****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 001L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 30.4 A 4 17.4 Sophomore 9 39.1 B 15 65.2 Junior 5 21.7 C 4 17.4 Senior 2 8.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 34.8 Studies Program 18 78.3 2 hours 8 34.8 Required by my major 2 8.7 3 hours 4 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 4.2 0.0 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 12.5 25.0 54.2 8.3 2.6 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 25.0 58.3 12.5 2.8 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 16.7 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 8.3 12.5 62.5 16.7 2.9 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 70.8 16.7 3.0 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 17.4 69.6 13.0 3.0 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 28.6 52.4 9.5 2.6 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 25.0 58.3 12.5 2.8 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 78.3 13.0 3.0 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 52.2 26.1 17.4 2.6 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 24 4.2 41.7 45.8 8.3 2.6 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 4.3 13.0 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 45.5 40.9 9.1 2.5 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 60.0 30.0 5.0 2.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 16.7 41.7 29.2 12.5 2.4 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 50.0 37.5 8.3 2.5 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 37.5 45.8 12.5 2.7 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 36.8 57.9 5.3 2.7 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 5.3 15.8 68.4 10.5 2.8 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 002L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 22.7 A 6 27.3 Sophomore 10 45.5 B 12 54.5 Junior 4 18.2 C 4 18.2 Senior 3 13.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 63.6 Studies Program 19 86.4 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 1 4.5 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 77.3 18.2 3.1 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 13.6 18.2 63.6 4.5 2.6 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 9.1 22.7 63.6 4.5 2.6 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 9.1 4.5 72.7 13.6 2.9 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 14.3 28.6 52.4 4.8 2.5 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 4.5 9.1 63.6 22.7 3.0 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 38.1 47.6 4.8 2.5 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 13.6 31.8 40.9 13.6 2.5 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 15.0 70.0 15.0 3.0 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 36.4 22.7 36.4 4.5 2.1 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 22 18.2 36.4 40.9 4.5 2.3 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 28.6 61.9 9.5 2.8 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 40.0 55.0 5.0 2.7 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 52.9 35.3 5.9 2.4 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 28.6 33.3 33.3 4.8 2.1 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 19.0 42.9 33.3 4.8 2.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 14.3 23.8 52.4 9.5 2.6 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 63.6 36.4 0.0 2.4 0.50 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 17 0.0 47.1 47.1 5.9 2.6 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 35.3 58.8 5.9 2.7 0.59 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 003L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.5 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 13 68.4 B 10 55.6 Junior 4 21.1 C 1 5.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 17 94.4 2 hours 8 44.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 42.1 47.4 5.3 2.5 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 36.8 47.4 10.5 2.6 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 26.3 5.3 42.1 26.3 2.7 1.16 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 10.5 21.1 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 5.6 77.8 11.1 2.9 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 10.5 26.3 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 5.3 0.0 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 16 6.3 0.0 87.5 6.3 2.9 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 33.3 27.8 27.8 11.1 2.2 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 47.4 47.4 0.0 2.4 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 26.3 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 52.6 31.6 10.5 2.5 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 11.1 61.1 22.2 5.6 2.2 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 26.3 42.1 26.3 5.3 2.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 21.1 26.3 47.4 5.3 2.4 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 26.3 15.8 42.1 15.8 2.5 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 22.2 44.4 22.2 11.1 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 18.2 18.2 54.5 9.1 2.5 0.93 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 2.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 73.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 004L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 11.5 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 14 53.8 B 11 44.0 Junior 8 30.8 C 3 12.0 Senior 1 3.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 19 73.1 Studies Program 25 96.2 2 hours 6 23.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 3.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 20.8 25.0 45.8 8.3 2.4 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 11.5 26.9 46.2 15.4 2.7 0.89 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 7.7 7.7 65.4 19.2 3.0 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 15.4 3.8 65.4 15.4 2.8 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 19.2 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 19.2 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 23.1 15.4 46.2 15.4 2.5 1.03 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 7.7 23.1 42.3 26.9 2.9 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 3.8 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.4 0.81 11. Was available for consultation 21 9.5 14.3 42.9 33.3 3.0 0.95 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 12.5 16.7 33.3 37.5 3.0 1.04 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 32.0 16.0 40.0 12.0 2.3 1.07 14. Encouraged class participation 25 40.0 16.0 28.0 16.0 2.2 1.15 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 15.4 19.2 46.2 19.2 2.7 0.97 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 23.1 23.1 46.2 7.7 2.4 0.94 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 29.2 25.0 37.5 8.3 2.3 0.99 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 15.4 3.8 65.4 15.4 2.8 0.90 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 30.8 38.5 19.2 11.5 2.1 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 23.1 23.1 50.0 3.8 2.3 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 15.4 11.5 53.8 19.2 2.8 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 35.7 14.3 42.9 7.1 2.2 1.05 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 13.0 21.7 56.5 8.7 2.6 0.84 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 23.8 9.5 52.4 14.3 2.6 1.03 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 21 9.5 4.8 57.1 28.6 3.0 0.86 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 005L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 16.7 A 11 45.8 Sophomore 14 58.3 B 10 41.7 Junior 6 25.0 C 3 12.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 41.7 Studies Program 22 91.7 2 hours 8 33.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 8.0 60.0 32.0 3.2 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 8.0 28.0 56.0 8.0 2.6 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 28.0 60.0 12.0 2.8 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 12.5 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.78 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 20.0 44.0 32.0 3.0 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 66.7 20.8 3.1 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 16.0 60.0 24.0 3.1 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 44.0 40.0 8.0 2.5 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 90.5 9.5 3.1 0.30 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 8.0 64.0 28.0 3.2 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 12.0 32.0 40.0 16.0 2.6 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 25 8.0 32.0 44.0 16.0 2.7 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 20.8 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 29.2 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 34.8 47.8 13.0 2.7 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 20.0 60.0 16.0 2.9 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 40.0 28.0 16.0 2.4 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 8.0 28.0 48.0 16.0 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 24.0 40.0 36.0 3.1 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 16.7 33.3 41.7 8.3 2.4 0.90 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 11.1 38.9 38.9 11.1 2.5 0.86 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 47.4 42.1 10.5 2.6 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 20 0.0 0.0 85.0 15.0 3.2 0.37 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 2.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 96.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 006L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 13.6 A 7 31.8 Sophomore 6 27.3 B 12 54.5 Junior 9 40.9 C 3 13.6 Senior 4 18.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 66.7 Studies Program 17 77.3 2 hours 2 9.5 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 8.7 78.3 8.7 2.9 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 21.7 65.2 8.7 2.8 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 17.4 78.3 4.3 2.9 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 13.6 77.3 9.1 3.0 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 17.4 73.9 4.3 2.8 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 13.6 81.8 4.5 2.9 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 8.7 8.7 78.3 4.3 2.8 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 19.0 66.7 4.8 2.7 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 4.5 31.8 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 77.3 22.7 3.2 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 21.1 73.7 5.3 2.8 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 18.2 77.3 4.5 2.9 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 19.0 28.6 47.6 4.8 2.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 22 9.1 22.7 68.2 0.0 2.6 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 81.0 4.8 2.9 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 19.0 38.1 42.9 0.0 2.2 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 9.1 81.8 4.5 2.9 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 33.3 23.8 42.9 0.0 2.1 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 47.6 47.6 0.0 2.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 10.0 25.0 55.0 10.0 2.7 0.81. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 0.83 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 18.8 75.0 0.0 2.7 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 11.8 0.0 88.2 0.0 2.8 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 18 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 0.58 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 0.78 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 007L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 20.0 Sophomore 7 70.0 B 7 70.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 30.0 Studies Program 8 80.0 2 hours 4 40.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 20.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 18.2 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 36.4 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 18.2 81.8 0.0 2.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 54.5 36.4 0.0 2.3 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 27.3 45.5 27.3 0.0 2.0 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 10 10.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 2.5 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 9.1 18.2 72.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 9.1 18.2 72.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 27.3 63.6 9.1 0.0 1.8 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 90.9 9.1 0.0 2.1 0.30 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 54.5 36.4 0.0 2.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 28.6 14.3 57.1 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 33.3 50.0 16.7 0.0 1.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 44.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 161 008L1 THE WORLD OF PEASANTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.6 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 11 61.1 B 8 47.1 Junior 4 22.2 C 3 17.6 Senior 2 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 17 94.4 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 10.5 78.9 10.5 3.0 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 52.6 36.8 5.3 2.4 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 47.4 47.4 5.3 2.6 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 26.3 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 15.8 31.6 42.1 10.5 2.5 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 5.3 5.3 63.2 26.3 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 5.3 73.7 15.8 3.0 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 2.4 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 36.8 57.9 0.0 2.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 5.3 0.0 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 17 11.8 17.6 58.8 11.8 2.7 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 10.5 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 26.3 31.6 31.6 10.5 2.3 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 18 16.7 38.9 38.9 5.6 2.3 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 43.8 43.8 6.3 2.5 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 20.0 46.7 26.7 6.7 2.2 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 16.7 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 42.1 36.8 21.1 0.0 1.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 22.2 44.4 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 15.4 53.8 30.8 0.0 2.2 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 7.7 61.5 30.8 0.0 2.2 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 14.3 7.1 71.4 7.1 2.7 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 50.0 12.5 25.0 12.5 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 661 001L1 ETHNOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anglin, Mary K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 25.0 4 - 5 hours 2 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 25.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 431G001L1 CULT/SOC SUBSAHAR AFRICA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 5 29.4 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 52.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 17.6 Studies Program 2 11.8 2 hours 5 29.4 Required by my major 6 35.3 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 9 52.9 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 11.1 27.8 61.1 3.5 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 732 001L1 ADVANCED SEMINAR IN ECOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cliggett, Lisa ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 3 50.0 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 230 001L1 INTRO TO PHYSICAL ANT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 6 40.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 7 46.7 C 4 26.7 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 6.7 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 53.3 Required by my major 11 73.3 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 26.7 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 18.8 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 002L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 46.2 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 7 53.8 Junior 9 69.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 61.5 Studies Program 10 76.9 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 3 23.1 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 13.3 20.0 33.3 33.3 2.9 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 7.1 7.1 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 7.7 38.5 38.5 15.4 2.6 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 0.0 80.0 13.3 3.0 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 46.7 33.3 13.3 2.5 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 14 7.1 50.0 35.7 7.1 2.4 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 53.3 40.0 6.7 2.5 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 13.3 13.3 53.3 20.0 2.8 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 65.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 004L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 2 28.6 B 2 28.6 Junior 4 57.1 C 1 14.3 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 57.1 Studies Program 6 85.7 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 0.0 71.4 14.3 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 42.9 28.6 14.3 14.3 2.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 28.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 005L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 16.7 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 14 77.8 Junior 6 33.3 C 1 5.6 Senior 9 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 61.1 Studies Program 15 83.3 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 3 16.7 3 hours 1 5.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 26.7 53.3 13.3 2.7 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 5.6 0.0 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 5.6 5.6 61.1 27.8 3.1 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 22.2 33.3 33.3 11.1 2.3 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 18 11.1 38.9 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.92 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 23.5 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 12.5 31.3 37.5 18.8 2.6 0.96 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 13.3 33.3 33.3 20.0 2.6 0.99 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 31.3 37.5 25.0 6.3 2.1 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 11.1 22.2 50.0 16.7 2.7 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 12.5 75.0 12.5 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 15.4 38.5 38.5 7.7 2.4 0.87 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 9.1 36.4 45.5 9.1 2.5 0.82 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 006L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 37.5 Sophomore 3 12.5 B 11 45.8 Junior 19 79.2 C 4 16.7 Senior 2 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 62.5 Studies Program 16 66.7 2 hours 9 37.5 Required by my major 7 29.2 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 20.8 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 4.0 68.0 24.0 3.1 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 4.0 64.0 32.0 3.3 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 23.8 61.9 14.3 2.9 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 68.0 28.0 3.2 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 40.0 44.0 8.0 2.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 16.7 70.8 12.5 3.0 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 20.8 66.7 12.5 2.9 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 52.2 43.5 4.3 2.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 8.3 58.3 29.2 4.2 2.3 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 8.0 16.0 72.0 4.0 2.7 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 8.0 68.0 20.0 3.0 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 007L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 30.4 Sophomore 2 8.7 B 16 69.6 Junior 15 65.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 21.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 69.6 Studies Program 18 78.3 2 hours 2 8.7 Required by my major 3 13.0 3 hours 3 13.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 25.0 50.0 20.8 2.9 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 66.7 20.8 3.0 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 4.2 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 4.2 29.2 54.2 12.5 2.8 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 31.8 54.5 13.6 2.8 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 12.5 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 20.8 54.2 25.0 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 23.8 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 34.8 60.9 4.3 2.7 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 29.2 62.5 8.3 2.8 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 12.5 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 7.1 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 21 0.0 9.5 76.2 14.3 3.0 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 64.7 29.4 3.2 0.56 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 235 008L1 FOOD AND CULTURE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crooks, Deborah L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 52.2 Sophomore 4 17.4 B 11 47.8 Junior 12 52.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 30.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 69.6 Studies Program 20 87.0 2 hours 4 17.4 Required by my major 2 8.7 3 hours 2 8.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 73.9 26.1 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 88.2 5.9 3.0 0.35 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 4.3 39.1 34.8 21.7 2.7 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 13.0 69.6 17.4 3.0 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 30.4 47.8 17.4 2.8 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 52.2 26.1 17.4 2.6 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 9.1 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 5.3 10.5 63.2 21.1 3.0 0.75 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ANT 770 002S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR:PREINDUS TRIAL POL SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dillehay, Tom D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 3 60.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3)