1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L2 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 5.3 A 4 10.5 Sophomore 12 31.6 B 15 39.5 Junior 11 28.9 C 17 44.7 Senior 13 34.2 D 2 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 39.5 Studies Program 11 29.7 2 hours 15 39.5 Required by my major 18 48.6 3 hours 4 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 21.6 4 - 5 hours 4 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 2.4 9.8 68.3 19.5 3.0 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 41 7.3 22.0 58.5 12.2 2.8 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 10.8 21.6 51.4 16.2 2.7 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 4.9 4.9 73.2 17.1 3.0 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 2.5 7.5 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 8.3 2.8 75.0 13.9 2.9 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 2.5 0.0 72.5 25.0 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 6.1 21.2 57.6 15.2 2.8 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 41 9.8 24.4 51.2 14.6 2.7 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 2.4 0.0 56.1 41.5 3.4 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 31 3.2 3.2 71.0 22.6 3.1 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 7.3 7.3 61.0 24.4 3.0 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 12.2 26.8 43.9 17.1 2.7 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 41 4.9 26.8 51.2 17.1 2.8 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 5.9 17.6 67.6 8.8 2.8 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 12.8 17.9 59.0 10.3 2.7 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 13.2 21.1 57.9 7.9 2.6 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 10.0 12.5 65.0 12.5 2.8 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 40 12.5 15.0 60.0 12.5 2.7 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 40 12.5 22.5 45.0 20.0 2.7 0.93 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L2 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 41 Percent completed = 77.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 005S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR: CELL CIRCLE REGULATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 12.5 Junior 1 12.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 87.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 62.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 7 87.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 12.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 005S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR: CELL CIRCLE REGULATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 361 001L1 ECOLOGY OF KY FLORA AND VEGETATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, Jerry M SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 52.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 47.6 Junior 1 4.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 19 90.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 42.9 Required by my major 3 14.3 3 hours 3 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 18 85.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 28.6 14.3 42.9 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 27.3 31.8 36.4 3.0 0.93 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 9.1 9.1 40.9 40.9 3.1 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 27.3 50.0 3.2 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 13.6 40.9 40.9 3.2 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 19.0 38.1 42.9 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 9.1 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 361 001L1 ECOLOGY OF KY FLORA AND VEGETATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, Jerry M % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 102 002L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 33 29.5 A 53 48.6 Sophomore 53 47.3 B 46 42.2 Junior 19 17.0 C 10 9.2 Senior 7 6.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 56 50.9 Studies Program 97 87.4 2 hours 24 21.8 Required by my major 14 12.6 3 hours 15 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 12 10.9 6 - 7 hours 2 1.8 8 or more hours 1 0.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 126 0.0 0.0 54.0 46.0 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 126 8.7 24.6 45.2 21.4 2.8 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 122 0.8 12.3 60.7 26.2 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 125 4.8 10.4 49.6 35.2 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 126 0.0 5.6 53.2 41.3 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 126 0.0 1.6 57.9 40.5 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 125 2.4 9.6 59.2 28.8 3.1 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 112 4.5 36.6 46.4 12.5 2.7 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 126 0.0 8.7 54.8 36.5 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 125 0.0 0.8 37.6 61.6 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 113 0.0 0.0 68.1 31.9 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 124 0.0 2.4 56.5 41.1 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 122 4.9 24.6 50.8 19.7 2.9 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 121 2.5 24.8 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 113 1.8 13.3 65.5 19.5 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 121 1.7 14.0 65.3 19.0 3.0 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 118 2.5 21.2 61.0 15.3 2.9 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 126 2.4 8.7 63.5 25.4 3.1 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 125 6.4 43.2 38.4 12.0 2.6 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 125 3.2 18.4 54.4 24.0 3.0 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 125 1.6 8.8 49.6 40.0 3.3 0.69 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 102 002L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 105 0.0 8.6 67.6 23.8 3.2 0.55 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 105 0.0 15.2 60.0 24.8 3.1 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 105 1.9 8.6 66.7 22.9 3.1 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 44 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.68 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 42 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 292 Number of forms scanned = 127 Number of forms with at least one student response = 127 Percent completed = 43.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 21.6 A 30 32.3 Sophomore 46 47.4 B 28 30.1 Junior 16 16.5 C 28 30.1 Senior 11 11.3 D 6 6.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 3.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 23 23.7 Studies Program 7 7.5 2 hours 24 24.7 Required by my major 70 75.3 3 hours 32 33.0 Other (e.g. elective) 16 17.2 4 - 5 hours 16 16.5 6 - 7 hours 1 1.0 8 or more hours 1 1.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 102 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 102 2.0 12.7 51.0 34.3 3.2 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 99 3.0 7.1 64.6 25.3 3.1 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 101 5.9 22.8 48.5 22.8 2.9 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 102 0.0 5.9 69.6 24.5 3.2 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 102 2.0 5.9 63.7 28.4 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 102 2.0 2.9 62.7 32.4 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 95 9.5 36.8 43.2 10.5 2.5 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 102 2.0 12.7 52.