****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 731 401S1 SEM INTERPERSONAL COM: DEV COMPL ASSESS INDIVID INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Applegate, James L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 77.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 22.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 12.5 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 87.5 4 - 5 hours 6 66.7 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 2 22.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 0.0 66.7 22.2 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 12.5 0.0 75.0 12.5 2.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 2.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 11.1 11.1 66.7 11.1 2.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 20.0 10.0 50.0 20.0 2.7 1.06 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 9 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 2.5 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 12.5 12.5 62.5 12.5 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 33.3 44.4 22.2 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 10.0 80.0 0.0 2.7 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 10.0 40.0 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 10 40.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 1.7 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 10.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 2.6 0.97 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 771 001S1 SEMINAR IN HEALTH COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harrington, Nancy Grant ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 42.9 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 85.7 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 765 001L1 ADV SEM COMM RES MTHDS TEXT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hertog, James K ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 3 50.0 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 16.7 0.0 83.3 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 667 401L1 QUALITATIVE METHODS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Lindlof, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 58.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 41.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 2 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 4 40.0 4 - 5 hours 5 41.7 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 2 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 30.8 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 46.2 38.5 15.4 2.7 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 651 401L1 COMMUNICATION THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Robinson, Karla ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 16 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 6.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 13 81.3 3 hours 3 18.8 Other (e.g. elective) 2 12.5 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 4 25.0 8 or more hours 6 37.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 6.3 87.5 3.8 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 6.3 87.5 3.8 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 18.8 31.3 50.0 3.3 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 6.3 18.8 68.8 3.5 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 6.3 0.0 37.5 56.3 3.4 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 33.3 53.3 3.4 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 20.0 73.3 3.7 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 28. Guided student report preparation 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 94.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 619 001L1 PROSEM IN INTERNATIONAL/ INTERCULTURAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rush, Ramona R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 88.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 2 22.2 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 77.8 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 10.0 50.0 30.0 3.0 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 1.07 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 10.0 0.0 40.0 50.0 3.3 0.95 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 10.0 30.0 10.0 50.0 3.0 1.15 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 11.1 22.2 33.3 33.3 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 10.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 2.8 1.03 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 30.0 40.0 3.1 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 30.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 2.6 1.26 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 30.0 20.0 40.0 2.9 1.10. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 10 10.0 10.0 40.0 40.0 3.1 0.99 28. Guided student report preparation 10 20.0 20.0 30.0 30.0 2.7 1.16 29. Students free to express opinions 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 482 001L1 PERSUASION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bostrom, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 69.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 30.8 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 76.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 15.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 8 61.5 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 5 38.5 4 - 5 hours 3 23.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 0.0 92.3 7.7 3.1 0.28 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 0.0 76.9 23.1 3.2 0.44 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 56.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 319 001L1 WORLD MEDIA SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Boyd, Douglas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 5 38.5 C 3 23.1 Senior 8 61.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 7 53.8 3 hours 4 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 46.2 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 28.6 28.6 28.6 2.7 1.07 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 28.6 21.4 35.7 2.8 1.12 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 18.2 9.1 36.4 36.4 2.9 1.14 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 35.7 14.3 42.9 2.9 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 252 007L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 15 75.0 Sophomore 5 25.0 B 5 25.0 Junior 3 15.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 30.0 Studies Program 16 80.0 2 hours 6 30.0 Required by my major 3 15.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 3 15.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 0.0 73.9 21.7 3.1 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 22.7 45.5 31.8 3.1 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 0.0 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 78.3 21.7 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 9.1 36.4 50.0 4.5 2.5 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 252 008L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 80.0 Sophomore 4 26.7 B 3 20.0 Junior 10 66.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 73.3 Studies Program 11 73.3 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 4 26.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 15.0 55.0 30.0 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 21.1 36.8 42.1 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 5.0 5.0 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 10.5 26.3 42.1 21.1 2.7 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 5.0 15.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 23.5 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 0.99 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 40.0 40.0 0.0 2.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 23 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 87.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 002L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 30.4 A 17 73.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 13.0 Junior 4 17.4 C 3 13.0 Senior 12 52.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 12 52.2 2 hours 2 8.7 Required by my major 10 43.5 3 hours 8 34.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 6 26.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 7 30.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 8.3 20.8 62.5 8.3 2.7 0.75 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 16.7 33.3 37.5 12.5 2.5 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 16.7 41.7 41.7 0.0 2.3 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 4.2 25.0 70.8 0.0 2.7 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 20.8 41.7 33.3 4.2 2.2 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 12.5 25.0 54.2 8.3 2.6 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 3.0 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 37.5 58.3 4.2 2.7 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 25.0 58.3 16.7 0.0 1.9 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 17.4 73.9 8.7 2.9 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 81.0 19.0 3.2 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 16.7 54.2 29.2 0.0 2.1 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 33.3 41.7 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 4.2 79.2 16.7 3.1 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 19.0 71.4 4.8 2.8 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 18.2 18.2 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 22.7 18.2 59.1 0.0 2.4 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 45.8 33.3 20.8 0.0 1.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 37.5 37.5 25.0 0.0 1.9 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 33.3 54.2 8.3 4.2 1.8 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 18.2 45.5 36.4 0.0 2.2 0.75 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 11.1 38.9 50.0 0.0 2.4 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 16.7 16.7 66.7 0.0 2.5 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 003L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 60.0 A 16 64.0 Sophomore 7 28.0 B 9 36.0 Junior 3 12.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 16.0 Studies Program 19 79.2 2 hours 5 20.0 Required by my major 5 20.8 3 hours 5 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 20.0 6 - 7 hours 4 16.0 8 or more hours 2 8.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 3.7 0.0 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 3.7 11.1 37.0 48.1 3.3 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 3.7 11.1 51.9 33.3 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 14.8 22.2 37.0 25.9 2.7 1.02 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 3.7 7.4 37.0 51.9 3.4 0.79 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 3.7 44.4 51.9 3.5 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 11.1 29.6 59.3 3.5 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 11.1 33.3 51.9 3.3 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 7.4 25.9 66.7 3.6 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 3.7 33.3 63.0 3.6 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 7.4 37.0 55.6 3.5 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 37.0 59.3 3.6 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 7.4 22.2 22.2 48.1 3.1 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 17.9 25.0 57.1 3.4 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 10.7 28.6 60.7 3.5 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 18.2 9.1 45.5 27.3 2.8 1.08 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 22.2 0.0 44.4 33.3 2.9 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 20.0 0.0 80.0 0.0 2.6 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 001L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 36 47.4 A 35 46.1 Sophomore 19 25.0 B 31 40.8 Junior 11 14.5 C 10 13.2 Senior 10 13.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 23.7 Studies Program 39 52.0 2 hours 30 39.5 Required by my major 23 30.7 3 hours 22 28.9 Other (e.g. elective) 13 17.3 4 - 5 hours 5 6.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 85 1.2 0.0 38.8 60.0 3.6 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 81 13.6 38.3 28.4 19.8 2.5 0.96 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 85 3.5 5.9 49.4 41.2 3.3 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 85 2.4 0.0 30.6 67.1 3.6 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 84 0.0 1.2 44.0 54.8 3.5 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 85 0.0 1.2 42.4 56.5 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 85 1.2 14.1 50.6 34.1 3.2 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 84 2.4 23.8 45.2 28.6 3.0 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 85 0.0 1.2 18.8 80.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 85 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.2 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 79 0.0 1.3 40.5 58.2 3.6 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 84 0.0 1.2 22.6 76.2 3.8 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 85 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.2 3.8 0.39 14. Encouraged class participation 85 0.0 2.4 24.7 72.9 3.7 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 84 1.2 2.4 40.5 56.0 3.5 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 84 1.2 2.4 41.7 54.8 3.5 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 78 1.3 6.4 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 85 0.0 0.0 28.2 71.8 3.7 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 85 0.0 5.9 40.0 54.1 3.5 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 84 0.0 2.4 11.9 85.7 3.8 0.43 21. Overall quality of teaching 83 0.0 2.4 10.8 86.7 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 29 0.0 3.4 48.3 48.3 3.4 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 101 Number of forms scanned = 85 Number of forms with at least one student response = 85 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 002L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 43 67.2 A 20 31.7 Sophomore 14 21.9 B 27 42.9 Junior 5 7.8 C 14 22.2 Senior 2 3.1 D 2 3.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 20.3 Studies Program 35 58.3 2 hours 30 46.9 Required by my major 18 30.0 3 hours 16 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 11.7 4 - 5 hours 5 7.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 75 0.0 0.0 42.7 57.3 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 70 17.1 28.6 27.1 27.1 2.6 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 75 4.0 2.7 45.3 48.0 3.4 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 75 0.0 0.0 34.7 65.3 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 74 9.5 12.2 50.0 28.4 3.0 0.89 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 75 0.0 1.3 54.7 44.0 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 75 16.0 14.7 48.0 21.3 2.7 0.97 8. Graded assignments included comments 75 10.7 30.7 44.0 14.7 2.6 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 75 0.0 1.3 22.7 76.0 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 75 0.0 0.0 10.7 89.3 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 67 4.5 0.0 32.8 62.7 3.5 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 75 0.0 1.3 18.7 80.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 75 1.3 1.3 22.7 74.7 3.7 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 75 0.0 2.7 17.3 80.0 3.8 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 74 0.0 1.4 44.6 54.1 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 71 0.0 4.2 40.8 54.9 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 68 0.0 13.2 50.0 36.8 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 74 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 74 1.4 6.8 43.2 48.6 3.4 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 75 0.0 2.7 21.3 76.0 3.7 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 74 0.0 1.4 10.8 87.8 3.9 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 26 0.0 3.8 69.2 26.9 3.2 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 42 0.0 2.4 52.4 45.2 3.4 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 42 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 107 Number of forms scanned = 76 Number of forms with at least one student response = 75 Percent completed = 70.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 350 001L1 LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 29.2 Sophomore 1 4.2 B 13 54.2 Junior 9 37.5 C 4 16.7 Senior 14 58.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 29.2 Required by my major 14 58.3 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 41.7 4 - 5 hours 8 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 11.5 38.5 50.0 3.4 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 11.5 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 48.0 44.0 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 8.0 16.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.89 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 8.7 4.3 56.5 30.4 3.1 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 23.1 73.1 3.7 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 7.7 26.9 65.4 3.6 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 13.0 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 24.0 28.0 48.0 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 3.8 38.5 57.7 3.5 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 3.8 19.2 76.9 3.7 0.53. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 525 001L1 ORGANIZATIONAL COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 60.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 30.4 Junior 2 8.3 C 2 8.7 Senior 18 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 4.2 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 34.8 Required by my major 14 63.6 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 8 36.4 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 7.7 26.9 65.4 3.6 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 19.2 26.9 53.8 3.3 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 8.0 8.0 40.0 44.0 3.2 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 23.5 17.6 17.6 41.2 2.8 1.25 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 6.3 18.8 18.8 56.3 3.3 1.00 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 19.2 19.2 61.5 3.4 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 4.0 36.0 60.0 3.6 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 15.4 34.6 50.0 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 32.0 60.0 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 3.8 26.9 23.1 46.2 3.1 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 4.2 20.8 41.7 33.3 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 24.0 20.0 56.0 3.3 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 89.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 591 001L1 SPEC TOPS IN COM: CORPORATE REPUTATION I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 87.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 87.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 62.5 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 62.5 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 11.1 11.1 66.7 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 42.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 591 002L1 SPEC TOPS IN COM: CORPORATE REPUTATION II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 1 10.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 60.0 Required by my major 4 40.0 3 hours 2 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 591 003L1 SPEC TOPS IN COM: CORPORATE REPUTATION III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 1 12.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 87.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 75.0 Required by my major 4 50.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % %