1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ENS 200 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 5 55.6 B 5 55.6 Junior 2 22.2 C 1 11.1 Senior 2 22.2 D 1 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 6 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ENS 200 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 47.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 130 001L1 DINOSAURS & DISASTERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ettensohn, Frank R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 25 48.1 A 17 32.7 Sophomore 12 23.1 B 16 30.8 Junior 8 15.4 C 17 32.7 Senior 7 13.5 D 1 1.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 38.5 Studies Program 31 59.6 2 hours 17 32.7 Required by my major 4 7.7 3 hours 11 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 17 32.7 4 - 5 hours 4 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 57 0.0 0.0 59.6 40.4 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 54 11.1 27.8 38.9 22.2 2.7 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 57 3.5 12.3 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 57 0.0 10.5 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 56 1.8 8.9 55.4 33.9 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 57 0.0 5.3 59.6 35.1 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 57 5.3 10.5 54.4 29.8 3.1 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 57 5.3 22.8 45.6 26.3 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 57 1.8 5.3 49.1 43.9 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 57 0.0 1.8 33.3 64.9 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 49 0.0 4.1 57.1 38.8 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 57 0.0 1.8 49.1 49.1 3.5 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 57 1.8 19.3 28.1 50.9 3.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 55 0.0 20.0 41.8 38.2 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 56 1.8 5.4 51.8 41.1 3.3 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 55 1.8 7.3 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 52 3.8 17.3 40.4 38.5 3.1 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 56 5.4 1.8 46.4 46.4 3.3 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 57 3.5 19.3 35.1 42.1 3.2 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 56 0.0 19.6 33.9 46.4 3.3 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 7.4 35.2 57.4 3.5 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 130 001L1 DINOSAURS & DISASTERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ettensohn, Frank R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 27 0.0 11.1 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 26 3.8 23.1 38.5 34.6 3.0 0.87 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 111 Number of forms scanned = 57 Number of forms with at least one student response = 57 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 001L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 7 46.7 C 2 13.3 Senior 8 53.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 53.3 Required by my major 15 100.0 3 hours 1 6.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 11.1 5.6 77.8 5.6 2.8 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 27.8 33.3 33.3 5.6 2.2 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 11.8 11.8 76.5 0.0 2.6 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 11.1 22.2 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 83.3 5.6 2.9 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 94.1 5.9 3.1 0.24 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 27.8 38.9 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 31.3 18.8 50.0 0.0 2.2 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 16 25.0 31.3 37.5 6.3 2.3 0.93 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 2.8 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 12.5 6.3 81.3 0.0 2.7 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 7.7 84.6 0.0 2.8 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 11.1 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 37.5 37.5 0.0 2.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 16.7 22.2 61.1 0.0 2.4 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 33.3 22.2 44.4 0.0 2.1 0.90 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 001L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 002L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 6 50.0 Junior 5 41.7 C 1 8.3 Senior 6 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 8.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 75.0 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 13.3 13.3 53.3 20.0 2.8 0.94 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 42.9 35.7 21.4 0.0 1.8 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 36.4 18.2 36.4 9.1 2.2 1.08 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 7.1 14.3 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 30.8 53.8 7.7 2.6 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 10.0 10.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 27.3 36.4 36.4 0.0 2.1 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 60.0 26.7 6.7 6.7 1.6 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 7.1 0.0 28.6 64.3 3.5 0.85 11. Was available for consultation 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 46.2 38.5 7.7 2.5 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 53.3 33.3 6.7 6.7 1.7 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 15 40.0 40.0 13.3 6.7 1.9 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 33.3 22.2 33.3 11.1 2.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 25.0 41.7 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 2.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 28.6 64.3 0.0 2.6 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 42.9 28.6 28.6 0.0 1.9 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 26.7 40.0 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 64.3 28.6 7.1 0.0 1.4 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 002L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 003L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 27.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 72.7 Junior 7 63.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 45.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 36.4 36.4 27.3 0.0 1.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 41.7 58.3 0.0 2.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 16.7 8.3 75.0 0.0 2.6 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 8.3 25.0 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 41.7 33.3 25.0 0.0 1.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 36.4 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 12 25.0 50.0 16.7 8.3 2.1 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 44.4 55.6 0.0 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 40.0 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 16.7 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 2.2 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 25.0 41.7 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 41.7 33.3 16.7 8.3 1.9 1.00 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 003L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 004L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 8.3 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 2 16.7 B 8 66.7 Junior 8 66.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 58.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 41.7 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 35.7 28.6 35.7 0.0 2.0 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 14.3 21.4 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.85 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 50.0 21.4 14.3 2.4 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 28.6 21.4 35.7 14.3 2.4 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 15.4 23.1 38.5 23.1 2.7 1.03 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 28.6 42.9 14.3 14.3 2.1 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 21.4 50.0 14.3 14.3 2.2 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 50.0 21.4 14.3 2.4 0.93 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 160 004L1 GEOLOGY FOR ELEMENTARY TEACHERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ferm, John C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 787 001O1 RESEARCH IN HYDROGEOLOGY & LOW-TEMP GEOCHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 787 001O1 RESEARCH IN HYDROGEOLOGY & LOW-TEMP GEOCHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fryar, Alan E. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 530 001L1 LOW TEMPERATURE GEOCHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 16.7 Required by my major 7 58.3 3 hours 5 41.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 41.7 4 - 5 hours 5 41.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GLY 530 001L1 LOW TEMPERATURE GEOCHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Henke, Kevin R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 102 001L1 HISTORICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 4.3 A 20 42.6 Sophomore 15 31.9 B 20 42.6 Junior 16 34.0 C 5 10.6 Senior 12 25.5 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 2.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 44.7 Studies Program 32 68.1 2 hours 14 29.8 Required by my major 8 17.0 3 hours 6 12.8 Other (e.g. elective) 7 14.9 4 - 5 hours 5 10.6 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 4.1 46.9 49.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 10.2 24.5 46.9 18.4 2.7 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 49 0.0 6.1 38.8 55.1 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 4.4 8.9 42.2 44.4 3.3 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 48 4.2 0.0 47.9 47.9 3.4 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 49 0.0 2.0 55.1 42.9 3.4 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 49 0.0 2.0 49.0 49.0 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 49 0.0 22.4 38.8 38.8 3.2 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 2.0 4.1 40.8 53.1 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 2.0 18.4 79.6 3.8 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 46 0.0 2.2 39.1 58.7 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 6.1 42.9 51.0 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 4.2 14.6 41.7 39.6 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 49 0.0 6.1 40.8 53.1 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 2.2 13.3 51.1 33.3 3.2 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 47 2.1 8.5 57.4 31.9 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 47 2.1 8.5 61.7 27.7 3.1 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 6.3 6.3 45.8 41.7 3.2 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 47 10.6 23.4 31.9 34.0 2.9 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 4.1 16.3 32.7 46.9 3.2 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 49 2.0 2.0 28.6 67.3 3.6 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 102 001L1 HISTORICAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 27 0.0 14.8 51.9 33.3 3.2 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 25 4.0 8.0 60.0 28.0 3.1 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 001L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 78.6 A 3 21.4 Sophomore 2 14.3 B 5 35.7 Junior 1 7.1 C 4 28.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 2 14.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 12 85.7 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 3.1 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 7.1 0.0 64.3 28.6 3.1 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 64.3 21.4 14.3 2.5 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 21.4 50.0 28.6 3.1 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 7.7 0.0 38.5 53.8 3.4 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 35.7 57.1 7.1 2.7 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 42.9 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 28.6 35.7 35.7 3.1 0.83 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 001L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 15.4 61.5 15.4 2.8 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 002L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 54.5 A 4 36.4 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 4 36.4 Junior 2 18.2 C 2 18.2 Senior 1 9.1 D 1 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 8 72.7 2 hours 3 27.3 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 6 54.5 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 1 9.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 27.3 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 50.0 20.0 30.0 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 002L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 003L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 62.5 A 1 12.5 Sophomore 3 37.5 B 1 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 4 50.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 2 25.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 50.0 Studies Program 8 100.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 88.9 11.1 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 55.6 33.3 0.0 2.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 11.1 22.2 66.7 0.0 2.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 22.2 44.4 33.3 0.0 2.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 55.6 22.2 22.2 2.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 66.7 22.2 0.0 2.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 11.1 55.6 33.3 0.0 2.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 55.6 44.4 0.0 2.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 003L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 12.5 37.5 50.0 0.0 2.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 40.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 004L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 57.1 A 1 14.3 Sophomore 3 42.9 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 14.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 14.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 4 57.1 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 28.6 42.9 0.0 28.6 2.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 004L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 570 001S1 SEM IN GEOLOGICAL SCI: TEACHING GEOSCIENCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 75.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 50.0 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 570 001S1 SEM IN GEOLOGICAL SCI: TEACHING GEOSCIENCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 001L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 6 60.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 40.0 D 2 20.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 8 80.0 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 0.0 60.0 30.0 3.1 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 10.0 10.0 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.99 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 10.0 10.0 20.0 60.0 3.3 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 10.0 20.0 60.0 3.3 1.06 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 461 001L1 IGNEOUS/METAMORPH PETROL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Moecher, David P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 005L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 73.3 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 6 40.0 Junior 1 6.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.7 D 3 20.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 3 20.0 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 35.7 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 30.8 61.5 7.7 2.8 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 3.1 0.26 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 33.3 40.0 26.7 2.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 005L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 006L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 70.6 A 4 23.5 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 9 52.9 Junior 2 11.8 C 3 17.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 5.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 17.6 Studies Program 14 82.4 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 1 5.9 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 27.8 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.94 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 27.8 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 88.2 11.8 3.1 0.33 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 5.9 35.3 41.2 17.6 2.7 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 5.6 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 22.2 27.8 50.0 3.3 0.83 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 006L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 007L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 60.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 2 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 60.0 Studies Program 4 80.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GLY 110 007L1 ENDANGERED PLANET:INTRO TO ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Hara, Kieran % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0