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 102 0.0 0.0 37.3 62.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 89 0.0 1.1 58.4 40.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 102 0.0 2.0 52.0 46.1 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 100 8.0 27.0 43.0 22.0 2.8 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 97 2.1 12.4 60.8 24.7 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 79 3.8 19.0 60.8 16.5 2.9 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 96 3.1 20.8 55.2 20.8 2.9 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 91 4.4 31.9 47.3 16.5 2.8 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 100 2.0 8.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 98 6.1 38.8 38.8 16.3 2.7 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 99 3.0 13.1 63.6 20.2 3.0 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 99 2.0 18.2 41.4 38.4 3.2 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 73 1.4 2.7 71.2 24.7 3.2 0.54 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 72 1.4 11.1 58.3 29.2 3.2 0.66 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 71 4.2 15.5 56.3 23.9 3.0 0.76 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 21 9.5 23.8 42.9 23.8 2.8 0.93 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 25 0.0 16.0 52.0 32.0 3.2 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 194 Number of forms scanned = 104 Number of forms with at least one student response = 104 Percent completed = 53.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 208 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF MICROBIO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 2.9 A 38 37.6 Sophomore 26 25.5 B 35 34.7 Junior 49 48.0 C 27 26.7 Senior 21 20.6 D 1 1.0 Graduate 1 1.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 2.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 21.0 Studies Program 2 2.0 2 hours 33 33.0 Required by my major 73 71.6 3 hours 29 29.0 Other (e.g. elective) 27 26.5 4 - 5 hours 14 14.0 6 - 7 hours 2 2.0 8 or more hours 1 1.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 109 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 109 0.9 8.3 67.9 22.9 3.1 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 109 0.9 6.4 63.3 29.4 3.2 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 108 9.3 24.1 50.9 15.7 2.7 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 108 0.9 13.0 57.4 28.7 3.1 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 109 0.0 2.8 61.5 35.8 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 109 0.0 0.9 56.9 42.2 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 99 5.1 47.5 32.3 15.2 2.6 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 109 0.0 9.2 59.6 31.2 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 109 0.0 1.8 40.4 57.8 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 100 0.0 1.0 61.0 38.0 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 108 0.0 4.6 50.9 44.4 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 107 2.8 27.1 46.7 23.4 2.9 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 104 0.0 19.2 55.8 25.0 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 74 1.4 14.9 63.5 20.3 3.0 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 104 0.0 14.4 65.4 20.2 3.1 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 99 1.0 23.2 60.6 15.2 2.9 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 108 0.0 7.4 63.0 29.6 3.2 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 105 3.8 30.5 49.5 16.2 2.8 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 107 0.0 21.5 57.0 21.5 3.0 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 106 1.9 12.3 48.1 37.7 3.2 0.73 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 208 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF MICROBIO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 176 Number of forms scanned = 111 Number of forms with at least one student response = 109 Percent completed = 61.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 001L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 23.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 19 44.2 Junior 24 53.3 C 10 23.3 Senior 19 42.2 D 4 9.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 4.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 18.2 Required by my major 36 81.8 3 hours 7 15.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 18.2 4 - 5 hours 16 36.4 6 - 7 hours 7 15.9 8 or more hours 2 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 4.1 2.0 67.3 26.5 3.2 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 0.0 2.0 38.8 59.2 3.6 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 13.3 60.0 23.3 3.0 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 10.2 24.5 53.1 12.2 2.7 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 6.3 12.5 58.3 22.9 3.0 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 9.1 3.0 63.6 24.2 3.0 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 2.1 64.6 33.3 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 8.9 31.1 44.4 15.6 2.7 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 16.3 20.4 40.8 22.4 2.7 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 4.1 36.7 59.2 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 44 2.3 6.8 47.7 43.2 3.3 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 4.1 10.2 49.0 36.7 3.2 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 16.7 22.9 33.3 27.1 2.7 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 49 6.1 28.6 51.0 14.3 2.7 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 16.1 74.2 9.7 2.9 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 45 2.2 20.0 62.2 15.6 2.9 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 45 2.2 22.2 60.0 15.6 2.9 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 47 0.0 2.1 68.1 29.8 3.3 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 6.5 28.3 54.3 10.9 2.7 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 2.0 28.6 51.0 18.4 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 49 14.3 22.4 32.7 30.6 2.8 1.04 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 001L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 91 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 53.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 103 002L1 BASIC IDEAS OF BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burke, William SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 80 46.5 A 35 20.6 Sophomore 67 39.0 B 79 46.5 Junior 15 8.7 C 48 28.2 Senior 10 5.8 D 8 4.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 61 35.5 Studies Program 145 86.3 2 hours 54 31.4 Required by my major 19 11.3 3 hours 35 20.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 2.4 4 - 5 hours 17 9.9 6 - 7 hours 5 2.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 192 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 187 5.9 17.1 55.6 21.4 2.9 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 178 5.6 12.9 56.7 24.7 3.0 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 191 1.0 5.8 51.8 41.4 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 191 0.0 4.2 56.5 39.3 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 177 1.7 7.9 52.0 38.4 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 190 0.5 2.6 58.9 37.9 3.3 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 127 6.3 44.9 33.1 15.7 2.6 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 191 1.0 5.2 49.7 44.0 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 192 0.0 0.5 34.4 65.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 175 0.0 1.1 49.1 49.7 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 192 0.5 4.2 50.0 45.3 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 189 4.8 21.2 38.6 35.4 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 191 1.0 4.7 46.1 48.2 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 166 1.2 10.2 62.7 25.9 3.1 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 177 1.7 16.4 54.2 27.7 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 168 1.8 16.1 62.5 19.6 3.0 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 190 2.1 4.2 62.1 31.6 3.2 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 187 7.5 38.0 40.1 14.4 2.6 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 191 2.1 14.1 49.7 34.0 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 190 2.1 7.4 41.1 49.5 3.4 0.72 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 103 002L1 BASIC IDEAS OF BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burke, William % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 169 0.6 3.6 60.9 34.9 3.3 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 163 1.8 11.7 57.1 29.4 3.1 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 156 1.3 9.6 60.9 28.2 3.2 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 30 3.3 3.3 70.0 23.3 3.1 0.63 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 24 0.0 4.2 75.0 20.8 3.2 0.48 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 297 Number of forms scanned = 192 Number of forms with at least one student response = 192 Percent completed = 64.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L1 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bush, L P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 5.3 A 4 10.5 Sophomore 13 34.2 B 15 39.5 Junior 12 31.6 C 17 44.7 Senior 11 28.9 D 2 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 39.5 Studies Program 10 26.3 2 hours 14 36.8 Required by my major 22 57.9 3 hours 6 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 15.8 4 - 5 hours 3 7.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 41 2.4 12.2 70.7 14.6 3.0 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 4.8 14.3 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 7.7 17.9 61.5 12.8 2.8 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 9.5 4.8 76.2 9.5 2.9 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 2.4 9.5 73.8 14.3 3.0 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 5.6 5.6 72.2 16.7 3.0 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 73.2 26.8 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 6.5 25.8 58.1 9.7 2.7 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 16.7 26.2 40.5 16.7 2.6 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 0.0 45.2 54.8 3.5 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 33 3.0 6.1 69.7 21.2 3.1 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 7.1 11.9 61.9 19.0 2.9 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 14.3 33.3 38.1 14.3 2.5 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 41 2.4 14.6 58.5 24.4 3.0 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 5.7 17.1 65.7 11.4 2.8 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 7.5 22.5 57.5 12.5 2.8 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 10.3 20.5 59.0 10.3 2.7 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 4.8 23.8 61.9 9.5 2.8 0.69 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 11.9 31.0 45.2 11.9 2.6 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 14.3 19.0 54.8 11.9 2.6 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 14.3 31.0 42.9 11.9 2.5 0.89 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 210 001L1 THE LIFE PROCESSES OF PLANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bush, L P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 573 001L1 MYCOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 72.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 27.8 Junior 2 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 77.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 11.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 38.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 5 27.8 Other (e.g. elective) 15 88.2 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 15.8 21.1 31.6 31.6 2.8 1.08 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 35.0 50.0 3.4 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 27.8 27.8 44.4 3.2 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 21.4 35.7 42.9 3.2 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 26.3 36.8 31.6 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 573 001L1 MYCOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 33. Amount of work appropriate 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 430G001L1 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 20.0 Senior 3 30.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 70.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 4 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 20.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 27.3 36.4 36.4 3.1 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 18.2 36.4 18.2 27.3 2.5 1.13 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 18.2 18.2 36.4 27.3 2.7 1.10 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 27.3 27.3 27.3 18.2 2.4 1.12 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 18.2 36.4 45.5 3.3 0.79 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 18.2 27.3 36.4 18.2 2.5 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 18.2 18.2 27.3 36.4 2.8 1.17 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 27.3 18.2 27.3 27.3 2.5 1.21 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 430G001L1 PLANT PHYSIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 650 001A1 ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Robin L. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 3 60.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 650 001A1 ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Robin L. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 508 001L1 EVOLUTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donohue, Kathleen SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 55.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 78.9 D 1 5.6 Graduate 4 21.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 5 26.3 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 14 73.7 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 30.0 30.0 35.0 3.0 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 5.0 10.0 35.0 50.0 3.3 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 20.0 45.0 35.0 3.2 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 15.0 35.0 50.0 3.4 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 10.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 2.9 1.02 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 20 5.0 0.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 25.0 40.0 35.0 3.1 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 15.8 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 5.0 25.0 30.0 40.0 3.1 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 30.0 20.0 45.0 3.1 1.00 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 508 001L1 EVOLUTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Donohue, Kathleen % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 152 003L2 PRIN OF BIOLOGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gleeson, Scott SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.3 A 12 29.3 Sophomore 25 58.1 B 18 43.9 Junior 13 30.2 C 10 24.4 Senior 3 7.0 D 1 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 30.2 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 13 30.2 Required by my major 38 88.4 3 hours 12 27.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 9.3 4 - 5 hours 5 11.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 47 0.0 0.0 57.4 42.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 2.2 15.2 56.5 26.1 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 47 0.0 2.1 42.6 55.3 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 46 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 3.2 3.2 48.4 45.2 3.4 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 4.7 51.2 44.2 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 37.5 33.3 29.2 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 47 0.0 6.4 51.1 42.6 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 47 0.0 6.4 38.3 55.3 3.5 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 43 0.0 0.0 65.1 34.9 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 47 0.0 4.3 55.3 40.4 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 47 2.1 27.7 38.3 31.9 3.0 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 46 2.2 26.1 50.0 21.7 2.9 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 2.6 15.4 66.7 15.4 2.9 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 2.3 18.2 61.4 18.2 3.0 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 40 5.0 22.5 55.0 17.5 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 47 0.0 4.3 68.1 27.7 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 4.3 26.1 50.0 19.6 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 0.0 17.0 66.0 17.0 3.0 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 0.0 14.9 44.7 40.4 3.3 0.71 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 152 003L2 PRIN OF BIOLOGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gleeson, Scott % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 104 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 47 Percent completed = 45.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 11.1 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 9 50.0 Junior 6 33.3 C 6 33.3 Senior 8 44.4 D 1 5.6 Graduate 1 5.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 15 83.3 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 3 16.7 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 3 16.7 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 50.0 33.3 11.1 2.5 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 11.1 38.9 44.4 5.6 2.4 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 94.4 0.0 2.9 0.24 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 52.9 35.3 11.8 2.6 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 61.1 22.2 16.7 2.6 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 50.0 31.3 18.8 2.7 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 50.0 38.9 11.1 2.6 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 38.9 38.9 16.7 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 44.4 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 004L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 7 53.8 Junior 6 42.9 C 3 23.1 Senior 7 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 13 92.9 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 7 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 16.7 0.0 44.4 38.9 3.1 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 11.1 5.6 61.1 22.2 2.9 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 11.8 17.6 58.8 11.8 2.7 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 0.0 82.4 11.8 3.0 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 60.0 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 22.2 33.3 27.8 16.7 2.4 1.04 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 16.7 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 16.7 38.9 38.9 5.6 2.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 16 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 2.4 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 46.7 26.7 20.0 2.6 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 11.1 16.7 66.7 5.6 2.7 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 16.7 33.3 38.9 11.1 2.4 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 004L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 005L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 47.1 Junior 6 33.3 C 4 23.5 Senior 11 61.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 5.6 Required by my major 17 94.4 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 8 44.4 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 16.7 11.1 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.91 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 11.1 38.9 44.4 5.6 2.4 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 46.7 46.7 6.7 2.6 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 16.7 44.4 38.9 0.0 2.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 88.9 5.6 3.0 0.34 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 47.1 41.2 0.0 2.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 28.6 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 16.7 66.7 11.1 2.8 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 16.7 66.7 11.1 2.8 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 16.7 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 22.2 27.8 44.4 5.6 2.3 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 50.0 38.9 5.6 2.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 0.81 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 005L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 69.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 006L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 4 25.0 Junior 6 35.3 C 5 31.3 Senior 8 47.1 D 3 18.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 11.8 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 14 82.4 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 3 17.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 16.7 44.4 33.3 5.6 2.3 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 52.9 47.1 0.0 2.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 18.8 81.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 33.3 33.3 27.8 5.6 2.1 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 61.1 22.2 11.1 5.6 1.6 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 18 16.7 38.9 44.4 0.0 2.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 27.8 38.9 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 22.2 44.4 27.8 5.6 2.2 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 44.4 38.9 11.1 5.6 1.8 0.88 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 006L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrison, Doug A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD