****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 152 001L1 REGIONAL GEO OF WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 64.5 A 5 15.6 Sophomore 5 16.1 B 12 37.5 Junior 5 16.1 C 11 34.4 Senior 1 3.2 D 4 12.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.5 Studies Program 23 71.9 2 hours 6 18.8 Required by my major 5 15.6 3 hours 11 34.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 12.5 4 - 5 hours 9 28.1 6 - 7 hours 1 3.1 8 or more hours 1 3.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 2.9 14.7 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 2.9 17.6 55.9 23.5 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 3.1 34.4 59.4 3.1 2.6 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 11.8 26.5 47.1 14.7 2.6 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 14.7 26.5 50.0 8.8 2.5 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 6.1 15.2 60.6 18.2 2.9 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 2.9 5.9 73.5 17.6 3.1 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 14.7 47.1 32.4 5.9 2.3 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 10.3 62.1 27.6 3.2 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 11.8 47.1 32.4 8.8 2.4 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 34 5.9 17.6 61.8 14.7 2.9 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 9.7 16.1 51.6 22.6 2.9 0.88 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 6.1 36.4 45.5 12.1 2.6 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 6.5 51.6 32.3 9.7 2.5 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 5.9 5.9 76.5 11.8 2.9 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 26.5 50.0 17.6 5.9 2.0 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 14.7 35.3 47.1 2.9 2.4 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 23.5 17.6 50.0 8.8 2.4 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 2.4 0.84 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 12.5 25.0 56.3 6.3 2.6 0.81 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 17.6 23.5 47.1 11.8 2.5 0.94 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 8.3 0.0 58.3 33.3 3.2 0.83 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 74 Number of forms scanned = 74 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 45.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 152 003L1 REGIONAL GEO OF WORLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 60.0 A 3 10.0 Sophomore 9 30.0 B 16 53.3 Junior 2 6.7 C 10 33.3 Senior 1 3.3 D 1 3.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 26.7 Studies Program 19 63.3 2 hours 13 43.3 Required by my major 4 13.3 3 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 7 23.3 4 - 5 hours 4 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 3.2 51.6 45.2 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 9.7 45.2 45.2 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 3.2 19.4 45.2 32.3 3.1 0.81 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 9.7 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 10.0 46.7 43.3 3.3 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 13.3 46.7 36.7 3.2 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 12.9 54.8 32.3 3.2 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 6.9 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 29.0 32.3 38.7 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 6.5 41.9 51.6 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 16.1 45.2 38.7 3.2 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 35.7 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.81 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 6.5 45.2 48.4 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 3.2 35.5 38.7 22.6 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 22.6 51.6 25.8 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 16.1 38.7 45.2 3.3 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 49 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 329 001L1 GEO OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 7 36.8 Junior 7 31.8 C 5 26.3 Senior 13 59.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 13 61.9 3 hours 5 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 38.1 4 - 5 hours 7 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 4.0 16.0 68.0 12.0 2.9 0.67 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 26.9 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 19.2 73.1 7.7 2.9 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 7.7 15.4 65.4 11.5 2.8 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 11.5 15.4 69.2 3.8 2.7 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 19.2 26.9 46.2 7.7 2.4 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 3.8 11.5 73.1 11.5 2.9 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 40.0 40.0 12.0 2.6 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 11.5 7.7 65.4 15.4 2.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 11.5 0.0 30.8 57.7 3.3 0.98 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 63.6 31.8 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 7.7 11.5 61.5 19.2 2.9 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 11.5 7.7 61.5 19.2 2.9 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 26 7.7 3.8 57.7 30.8 3.1 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 8.7 4.3 69.6 17.4 3.0 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 14.3 9.5 66.7 9.5 2.7 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 10.5 36.8 42.1 10.5 2.5 0.84 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 12.0 4.0 72.0 12.0 2.8 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 8.0 16.0 68.0 8.0 2.8 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 15.4 19.2 61.5 3.8 2.5 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 15.4 11.5 50.0 23.1 2.8 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G001L1 INTRO TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Francis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 1 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 66.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 8.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 8.3 Required by my major 3 25.0 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 5 41.7 8 or more hours 3 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 15.4 76.9 7.7 2.9 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 53.8 15.4 30.8 0.0 1.8 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 8.3 25.0 66.7 0.0 2.6 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 33.3 58.3 0.0 2.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 7.7 92.3 0.0 2.9 0.28 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 27.3 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 7.7 15.4 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 15.4 30.8 53.8 0.0 2.4 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 722 001S2 TOP SEM SOC/POL GEO: DIGITAL PLACES/SPACES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Francis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 4 80.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 310 001L1 QUANTITATIVE TECH IN GEO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, John P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 31.6 Junior 3 15.8 C 6 31.6 Senior 16 84.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.1 Required by my major 17 94.4 3 hours 8 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.6 4 - 5 hours 3 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 2 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 21.1 42.1 36.8 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 15.8 15.8 47.4 21.1 2.7 0.99 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 21.1 36.8 31.6 10.5 2.3 0.95 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 11.1 50.0 27.8 2.9 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 15.8 21.1 47.4 15.8 2.6 0.96 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 15.8 42.1 42.1 3.3 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 42.1 47.4 3.4 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 15.8 31.6 42.1 10.5 2.5 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 21.1 36.8 36.8 3.1 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 65.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 716 401S1 TOP SEM CULT GEO:SPACE IDENTITY & CULT POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, John P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 9 100.0 4 - 5 hours 4 44.4 6 - 7 hours 3 33.3 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 31. Developed abil to conduct research 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 001L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Karan, P P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 10.7 A 1 3.7 Sophomore 15 53.6 B 12 44.4 Junior 6 21.4 C 13 48.1 Senior 4 14.3 D 1 3.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 10.7 Studies Program 26 89.7 2 hours 12 42.9 Required by my major 2 6.9 3 hours 6 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.4 4 - 5 hours 4 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 10.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 5.6 2.8 75.0 16.7 3.0 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 15.6 37.5 37.5 9.4 2.4 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 9.1 33.3 48.5 9.1 2.6 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 8.6 20.0 62.9 8.6 2.7 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 14.3 20.0 60.0 5.7 2.6 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 3.1 9.4 75.0 12.5 3.0 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 13.9 66.7 19.4 3.1 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 9.4 46.9 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 13.9 11.1 58.3 16.7 2.8 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 2.8 0.0 30.6 66.7 3.6 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 33 3.0 3.0 57.6 36.4 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 5.6 0.0 52.8 41.7 3.3 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 14.3 28.6 40.0 17.1 2.6 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 36 5.6 2.8 63.9 27.8 3.1 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 2.9 5.9 64.7 26.5 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 3.1 18.8 65.6 12.5 2.9 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 6.7 26.7 63.3 3.3 2.6 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 2.8 11.1 72.2 13.9 3.0 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 16.7 44.4 30.6 8.3 2.3 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 8.3 47.2 38.9 5.6 2.4 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 11.1 27.8 41.7 19.4 2.7 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 41.7 41.7 8.3 2.5 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 4.3 21.7 65.2 8.7 2.8 0.67 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 4.5 13.6 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 23 4.3 0.0 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 334 001L1 ENVIRON, SOC AND ECONOMY OF JAPAN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Karan, P P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 3.4 A 8 27.6 Sophomore 3 10.3 B 17 58.6 Junior 10 34.5 C 3 10.3 Senior 15 51.7 D 1 3.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 27.6 Studies Program 12 41.4 2 hours 9 31.0 Required by my major 8 27.6 3 hours 9 31.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 31.0 4 - 5 hours 2 6.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 6.9 58.6 34.5 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 3.6 14.3 57.1 25.0 3.0 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 3.4 3.4 62.1 31.0 3.2 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 4.2 25.0 50.0 20.8 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 3.4 20.7 51.7 24.1 3.0 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 0.0 48.1 51.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 3.7 22.2 44.4 29.6 3.0 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 29 3.4 17.2 34.5 44.8 3.2 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 60.0 28.0 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 19.2 61.5 19.2 3.0 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 35.0 40.0 25.0 2.9 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 0.0 18.5 55.6 25.9 3.1 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 17.2 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 6.9 20.7 41.4 31.0 3.0 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 80.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G401L1 INTRO TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 35.7 Junior 1 7.1 C 3 21.4 Senior 11 78.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.1 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 14.3 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 13 92.9 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 7.7 30.8 61.5 0.0 2.5 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 7.7 84.6 0.0 2.8 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 92.9 0.0 2.9 0.27 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 21.4 78.6 0.0 2.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 7.1 71.4 21.4 0.0 2.1 0.53 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 21.4 50.0 14.3 2.6 0.93 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.78 11. Was available for consultation 11 9.1 0.0 81.8 9.1 2.9 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 2.8 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 38.5 53.8 7.7 2.7 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 23.1 69.2 0.0 2.6 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 7.7 0.0 92.3 0.0 2.8 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 38.5 38.5 15.4 2.6 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 7.1 28.6 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 28.6 7.1 50.0 14.3 2.5 1.09. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 7 14.3 14.3 71.4 0.0 2.6 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 16.7 0.0 66.7 16.7 2.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 16.7 0.0 83.3 0.0 2.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 82.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 465 001L1 SPEC TOPS: INTRO TO GIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 4 30.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 61.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.7 Required by my major 5 38.5 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 8 61.5 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 21.4 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.77 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 7.1 7.1 71.4 14.3 2.9 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 14.3 7.1 35.7 42.9 3.1 1.07 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 28.6 14.3 42.9 14.3 2.4 1.09 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 35.7 42.9 7.1 14.3 2.0 1.04 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 21.4 21.4 50.0 7.1 2.4 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 14.3 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.92 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 14 14.3 7.1 57.1 21.4 2.9 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 27.3 18.2 27.3 27.3 2.5 1.21 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 15.4 53.8 23.1 2.9 0.86 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 7.1 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.89 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 14.3 50.0 28.6 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 1.03 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 35.7 14.3 35.7 2.7 1.14. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 33. Amount of work appropriate 11 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.77 34. Instructor explained expectations 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 35. Instructor helped with my problems 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 93.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 260 001L1 THIRD WORLD DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leinbach, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 18.5 Sophomore 11 37.9 B 10 37.0 Junior 11 37.9 C 10 37.0 Senior 7 24.1 D 1 3.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 29.6 Studies Program 16 57.1 2 hours 7 25.9 Required by my major 3 10.7 3 hours 10 37.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 32.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 33 6.1 21.2 60.6 12.1 2.8 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 14.7 76.5 8.8 2.9 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 2.9 14.7 67.6 14.7 2.9 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 33 3.0 9.1 63.6 24.2 3.1 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 34 0.0 8.8 64.7 26.5 3.2 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 73.3 16.7 3.1 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 5.9 11.8 44.1 38.2 3.1 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 26.5 73.5 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 6.5 58.1 35.5 3.3 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 6.1 18.2 48.5 27.3 3.0 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 34 2.9 20.6 52.9 23.5 3.0 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 3.2 9.7 58.1 29.0 3.1 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 3.2 25.8 48.4 22.6 2.9 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 33 3.0 12.1 54.5 30.3 3.1 0.74 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 9.1 30.3 42.4 18.2 2.7 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 3.0 27.3 60.6 9.1 2.8 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 25.0 46.9 28.1 3.0 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 600 001L1 ANALYTIC METHS IN GEO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leinbach, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 66.7 3 hours 2 66.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 33.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 130 401L1 EARTH'S PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Dell, Gary ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 39.1 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 5 21.7 B 10 43.5 Junior 6 26.1 C 3 13.0 Senior 2 8.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 21.7 Studies Program 17 77.3 2 hours 10 43.5 Required by my major 2 9.1 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.6 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 67.7 32.3 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 6.5 83.9 9.7 3.0 0.41 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 3.2 67.7 29.0 3.3 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 9.7 64.5 25.8 3.2 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 3.2 74.2 22.6 3.2 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 74.2 25.8 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 0.0 6.5 77.4 16.1 3.1 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 71.0 29.0 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 3.1 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 12.9 74.2 12.9 3.0 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 7.4 81.5 11.1 3.0 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 84.4 12.5 3.1 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 6.5 80.6 12.9 3.1 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 3.1 15.6 62.5 18.8 3.0 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 6.3 71.9 21.9 3.2 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 0.0 9.7 45.2 45.2 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 0.0 42.9 50.0 7.1 2.6 0.63 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 722 001S1 TOP SEM SOC/POL GEO: DIGITAL PLACES/SPACES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pickles, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 4 80.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 490G001L1 AMERICAN LANDSCAPES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Raitz, K B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 66.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 50.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 50.0 4 - 5 hours 3 60.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 35.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 160 009L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roberts, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 41.7 A 14 40.0 Sophomore 9 25.0 B 11 31.4 Junior 8 22.2 C 10 28.6 Senior 4 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 45.7 Studies Program 30 83.3 2 hours 12 34.3 Required by my major 2 5.6 3 hours 5 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 11.1 4 - 5 hours 2 5.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 0.0 4.4 53.3 42.2 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 4.7 7.0 69.8 18.6 3.0 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 45 2.2 20.0 57.8 20.0 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 6.7 6.7 55.6 31.1 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 2.2 15.6 55.6 26.7 3.1 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 4.5 18.2 43.2 34.1 3.1 0.85 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 0.0 13.3 55.6 31.1 3.2 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 0.0 41.9 39.5 18.6 2.8 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 13.3 15.6 35.6 35.6 2.9 1.03 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 0.0 8.9 31.1 60.0 3.5 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 9.8 53.7 36.6 3.3 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 4.4 8.9 42.2 44.4 3.3 0.81 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 11.1 17.8 40.0 31.1 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 44 2.3 4.5 61.4 31.8 3.2 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 4.5 9.1 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.74 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 2.3 29.5 43.2 25.0 2.9 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 42 0.0 40.5 45.2 14.3 2.7 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 45 4.4 17.8 55.6 22.2 3.0 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 45 11.1 37.8 33.3 17.8 2.6 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 11.1 22.2 37.8 28.9 2.8 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 41 14.6 14.6 19.5 51.2 3.1 1.13. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 0.0 20.0 66.7 13.3 2.9 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 17.4 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.64 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 0.0 13.6 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 24 0.0 12.5 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.66 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 42. Question 42 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 64 Number of forms scanned = 61 Number of forms with at least one student response = 46 Percent completed = 71.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 702 001L1 CONCEPTS IN GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Roberts, Susan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 85.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 14.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 28.6 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 57.1 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 3 42.9 8 or more hours 3 42.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 172 001L1 HUMAN GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 33.3 A 15 34.9 Sophomore 10 22.2 B 17 39.5 Junior 11 24.4 C 9 20.9 Senior 9 20.0 D 2 4.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 24.4 Studies Program 18 40.0 2 hours 19 42.2 Required by my major 20 44.4 3 hours 10 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 7 15.6 4 - 5 hours 3 6.7