.0 0.5 48.9 50.5 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 149 7.4 22.8 44.3 25.5 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 170 2.4 10.6 52.9 34.1 3.2 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 174 1.1 12.1 40.8 46.0 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 175 0.6 5.1 45.1 49.1 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 175 0.0 5.7 42.9 51.4 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 173 0.0 1.2 43.4 55.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 168 0.6 18.5 41.7 39.3 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 182 0.5 7.1 45.1 47.3 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 185 0.0 0.5 31.9 67.6 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 160 1.3 3.8 38.1 56.9 3.5 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 185 1.6 2.7 44.9 50.8 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 184 3.3 10.9 45.1 40.8 3.2 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 184 2.7 7.6 49.5 40.2 3.3 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 142 1.4 12.7 57.7 28.2 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 168 0.6 7.1 61.9 30.4 3.2 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 158 1.3 14.6 58.9 25.3 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 179 0.0 2.8 53.1 44.1 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 177 3.4 22.6 50.8 23.2 2.9 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 184 1.1 11.4 47.8 39.7 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 183 0.0 8.7 42.6 48.6 3.4 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Entomology % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 33 0.0 6.1 78.8 15.2 3.1 0.46 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 8.3 25.0 58.3 8.3 2.7 0.78 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 65 1.5 4.6 47.7 46.2 3.4 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 65 0.0 9.2 52.3 38.5 3.3 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 65 0.0 1.5 50.8 47.7 3.5 0.53 35. Instructor helped with my problems 65 0.0 4.6 43.1 52.3 3.5 0.59 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 62 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 248 Number of forms scanned = 185 Number of forms with at least one student response = 185 Percent completed = 74.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Forestry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 7.4 A 107 41.8 Sophomore 28 10.9 B 105 41.0 Junior 69 26.7 C 37 14.5 Senior 117 45.3 D 7 2.7 Graduate 23 8.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.4 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 66 25.7 Studies Program 19 7.4 2 hours 71 27.6 Required by my major 209 81.3 3 hours 55 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 29 11.3 4 - 5 hours 48 18.7 6 - 7 hours 14 5.4 8 or more hours 3 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 273 0.0 3.3 58.2 38.5 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 219 9.1 27.4 46.6 16.9 2.7 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 224 2.2 9.4 61.6 26.8 3.1 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 244 4.5 10.2 47.5 37.7 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 269 2.6 6.3 55.4 35.7 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 229 1.3 5.2 64.6 28.8 3.2 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 258 0.8 4.3 65.5 29.5 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 232 4.7 18.5 53.0 23.7 3.0 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 272 3.7 10.7 43.8 41.9 3.2 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 273 0.4 1.5 24.9 73.3 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 257 0.0 1.2 53.3 45.5 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 273 0.7 3.7 49.8 45.8 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 271 3.3 10.7 48.3 37.6 3.2 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 269 0.0 11.2 55.8 33.1 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 238 2.1 6.7 71.0 20.2 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 268 1.1 8.6 62.7 27.6 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 245 0.8 13.5 63.7 22.0 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 270 0.0 4.8 57.4 37.8 3.3 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 267 1.9 18.7 54.3 25.1 3.0 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 272 1.5 10.3 44.9 43.4 3.3 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 271 4.4 11.1 30.6 53.9 3.3 0.84 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Forestry % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.83 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 125 1.6 8.8 60.8 28.8 3.2 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 127 0.8 8.7 70.1 20.5 3.1 0.56 34. Instructor explained expectations 127 0.0 1.6 72.4 26.0 3.2 0.47 35. Instructor helped with my problems 123 0.0 7.3 70.7 22.0 3.1 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 98 0.0 1.0 74.5 24.5 3.2 0.45 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 378 Number of forms scanned = 298 Number of forms with at least one student response = 273 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ZAgriculture GENERAL and CEX SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 41 13.2 A 210 68.2 Sophomore 64 20.6 B 81 26.3 Junior 105 33.8 C 16 5.2 Senior 92 29.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 2.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 112 36.2 Studies Program 65 21.2 2 hours 109 35.3 Required by my major 195 63.7 3 hours 61 19.7 Other (e.g. elective) 46 15.0 4 - 5 hours 23 7.4 6 - 7 hours 2 0.6 8 or more hours 2 0.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 324 0.3 2.5 46.3 50.9 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 191 2.1 10.5 53.4 34.0 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 320 0.3 1.9 51.3 46.6 3.4 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 268 0.0 3.4 42.9 53.7 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 321 0.6 4.4 40.2 54.8 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 322 0.9 2.5 44.1 52.5 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 306 1.0 4.9 43.1 51.0 3.4 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 302 1.3 6.0 52.0 40.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 321 1.2 4.7 43.9 50.2 3.4 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 321 0.0 1.9 30.2 67.9 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 300 0.3 1.0 42.7 56.0 3.5 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 321 0.0 1.6 37.4 61.1 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 321 1.9 9.0 43.0 46.1 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 321 0.0 1.2 35.5 63.2 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 312 0.3 2.2 54.8 42.6 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 318 0.6 5.7 50.3 43.4 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 306 1.0 7.2 56.9 35.0 3.3 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 318 0.6 0.6 49.1 49.7 3.5 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 315 3.2 18.1 45.1 33.7 3.1 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 322 2.2 6.8 46.9 44.1 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 321 0.9 5.9 29.0 64.2 3.6 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ZAgriculture GENERAL and CEX % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 74 0.0 10.8 59.5 29.7 3.2 0.61 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 82 0.0 6.1 65.9 28.0 3.2 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 68 0.0 2.9 60.3 36.8 3.3 0.54 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 43 0.0 9.3 62.8 27.9 3.2 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 58 5.2 8.6 62.1 24.1 3.1 0.74 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 424 Number of forms scanned = 327 Number of forms with at least one student response = 324 Percent completed = 76.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Hort. & Landscape Architecture SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 3.6 A 63 32.0 Sophomore 27 13.8 B 80 40.6 Junior 46 23.5 C 34 17.3 Senior 107 54.6 D 1 0.5 Graduate 5 2.6 E/Fail 1 0.5 Professional 4 2.0 I 1 0.5 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 17 8.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 13.9 Studies Program 6 3.0 2 hours 33 16.3 Required by my major 162 81.4 3 hours 22 10.9 Other (e.g. elective) 31 15.6 4 - 5 hours 29 14.4 6 - 7 hours 18 8.9 8 or more hours 72 35.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 207 0.0 4.8 57.0 38.2 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 174 7.5 15.5 52.9 24.1 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 198 0.0 7.1 61.1 31.8 3.2 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 113 4.4 6.2 59.3 30.1 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 201 6.0 8.5 54.2 31.3 3.1 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 194 2.1 4.6 60.8 32.5 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 187 1.6 9.1 58.3 31.0 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 182 2.2 11.0 56.0 30.8 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 187 2.1 10.2 52.9 34.8 3.2 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 187 0.0 0.5 26.7 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 178 0.6 3.4 55.1 41.0 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 188 1.6 4.8 52.1 41.5 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 186 2.2 9.7 55.4 32.8 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 187 1.1 6.4 49.2 43.3 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 186 1.6 9.7 59.7 29.0 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 199 1.0 3.5 59.8 35.7 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 191 1.6 5.8 60.2 32.5 3.2 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 205 0.5 3.9 51.7 43.9 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 201 1.0 11.4 53.7 33.8 3.2 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 202 2.5 10.9 40.1 46.5 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 190 3.2 8.9 35.3 52.6 3.4 0.78 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Hort. & Landscape Architecture % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 59 8.5 13.6 57.6 20.3 2.9 0.82 33. Amount of work appropriate 64 10.9 23.4 56.3 9.4 2.6 0.80 34. Instructor explained expectations 59 3.4 8.5 62.7 25.4 3.1 0.69 35. Instructor helped with my problems 58 3.4 19.0 56.9 20.7 2.9 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 55 10.9 5.5 61.8 21.8 2.9 0.85 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 282 Number of forms scanned = 211 Number of forms with at least one student response = 210 Percent completed = 74.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant and Soil Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 39 14.7 A 89 33.8 Sophomore 48 18.0 B 138 52.5 Junior 85 32.0 C 31 11.8 Senior 93 35.0 D 1 0.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.4 Pass or Audit 4 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 71 26.8 Studies Program 58 22.0 2 hours 91 34.3 Required by my major 160 60.6 3 hours 66 24.9 Other (e.g. elective) 46 17.4 4 - 5 hours 29 10.9 6 - 7 hours 6 2.3 8 or more hours 2 0.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 284 0.0 0.0 40.1 59.9 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 281 9.6 14.9 41.6 33.8 3.0 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 273 0.4 4.4 55.7 39.6 3.3 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 284 0.0 4.6 41.2 54.2 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 284 0.7 3.5 44.0 51.8 3.5 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 281 0.0 1.4 43.1 55.5 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 283 0.4 2.8 42.4 54.4 3.5 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 280 0.0 5.7 44.6 49.6 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 284 0.4 2.8 37.3 59.5 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 284 0.0 0.0 24.3 75.7 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 264 0.0 0.4 40.2 59.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 284 0.0 0.4 37.3 62.3 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 283 0.7 6.7 37.8 54.8 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 282 0.0 3.9 37.2 58.9 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 255 0.4 4.7 54.5 40.4 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 278 0.4 5.8 51.8 42.1 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 260 0.4 10.0 53.5 36.2 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 283 0.0 1.1 44.5 54.4 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 278 1.4 15.5 45.7 37.4 3.2 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 280 0.7 6.4 40.4 52.5 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 279 0.0 4.3 25.4 70.3 3.7 0.56 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant and Soil Science % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 61 1.6 4.9 72.1 21.3 3.1 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 60 1.7 6.7 53.3 38.3 3.3 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 57 1.8 3.5 56.1 38.6 3.3 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 32 3.1 0.0 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.63 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 38 0.0 2.6 47.4 50.0 3.5 0.56 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 102 0.0 8.8 46.1 45.1 3.4 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 103 0.0 2.9 52.4 44.7 3.4 0.55 34. Instructor explained expectations 103 0.0 2.9 49.5 47.6 3.4 0.56 35. Instructor helped with my problems 101 1.0 0.0 53.5 45.5 3.4 0.56 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 94 0.0 4.3 48.9 46.8 3.4 0.58 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 32 0.0 6.3 53.1 40.6 0.0 3.3 0.60 38. Question 38 32 3.1 3.1 46.9 46.9 0.0 3.4 0.71 39. Question 39 32 0.0 9.4 56.3 34.4 0.0 3.3 0.62 40. Question 40 32 9.4 21.9 62.5 6.3 0.0 2.7 0.75 41. Question 41 29 0.0 6.9 62.1 31.0 0.0 3.2 0.58 42. Question 42 33 3.0 0.0 48.5 48.5 0.0 3.4 0.66 43. Question 43 33 3.0 30.3 39.4 27.3 0.0 2.9 0.84 44. Question 44 33 24.2 30.3 30.3 15.2 0.0 2.4 1.03 45. Question 45 33 51.5 36.4 12.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.70 46. Question 46 33 3.0 9.1 51.5 36.4 0.0 3.2 0.74 47. Question 47 32 6.3 43.8 46.9 3.1 0.0 2.5 0.67 48. Question 48 33 15.2 63.6 21.2 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.61 49. Question 49 33 0.0 0.0 48.5 51.5 0.0 3.5 0.51 Number of forms preslugged = at least 372 Number of forms scanned = 286 Number of forms with at least one student response = 284 Percent completed = 76.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant Pathology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 14 58.3 Junior 1 3.8 C 2 8.3 Senior 16 61.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 34.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 23.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 26.9 Required by my major 24 92.3 3 hours 11 42.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 7.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.8 8 or more hours 1 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 10.7 67.9 21.4 3.1 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 14.3 53.6 28.6 3.1 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 0.0 57.1 39.3 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 3.6 35.7 60.7 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 14.3 53.6 32.1 3.2 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 3.6 32.1 64.3 3.6 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 10.7 25.0 64.3 3.5 0.69 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant Pathology % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 34. Instructor explained expectations 17 5.9 0.0 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.79 35. Instructor helped with my problems 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 23 0.0 4.3 8.7 39.1 47.8 4.3 0.82 38. Question 38 23 13.0 4.3 21.7 30.4 30.4 3.6 1.34 39. Question 39 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 52.2 21.7 4.0 0.71 40. Question 40 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 34.8 47.8 4.3 0.76 41. Question 41 23 0.0 4.3 21.7 17.4 56.5 4.3 0.96 42. Question 42 23 4.3 8.7 8.7 30.4 47.8 4.1 1.16 43. Question 43 23 4.3 0.0 8.7 52.2 34.8 4.1 0.92 44. Question 44 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 47.6 23.8 3.9 0.83 45. Question 45 23 0.0 4.3 4.3 47.8 43.5 4.3 0.76 46. Question 46 18 16.7 5.6 33.3 33.3 11.1 3.2 1.25 47. Question 47 18 61.1 27.8 5.6 5.6 0.0 1.6 0.86 Number of forms preslugged = at least 39 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 71.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Veterinary Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 42.4 Sophomore 1 3.0 B 15 45.5 Junior 15 45.5 C 4 12.1 Senior 17 51.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 36.4 Required by my major 5 15.2 3 hours 9 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 28 84.8 4 - 5 hours 7 21.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 11.8 55.9 32.4 3.2 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 8.8 44.1 47.1 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 8.8 50.0 41.2 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 3.3 46.7 50.0 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 2.9 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 18.2 51.5 30.3 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 0.0 44.1 55.9 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 6.9 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 8.8 35.3 55.9 3.5 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 8.8 23.5 67.6 3.6 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 2.9 26.5 70.6 3.7 0.53 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Veterinary Science % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 43 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 79.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 147 25.3 A 206 36.5 Sophomore 253 43.6 B 197 34.9 Junior 85 14.7 C 41 7.3 Senior 68 11.7 D 2 0.4 Graduate 20 3.4 E/Fail 2 0.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 7 1.2 Pass or Audit 117 20.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 146 25.5 Studies Program 201 35.6 2 hours 147 25.7 Required by my major 51 9.0 3 hours 120 21.0 Other (e.g. elective) 312 55.3 4 - 5 hours 102 17.8 6 - 7 hours 32 5.6 8 or more hours 25 4.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 633 0.3 3.2 55.0 41.5 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 480 5.0 7.5 51.0 36.5 3.2 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 620 1.8 8.7 50.5 39.0 3.3 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 459 1.7 5.7 56.4 36.2 3.3 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 554 3.6 10.8 50.9 34.7 3.2 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 579 1.2 11.7 52.3 34.7 3.2 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 505 2.8 6.9 53.3 37.0 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 495 3.2 9.7 47.7 39.4 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 632 1.6 9.3 43.8 45.3 3.3 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 636 0.0 2.0 32.7 65.3 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 599 0.3 3.3 46.1 50.3 3.5 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 632 0.8 6.5 41.3 51.4 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 630 3.7 14.9 37.6 43.8 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 633 1.7 6.8 34.4 57.0 3.5 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 577 1.0 3.8 53.6 41.6 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 604 0.7 6.8 52.0 40.6 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 572 1.2 9.8 55.1 33.9 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 615 0.7 5.7 51.2 42.4 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 619 6.5 21.6 38.4 33.4 3.0 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 640 4.4 13.6 35.5 46.6 3.2 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 639 2.5 13.1 31.0 53.4 3.4 0.80 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 109 2.8 15.6 64.2 17.4 3.0 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 164 2.4 9.1 65.2 23.2 3.1 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 167 3.0 13.2 55.1 28.7 3.1 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 123 1.6 7.3 43.9 47.2 3.4 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 80 3.8 13.8 45.0 37.5 3.2 0.80 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 59 5.1 6.8 52.5 35.6 3.2 0.78 28. Guided student report preparation 70 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 81 1.2 2.5 19.8 76.5 3.7 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 80 0.0 2.5 23.8 73.8 3.7 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 72 1.4 11.1 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 99 4.0 4.0 36.4 55.6 3.4 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 95 0.0 1.1 63.2 35.8 3.3 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 101 1.0 2.0 52.5 44.6 3.4 0.59 35. Instructor helped with my problems 99 1.0 4.0 37.4 57.6 3.5 0.63 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 39. Question 39 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 859 Number of forms scanned = 789 Number of forms with at least one student response = 646 Percent completed = 75.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 187 14.1 A 593 45.1 Sophomore 418 31.5 B 585 44.5 Junior 411 31.0 C 127 9.7 Senior 256 19.3 D 7 0.5 Graduate 49 3.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 0.3 Pass or Audit 4 0.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 506 38.3 Studies Program 971 74.0 2 hours 404 30.6 Required by my major 211 16.1 3 hours 227 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 130 9.9 4 - 5 hours 123 9.3 6 - 7 hours 40 3.0 8 or more hours 20 1.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,418 0.4 2.3 58.7 38.6 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,365 2.3 10.8 59.2 27.6 3.1 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,406 1.5 8.9 62.9 26.7 3.1 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,356 1.2 6.7 57.0 35.1 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,408 2.1 5.5 56.8 35.7 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,408 0.5 4.9 61.1 33.5 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,402 1.8 9.4 59.7 29.1 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,335 2.2 17.5 55.7 24.6 3.0 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,422 2.2 11.5 52.3 34.0 3.2 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,426 0.4 2.4 46.1 51.1 3.5 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 1,248 0.5 2.4 57.1 40.1 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,403 0.6 4.6 56.0 38.8 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,395 7.0 19.4 44.9 28.7 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 1,380 2.4 14.1 49.2 34.3 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,349 0.9 7.6 58.5 33.1 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,322 1.9 16.2 58.9 23.0 3.0 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,148 3.5 31.2 48.4 16.9 2.8 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,394 0.6 4.9 63.1 31.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,378 10.2 32.0 38.2 19.7 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,413 3.5 18.5 52.7 25.3 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,409 2.6 13.8 45.0 38.5 3.2 0.77 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 526 6.7 24.9 54.6 13.9 2.8 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 771 4.4 18.7 62.9 14.0 2.9 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 786 3.4 11.5 65.3 19.8 3.0 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 765 0.7 4.2 56.9 38.3 3.3 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 372 3.5 14.2 58.1 24.2 3.0 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 134 0.7 8.2 54.5 36.6 3.3 0.64 28. Guided student report preparation 143 1.4 5.6 58.0 35.0 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 167 1.2 4.8 44.3 49.7 3.4 0.64 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 167 2.4 4.2 50.3 43.1 3.3 0.67 31. Developed abil to conduct research 146 3.4 12.3 52.1 32.2 3.1 0.75 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 480 3.3 6.0 47.9 42.7 3.3 0.73 33. Amount of work appropriate 477 1.3 3.8 56.0 39.0 3.3 0.61 34. Instructor explained expectations 477 2.5 6.5 48.8 42.1 3.3 0.70 35. Instructor helped with my problems 441 3.2 9.3 48.1 39.5 3.2 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 151 3.3 7.3 53.6 35.8 3.2 0.72 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 2014 Number of forms scanned = 1446 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1431 Percent completed = 71.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 311 9.6 A 1,284 40.4 Sophomore 807 24.9 B 1,347 42.4 Junior 738 22.8 C 468 14.7 Senior 1,104 34.1 D 60 1.9 Graduate 202 6.2 E/Fail 9 0.3 Professional 10 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 66 2.0 Pass or Audit 12 0.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 689 21.4 Studies Program 539 16.8 2 hours 834 25.9 Required by my major 1,956 61.0 3 hours 827 25.7 Other (e.g. elective) 711 22.2 4 - 5 hours 576 17.9 6 - 7 hours 178 5.5 8 or more hours 110 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,384 1.1 3.5 53.4 42.1 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3,190 5.3 12.2 51.3 31.2 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,958 2.5 9.4 58.9 29.2 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3,221 4.1 12.4 51.6 31.9 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,330 2.0 8.1 52.7 37.3 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,912 2.9 6.4 56.4 34.3 3.2 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,235 2.1 8.1 54.8 34.9 3.2 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,547 6.9 27.8 42.2 23.1 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,401 5.3 12.8 44.5 37.4 3.1 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,437 0.9 2.4 41.0 55.8 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 2,997 1.2 3.9 54.5 40.5 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,419 2.3 5.4 48.3 44.0 3.3 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3,379 6.0 17.8 43.0 33.2 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 3,326 3.2 12.0 46.2 38.6 3.2 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,573 2.6 13.7 57.4 26.2 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 3,179 2.2 11.1 57.9 28.8 3.1 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,970 2.8 16.3 55.4 25.6 3.0 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,332 1.8 5.9 57.5 34.7 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3,226 7.3 26.2 42.9 23.6 2.8 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 3,409 4.3 14.6 50.2 30.9 3.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 3,404 6.1 14.1 36.8 43.0 3.2 0.89 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 726 1.0 7.2 61.6 30.3 3.2 0.61 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 712 2.1 12.1 61.4 24.4 3.1 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 641 3.0 11.9 60.2 25.0 3.1 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 258 1.9 16.3 57.8 24.0 3.0 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 261 1.5 9.6 61.3 27.6 3.1 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 146 4.8 9.6 43.8 41.8 3.2 0.81 28. Guided student report preparation 142 0.7 9.9 44.4 45.1 3.3 0.68 29. Students free to express opinions 155 1.3 1.3 40.0 57.4 3.5 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 153 2.6 5.9 40.5 51.0 3.4 0.72 31. Developed abil to conduct research 135 1.5 9.6 43.7 45.2 3.3 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 799 3.9 14.4 52.3 29.4 3.1 0.77 33. Amount of work appropriate 825 12.4 13.7 47.4 26.5 2.9 0.94 34. Instructor explained expectations 821 5.0 9.4 50.9 34.7 3.2 0.79 35. Instructor helped with my problems 800 5.3 11.0 49.1 34.6 3.1 0.81 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 706 4.2 7.1 55.5 33.1 3.2 0.74 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 5500 Number of forms scanned = 3795 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3491 Percent completed = 63.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 477 25.3 A 567 30.5 Sophomore 636 33.7 B 805 43.3 Junior 343 18.2 C 388 20.9 Senior 317 16.8 D 83 4.5 Graduate 87 4.6 E/Fail 14 0.8 Professional 2 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 24 1.3 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 131 7.0 Studies Program 126 6.8 2 hours 355 19.0 Required by my major 1,574 84.4 3 hours 509 27.2 Other (e.g. elective) 164 8.8 4 - 5 hours 486 26.0 6 - 7 hours 201 10.7 8 or more hours 188 10.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,028 0.9 4.1 55.5 39.5 3.3 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,029 3.0 9.9 57.6 29.6 3.1 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,974 2.4 7.6 55.8 34.1 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,019 3.6 12.0 56.0 28.4 3.1 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,052 2.7 8.8 56.0 32.6 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,923 1.5 4.3 61.1 33.1 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,922 1.4 5.3 50.6 42.7 3.3 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,462 10.6 26.9 42.5 20.0 2.7 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,040 3.5 12.0 47.6 36.9 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,061 0.8 2.4 40.6 56.2 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 1,921 1.1 4.5 50.7 43.6 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,055 3.8 8.2 47.3 40.7 3.2 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,004 6.9 25.0 41.7 26.4 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 1,962 3.3 14.7 50.5 31.5 3.1 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,349 3.9 19.1 59.8 17.2 2.9 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,994 2.4 7.1 60.5 30.0 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,994 2.1 8.1 58.5 31.3 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,022 2.4 5.9 61.7 30.0 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,952 11.3 38.7 36.9 13.1 2.5 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,050 4.5 17.0 53.3 25.2 3.0 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,048 5.2 12.9 38.2 43.8 3.2 0.86 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 337 2.1 7.1 62.9 27.9 3.2 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 309 2.6 22.3 54.0 21.0 2.9 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 171 1.8 14.0 64.3 19.9 3.0 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 51 13.7 25.5 43.1 17.6 2.6 0.93 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 62 4.8 22.6 43.5 29.0 3.0 0.85 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 25 0.0 0.0 64.0 36.0 3.4 0.49 28. Guided student report preparation 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 29. Students free to express opinions 29 0.0 6.9 69.0 24.1 3.2 0.54 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 31 0.0 12.9 64.5 22.6 3.1 0.60 31. Developed abil to conduct research 29 0.0 34.5 41.4 24.1 2.9 0.77 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 490 4.5 14.5 55.3 25.7 3.0 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 504 7.7 13.3 58.5 20.4 2.9 0.80 34. Instructor explained expectations 492 4.1 12.6 56.5 26.8 3.1 0.74 35. Instructor helped with my problems 474 4.4 12.2 54.4 28.9 3.1 0.76 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 486 6.0 12.3 56.4 25.3 3.0 0.79 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 3648 Number of forms scanned = 3550 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2075 Percent completed = 56.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Classics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 12.4 A 63 42.9 Sophomore 26 17.0 B 58 39.5 Junior 35 22.9 C 18 12.2 Senior 56 36.6 D 3 2.0 Graduate 13 8.5 E/Fail 2 1.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 4 2.6 Pass or Audit 3 2.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 7.9 Studies Program 30 19.9 2 hours 20 13.2 Required by my major 63 41.7 3 hours 39 25.7 Other (e.g. elective) 58 38.4 4 - 5 hours 47 30.9 6 - 7 hours 14 9.2 8 or more hours 20 13.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 164 0.0 0.6 42.1 57.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 162 2.5 5.6 37.7 54.3 3.4 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 160 0.0 3.1 45.0 51.9 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 161 0.0 3.1 37.3 59.6 3.6 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 162 0.6 3.1 37.7 58.6 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 160 0.6 4.4 41.3 53.8 3.5 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 160 0.6 8.1 35.6 55.6 3.5 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 155 0.6 4.5 47.7 47.1 3.4 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 164 0.6 3.7 36.6 59.1 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 164 0.0 1.2 18.9 79.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 151 0.0 3.3 39.1 57.6 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 164 0.6 1.2 36.0 62.2 3.6 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 162 2.5 8.6 30.2 58.6 3.5 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 164 0.6 2.4 23.8 73.2 3.7 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 127 1.6 5.5 55.9 37.0 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 142 1.4 6.3 50.7 41.5 3.3 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 108 1.9 16.7 46.3 35.2 3.1 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 156 0.0 1.9 45.5 52.6 3.5 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 160 3.8 14.4 33.1 48.8 3.3 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 164 1.2 5.5 31.1 62.2 3.5 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 163 1.2 3.7 22.1 73.0 3.7 0.61 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Classics % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 33.3 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.97 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 3.3 6.7 43.3 46.7 3.3 0.76 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 32 0.0 6.3 53.1 40.6 3.3 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 226 Number of forms scanned = 164 Number of forms with at least one student response = 164 Percent completed = 72.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = French SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 59 16.1 A 160 44.2 Sophomore 92 25.1 B 138 38.1 Junior 89 24.3 C 48 13.3 Senior 99 27.0 D 2 0.6 Graduate 19 5.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 9 2.5 Pass or Audit 14 3.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 65 17.8 Studies Program 99 27.1 2 hours 113 30.9 Required by my major 192 52.6 3 hours 93 25.4 Other (e.g. elective) 74 20.3 4 - 5 hours 68 18.6 6 - 7 hours 20 5.5