****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 104 001L1 INTRO GENERAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 44 72.1 A 12 19.4 Sophomore 11 18.0 B 25 40.3 Junior 3 4.9 C 19 30.6 Senior 3 4.9 D 6 9.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 8.2 Studies Program 24 38.7 2 hours 15 24.6 Required by my major 33 53.2 3 hours 17 27.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 8.1 4 - 5 hours 14 23.0 6 - 7 hours 9 14.8 8 or more hours 1 1.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 65 3.1 4.6 75.4 16.9 3.1 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 67 6.0 16.4 64.2 13.4 2.9 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 65 6.2 10.8 60.0 23.1 3.0 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 66 4.5 15.2 62.1 18.2 2.9 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 67 1.5 6.0 62.7 29.9 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 66 4.5 3.0 65.2 27.3 3.2 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 55 1.8 3.6 58.2 36.4 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 38.2 41.2 8.8 11.8 1.9 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 66 28.8 34.8 28.8 7.6 2.2 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 4.5 14.9 58.2 22.4 3.0 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 66 1.5 3.0 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 19.4 41.8 35.8 3.0 2.2 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 64 45.3 39.1 12.5 3.1 1.7 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 64 17.2 39.1 37.5 6.3 2.3 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 13.3 35.6 46.7 4.4 2.4 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 63 15.9 36.5 41.3 6.3 2.4 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 63 14.3 28.6 49.2 7.9 2.5 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 65 13.8 33.8 43.1 9.2 2.5 0.85 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 62 37.1 37.1 24.2 1.6 1.9 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 67 25.4 38.8 31.3 4.5 2.1 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 67 37.3 34.3 25.4 3.0 1.9 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 53.8 23.1 23.1 2.7 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 134 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 104 002L1 INTRO GENERAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 40 64.5 A 17 28.3 Sophomore 14 22.6 B 20 33.3 Junior 7 11.3 C 22 36.7 Senior 1 1.6 D 1 1.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 8.1 Studies Program 10 16.7 2 hours 15 24.2 Required by my major 41 68.3 3 hours 19 30.6 Other (e.g. elective) 9 15.0 4 - 5 hours 14 22.6 6 - 7 hours 7 11.3 8 or more hours 2 3.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 65 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 69 14.5 39.1 36.2 10.1 2.4 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 66 10.6 9.1 54.5 25.8 3.0 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 69 8.7 11.6 58.0 21.7 2.9 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 69 0.0 10.1 69.6 20.3 3.1 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 68 1.5 11.8 61.8 25.0 3.1 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 60 0.0 3.3 58.3 38.3 3.4 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 34.2 39.5 18.4 7.9 2.0 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 68 30.9 30.9 26.5 11.8 2.2 1.01 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 69 2.9 8.7 58.0 30.4 3.2 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 64 1.6 6.3 65.6 26.6 3.2 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 69 24.6 33.3 26.1 15.9 2.3 1.02 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 67 32.8 37.3 20.9 9.0 2.1 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 67 26.9 35.8 28.4 9.0 2.2 0.94 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 49 14.3 26.5 53.1 6.1 2.5 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 63 14.3 25.4 49.2 11.1 2.6 0.87 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 63 14.3 22.2 50.8 12.7 2.6 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 66 15.2 21.2 48.5 15.2 2.6 0.92 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 33.8 32.3 29.2 4.6 2.0 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 69 20.3 34.8 33.3 11.6 2.4 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 69 29.0 39.1 26.1 5.8 2.1 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 8.3 25.0 58.3 8.3 2.7 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 24 8.3 25.0 54.2 12.5 2.7 0.81 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 18.8 18.8 50.0 12.5 2.6 0.96 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 132 Number of forms with at least one student response = 69 Percent completed = 51.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 003L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anthony, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 63 79.7 A 15 20.3 Sophomore 11 13.9 B 32 43.2 Junior 5 6.3 C 18 24.3 Senior 0 0.0 D 8 10.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 5.1 Studies Program 10 13.0 2 hours 16 20.5 Required by my major 64 83.1 3 hours 23 29.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 3.9 4 - 5 hours 27 34.6 6 - 7 hours 6 7.7 8 or more hours 2 2.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 83 0.0 6.0 60.2 33.7 3.3 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 83 4.8 10.8 60.2 24.1 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 83 0.0 9.6 62.7 27.7 3.2 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 82 6.1 24.4 54.9 14.6 2.8 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 83 1.2 18.1 60.2 20.5 3.0 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 80 0.0 2.5 61.3 36.3 3.3 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 76 1.3 0.0 60.5 38.2 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 29.5 45.5 20.5 4.5 2.0 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 83 4.8 36.1 44.6 14.5 2.7 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 82 0.0 8.5 48.8 42.7 3.3 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 74 0.0 6.8 68.9 24.3 3.2 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 83 2.4 19.3 61.4 16.9 2.9 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 83 9.6 33.7 43.4 13.3 2.6 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 82 1.2 18.3 64.6 15.9 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 59 0.0 33.9 52.5 13.6 2.8 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 81 0.0 21.0 63.0 16.0 3.0 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 81 2.5 9.9 66.7 21.0 3.1 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 83 1.2 18.1 59.0 21.7 3.0 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 82 9.8 51.2 30.5 8.5 2.4 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 83 8.4 26.5 47.0 18.1 2.7 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 83 15.7 32.5 31.3 20.5 2.6 0.99. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 47 4.3 14.9 61.7 19.1 3.0 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 45 4.4 33.3 51.1 11.1 2.7 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 31 3.2 25.8 54.8 16.1 2.8 0.73 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.60 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 22.2 77.8 0.0 2.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 40.0 50.0 10.0 2.7 0.67 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.79 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.50 34. Instructor explained expectations 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 35. Instructor helped with my problems 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 278 Number of forms scanned = 275 Number of forms with at least one student response = 83 Percent completed = 29.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 538 001L1 PRIN OF ORGANIC CHE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anthony, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 61.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 15.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 23.1 Senior 2 15.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 84.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 7.7 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 9 69.2 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 23.1 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 23.5 58.8 11.8 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 002L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Atwood, David ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 84 79.2 A 22 21.2 Sophomore 14 13.2 B 34 32.7 Junior 5 4.7 C 34 32.7 Senior 2 1.9 D 13 12.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 17.1 Studies Program 18 17.3 2 hours 26 24.8 Required by my major 80 76.9 3 hours 26 24.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 5.8 4 - 5 hours 25 23.8 6 - 7 hours 6 5.7 8 or more hours 4 3.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 117 1.7 3.4 60.7 34.2 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 117 0.9 6.8 48.7 43.6 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 116 3.4 11.2 56.9 28.4 3.1 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 116 4.3 20.7 57.8 17.2 2.9 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 117 0.0 11.1 57.3 31.6 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 116 0.0 0.9 65.5 33.6 3.3 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 106 0.9 2.8 56.6 39.6 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 81 32.1 44.4 16.0 7.4 2.0 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 115 10.4 38.3 41.7 9.6 2.5 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 117 0.9 4.3 61.5 33.3 3.3 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 104 1.0 3.8 73.1 22.1 3.2 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 114 4.4 14.9 57.0 23.7 3.0 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 117 12.0 41.9 34.2 12.0 2.5 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 113 12.4 25.7 50.4 11.5 2.6 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 86 5.8 29.1 50.0 15.1 2.7 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 113 5.3 24.8 52.2 17.7 2.8 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 117 6.0 17.9 57.3 18.8 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 116 6.0 12.9 61.2 19.8 2.9 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 116 17.2 50.9 21.6 10.3 2.3 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 114 5.3 31.6 45.6 17.5 2.8 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 113 14.2 36.3 38.9 10.6 2.5 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 279 Number of forms scanned = 271 Number of forms with at least one student response = 117 Percent completed = 41.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 510 001L1 ADV INORGANIC CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Atwood, David ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 71.4 Sophomore 1 14.3 B 2 28.6 Junior 1 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 14.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 57.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 580 003L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: BIOANALYTICAL SENSORS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bachas, Leonidas G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 37.5 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 001A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.8 A 9 17.0 Sophomore 37 67.3 B 28 52.8 Junior 11 20.0 C 15 28.3 Senior 6 10.9 D 1 1.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.8 Studies Program 6 11.1 2 hours 5 9.1 Required by my major 43 79.6 3 hours 17 30.9 Other (e.g. elective) 5 9.3 4 - 5 hours 17 30.9 6 - 7 hours 8 14.5 8 or more hours 7 12.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 79 3.8 7.6 64.6 24.1 3.1 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 78 7.7 11.5 52.6 28.2 3.0 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 79 6.3 11.4 55.7 26.6 3.0 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 78 14.1 15.4 52.6 17.9 2.7 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 78 10.3 17.9 57.7 14.1 2.8 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 79 3.8 8.9 68.4 19.0 3.0 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 79 0.0 1.3 51.9 46.8 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 79 5.1 15.2 50.6 29.1 3.0 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 28.6 39.3 28.6 2.9 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 3.6 7.1 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 27 3.7 0.0 55.6 40.7 3.3 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 18.5 40.7 40.7 3.2 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 11.1 33.3 37.0 18.5 2.6 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 3.8 0.0 65.4 30.8 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 57.7 34.6 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 3.8 3.8 57.7 34.6 3.2 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 15.4 34.6 34.6 15.4 2.5 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 7.1 39.3 35.7 17.9 2.6 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 14.3 17.9 39.3 28.6 2.8 1.02. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 66 10.6 24.2 40.9 24.2 2.8 0.94 33. Amount of work appropriate 66 10.6 18.2 56.1 15.2 2.8 0.84 34. Instructor explained expectations 66 6.1 21.2 39.4 33.3 3.0 0.89 35. Instructor helped with my problems 65 4.6 15.4 38.5 41.5 3.2 0.86 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 66 3.0 9.1 57.6 30.3 3.2 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 93 Number of forms scanned = 82 Number of forms with at least one student response = 79 Percent completed = 84.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 002A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 4.1 A 13 26.5 Sophomore 37 75.5 B 19 38.8 Junior 6 12.2 C 16 32.7 Senior 3 6.1 D 1 2.0 Graduate 1 2.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 10.6 2 hours 3 6.1 Required by my major 40 85.1 3 hours 11 22.4 Other (e.g. elective) 2 4.3 4 - 5 hours 19 38.8 6 - 7 hours 10 20.4 8 or more hours 6 12.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 63 3.2 7.9 66.7 22.2 3.1 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 63 1.6 9.5 65.1 23.8 3.1 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 63 1.6 12.7 73.0 12.7 3.0 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 62 11.3 11.3 59.7 17.7 2.8 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 63 12.7 27.0 54.0 6.3 2.5 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 63 3.2 9.5 73.0 14.3 3.0 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 61 0.0 3.3 65.6 31.1 3.3 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 62 8.1 19.4 58.1 14.5 2.8 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 21.4 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 25.0 41.7 25.0 2.8 0.94 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 16.7 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 57 5.3 14.0 61.4 19.3 2.9 0.74 33. Amount of work appropriate 57 10.5 26.3 56.1 7.0 2.6 0.78 34. Instructor explained expectations 56 10.7 21.4 53.6 14.3 2.7 0.85 35. Instructor helped with my problems 56 3.6 28.6 51.8 16.1 2.8 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 56 5.4 5.4 66.1 23.2 3.1 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 73 Number of forms scanned = 69 Number of forms with at least one student response = 64 Percent completed = 87.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 003A3 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 20.7 Sophomore 21 65.6 B 12 41.4 Junior 7 21.9 C 11 37.9 Senior 1 3.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.1 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 9.4 2 hours 2 6.5 Required by my major 28 87.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.1 4 - 5 hours 10 32.3 6 - 7 hours 9 29.0 8 or more hours 10 32.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 43 0.0 9.3 53.5 37.2 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 6.8 15.9 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 44 2.3 15.9 56.8 25.0 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 11.1 17.8 57.8 13.3 2.7 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 6.7 22.2 62.2 8.9 2.7 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 6.8 20.5 59.1 13.6 2.8 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 0.0 2.2 66.7 31.1 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 45 0.0 6.7 68.9 24.4 3.2 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 12.5 18.8 62.5 6.3 2.6 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 92.9 7.1 3.1 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 14 7.1 0.0 78.6 14.3 3.0 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 13.3 73.3 6.7 2.8 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 18.8 25.0 50.0 6.3 2.4 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 8.3 75.0 8.3 2.8 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 13.3 6.7 73.3 6.7 2.7 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 12.5 6.3 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 12.5 6.3 68.8 12.5 2.8 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 20.0 46.7 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 16.7 33.3 44.4 5.6 2.4 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 22.2 5.6 72.2 0.0 2.5 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 39 10.3 17.9 59.0 12.8 2.7 0.82 33. Amount of work appropriate 39 25.6 23.1 41.0 10.3 2.4 0.99 34. Instructor explained expectations 39 2.6 17.9 61.5 17.9 2.9 0.69 35. Instructor helped with my problems 38 0.0 13.2 60.5 26.3 3.1 0.62 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 39 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.54 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 58 Number of forms scanned = 54 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 77.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 532 001L1 SPECTROMET ID-ORG COMPND INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cammers-Goodwin, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 37.5 Junior 12 50.0 C 1 4.2 Senior 9 37.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 22 91.7 3 hours 2 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.3 4 - 5 hours 7 29.2 6 - 7 hours 3 12.5 8 or more hours 6 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 37.5 12.5 41.7 8.3 2.2 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 25.0 8.3 54.2 12.5 2.5 1.02 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 8.3 29.2 50.0 12.5 2.7 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 4.2 20.8 62.5 12.5 2.8 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 13.0 30.4 34.8 21.7 2.7 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 12.5 45.8 20.8 20.8 2.5 0.98 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 24 20.8 20.8 29.2 29.2 2.7 1.13 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 20.8 29.2 20.8 29.2 2.6 1.14 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 13.0 30.4 39.1 17.4 2.6 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 0.0 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 8.7 47.8 39.1 3.2 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 8.7 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 21.7 43.5 34.8 3.1 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 28.6 28.6 23.8 2.6 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 34.8 39.1 21.7 2.8 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 21.7 47.8 8.7 21.7 2.3 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 82.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 580 005L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: MOLECULAR DESIGN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cammers-Goodwin, Arthur ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 83.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 33.3 3 hours 4 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 522 001L1 INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Daunert, Sylvia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 12 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 12 100.0 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 50.0 6 - 7 hours 3 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 3.1 1.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 11.1 33.3 33.3 22.2 2.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 33.3 22.2 33.3 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 36.4 18.2 45.5 3.1 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 72.7 3.5 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 580 001L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: CHEMICAL SAFETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Enoch, Harry ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 28.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 71.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 85.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 2.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 547 001L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL CHEM I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grev, Roger ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 60.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 16.7 16.7 33.3 33.3 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 50.0 16.7 33.3 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 50.0 33.3 16.7 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 230 002L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grossman, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.4 A 16 23.2 Sophomore 41 59.4 B 20 29.0 Junior 18 26.1 C 28 40.6 Senior 7 10.1 D 3 4.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.4 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 2.9 Pass or Audit 1 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 4.5 Studies Program 1 1.4 2 hours 7 10.4 Required by my major 61 88.4 3 hours 24 35.8 Other (e.g. elective) 7 10.1 4 - 5 hours 19 28.4 6 - 7 hours 4 6.0 8 or more hours 10 14.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 74 0.0 8.1 71.6 20.3 3.1 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 74 6.8 12.2 63.5 17.6 2.9 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 60 6.7 26.7 51.7 15.0 2.8 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 73 19.2 23.3 43.8 13.7 2.5 0.96 5. Grading was fair and consistent 74 14.9 21.6 51.4 12.2 2.6 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 10.9 10.9 56.4 21.8 2.9 0.88 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 72 0.0 1.4 37.5 61.1 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 62 25.8 33.9 33.9 6.5 2.2 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 74 12.2 24.3 47.3 16.2 2.7 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 74 0.0 0.0 39.2 60.8 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 72 1.4 6.9 55.6 36.1 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 73 0.0 11.0 61.6 27.4 3.2 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 72 23.6 29.2 31.9 15.3 2.4 1.01 14. Encouraged class participation 72 6.9 13.9 58.3 20.8 2.9 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 11.4 20.5 56.8 11.4 2.7 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 72 6.9 9.7 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 71 5.6 14.1 59.2 21.1 3.0 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 73 4.1 24.7 52.1 19.2 2.9 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 73 26.0 31.5 31.5 11.0 2.3 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 72 9.7 29.2 45.8 15.3 2.7 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 72 18.1 27.8 30.6 23.6 2.6 1.04. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 150 Number of forms scanned = 149 Number of forms with at least one student response = 74 Percent completed = 49.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 580 002L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Haley, Boyd E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 37.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 16 55.2 Junior 2 6.7 C 2 6.9 Senior 13 43.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 15 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 6.9 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 4 13.8 Required by my major 16 57.1 3 hours 9 31.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 39.3 4 - 5 hours 9 31.0 6 - 7 hours 5 17.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 3.1 3.1 50.0 43.8 3.3 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 28.6 35.7 32.1 3.6 2.1 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 5.6 16.7 66.7 11.1 2.8 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 2.5 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 3.1 18.8 46.9 31.3 3.1 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 3.1 9.4 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 9.7 58.1 32.3 3.2 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 20.0 68.0 12.0 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 3.1 3.1 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 3.1 9.4 46.9 40.6 3.3 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 3.1 6.3 53.1 37.5 3.3 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 6.5 19.4 51.6 22.6 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 15.6 50.0 34.4 3.2 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 3.1 12.5 34.4 50.0 3.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 107 002L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 5.2 A 9 15.8 Sophomore 39 67.2 B 19 33.3 Junior 9 15.5 C 22 38.6 Senior 6 10.3 D 6 10.5 Graduate 1 1.7 E/Fail 1 1.8 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 5 9.1 2 hours 8 13.8 Required by my major 48 87.3 3 hours 11 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 3.6 4 - 5 hours 18 31.0 6 - 7 hours 11 19.0 8 or more hours 10 17.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 66 4.5 3.0 60.6 31.8 3.2 0.71 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 65 9.2 13.8 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 65 6.2 9.2 55.4 29.2 3.1 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 66 6.1 18.2 53.0 22.7 2.9 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 6.2 13.8 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 66 3.0 6.1 69.7 21.2 3.1 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 55 0.0 3.6 58.2 38.2 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 25.9 48.1 18.5 7.4 2.1 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 65 21.5 24.6 33.8 20.0 2.5 1.05 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 66 1.5 1.5 43.9 53.0 3.5 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 60 6.7 8.3 56.7 28.3 3.1 0.80 12. Satisfact answered class questions 65 13.8 23.1 40.0 23.1 2.7 0.98 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 63 22.2 33.3 27.0 17.5 2.4 1.02 14. Encouraged class participation 63 19.0 19.0 41.3 20.6 2.6 1.02 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 2.3 31.8 50.0 15.9 2.8 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 62 6.5 21.0 51.6 21.0 2.9 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 63 6.3 20.6 49.2 23.8 2.9 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 63 6.3 17.5 50.8 25.4 3.0 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 62 29.0 30.6 29.0 11.3 2.2 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 66 15.2 28.8 37.9 18.2 2.6 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 66 31.8 12.1 36.4 19.7 2.4 1.14. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 6.7 6.7 80.0 6.7 2.9 0.64 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 177 Number of forms scanned = 174 Number of forms with at least one student response = 66 Percent completed = 37.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 614 001L1 ORGANOTRANS METAL CHE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ladipo, Folami ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior