UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 16.1 A 47 51.6 Sophomore 26 28.0 B 14 15.4 Junior 23 24.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 28.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 2.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.1 Pass or Audit 30 33.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 43 46.7 Studies Program 2 2.2 2 hours 26 28.3 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 9 9.8 Other (e.g. elective) 91 97.8 4 - 5 hours 8 8.7 6 - 7 hours 6 6.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 96 0.0 1.0 31.3 67.7 3.7 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 82 0.0 1.2 37.8 61.0 3.6 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 88 0.0 1.1 36.4 62.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 92 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 94 0.0 1.1 34.0 64.9 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 86 0.0 0.0 29.1 70.9 3.7 0.46 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 89 0.0 4.5 29.2 66.3 3.6 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 88 0.0 1.1 30.7 68.2 3.7 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 96 0.0 2.1 27.1 70.8 3.7 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 96 0.0 0.0 22.9 77.1 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 96 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 94 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 95 0.0 3.2 24.2 72.6 3.7 0.53 14. Encouraged class participation 96 0.0 2.1 26.0 71.9 3.7 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 91 0.0 2.2 30.8 67.0 3.6 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 94 0.0 2.1 30.9 67.0 3.6 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 95 0.0 3.2 31.6 65.3 3.6 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 96 0.0 1.0 26.0 72.9 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 92 0.0 3.3 28.3 68.5 3.7 0.54 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 95 1.1 2.1 20.0 76.8 3.7 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 94 0.0 1.1 19.1 79.8 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 125 Number of forms scanned = 124 Number of forms with at least one student response = 96 Percent completed = 76.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 228 9.3 A 1,220 50.4 Sophomore 287 11.7 B 894 36.9 Junior 622 25.4 C 241 9.9 Senior 978 40.0 D 23 0.9 Graduate 307 12.6 E/Fail 3 0.1 Professional 6 0.2 I 1 0.0 Other 17 0.7 Pass or Audit 41 1.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 655 26.9 Studies Program 270 11.1 2 hours 703 28.8 Required by my major 1,591 65.3 3 hours 513 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 574 23.6 4 - 5 hours 284 11.7 6 - 7 hours 116 4.8 8 or more hours 166 6.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,579 0.5 1.7 47.5 50.3 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,919 5.0 16.2 49.0 29.9 3.0 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,479 0.9 4.8 54.8 39.5 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,214 1.1 4.8 47.7 46.3 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,518 1.4 4.5 48.3 45.8 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,492 1.2 3.9 51.6 43.3 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,478 2.3 6.4 47.4 43.9 3.3 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,415 1.9 9.6 49.2 39.3 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,570 1.9 7.7 43.7 46.7 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,577 0.4 1.5 34.0 64.1 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 2,445 0.4 1.8 42.9 54.9 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,577 0.6 3.2 43.6 52.6 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,555 2.9 10.1 42.3 44.7 3.3 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 2,565 0.8 5.3 45.1 48.9 3.4 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,272 0.9 7.1 55.6 36.4 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,496 1.0 6.4 52.0 40.6 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,414 0.9 8.9 54.0 36.2 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,554 0.8 3.6 49.1 46.5 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,516 3.5 18.1 43.7 34.6 3.1 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,582 2.0 8.4 42.4 47.2 3.3 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,574 2.2 7.9 31.8 58.1 3.5 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 301 2.0 13.3 54.2 30.6 3.1 0.71 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 336 2.7 7.1 58.9 31.3 3.2 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 305 1.6 7.5 54.4 36.4 3.3 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 181 1.7 11.6 53.6 33.1 3.2 0.70 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 206 5.3 13.1 51.5 30.1 3.1 0.80 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 97 2.1 4.1 39.2 54.6 3.5 0.68 28. Guided student report preparation 103 0.0 3.9 43.7 52.4 3.5 0.58 29. Students free to express opinions 110 0.9 0.0 37.3 61.8 3.6 0.55 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 107 0.9 3.7 47.7 47.7 3.4 0.61 31. Developed abil to conduct research 98 2.0 8.2 43.9 45.9 3.3 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 465 1.3 6.2 51.8 40.6 3.3 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 469 3.4 6.4 54.6 35.6 3.2 0.71 34. Instructor explained expectations 468 1.7 6.0 55.1 37.2 3.3 0.65 35. Instructor helped with my problems 459 0.7 6.3 51.4 41.6 3.3 0.63 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 410 1.2 2.2 56.6 40.0 3.4 0.59 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 69 2.9 7.2 34.8 42.0 13.0 3.6 0.92 38. Question 38 69 4.3 10.1 26.1 40.6 18.8 3.6 1.05 39. Question 39 68 4.4 8.8 35.3 29.4 22.1 3.6 1.07 40. Question 40 71 1.4 8.5 19.7 45.1 25.4 3.8 0.95 41. Question 41 59 3.4 20.3 16.9 35.6 23.7 3.6 1.16 42. Question 42 69 5.8 15.9 27.5 39.1 11.6 3.3 1.07 43. Question 43 69 15.9 4.3 34.8 36.2 8.7 3.2 1.18 44. Question 44 64 1.6 10.9 31.3 39.1 17.2 3.6 0.95 45. Question 45 71 2.8 9.9 22.5 38.0 26.8 3.8 1.05 46. Question 46 70 0.0 5.7 21.4 37.1 35.7 4.0 0.90 47. Question 47 70 2.9 7.1 38.6 35.7 15.7 3.5 0.94 48. Question 48 69 4.3 20.3 27.5 31.9 15.9 3.3 1.11 49. Question 49 56 8.9 10.7 33.9 26.8 19.6 3.4 1.18 Number of forms preslugged = at least 3295 Number of forms scanned = 2625 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2595 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6,182 27.4 A 9,201 41.4 Sophomore 5,498 24.4 B 9,010 40.5 Junior 4,729 21.0 C 3,020 13.6 Senior 4,838 21.4 D 455 2.0 Graduate 1,107 4.9 E/Fail 57 0.3 Professional 26 0.1 I 4 0.0 Other 175 0.8 Pass or Audit 481 2.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5,619 25.1 Studies Program 7,666 34.5 2 hours 5,998 26.8 Required by my major 10,290 46.2 3 hours 5,325 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 4,293 19.3 4 - 5 hours 3,590 16.0 6 - 7 hours 1,131 5.0 8 or more hours 751 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24,380 0.8 3.1 50.0 46.1 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23,521 5.0 12.8 49.9 32.3 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23,336 2.1 9.2 53.4 35.3 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23,063 2.4 7.9 49.1 40.6 3.3 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24,152 2.3 7.6 48.6 41.5 3.3 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23,401 1.4 5.0 52.4 41.2 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23,848 1.6 6.0 48.4 43.9 3.3 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 22,042 4.0 17.1 45.6 33.3 3.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24,345 3.3 10.3 42.8 43.6 3.3 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24,426 0.6 1.9 35.9 61.5 3.6 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 22,325 0.8 2.7 48.3 48.2 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24,232 1.6 5.6 44.2 48.5 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24,074 5.8 17.8 39.7 36.7 3.1 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 23,978 2.5 10.6 43.6 43.3 3.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20,474 2.0 11.1 56.1 30.9 3.2 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23,042 2.1 11.2 54.4 32.2 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21,601 2.7 16.4 51.8 29.1 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23,877 1.9 6.2 54.9 36.9 3.3 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23,391 8.8 27.7 38.4 25.1 2.8 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24,242 4.2 14.8 44.9 36.1 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 24,163 4.3 11.7 33.4 50.6 3.3 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5,337 3.2 15.2 57.4 24.2 3.0 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6,734 3.1 15.0 58.3 23.6 3.0 0.71 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6,084 2.8 12.1 56.4 28.6 3.1 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3,619 2.5 10.3 54.3 32.9 3.2 0.71 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2,889 3.1 11.0 56.6 29.2 3.1 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1,484 1.5 7.6 47.8 43.1 3.3 0.68 28. Guided student report preparation 1,526 1.1 7.9 50.1 40.9 3.3 0.66 29. Students free to express opinions 1,769 0.7 2.8 38.3 58.2 3.5 0.59 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1,746 1.3 5.5 39.9 53.3 3.5 0.66 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1,555 2.3 9.7 48.8 39.2 3.2 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4,455 3.6 10.4 48.8 37.2 3.2 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 4,496 4.9 8.2 50.0 37.0 3.2 0.78 34. Instructor explained expectations 4,485 2.8 8.5 48.3 40.4 3.3 0.73 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4,289 3.0 10.5 49.3 37.3 3.2 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3,114 3.5 7.9 52.6 36.0 3.2 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1,064 5.9 11.3 10.2 40.0 32.5 3.8 1.17 38. Question 38 1,038 1.5 4.8 3.8 28.3 61.6 4.4 0.89 39. Question 39 1,024 6.0 12.9 13.3 36.3 31.5 3.7 1.20 40. Question 40 1,036 5.3 6.9 9.6 32.4 45.8 4.1 1.14 41. Question 41 38 5.3 5.3 18.4 31.6 39.5 3.9 1.14 42. Question 42 20 5.0 15.0 15.0 45.0 20.0 3.6 1.14 43. Question 43 17 0.0 17.6 23.5 35.3 23.5 3.6 1.06 44. Question 44 18 11.1 27.8 27.8 16.7 16.7 3.0 1.28 45. Question 45 18 16.7 11.1 16.7 33.3 22.2 3.3 1.41 46. Question 46 14 14.3 14.3 7.1 35.7 28.6 3.5 1.45 47. Question 47 9 33.3 0.0 0.0 22.2 44.4 3.4 . 48. Question 48 8 12.5 12.5 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.9 . 49. Question 49 9 11.1 0.0 11.1 33.3 44.4 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 36572 Number of forms scanned = 29713 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24767 Percent completed = 67.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Business and Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 94 1.5 A 2,980 47.4 Sophomore 824 13.0 B 2,570 40.9 Junior 1,758 27.8 C 577 9.2 Senior 2,831 44.8 D 56 0.9 Graduate 743 11.8 E/Fail 5 0.1 Professional 24 0.4 I 2 0.0 Other 45 0.7 Pass or Audit 92 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1,564 24.8 Studies Program 254 4.0 2 hours 1,946 30.9 Required by my major 5,092 81.0 3 hours 1,546 24.6 Other (e.g. elective) 942 15.0 4 - 5 hours 839 13.3 6 - 7 hours 258 4.1 8 or more hours 143 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6,720 0.4 2.0 51.2 46.4 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6,513 3.7 11.3 52.2 32.7 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6,512 0.9 5.8 53.4 39.9 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6,524 1.9 6.6 49.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6,666 1.2 4.2 50.1 44.6 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6,488 0.8 3.9 52.6 42.6 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6,622 0.5 3.2 48.0 48.2 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 6,101 2.6 17.7 50.3 29.4 3.1 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6,726 2.6 9.9 44.2 43.3 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6,730 0.5 1.6 36.0 61.9 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 6,265 0.4 2.0 48.3 49.2 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6,703 1.2 5.5 45.7 47.6 3.4 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6,671 4.4 15.7 43.6 36.2 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 6,697 1.1 6.5 45.2 47.1 3.4 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5,708 1.3 11.0 60.8 26.9 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6,571 1.2 6.7 57.5 34.5 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6,455 1.3 8.2 58.3 32.2 3.2 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6,671 1.2 4.6 55.3 38.9 3.3 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6,548 6.2 24.5 45.2 24.1 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6,684 2.5 11.5 47.5 38.5 3.2 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 6,654 3.3 11.0 33.7 51.9 3.3 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 246 2.0 17.1 58.1 22.8 3.0 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 310 3.2 10.0 62.9 23.9 3.1 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 290 3.4 6.9 59.0 30.7 3.2 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 153 3.3 19.0 54.2 23.5 3.0 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 142 2.8 9.9 59.9 27.5 3.1 0.69 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 126 0.8 9.5 42.9 46.8 3.4 0.69 28. Guided student report preparation 140 0.7 6.4 50.7 42.1 3.3 0.63 29. Students free to express opinions 169 0.6 2.4 43.2 53.8 3.5 0.58 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 169 0.6 2.4 46.7 50.3 3.5 0.58 31. Developed abil to conduct research 151 0.7 13.2 48.3 37.7 3.2 0.70 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 121 2.5 7.4 65.3 24.8 3.1 0.64 33. Amount of work appropriate 127 3.1 2.4 66.1 28.3 3.2 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 118 1.7 10.2 58.5 29.7 3.2 0.67 35. Instructor helped with my problems 115 3.5 8.7 58.3 29.6 3.1 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 84 3.6 2.4 58.3 35.7 3.3 0.68 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 28 0.0 3.6 17.9 78.6 0.0 3.8 0.52 38. Question 38 28 0.0 10.7 14.3 75.0 0.0 3.6 0.68 39. Question 39 28 0.0 3.6 25.0 71.4 0.0 3.7 0.55 40. Question 40 28 0.0 7.1 32.1 60.7 0.0 3.5 0.64 41. Question 41 28 0.0 3.6 32.1 64.3 0.0 3.6 0.57 42. Question 42 28 0.0 10.7 28.6 60.7 0.0 3.5 0.69 43. Question 43 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 64.3 3.6 3.7 0.53 44. Question 44 26 3.8 19.2 26.9 50.0 0.0 3.2 0.91 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 10528 Number of forms scanned = 6757 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6752 Percent completed = 64.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 328 12.2 A 1,476 55.3 Sophomore 562 20.9 B 1,025 38.4 Junior 581 21.6 C 155 5.8 Senior 786 29.2 D 7 0.3 Graduate 410 15.3 E/Fail 1 0.0 Professional 7 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 14 0.5 Pass or Audit 5 0.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 510 19.0 Studies Program 766 28.9 2 hours 885 33.0 Required by my major 1,318 49.8 3 hours 653 24.3 Other (e.g. elective) 564 21.3 4 - 5 hours 414 15.4 6 - 7 hours 129 4.8 8 or more hours 92 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,961 0.9 2.5 44.5 52.0 3.5 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,758 5.0 12.5 47.1 35.3 3.1 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,938 1.9 7.6 51.5 39.0 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,391 2.0 7.6 49.4 40.9 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,935 2.6 8.9 47.9 40.6 3.3 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,944 2.1 7.8 49.5 40.7 3.3 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,926 2.5 7.1 48.6 41.7 3.3 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,913 2.1 9.4 45.8 42.7 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,960 2.7 8.9 43.3 45.1 3.3 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,961 0.4 1.5 31.4 66.6 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 2,750 0.8 2.8 45.2 51.2 3.5 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,952 1.0 4.7 42.8 51.5 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,939 3.7 13.7 39.6 42.9 3.2 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 2,946 0.6 4.1 40.2 55.2 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,634 1.0 6.5 56.4 36.1 3.3 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,836 1.2 7.2 52.4 39.2 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,633 1.7 13.9 50.2 34.1 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,917 1.1 3.9 50.3 44.7 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,851 5.8 23.9 38.6 31.7 3.0 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,941 2.7 11.3 41.3 44.6 3.3 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,932 2.8 10.3 31.8 55.1 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 483 8.3 25.1 49.7 17.0 2.8 0.83 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 817 2.7 12.2 61.1 24.0 3.1 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 804 3.7 10.4 60.4 25.4 3.1 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 261 4.2 13.4 57.1 25.3 3.0 0.75 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 218 1.4 15.1 56.9 26.6 3.1 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 162 3.1 4.3 46.3 46.3 3.4 0.71 28. Guided student report preparation 166 4.8 10.2 45.2 39.8 3.2 0.81 29. Students free to express opinions 172 0.6 3.5 42.4 53.5 3.5 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 168 0.6 7.7 42.9 48.8 3.4 0.66 31. Developed abil to conduct research 151 1.3 11.3 45.0 42.4 3.3 0.72 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 53 0.0 7.5 49.1 43.4 3.4 0.62 33. Amount of work appropriate 54 0.0 14.8 44.4 40.7 3.3 0.71 34. Instructor explained expectations 52 1.9 7.7 48.1 42.3 3.3 0.70 35. Instructor helped with my problems 49 0.0 8.2 46.9 44.9 3.4 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 47 4.3 4.3 51.1 40.4 3.3 0.74 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 4.0 . 38. Question 38 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.7 . 39. Question 39 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 3.7 . 40. Question 40 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 3.7 . 41. Question 41 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 33.3 3.3 . 42. Question 42 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 45. Question 45 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 4.5 . 46. Question 46 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 48. Question 48 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3690 Number of forms scanned = 2974 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2971 Percent completed = 80.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 120 4.0 A 2,279 76.6 Sophomore 260 8.7 B 593 19.9 Junior 476 15.9 C 54 1.8 Senior 970 32.4 D 2 0.1 Graduate 1,119 37.4 E/Fail 1 0.0 Professional 19 0.6 I 5 0.2 Other 27 0.9 Pass or Audit 42 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 851 28.5 Studies Program 68 2.3 2 hours 738 24.8 Required by my major 2,202 73.9 3 hours 591 19.8 Other (e.g. elective) 709 23.8 4 - 5 hours 452 15.2 6 - 7 hours 163 5.5 8 or more hours 186 6.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 3,171 0.6 2.5 37.3 59.6 3.6 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,776 3.7 9.0 44.7 42.7 3.3 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3,023 1.0 5.0 43.6 50.3 3.4 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,461 1.4 4.8 38.4 55.3 3.5 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3,079 0.8 4.5 37.4 57.2 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3,079 1.1 5.0 41.5 52.4 3.5 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3,005 0.8 5.3 38.1 55.9 3.5 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 2,921 0.9 6.5 38.2 54.4 3.5 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 3,170 1.5 6.1 36.2 56.2 3.5 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3,176 0.2 1.7 26.4 71.7 3.7 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 2,940 0.3 1.9 37.1 60.7 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 3,159 0.7 3.3 34.3 61.7 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 3,146 2.0 7.8 35.0 55.2 3.4 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 3,156 0.5 1.9 30.3 67.3 3.6 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 2,859 1.1 4.2 44.5 50.2 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,980 1.1 5.4 42.2 51.2 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,861 1.2 7.6 44.3 46.8 3.4 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 3,126 0.7 2.7 40.2 56.4 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 3,047 2.3 13.5 40.8 43.4 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 3,151 1.8 7.6 32.8 57.8 3.5 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 3,143 1.9 6.4 27.2 64.6 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 90 0.0 7.8 46.7 45.6 3.4 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 108 1.9 6.5 44.4 47.2 3.4 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 102 1.0 5.9 38.2 54.9 3.5 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 75 0.0 9.3 41.3 49.3 3.4 0.66 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 77 0.0 14.3 39.0 46.8 3.3 0.72 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 141 0.7 7.8 35.5 56.0 3.5 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 156 1.3 9.6 36.5 52.6 3.4 0.72 29. Students free to express opinions 175 0.0 4.0 22.9 73.1 3.7 0.54 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 168 0.0 4.2 27.4 68.5 3.6 0.56 31. Developed abil to conduct research 146 0.7 8.9 41.1 49.3 3.4 0.68 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 134 0.0 8.2 33.6 58.2 3.5 0.65 33. Amount of work appropriate 134 0.7 4.5 35.8 59.0 3.5 0.62 34. Instructor explained expectations 134 0.0 9.0 32.8 58.2 3.5 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 131 0.0 7.6 32.1 60.3 3.5 0.64 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 128 0.8 5.5 35.2 58.6 3.5 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 9 11.1 44.4 22.2 22.2 0.0 2.6 . 38. Question 38 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 33.3 11.1 3.2 . 39. Question 39 9 11.1 77.8 0.0 0.0 11.1 2.2 . 40. Question 40 9 33.3 0.0 44.4 11.1 11.1 2.7 . 41. Question 41 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 4.6 . 42. Question 42 9 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 43. Question 43 9 66.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 . 44. Question 44 9 11.1 44.4 22.2 11.1 11.1 2.7 . 45. Question 45 8 75.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 46. Question 46 8 37.5 12.5 25.0 25.0 0.0 2.4 . 47. Question 47 8 25.0 62.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 1.9 . 48. Question 48 8 62.5 25.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 49. Question 49 9 55.6 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3962 Number of forms scanned = 3251 Number of forms with at least one student response = 3200 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 415 8.7 A 2,269 48.1 Sophomore 596 12.5 B 1,728 36.6 Junior 1,013 21.3 C 529 11.2 Senior 2,114 44.5 D 65 1.4 Graduate 569 12.0 E/Fail 16 0.3 Professional 8 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 37 0.8 Pass or Audit 109 2.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 903 19.0 Studies Program 148 3.1 2 hours 806 17.0 Required by my major 3,885 82.0 3 hours 1,094 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 705 14.9 4 - 5 hours 1,036 21.8 6 - 7 hours 469 9.9 8 or more hours 434 9.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5,036 1.3 4.2 61.0 33.5 3.3 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4,464 7.5 15.1 53.8 23.7 2.9 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4,976 2.0 8.4 57.9 31.7 3.2 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4,505 2.1 8.3 58.4 31.3 3.2 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5,011 3.2 9.6 56.0 31.2 3.2 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5,021 1.8 6.4 61.3 30.5 3.2 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4,954 3.3 10.5 57.4 28.8 3.1 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 4,811 6.4 24.6 49.6 19.4 2.8 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5,020 5.2 14.8 51.2 28.8 3.0 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5,060 1.2 2.7 48.1 47.9 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 4,718 2.3 6.8 55.3 35.7 3.2 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5,006 2.9 9.1 55.4 32.6 3.2 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4,979 7.3 21.2 46.3 25.2 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 4,911 4.3 15.5 53.1 27.1 3.0 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3,830 3.2 16.1 60.1 20.5 3.0 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4,920 2.1 9.3 60.2 28.5 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4,917 2.1 9.7 59.6 28.6 3.1 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4,993 1.9 6.2 62.3 29.5 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4,871 8.0 27.0 45.0 20.0 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5,013 5.6 17.0 48.4 29.0 3.0 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 4,995 7.1 16.1 41.6 35.3 3.0 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 207 3.9 11.6 51.2 33.3 3.1 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 216 6.5 10.2 56.9 26.4 3.0 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 183 2.7 12.0 48.6 36.6 3.2 0.75 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 132 4.5 12.9 43.9 38.6 3.2 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 134 5.2 12.7 44.0 38.1 3.1 0.84 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 155 1.9 4.5 56.8 36.8 3.3 0.64 28. Guided student report preparation 159 2.5 8.8 56.0 32.7 3.2 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 165 0.6 4.8 52.7 41.8 3.4 0.60 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 170 3.5 6.5 55.9 34.1 3.2 0.71 31. Developed abil to conduct research 152 2.0 11.2 52.6 34.2 3.2 0.71 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 490 4.1 11.0 59.6 25.3 3.1 0.72 33. Amount of work appropriate 498 5.6 9.2 61.2 23.9 3.0 0.75 34. Instructor explained expectations 491 5.5 13.4 55.6 25.5 3.0 0.78 35. Instructor helped with my problems 484 6.0 13.4 56.0 24.6 3.0 0.79 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 456 5.3 11.8 58.6 24.3 3.0 0.76 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1,329 1.1 3.1 18.8 48.5 28.5 4.0 0.84 38. Question 38 1,312 2.0 4.0 21.5 46.2 26.4 3.9 0.90 39. Question 39 1,223 1.4 4.8 21.2 46.6 26.0 3.9 0.88 40. Question 40 1,084 1.8 5.2 21.1 48.3 23.5 3.9 0.90 41. Question 41 1,028 2.4 6.0 22.4 45.8 23.3 3.8 0.94 42. Question 42 673 1.5 7.7 19.2 46.7 25.0 3.9 0.93 43. Question 43 586 3.4 7.5 20.8 43.0 25.3 3.8 1.01 44. Question 44 417 2.2 3.8 18.7 48.4 26.9 3.9 0.90 45. Question 45 356 1.4 4.2 22.2 44.4 27.8 3.9 0.89 46. Question 46 242 0.8 4.5 18.2 50.0 26.4 4.0 0.84 47. Question 47 122 0.0 1.6 18.0 51.6 28.7 4.1 0.73 48. Question 48 106 1.9 1.9 27.4 44.3 24.5 3.9 0.87 49. Question 49 76 1.3 5.3 21.1 43.4 28.9 3.9 0.91 Number of forms preslugged = at least 7706 Number of forms scanned = 5154 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5115 Percent completed = 66.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 182 9.4 A 942 49.2 Sophomore 313 16.1 B 769 40.2 Junior 520 26.8 C 179 9.3 Senior 781 40.2 D 10 0.5 Graduate 133 6.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 8 0.4 I 2 0.1 Other 5 0.3 Pass or Audit 13 0.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 612 31.7 Studies Program 271 14.1 2 hours 583 30.2 Required by my major 1,316 68.3 3 hours 398 20.6 Other (e.g. elective) 339 17.6 4 - 5 hours 188 9.7 6 - 7 hours 51 2.6 8 or more hours 97 5.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,080 0.9 3.6 52.4 43.1 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,834 4.1 8.9 53.8 33.3 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,024 2.1 10.8 57.2 29.9 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,808 3.8 11.8 50.7 33.7 3.1 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,037 2.6 9.6 53.4 34.4 3.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,044 1.1 6.5 57.8 34.5 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,033 4.0 11.9 50.5 33.6 3.1 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,939 3.7 19.0 50.5 26.8 3.0 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,077 3.2 14.2 46.6 36.1 3.2 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,079 0.9 2.7 41.0 55.4 3.5 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 1,878 0.9 4.7 53.8 40.6 3.3 0.61 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,076 1.6 6.5 49.3 42.6 3.3 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,059 5.5 17.2 42.8 34.5 3.1 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 2,069 1.8 8.3 48.6 41.2 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,870 1.3 11.0 59.3 28.4 3.1 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,987 1.8 12.3 56.1 29.8 3.1 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 1,897 2.1 16.3 55.5 26.1 3.1 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,062 1.2 5.5 58.7 34.6 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,018 4.7 24.0 46.0 25.3 2.9 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,067 4.3 16.0 45.7 34.1 3.1 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,058 5.1 15.0 36.6 43.3 3.2 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 207 4.8 28.5 54.1 12.6 2.7 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 258 2.3 21.7 60.5 15.5 2.9 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 260 2.7 22.3 56.2 18.8 2.9 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 162 4.9 26.5 45.7 22.8 2.9 0.82 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 127 4.7 19.7 55.9 19.7 2.9 0.76 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 40 10.0 10.0 57.5 22.5 2.9 0.86 28. Guided student report preparation 43 11.6 9.3 53.5 25.6 2.9 0.91 29. Students free to express opinions 53 3.8 1.9 39.6 54.7 3.5 0.72 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 53 7.5 11.3 39.6 41.5 3.2 0.91 31. Developed abil to conduct research 47 12.8 14.9 48.9 23.4 2.8 0.94 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 80 1.3 12.5 58.8 27.5 3.1 0.66 33. Amount of work appropriate 86 3.5 17.4 61.6 17.4 2.9 0.70 34. Instructor explained expectations 84 3.6 13.1 60.7 22.6 3.0 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 83 3.6 8.4 60.2 27.7 3.1 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 50 8.0 8.0 66.0 18.0 2.9 0.77 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 179 9.5 28.5 41.3 20.7 0.0 2.7 0.90 38. Question 38 180 4.4 11.7 36.7 46.1 1.1 3.3 0.85 39. Question 39 178 5.1 19.1 50.0 25.3 0.6 3.0 0.82 40. Question 40 180 0.6 1.1 39.4 56.1 2.8 3.6 0.60 41. Question 41 180 14.4 44.4 34.4 6.7 0.0 2.3 0.81 42. Question 42 179 5.6 27.4 46.4 19.0 1.7 2.8 0.86 43. Question 43 176 5.1 24.4 35.8 32.4 2.3 3.0 0.93 44. Question 44 180 1.7 13.9 59.4 23.9 1.1 3.1 0.70 45. Question 45 179 0.0 3.9 44.7 49.7 1.7 3.5 0.60 46. Question 46 175 44.6 25.1 21.7 8.6 0.0 1.9 1.00 47. Question 47 175 13.1 29.7 41.1 15.4 0.6 2.6 0.92 48. Question 48 180 1.1 3.3 58.9 33.9 2.8 3.3 0.64 49. Question 49 164 17.7 27.4 51.8 3.0 0.0 2.4 0.81 Number of forms preslugged = at least 2956 Number of forms scanned = 2113 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2089 Percent completed = 70.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Lexington Campus Graduate School SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 144 69.6 Sophomore 1 0.5 B 63 30.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 205 96.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 4 1.9 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 7.6 Studies Program 8 3.9 2 hours 55 26.2 Required by my major 172 83.1 3 hours 63 30.0 Other (e.g. elective) 27 13.0 4 - 5 hours 41 19.5 6 - 7 hours 20 9.5 8 or more hours 15 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 220 1.4 2.3 49.5 46.8 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 196 1.5 8.7 53.1 36.7 3.3 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 212 1.4 7.5 54.7 36.3 3.3 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 204 1.5 9.3 50.5 38.7 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 214 1.4 6.1 48.6 43.9 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 216 3.7 6.0 48.6 41.7 3.3 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 221 0.9 3.2 44.8 51.1 3.5 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 209 2.9 13.4 49.8 34.0 3.1 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 220 5.0 15.5 37.7 41.8 3.2 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 220 3.2 3.6 30.0 63.2 3.5 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 212 1.9 5.7 50.9 41.5 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 219 2.3 6.8 43.8 47.0 3.4 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 219 5.5 19.6 36.1 38.8 3.1 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 219 1.4 3.7 44.7 50.2 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 195 2.1 8.7 59.0 30.3 3.2 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 219 2.7 7.8 50.2 39.3 3.3 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 216 2.3 9.3 55.6 32.9 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 221 3.2 4.1 52.5 40.3 3.3 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 218 6.4 26.1 41.3 26.1 2.9 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 220 4.5 12.3 41.4 41.8 3.2 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 220 5.0 17.3 28.6 49.1 3.2 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 29. Students free to express opinions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 248 Number of forms scanned = 243 Number of forms with at least one student response = 221 Percent completed = 89.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Military Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 19 40.4 A 41 89.1 Sophomore 15 31.9 B 5 10.9 Junior 7 14.9 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 10.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 58.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 21.7 Required by my major 5 10.6 3 hours 5 10.9 Other (e.g. elective) 42 89.4 4 - 5 hours 2 4.3 6 - 7 hours 1 2.2 8 or more hours 1 2.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 59 0.0 0.0 32.2 67.8 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 0.0 36.7 63.3 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 56 0.0 0.0 44.6 55.4 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 59 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 59 0.0 0.0 30.5 69.5 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 57 0.0 1.8 36.8 61.4 3.6 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 59 0.0 1.7 32.2 66.1 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 56 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 59 0.0 0.0 30.5 69.5 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 59 0.0 0.0 20.3 79.7 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 56 0.0 5.4 23.2 71.4 3.7 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 59 0.0 0.0 27.1 72.9 3.7 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 58 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 59 0.0 0.0 32.2 67.8 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 57 0.0 0.0 40.4 59.6 3.6 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 57 0.0 3.5 40.4 56.1 3.5 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 57 0.0 0.0 45.6 54.4 3.5 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 58 0.0 0.0 36.2 63.8 3.6 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 57 0.0 3.5 42.1 54.4 3.5 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 59 0.0 1.7 23.7 74.6 3.7 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 59 0.0 0.0 18.6 81.4 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 64 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 59 Percent completed = 92.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 0.8 A 631 72.4 Sophomore 28 3.1 B 221 25.4 Junior 74 8.3 C 18 2.1 Senior 206 23.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 573 64.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 7 0.8 I 0 0.0 Other 1 0.1 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 116 13.1 Studies Program 43 4.9 2 hours 186 21.1 Required by my major 723 82.1 3 hours 181 20.5 Other (e.g. elective) 115 13.1 4 - 5 hours 154 17.4 6 - 7 hours 48 5.4 8 or more hours 198 22.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 954 1.5 3.6 39.0 56.0 3.5 0.64 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 764 3.0 9.7 47.5 39.8 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 946 1.4 5.7 49.2 43.8 3.4 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 684 2.3 6.3 45.9 45.5 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 934 1.9 6.6 40.7 50.7 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 942 1.5 5.8 45.3 47.3 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 928 0.9 4.3 41.1 53.8 3.5 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 915 2.8 8.4 38.8 49.9 3.4 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 956 3.1 9.5 37.9 49.5 3.3 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 957 1.8 2.4 31.0 64.8 3.6 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 854 1.3 4.8 40.3 53.6 3.5 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 954 1.8 5.7 36.8 55.8 3.5 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 951 2.9 10.5 36.5 50.1 3.3 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 955 1.4 3.1 31.2 64.3 3.6 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 924 0.9 4.3 46.1 48.7 3.4 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 941 1.3 6.3 43.0 49.4 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 918 1.6 8.8 44.8 44.8 3.3 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 952 1.4 5.5 40.8 52.4 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 935 3.4 12.4 43.5 40.6 3.2 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 949 2.3 10.6 32.7 54.4 3.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 940 4.6 10.6 27.4 57.3 3.4 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 35 5.7 17.1 51.4 25.7 3.0 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 48 6.3 8.3 50.0 35.4 3.1 0.82 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 44 6.8 6.8 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.87 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 28 10.7 7.1 42.9 39.3 3.1 0.96 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 31 9.7 6.5 48.4 35.5 3.1 0.91 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 72 4.2 6.9 36.1 52.8 3.4 0.80 28. Guided student report preparation 72 6.9 2.8 38.9 51.4 3.3 0.84 29. Students free to express opinions 79 3.8 2.5 38.0 55.7 3.5 0.73 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 77 2.6 3.9 33.8 59.7 3.5 0.70 31. Developed abil to conduct research 46 6.5 8.7 45.7 39.1 3.2 0.85 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 34. Instructor explained expectations 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 35. Instructor helped with my problems 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1155 Number of forms scanned = 967 Number of forms with at least one student response = 960 Percent completed = 83.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************