1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 529 001L1 SURVEY OF MEDICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 61.5 Junior 2 14.3 C 1 7.7 Senior 9 64.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 21.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 12 85.7 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 7 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 3.1 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 14.3 28.6 50.0 3.2 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 529 001L1 SURVEY OF MEDICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 4 80.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.0 A 7 28.0 Sophomore 8 32.0 B 14 56.0 Junior 11 44.0 C 4 16.0 Senior 5 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 12.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 19 79.2 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 20.8 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 7.7 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 52.0 44.0 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 28.0 36.0 32.0 3.0 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 12.0 20.0 64.0 3.4 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 16.0 32.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 120 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR: GLOBAL HEALTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 3 37.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR: GLOBAL HEALTH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 001L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 57.1 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 2 28.6 Junior 2 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 4 57.1 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 001L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 28.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 002L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 50.0 A 13 54.2 Sophomore 7 29.2 B 10 41.7 Junior 3 12.5 C 1 4.2 Senior 1 4.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 54.2 Studies Program 14 58.3 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 4 16.7 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 25.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 7.7 50.0 42.3 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 11.5 50.0 34.6 3.2 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 0.0 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 0.0 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 12.5 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 33.3 44.4 16.7 2.7 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 15.4 53.8 26.9 3.0 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 3.8 7.7 42.3 46.2 3.3 0.79 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 4.0 8.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 12.0 36.0 44.0 3.2 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 24 4.2 16.7 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 17.4 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 30.0 45.0 20.0 2.8 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 32.0 44.0 20.0 2.8 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 7.7 11.5 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 15.4 42.3 34.6 3.0 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 002L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 5.9 5.9 47.1 41.2 3.2 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 003L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 50.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 3 37.5 B 4 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 12.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 37.5 Studies Program 4 50.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 37.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 003L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 41.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 004L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 57.1 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 4 57.1 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 71.4 Studies Program 2 28.6 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 121 004L1 INTRO TO CULTURAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 36.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 001L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 52.4 A 15 71.4 Sophomore 5 23.8 B 6 28.6 Junior 2 9.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 66.7 Studies Program 17 81.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 2 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 21.7 39.1 34.8 3.0 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 9.1 54.5 31.8 3.1 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 0.0 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 4.3 43.5 47.8 3.3 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 4.5 18.2 50.0 27.3 3.0 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 47.4 31.6 15.8 2.6 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 8.7 26.1 39.1 26.1 2.8 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 21.1 42.1 36.8 3.2 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 13.6 13.6 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 23 13.0 21.7 56.5 8.7 2.6 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 4.5 59.1 31.8 3.2 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 25.0 55.0 15.0 2.8 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 13.6 18.2 45.5 22.7 2.8 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 22.7 45.5 31.8 3.1 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 9.1 18.2 40.9 31.8 3.0 0.95 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 001L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 0.0 78.6 14.3 3.0 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 5.6 0.0 61.1 33.3 3.2 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 5.6 0.0 61.1 33.3 3.2 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 002L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 29.2 A 13 54.2 Sophomore 14 58.3 B 8 33.3 Junior 2 8.3 C 3 12.5 Senior 1 4.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 83.3 Studies Program 24 100.0 2 hours 2 8.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 4.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 16.0 68.0 16.0 3.0 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 16.7 37.5 33.3 12.5 2.4 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 12.0 24.0 56.0 8.0 2.6 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 4.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 4.2 66.7 25.0 3.1 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 9.1 45.5 45.5 0.0 2.4 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 12.0 28.0 52.0 8.0 2.6 0.82 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 19 10.5 10.5 68.4 10.5 2.8 0.79 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 13.0 21.7 52.2 13.0 2.7 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 20.0 36.0 36.0 8.0 2.3 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 25 12.0 64.0 20.0 4.0 2.2 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 8.0 12.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 8.7 47.8 34.8 8.7 2.4 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 13.0 56.5 26.1 4.3 2.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 8.0 12.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 56.0 24.0 4.0 2.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 12.5 41.7 41.7 4.2 2.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 25.0 20.8 45.8 8.3 2.4 0.97 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 002L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 63.6 0.0 27.3 2.5 1.04 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 42.9 35.7 21.4 2.8 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 28.6 0.0 42.9 28.6 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 003L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 28.6 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 9 42.9 B 9 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 90.5 Studies Program 20 95.2 2 hours 1 4.8 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 1 4.8 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 23.8 52.4 23.8 0.0 2.0 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 18.2 36.4 45.5 0.0 2.3 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 82.6 17.4 3.2 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 8.3 12.5 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 38.1 52.4 0.0 2.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 29.2 37.5 29.2 4.2 2.1 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 4.2 16.7 58.3 20.8 3.0 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 30.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 13.0 26.1 47.8 13.0 2.6 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 37.5 37.5 16.7 8.3 2.0 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 22 18.2 45.5 31.8 4.5 2.2 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 12.5 25.0 54.2 8.3 2.6 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 17.4 39.1 39.1 4.3 2.3 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 30.0 50.0 15.0 5.0 2.0 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 12.5 20.8 58.3 8.3 2.6 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 37.5 54.2 4.2 4.2 1.8 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 29.2 33.3 37.5 0.0 2.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 29.2 29.2 37.5 4.2 2.2 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 003L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 10.0 20.0 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 96.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 33.3 Sophomore 7 77.8 B 6 66.7 Junior 2 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 88.9 Studies Program 7 77.8 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 1 11.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 33.3 22.2 22.2 22.2 2.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 10.0 40.0 20.0 30.0 2.7 1.06 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 33.3 55.6 0.0 11.1 1.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 1.05 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 30.0 10.0 50.0 10.0 2.4 1.07 11. Was available for consultation 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 30.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 2.2 1.03 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 50.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 1.8 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 9 33.3 44.4 22.2 0.0 1.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 33.3 22.2 44.4 0.0 2.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 25.0 62.5 12.5 0.0 1.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 37.5 50.0 12.5 0.0 1.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 22.2 22.2 55.6 0.0 2.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 55.6 33.3 11.1 0.0 1.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 40.0 50.0 0.0 10.0 1.8 0.92 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 50.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 1.8 1.03 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 004L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 37.5 50.0 12.5 0.0 1.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 37.5 12.5 50.0 0.0 2.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 14.3 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 10 47.6 B 9 42.9 Junior 7 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 76.2 Studies Program 19 95.0 2 hours 4 19.0 Required by my major 1 5.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 8.7 47.8 39.1 3.2 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 9.5 28.6 38.1 23.8 2.8 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 8.7 17.4 47.8 26.1 2.9 0.90 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 8.7 13.0 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.95 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 16.7 27.8 33.3 22.2 2.6 1.04 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 13.0 21.7 39.1 26.1 2.8 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 4.3 8.7 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.81 11. Was available for consultation 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 4.3 21.7 39.1 34.8 3.0 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 26.1 21.7 30.4 21.7 2.5 1.12 14. Encouraged class participation 22 13.6 27.3 36.4 22.7 2.7 0.99 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 4.3 13.0 47.8 34.8 3.1 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 9.1 31.8 31.8 27.3 2.8 0.97 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 16.7 44.4 22.2 16.7 2.4 0.98 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 13.0 8.7 43.5 34.8 3.0 1.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 17.4 39.1 30.4 13.0 2.4 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 13.6 22.7 31.8 31.8 2.8 1.05 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 13.6 27.3 27.3 31.8 2.8 1.07 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 005L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 8 88.9 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 77.8 Studies Program 8 88.9 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 22.2 44.4 33.3 0.0 2.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 2.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 22.2 55.6 22.2 0.0 2.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 33.3 55.6 11.1 0.0 1.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 33.3 55.6 11.1 0.0 1.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 12.5 62.5 25.0 0.0 2.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 50.0 37.5 0.0 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 22.2 55.6 22.2 0.0 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 25.0 62.5 12.5 0.0 1.9 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 006L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 20.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 2.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 60.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 39.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 009L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 12.1 A 21 63.6 Sophomore 14 42.4 B 11 33.3 Junior 9 27.3 C 1 3.0 Senior 5 15.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 48.5 Studies Program 31 93.9 2 hours 8 24.2 Required by my major 1 3.0 3 hours 5 15.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.0 4 - 5 hours 3 9.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 2.7 56.8 40.5 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 19.4 66.7 13.9 2.9 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 5.6 63.9 30.6 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 2.7 51.4 45.9 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 5.4 56.8 37.8 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 2.8 75.0 22.2 3.2 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 8.1 59.5 32.4 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 2.7 32.4 64.9 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 63.6 33.3 3.3 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 8.1 45.9 45.9 3.4 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 2.8 72.2 25.0 3.2 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 25.0 53.1 21.9 3.0 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 27.0 51.4 21.6 2.9 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 8.1 43.2 48.6 3.4 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = ANT 160 009L1 TRIBAL PEOPLES-MOD WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Heath, Robin % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 29 0.0 3.4 72.4 24.1 3.2 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 30 0.0 3.3 83.3 13.3 3.1 0.40 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 62.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 001L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 13.3 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 6 40.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 4 26.7 C 3 20.0 Senior 2 13.3 D 1 6.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 6.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 6.7 73.3 13.3 2.9 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 7.1 28.6 42.9 21.4 2.8 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 0.36 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 40.0 20.0 33.3 2.8 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 20.0 40.0 33.3 3.0 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 001L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 65.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 002L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.3 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 9 47.4 B 12 63.2 Junior 3 15.8 C 1 5.3 Senior 6 31.6 D 1 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 15 78.9 2 hours 11 57.9 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 15.0 45.0 40.0 3.3 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 25.0 45.0 30.0 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 31.6 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 41.7 25.0 33.3 2.9 0.90 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 002L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 221 003L1 NATIVE PEOPLE OF NORTH AMERICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jefferies, Richard W SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 7 35.0 Sophomore 5 25.0 B 11 55.0 Junior 8 40.0 C 2 10.0 Senior 5 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 35.0 Studies Program 14 70.0 2 hours 10 50.0 Required by my major 2 10.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 10.0 15.0 55.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 15.0 65.0 20.0 3.1 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 5.0 10.0 55.0 30.0 3.1 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 5.0 5.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 5.0 25.0 45.0 25.0 2.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 29.4 58.8 0.0 2.5 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 11.8 76.5 5.9 2.8 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 25.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.72 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall