1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 623 001S1 READINGS IN EUROPEAN CULTURAL HIS SINCE 1815 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Albisetti, James C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 623 001S1 READINGS IN EUROPEAN CULTURAL HIS SINCE 1815 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Albisetti, James C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 240 401L1 HISTORY OF KENTUCKY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Appleton Jr, Thomas H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 54.8 Sophomore 3 9.4 B 11 35.5 Junior 15 46.9 C 2 6.5 Senior 13 40.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 36.4 Studies Program 2 6.1 2 hours 12 36.4 Required by my major 21 63.6 3 hours 5 15.2 Other (e.g. elective) 10 30.3 4 - 5 hours 4 12.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 10.0 16.7 50.0 23.3 2.9 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 0.0 34.3 62.9 3.6 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 8.6 37.1 54.3 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 8.6 48.6 42.9 3.3 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 5.7 45.7 45.7 3.3 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 0.0 25.7 71.4 3.7 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 5.7 94.3 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 34.3 65.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 2.9 2.9 17.1 77.1 3.7 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 5.7 40.0 54.3 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 6.7 36.7 56.7 3.5 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 6.5 41.9 51.6 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 11.5 38.5 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 3.0 24.2 72.7 3.7 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 0.0 6.1 12.1 81.8 3.8 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 0.0 3.0 6.1 90.9 3.9 0.42 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 240 401L1 HISTORY OF KENTUCKY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Appleton Jr, Thomas H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 76.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 461 001L1 AMER REVOLUT, 1763-1789 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 21.2 Sophomore 1 3.0 B 13 39.4 Junior 7 21.2 C 12 36.4 Senior 23 69.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 18.2 Studies Program 2 6.1 2 hours 11 33.3 Required by my major 22 66.7 3 hours 7 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 9 27.3 4 - 5 hours 5 15.2 6 - 7 hours 4 12.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 8.6 62.9 28.6 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 8.6 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 8.6 60.0 31.4 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 11.4 60.0 28.6 3.2 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 11.4 68.6 17.1 3.0 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 8.6 62.9 28.6 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 11.4 71.4 17.1 3.1 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 2.9 11.4 60.0 25.7 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 34.3 31.4 31.4 2.9 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 29 3.4 6.9 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 14.3 51.4 34.3 3.2 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 5.7 20.0 48.6 25.7 2.9 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 34 2.9 11.8 67.6 17.6 3.0 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 16.1 61.3 22.6 3.1 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 30.4 56.5 13.0 2.8 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 0.0 6.1 60.6 33.3 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 2.9 28.6 42.9 25.7 2.9 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 5.7 22.9 34.3 37.1 3.0 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 5.7 25.7 45.7 22.9 2.9 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 461 001L1 AMER REVOLUT, 1763-1789 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 74.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 631 001S1 READINGS IN AMER HISTORY AM REVOLUTION/NEW REPUB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 71.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 25.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 3 42.9 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 631 001S1 READINGS IN AMER HISTORY AM REVOLUTION/NEW REPUB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 109 401L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blackwell, Debbie L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.2 A 16 51.6 Sophomore 9 29.0 B 14 45.2 Junior 10 32.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 35.5 D 1 3.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 35.5 Studies Program 25 80.6 2 hours 9 29.0 Required by my major 4 12.9 3 hours 9 29.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.5 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 3.2 6.5 45.2 45.2 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 16.1 41.9 41.9 3.3 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 3.2 41.9 54.8 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 3.2 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 43.3 46.7 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 6.5 51.6 41.9 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 16.1 29.0 54.8 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 3.2 38.7 58.1 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 3.4 48.3 44.8 3.3 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 7.1 53.6 35.7 3.2 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 17.4 56.5 21.7 3.0 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 3.3 13.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 12.9 45.2 41.9 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 3.2 32.3 64.5 3.6 0.56 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 109 401L1 HIST OF U.S. SINCE 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Blackwell, Debbie L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 27.3 54.5 9.1 2.6 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 5.9 5.9 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 78.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Block, Mary R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 63.6 A 4 12.1 Sophomore 4 12.1 B 15 45.5 Junior 3 9.1 C 13 39.4 Senior 4 12.1 D 1 3.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 33.3 Studies Program 26 83.9 2 hours 9 27.3 Required by my major 3 9.7 3 hours 8 24.2 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.5 4 - 5 hours 3 9.1 6 - 7 hours 2 6.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 2.9 62.9 34.3 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 6.1 36.4 45.5 12.1 2.6 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 8.8 73.5 17.6 3.1 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 28.6 51.4 20.0 2.9 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 0.0 6.1 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 82.9 17.1 3.2 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 5.9 11.8 55.9 26.5 3.0 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 8.6 20.0 54.3 17.1 2.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 2.9 2.9 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 3.2 71.0 22.6 3.1 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 5.7 8.6 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 6.1 39.4 39.4 15.2 2.6 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 34 5.9 8.8 58.8 26.5 3.1 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 11.8 67.6 20.6 3.1 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 35 2.9 17.1 57.1 22.9 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 3.8 26.9 50.0 19.2 2.8 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 3.0 9.1 72.7 15.2 3.0 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 8.6 45.7 37.1 8.6 2.5 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 8.6 25.7 51.4 14.3 2.7 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 8.6 37.1 34.3 20.0 2.7 0.91 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Block, Mary R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 47.1 41.2 11.8 2.6 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 562 001L1 MODERN MEXICO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 46.2 Sophomore 2 15.4 B 4 30.8 Junior 2 15.4 C 2 15.4 Senior 6 46.2 D 1 7.7 Graduate 3 23.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 15.4 2 hours 1 7.7 Required by my major 6 46.2 3 hours 7 53.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 38.5 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 38.5 46.2 3.3 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 23.1 15.4 30.8 30.8 2.7 1.18 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 15.4 23.1 53.8 3.2 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 562 001L1 MODERN MEXICO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 41.2 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 6 35.3 B 9 56.3 Junior 3 17.6 C 2 12.5 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 4 23.5 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 15.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 15.0 75.0 10.0 3.0 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 75.0 20.0 3.2 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 75.0 10.0 3.0 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 37.5 56.3 6.3 2.7 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 85.0 15.0 3.2 0.37 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 45.0 35.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 15.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 15.0 35.0 45.0 3.2 0.89 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 002L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 23.1 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 8 61.5 B 9 69.2 Junior 1 7.7 C 1 7.7 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 53.8 Studies Program 9 75.0 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 2 16.7 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 8.3 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 0.32 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 0.0 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 0.32 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 22.2 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 11.1 77.8 5.6 2.8 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 27.8 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 44.4 44.4 5.6 2.5 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 35.3 58.8 5.9 2.7 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 37.5 56.3 6.3 2.7 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 11.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 38.9 55.6 5.6 2.7 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 002L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 26.7 A 5 33.3 Sophomore 6 40.0 B 8 53.3 Junior 5 33.3 C 2 13.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 66.7 Studies Program 13 86.7 2 hours 2 13.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 16.7 50.0 22.2 2.8 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 44.4 38.9 11.1 2.6 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 25.0 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 23.5 70.6 5.9 2.8 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 53.8 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 66.7 22.2 5.6 2.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 50.0 Sophomore 3 75.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 1 25.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 75.0 2 hours 3 75.0 Required by my major 1 25.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 30.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 41.2 A 7 41.2 Sophomore 5 29.4 B 8 47.1 Junior 4 23.5 C 2 11.8 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 23.5 Studies Program 16 94.1 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 0.0 63.2 31.6 3.2 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 78.9 15.8 3.1 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 31.3 37.5 31.3 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 12.5 31.3 37.5 18.8 2.6 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 33.3 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 16.7 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.76 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 44.4 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 10 55.6 Junior 5 27.8 C 1 5.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 16 88.9 2 hours 11 61.1 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 5 27.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 5.6 61.1 22.2 2.9 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 22.2 38.9 33.3 3.0 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 56.3 31.3 6.3 2.4 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 47.1 47.1 5.9 2.6 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 27.8 44.4 22.2 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 44.4 38.9 3.2 0.73 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 011L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 35.3 A 8 47.1 Sophomore 6 35.3 B 8 47.1 Junior 4 23.5 C 1 5.9 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 11 64.7 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 5 29.4 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 43.8 37.5 18.8 2.8 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 011L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 012L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 52.6 A 4 21.1 Sophomore 6 31.6 B 15 78.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 16 88.9 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 2 11.1 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 10.0 20.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 15.0 65.0 15.0 2.9 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 5.0 0.0 75.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 15.0 5.0 75.0 5.0 2.7 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 5.0 5.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 5.0 5.0 75.0 15.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 10.0 25.0 50.0 15.0 2.7 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 23.1 76.9 0.0 2.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 3.0 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 15.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 20 10.0 35.0 50.0 5.0 2.5 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 26.3 68.4 5.3 2.8 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 15.8 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 47.4 42.1 5.3 2.5 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 15.8 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 21.1 42.1 31.6 3.0 0.88 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 012L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 013L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 18.8 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 9 56.3 B 10 62.5 Junior 3 18.8 C 1 6.3 Senior 1 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 37.5 Studies Program 12 80.0 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 2 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 23.5 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 41.2 35.3 23.5 2.8 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 013L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 350 001S1 TOPS US HIS BEFOR 1789: AMERICANS & THEIR ENVIRO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 350 001S1 TOPS US HIS BEFOR 1789: AMERICANS & THEIR ENVIRO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available from VIEW on the IBM 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 584 001L1 HEALTH & DISEASE IN U.S. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 1 6.3 B 8 50.0 Junior 3 18.8 C 1 6.3 Senior 8 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 25.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 25.0 Studies Program 2 14.3 2 hours 3 18.8 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 1 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 57.1 4 - 5 hours 6 37.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 12.5 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 46.7 3.3 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 12.5 25.0 56.3 3.3 0.95 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1997 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 584 001L1 HEALTH & DISEASE IN U.S. INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 59.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE