****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 009L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM HOMELESSNESS IN LEXINGT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 100.0 A 10 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 30.0 Studies Program 11 55.0 2 hours 12 60.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 45.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 4.8 81.0 9.5 3.0 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 81.0 9.5 3.0 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 9.5 76.2 14.3 3.0 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 19.0 71.4 9.5 2.9 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 23.8 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 21 4.8 14.3 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.74 28. Guided student report preparation 21 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.72 29. Students free to express opinions 21 4.8 4.8 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.81 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 001L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM MEN, WOMEN & THE MOVIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bordo, S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 100.0 A 7 38.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 55.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 5.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 9 50.0 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 7 38.9 Other (e.g. elective) 9 50.0 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 5.6 5.6 50.0 38.9 3.2 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 0.0 42.1 52.6 3.4 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 26.3 36.8 31.6 2.9 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 0.0 42.1 52.6 3.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 15.8 26.3 57.9 3.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 008L1 USP NAT SCI:DISCOVER SEM DINOSAURS & DISASTERS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ettensohn, Frank R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 17 100.0 A 10 58.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 35.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 47.1 Studies Program 6 35.3 2 hours 9 52.9 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 64.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 4.5 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 4.5 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 4.5 13.6 81.8 3.8 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 9.5 33.3 52.4 3.3 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 9.1 13.6 77.3 3.7 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 15 0.0 26.7 33.3 40.0 3.1 0.83 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 29. Students free to express opinions 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 004L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM LEWIS AND CLARK INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Foreman, Walter C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 100.0 A 13 81.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 6.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 18.8 Studies Program 8 50.0 2 hours 2 12.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 8 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 16.7 77.8 3.7 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 11.1 27.8 61.1 3.5 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 15.8 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.61 28. Guided student report preparation 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 29. Students free to express opinions 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 17 0.0 5.9 11.8 82.4 3.8 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 90.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 014L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM SLAVERY INTERDISC PERSP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Freehling, William ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 100.0 A 10 52.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 47.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 4 21.1 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 1 5.3 3 hours 9 47.4 Other (e.g. elective) 14 73.7 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 10.5 84.2 3.8 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 5.3 5.3 89.5 3.8 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 19 0.0 0.0 5.3 94.7 3.9 0.23 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 95.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 002L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM: KANSAS CITY JAZZ INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Greenway, John L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 100.0 A 8 72.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 27.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 27.3 Studies Program 3 27.3 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 8 72.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 8.3 8.3 50.0 33.3 3.1 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 8.3 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 66.7 22.2 11.1 2.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 16.7 25.0 58.3 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 16.7 8.3 75.0 3.6 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 28. Guided student report preparation 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 003L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM GREAT 19THCENTURY NOVELS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lee, Edward S. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 100.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 3 23.1 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 7 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 76.9 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 6.3 18.8 75.0 3.7 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 12.5 81.3 3.8 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 6.3 6.3 87.5 3.8 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 94.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 005L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM FATHERS & SONS WEST. LIT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, David L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 100.0 A 3 37.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 12.5 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 25.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 6 75.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 25.0 12.5 62.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 006L1 USP HUMANITIES:DISC SEM INDIAN CAPTIVITY NARRAT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Prats, Armando J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 100.0 A 11 73.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 5 33.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 66.7 4 - 5 hours 7 46.7 6 - 7 hours 4 26.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 46.7 40.0 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 21.4 57.1 3.4 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 93.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 012L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM THE AMERICAN JURY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Segal, Jennifer A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 100.0 A 18 90.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 75.0 Studies Program 2 10.0 2 hours 3 15.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 18 90.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 0.0 52.4 42.9 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 28. Guided student report preparation 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 29. Students free to express opinions 22 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.29 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 22 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.39 31. Developed abil to conduct research 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 95.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = A&S 100 010L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM COMPUTERS & MULTIMEDIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tannenbaum, ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 100.0 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 27.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 6 27.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 4.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 23.8 Studies Program 14 66.7 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 17.4 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 36.4 50.0 9.1 2.6 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 34.8 47.8 17.4 2.8 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 4.3 0.0 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 65.2 26.1 3.2 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 8.7 17.4 65.2 8.7 2.7 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 21 4.8 0.0 42.9 52.4 3.4 0.75 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 17.4 56.5 26.1 3.1 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 18.2 36.4 40.9 4.5 2.3 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 4.3 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 47.8 43.5 8.7 2.6 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 50.0 40.0 5.0 2.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 26.1 47.8 17.4 8.7 2.1 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 47.8 39.1 8.7 2.5 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 17.4 69.6 8.7 2.8 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 35.7 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.84 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 25.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 15 13.3 33.3 46.7 6.7 2.5 0.83 29. Students free to express opinions 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 19 10.5 21.1 52.6 15.8 2.7 0.87 31. Developed abil to conduct research 16 6.3 50.0 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.73 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 100 013L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM EXP EDUCAT DI134SITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Tice, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 100.0 A 12 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 23.1 Studies Program 7 53.8 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 46.2 4 - 5 hours 4 30.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 8.3 41.7 41.7 3.2 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 42.9 42.9 14.3 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Unknown faculty type COURSE = A&S 100 011L1 USP SOC SCI:DISCOVER SEM GROWING OLD TODAY WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Watkins, John F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 100.0 A 17 89.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 10.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 36.8 Studies Program 8 42.1 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 10.5 Other (e.g. elective) 11 57.9 4 - 5 hours 2 10.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 9.5 85.7 3.8 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 4.8 19.0 76.2 3.7 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 15 0.0 0.0 86.7 13.3 3.1 0.35 29. Students free to express opinions 21 0.0 0.0 4.8 95.2 4.0 0.22 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 31. Developed abil to conduct research 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 91.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = A&S 500 001L1 SPEC COURSE: SENSORY BIO AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Yan, Hong Y. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 1 5.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 17 85.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 10.0 Required by my major 4 20.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 16 80.0 4 - 5 hours 7 35.0 6 - 7 hours 3 15.0 8 or more hours 2 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 4.8 38.1 57.1 3.5 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 4.8 61.9 28.6 3.1 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 40.0 35.0 25.0 2.9 0.81 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 4.8 4.8 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 9.5 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 23.8 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 3.0 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 11.1 77.8 5.6 2.8 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 35.0 35.0 20.0 2.7 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AAS 400 002L1 SPEC TOP IN AFRI-AM STUD MULTICUL EDU IN URBAN A INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, J John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 1 8.3 B 1 8.3 Junior 4 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 8.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 2 16.7 2 hours 4 33.3 Required by my major 4 33.3 3 hours 4 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 50.0 4 - 5 hours 2 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 7.7 92.3 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = AC 301 001L1 TOPICS IN AMERICAN CULT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Yanarella, Ernest J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 7.7 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 5 38.5 Junior 3 23.1 C 3 23.1 Senior 5 38.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 23.1 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 11 84.6 4 - 5 hours 4 30.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 3.0 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 30.8 30.8 38.5 3.1 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = APP 200 001L1 INTRO-APPALACH STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.3 A 8 50.0 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 7 43.8 Junior 6 37.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 31.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 16 94.1 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ENS 200 001L1 INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Howell, Paul D. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 45.5 Sophomore 4 28.6 B 4 36.4 Junior 6 42.9 C 1 9.1 Senior 4 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 9.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 3 21.4 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 71.4 4 - 5 hours 5 35.7 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 23.5 47.1 29.4 3.1 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 23.5 35.3 23.5 17.6 2.4 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 5.9 23.5 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 5.9 17.6 52.9 23.5 2.9 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 17.6 11.8 47.1 23.5 2.8 1.03 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 17.6 35.3 29.4 17.6 2.5 1.01 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 58.8 17.6 23.5 0.0 1.6 0.86 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 18.8 43.8 31.3 3.0 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 11.8 35.3 29.4 23.5 2.6 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 17.6 58.8 23.5 3.1 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 11.8 5.9 58.8 23.5 2.9 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 6.3 6.3 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 3.0 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 17.6 52.9 29.4 3.1 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 17.6 17.6 41.2 23.5 2.7 1.05 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 11.8 29.4 35.3 23.5 2.7 0.99 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 17.6 29.4 29.4 23.5 2.6 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 58.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = ST 500 001L1 INTRO TO SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Natter, Wolfgang ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 71.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign hel