1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 542 001L1 GERMAN HISTORY 1815-1914 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Albisetti, James C SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 53.8 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 6 46.2 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 23.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 50.0 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 50.0 4 - 5 hours 6 46.2 6 - 7 hours 2 15.4 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 0.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 542 001L1 GERMAN HISTORY 1815-1914 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Albisetti, James C % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 240 401L1 HISTORY OF KENTUCKY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Appleton Jr, Thomas H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.3 A 11 26.2 Sophomore 8 18.2 B 27 64.3 Junior 15 34.1 C 4 9.5 Senior 20 45.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 38.6 Studies Program 1 2.3 2 hours 20 45.5 Required by my major 22 50.0 3 hours 3 6.8 Other (e.g. elective) 21 47.7 4 - 5 hours 3 6.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 29.5 70.5 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 6.1 12.1 48.5 33.3 3.1 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 44 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 44 2.3 18.2 47.7 31.8 3.1 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 0.0 7.0 44.2 48.8 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 2.3 20.9 76.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 0.0 41.5 58.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 0.0 34.9 65.1 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 0.0 2.3 31.8 65.9 3.6 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 2.3 27.9 69.8 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 0.0 2.7 40.5 56.8 3.5 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 10.7 39.3 50.0 3.4 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 38 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 2.4 4.8 40.5 52.4 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 0.0 2.3 36.4 61.4 3.6 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 2.4 16.7 81.0 3.8 0.47 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 240 401L1 HISTORY OF KENTUCKY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Appleton Jr, Thomas H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 89.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 461 001L1 AMER REVOLUT, 1763-1789 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 48.1 Sophomore 1 3.7 B 11 40.7 Junior 8 29.6 C 3 11.1 Senior 18 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 18.5 Required by my major 20 74.1 3 hours 14 51.9 Other (e.g. elective) 7 25.9 4 - 5 hours 4 14.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 10.3 31.0 58.6 3.5 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 3.6 57.1 39.3 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 6.9 58.6 34.5 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 3.4 3.4 48.3 44.8 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 20.7 27.6 48.3 3.2 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 13.8 34.5 48.3 3.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 3.4 31.0 62.1 3.5 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 15.4 50.0 34.6 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 11.1 48.1 40.7 3.3 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 7.1 39.3 53.6 3.5 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 24.1 41.4 34.5 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 10.3 37.9 48.3 3.3 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 7.1 14.3 17.9 60.7 3.3 0.98 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 461 001L1 AMER REVOLUT, 1763-1789 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 002S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY: TWO REVOL: AM & FRENCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 71.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 650 002S1 RDGS SPEC TOPS HISTORY: TWO REVOL: AM & FRENCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Banning, L G % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Block, Mary R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 50.0 A 4 13.8 Sophomore 6 20.0 B 12 41.4 Junior 4 13.3 C 10 34.5 Senior 5 16.7 D 2 6.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 3.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.0 Studies Program 21 70.0 2 hours 9 30.0 Required by my major 7 23.3 3 hours 8 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 6.7 4 - 5 hours 7 23.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 8.6 34.3 57.1 3.5 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 10.0 16.7 33.3 40.0 3.0 1.00 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 5.7 11.4 40.0 42.9 3.2 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 8.6 37.1 51.4 3.4 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 2.9 20.0 45.7 31.4 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 8.6 57.1 31.4 3.2 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 5.7 60.0 34.3 3.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 8.6 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 11.8 5.9 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 2.9 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 5.7 45.7 45.7 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 17.1 14.3 31.4 37.1 2.9 1.11 14. Encouraged class participation 35 5.7 5.7 25.7 62.9 3.5 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 5.9 8.8 38.2 47.1 3.3 0.86 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 5.9 14.7 44.1 35.3 3.1 0.87 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 10.7 28.6 39.3 21.4 2.7 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 2.9 20.0 37.1 40.0 3.1 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 14.3 22.9 34.3 28.6 2.8 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 8.8 11.8 52.9 26.5 3.0 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 11.4 5.7 51.4 31.4 3.0 0.92 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = HIS 108 401L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Block, Mary R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 638 001S1 RDGS LATIN AMER HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 77.8 4 - 5 hours 4 44.4 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 4 44.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 638 001S1 RDGS LATIN AMER HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chassen-Lopez, Francie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 57.1 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 6 42.9 B 6 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 14.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 28.6 Studies Program 11 78.6 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 5.9 0.0 70.6 23.5 3.1 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 5.9 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 0.0 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 5.9 11.8 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 11.8 5.9 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 17.6 35.3 35.3 2.9 1.03 14. Encouraged class participation 17 11.8 47.1 35.3 5.9 2.4 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 12.5 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 26.7 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 43.8 43.8 6.3 2.5 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 0.0 62.5 31.3 3.2 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 31.3 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 11.8 5.9 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 11.8 5.9 35.3 47.1 3.2 1.01 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 001L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 002L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 61.5 A 2 15.4 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 5 38.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 6 46.2 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 46.2 Studies Program 11 84.6 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 20.0 0.0 70.0 10.0 2.7 0.95 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 10.0 90.0 0.0 2.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 53.8 30.8 15.4 2.6 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 53.8 46.2 0.0 2.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 8.3 50.0 41.7 0.0 2.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 002L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 58.3 A 6 50.0 Sophomore 4 33.3 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 8.3 Senior 1 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 8.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 11 91.7 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 1 8.3 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 21.4 57.1 21.4 3.0 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 10 10.0 20.0 70.0 0.0 2.6 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 45.5 36.4 18.2 2.7 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 10.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 2.5 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 35.7 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 003L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 004L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 46.7 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 7 46.7 B 9 60.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 13.3 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 53.3 Studies Program 14 93.3 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 1 6.7 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3 3.1 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 12.5 6.3 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 18.8 43.8 37.5 3.2 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 25.0 43.8 31.3 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 25.0 50.0 18.8 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 43.8 43.8 12.5 2.7 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 78.6 14.3 7.1 2.3 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 56.3 31.3 6.3 2.4 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.81 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 004L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 005L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 23.5 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 11 64.7 B 10 58.8 Junior 2 11.8 C 1 5.9 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 64.7 Studies Program 16 94.1 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 21.1 15.8 42.1 21.1 2.6 1.07 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 10.5 5.3 73.7 10.5 2.8 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 31.6 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 47.4 47.4 5.3 2.6 0.61 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 44.4 50.0 5.6 2.6 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 22.2 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 36.8 52.6 10.5 2.7 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 56.3 37.5 6.3 2.5 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 83.3 11.1 3.1 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 42.1 42.1 5.3 2.4 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 005L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 20.0 50.0 20.0 10.0 2.2 0.92 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 30.8 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 42.9 A 3 23.1 Sophomore 6 42.9 B 7 53.8 Junior 2 14.3 C 3 23.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 50.0 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 26.7 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 6.7 13.3 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 26.7 73.3 0.0 2.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7 2.7 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 13.3 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 13.3 86.7 0.0 2.9 0.35 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 46.7 46.7 6.7 2.6 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 13.3 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 006L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 007L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 57.1 A 4 28.6 Sophomore 3 21.4 B 6 42.9 Junior 2 14.3 C 4 28.6 Senior 1 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 57.1 Studies Program 14 100.0 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 38.5 38.5 23.1 2.8 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 47.1 35.3 17.6 2.7 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 23.5 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 007L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 008L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 31.3 A 8 50.0 Sophomore 7 43.8 B 6 37.5 Junior 2 12.5 C 1 6.3 Senior 2 12.5 D 1 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 43.8 Studies Program 13 81.3 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 1 6.3 3 hours 2 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 84.2 15.8 3.2 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 5.3 73.7 15.8 3.0 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 84.2 10.5 3.1 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 5.9 70.6 17.6 3.0 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 31.3 43.8 18.8 2.8 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 0.0 73.7 21.1 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 21.1 42.1 31.6 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 008L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 50.0 37.5 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 50.0 A 9 56.3 Sophomore 7 43.8 B 6 37.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 1 6.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 31.3 Studies Program 16 100.0 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 26.7 33.3 33.3 2.9 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 7.1 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 0.0 69.2 23.1 3.1 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.87 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 0.0 78.6 14.3 3.0 0.68 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 28.6 50.0 7.1 2.5 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 009L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 57.1 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 6 42.9 Junior 2 14.3 C 2 14.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 28.6 Studies Program 10 71.4 2 hours 8 57.1 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 26.7 40.0 33.3 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 20.0 53.3 26.7 3.1 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 12.5 18.8 56.3 12.5 2.7 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 37.5 43.8 18.8 2.8 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 14.3 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 12.5 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.85 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 108 010L1 HIST OF U.S. THRU 1865 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christianson, Eric H % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 64.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 653 001L1 READINGS IN U.S. WOMEN'S HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Pat SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 42.9 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 4 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 12.5 0.0 62.5 25.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 25.0 12.5 62.5 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 653 001L1 READINGS IN U.S. WOMEN'S HISTORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooper, Pat % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 72.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 270 001L1 EARLY MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Daniel, Emmett R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.7 A 12 92.3 Sophomore 5 38.5 B 1 7.7 Junior 4 30.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 23.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 53.8 Studies Program 8 61.5 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 6.3 50.0 37.5 3.2 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 0.0 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 25.0 31.3 43.8 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 18.8 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.79 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = History FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = HIS 270 001L1 EARLY MIDDLE AGES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Daniel, Emmett R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 2.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were ans