1****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * ****************************************************************************** 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 335 001L1 WOMEN AND MEN IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 48.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 44.4 Junior 6 21.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 22 78.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 7.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 14.8 Studies Program 2 7.4 2 hours 10 37.0 Required by my major 8 29.6 3 hours 8 29.6 Other (e.g. elective) 17 63.0 4 - 5 hours 4 14.8 6 - 7 hours 1 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 3.4 3.4 41.4 51.7 3.4 0.73 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 3.4 3.4 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 7.1 7.1 39.3 46.4 3.3 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 3.6 3.6 25.0 67.9 3.6 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 34.5 65.5 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 6.9 3.4 31.0 58.6 3.4 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 3.4 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 27.6 72.4 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 3.6 7.1 28.6 60.7 3.5 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 20.7 24.1 51.7 3.2 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 0.0 20.7 75.9 3.7 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 3.4 34.5 58.6 3.5 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 3.6 39.3 53.6 3.4 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 4.2 20.8 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 62.1 37.9 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 17.9 32.1 42.9 3.1 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 17.2 34.5 44.8 3.2 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 3.4 34.5 58.6 3.5 0.74 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 335 001L1 WOMEN AND MEN IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 85.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 83.9 A 19 61.3 Sophomore 3 9.7 B 11 35.5 Junior 2 6.5 C 1 3.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 61.3 Studies Program 23 74.2 2 hours 4 12.9 Required by my major 5 16.1 3 hours 7 22.6 Other (e.g. elective) 3 9.7 4 - 5 hours 1 3.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 12.0 52.0 32.0 4.0 2.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 26.3 68.4 0.0 2.6 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.43 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 8.3 29.2 41.7 20.8 2.8 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 18.2 42.4 39.4 3.2 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 9.1 39.4 51.5 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 8.8 50.0 41.2 3.3 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 3.0 3.0 45.5 48.5 3.4 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 3.1 9.4 46.9 40.6 3.3 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 3.6 14.3 42.9 39.3 3.2 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 2.9 0.0 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 6.1 33.3 42.4 18.2 2.7 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 2.9 38.2 58.8 3.6 0.56 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 005L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 52 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 65.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 65.0 Sophomore 2 5.0 B 10 25.0 Junior 2 5.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 36 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 30 75.0 Studies Program 4 10.0 2 hours 5 12.5 Required by my major 7 17.5 3 hours 4 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 29 72.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 3.7 0.0 37.0 59.3 3.5 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 2.4 35.7 61.9 3.6 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 0.0 0.0 35.6 64.4 3.6 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 0.0 0.0 28.9 71.1 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 2.3 2.3 27.9 67.4 3.6 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 4.7 41.9 53.5 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 0.0 9.1 38.6 52.3 3.4 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 0.0 2.2 26.7 71.1 3.7 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 40 2.5 2.5 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 45 0.0 0.0 42.2 57.8 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 2.4 42.9 54.8 3.5 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 0.0 4.7 34.9 60.5 3.6 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 2.4 41.5 56.1 3.5 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 0.0 7.0 41.9 51.2 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 0.0 4.5 34.1 61.4 3.6 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 2.3 2.3 20.5 75.0 3.7 0.64 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Battista, % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 66 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 68.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 651 001L1 SOC THEORY IN TRANSITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 83.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 16.7 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 651 001L1 SOC THEORY IN TRANSITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 773 401S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR:SOCIAL THEORIES OF COMMUNITIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bridger, Jeff SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 25.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 75.0 4 - 5 hours 2 50.0 6 - 7 hours 2 50.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 773 401S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR:SOCIAL THEORIES OF COMMUNITIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bridger, Jeff % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 61.1 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 7 38.9 Junior 8 44.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 3 15.8 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 5 26.3 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 11 57.9 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 5.9 0.0 52.9 41.2 3.3 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 6.3 56.3 31.3 3.1 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 11.1 5.6 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 51.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 016L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 28 90.3 A 9 30.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 43.3 Junior 3 9.7 C 4 13.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 4 13.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 56.7 Studies Program 22 75.9 2 hours 8 26.7 Required by my major 4 13.8 3 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 10.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 3.0 6.1 60.6 30.3 3.2 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 6.1 24.2 45.5 24.2 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 3.0 21.2 51.5 24.2 3.0 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 3.0 6.1 60.6 30.3 3.2 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 15.6 56.3 28.1 3.1 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 9.4 12.5 46.9 31.3 3.0 0.92 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 10.0 30.0 36.7 23.3 2.7 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 6.1 9.1 63.6 21.2 3.0 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 8.8 58.8 32.4 3.2 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 13.8 58.6 27.6 3.1 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 12.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 9.4 15.6 50.0 25.0 2.9 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 24.2 48.5 27.3 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 3.3 30.0 46.7 20.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 3.0 12.1 57.6 27.3 3.1 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 6.3 37.5 34.4 21.9 2.7 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 9.4 15.6 53.1 21.9 2.9 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 9.4 18.8 40.6 31.3 2.9 0.95 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 016L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hardesty, Sharon L % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 26.3 47.4 26.3 3.0 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 003L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: AGING/INEQUALITY/SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 44.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 5 27.8 Senior 18 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 11.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 1 5.6 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 17 94.4 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 4 22.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 0.0 84.2 10.5 3.0 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 10.5 5.3 63.2 21.1 2.9 0.85 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 21.1 31.6 47.4 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 36.8 42.1 21.1 2.8 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 5.3 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 003L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: AGING/INEQUALITY/SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 436 001L1 SOC OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 28 68.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 19.5 Junior 10 23.8 C 2 4.9 Senior 32 76.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 2.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 47.6 Studies Program 2 4.8 2 hours 13 31.0 Required by my major 16 38.1 3 hours 5 11.9 Other (e.g. elective) 24 57.1 4 - 5 hours 3 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 46 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 46 0.0 4.3 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 2.4 40.5 57.1 3.5 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 46 0.0 4.3 10.9 84.8 3.8 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 0.0 0.0 8.9 91.1 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 41 0.0 0.0 22.0 78.0 3.8 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 44 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 27.3 4.5 68.2 3.4 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 46 0.0 0.0 41.3 58.7 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 46 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 27.5 72.5 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 46 0.0 4.3 28.3 67.4 3.6 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 46 2.2 6.5 37.0 54.3 3.4 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 7.0 30.2 62.8 3.6 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 7.1 45.2 47.6 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 13.9 38.9 47.2 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 46 0.0 2.2 30.4 67.4 3.7 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 2.2 13.3 31.1 53.3 3.4 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 0.0 4.4 35.6 60.0 3.6 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 43 0.0 4.7 27.9 67.4 3.6 0.58 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 436 001L1 SOC OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 75.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 16.7 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 91.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 41.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 50.0 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 15.4 46.2 30.8 3.0 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 23.1 15.4 38.5 23.1 2.6 1.12 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 46.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 014L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 30 78.9 A 13 34.2 Sophomore 6 15.8 B 21 55.3 Junior 2 5.3 C 3 7.9 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 2.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 31.6 Studies Program 29 76.3 2 hours 13 34.2 Required by my major 5 13.2 3 hours 12 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 10.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 39 10.3 25.6 53.8 10.3 2.6 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 7.1 9.5 52.4 31.0 3.1 0.84 4. Exams reflected what was taught 41 2.4 9.8 46.3 41.5 3.3 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 2.4 57.1 40.5 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 2.5 7.5 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 4.8 14.3 50.0 31.0 3.1 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 42 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 42 4.8 2.4 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 9.5 21.4 40.5 28.6 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 41 4.9 4.9 61.0 29.3 3.1 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 40 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 7.7 10.3 59.0 23.1 3.0 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 8.1 21.6 51.4 18.9 2.8 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 5.0 7.5 55.0 32.5 3.2 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 39 15.4 33.3 43.6 7.7 2.4 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 41 4.9 17.1 65.9 12.2 2.9 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 4.8 11.9 40.5 42.9 3.2 0.84 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 014L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 27 7.4 7.4 66.7 18.5 3.0 0.76 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 26 7.7 3.8 53.8 34.6 3.2 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 435 001L1 POWER & POLITICS SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 51.7 Sophomore 3 10.0 B 9 31.0 Junior 8 26.7 C 1 3.4 Senior 19 63.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 13.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 20.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 41.4 Required by my major 8 27.6 3 hours 10 34.5 Other (e.g. elective) 21 72.4 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 64.5 35.5 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 3.4 6.9 62.1 27.6 3.1 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 3.2 3.2 61.3 32.3 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 6.5 61.3 32.3 3.3 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 6.5 58.1 35.5 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 16.7 63.3 20.0 3.0 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 3.2 61.3 32.3 3.2 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 12.9 41.9 45.2 3.3 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 6.5 51.6 41.9 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 3.6 67.9 28.6 3.3 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 64.5 32.3 3.3 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 19.4 45.2 32.3 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 10.0 43.3 46.7 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 3.4 51.7 44.8 3.4 0.57 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 435 001L1 POWER & POLITICS SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 81.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 019L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 72.0 A 5 20.0 Sophomore 6 24.0 B 17 68.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 12.0 Senior 1 4.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 44.0 Studies Program 19 76.0 2 hours 10 40.0 Required by my major 3 12.0 3 hours 2 8.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 12.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 7.7 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 7.7 73.1 19.2 3.1 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 73.1 23.1 3.2 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 73.1 26.9 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 4.5 45.5 36.4 13.6 2.6 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 38.5 42.3 15.4 2.7 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 7.7 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 79.2 20.8 3.2 0.41 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 16.0 60.0 24.0 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 40.0 44.0 8.0 2.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 26 3.8 11.5 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 11.5 76.9 11.5 3.0 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 25.0 70.8 4.2 2.8 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 31.8 59.1 4.5 2.6 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 26.9 65.4 7.7 2.8 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 11.5 46.2 38.5 3.8 2.3 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 30.8 50.0 15.4 2.8 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.82 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 019L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 54.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 003L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 64.7 A 1 5.9 Sophomore 4 23.5 B 13 76.5 Junior 1 5.9 C 2 11.8 Senior 1 5.9 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 47.1 Studies Program 12 70.6 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 2 11.8 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 17.6 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 21.1 57.9 21.1 3.0 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 33.3 61.1 5.6 2.7 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 36.8 42.1 15.8 5.3 1.9 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 11.1 16.7 72.2 0.0 2.6 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 10.5 89.5 0.0 2.9 0.32 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 15.8 26.3 57.9 0.0 2.4 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 68.4 26.3 0.0 2.2 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 15.8 47.4 31.6 5.3 2.3 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 21.1 68.4 5.3 2.7 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 21.1 52.6 21.1 5.3 2.1 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 27.8 66.7 5.6 2.8 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 38.9 50.0 11.1 2.7 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 47.1 47.1 5.9 2.6 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 27.8 66.7 5.6 2.8 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 50.0 38.9 5.6 2.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 23.5 41.2 29.4 5.9 2.2 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 35.3 35.3 23.5 5.9 2.0 0.94 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 003L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 38.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 401L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 20.0 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 2 20.0 B 5 45.5 Junior 3 30.0 C 3 27.3 Senior 2 20.0 D 1 9.1 Graduate 1 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 36.4 Studies Program 5 45.5 2 hours 4 36.4 Required by my major 2 18.2 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 25.0 33.3 33.3 8.3 2.3 0.97 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 8.3 25.0 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 1.11 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 16.7 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 16.7 8.3 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.97 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 18.2 18.2 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 16.7 0.0 58.3 25.0 2.9 1.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 33.3 25.0 25.0 2.6 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 25.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.00 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 33.3 25.0 41.7 3.1 0.90 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 152 401L1 MODERN SOCIAL PROBLEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 37.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 017L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 84.0 A 10 40.0 Sophomore 3 12.0 B 12 48.0 Junior 1 4.0 C 3 12.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 36.0 Studies Program 21 84.0 2 hours 6 24.0 Required by my major 2 8.0 3 hours 7 28.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.0 4 - 5 hours 3 12.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 17.2 51.7 31.0 3.1 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 65.5 34.5 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 10.7 35.7 53.6 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 29 0.0 3.4 31.0 65.5 3.6 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 20.7 44.8 34.5 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 6.9 24.1 44.8 24.1 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 3.4 41.4 55.2 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 58.6 34.5 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 21.4 57.1 17.9 2.9 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 3.8 46.2 30.8 19.2 2.7 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 10.3 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 44.8 34.5 17.2 2.7 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 13.8 58.6 24.1 3.0 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 24.1 44.8 31.0 3.1 0.75 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 017L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 6.7 73.3 13.3 2.9 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 58.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 1 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 434 001L1 SOCIAL CLASSES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McKeever, Matt SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 15.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 13 68.4 Junior 9 47.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 52.6 D 1 5.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 13 68.4 Required by my major 7 36.8 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 11 57.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 5.0 25.0 50.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 15.0 40.0 45.0 3.3 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 47.4 21.1 31.6 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 1LEXINGTON CAMPUS - ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA Page 2 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - Fall 1998 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 434 001L1 SOCIAL CLASSES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McKeever, Matt % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM CO