****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 601 001L1 SYSTEMIC FAMILY DEVELOP INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 9 75.0 3 hours 3 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 25.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 8.3 8 or more hours 1 8.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 7.7 84.6 3.8 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 0.0 23.1 30.8 46.2 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 16 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 81.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 687 001L1 TREATMENT MODALITIES IN MARRIAGE/FAMILY THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 20.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 2.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 25.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 001S1 PROSEM IN MARRIAGE/FAM THER:DSMIV FAM THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 85.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 14.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 6 85.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 14.3 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 685 001L1 PROF ISSUES IN MARRIAGE & FAMILY INTERVENTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brock, Gregory W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 12.5 37.5 25.0 25.0 2.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 42.9 57.1 0.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 12.5 25.0 25.0 37.5 2.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 37.5 25.0 37.5 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 25.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 2.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 12.5 37.5 25.0 25.0 2.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 25.0 25.0 37.5 12.5 2.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 255 001L1 CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crum, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 1 6.7 B 8 53.3 Junior 11 73.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 26.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 3 20.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 82.4 17.6 3.2 0.39 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 88.2 11.8 3.1 0.33 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 88.2 11.8 3.1 0.33 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 29.4 64.7 5.9 2.8 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 88.2 5.9 3.0 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 25.0 62.5 6.3 2.7 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 82.4 11.8 3.1 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 6.3 12.5 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 12.5 75.0 6.3 2.8 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 0.0 3.1 0.64 38. Question 38 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 0.0 3.1 0.95 39. Question 39 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 0.0 3.0 0.82 40. Question 40 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 38.5 7.7 3.5 0.66 41. Question 41 13 7.7 53.8 30.8 7.7 0.0 2.4 0.77 42. Question 42 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 0.0 2.9 0.64 43. Question 43 13 0.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 0.0 3.0 0.82 44. Question 44 13 0.0 38.5 46.2 15.4 0.0 2.8 0.73 45. Question 45 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 0.0 3.5 0.52 46. Question 46 13 46.2 46.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.65 47. Question 47 13 23.1 46.2 23.1 7.7 0.0 2.2 0.90 48. Question 48 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 30.8 7.7 3.5 0.66 49. Question 49 13 0.0 69.2 30.8 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.48 Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 58.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 407 001L1 ASSESS OF YOUNG CHILDREN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crum, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 29.4 Junior 3 17.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 82.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 35.3 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 9 52.9 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 0.0 3.3 0.70 38. Question 38 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 0.0 3.6 0.51 39. Question 39 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 0.0 3.4 0.50 40. Question 40 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 3.6 0.50 41. Question 41 16 12.5 50.0 31.3 6.3 0.0 2.3 0.79 42. Question 42 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 0.0 2.9 0.57 43. Question 43 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 0.0 3.1 0.64 44. Question 44 16 6.3 12.5 37.5 43.8 0.0 3.2 0.91 45. Question 45 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 3.5 0.52 46. Question 46 16 50.0 25.0 18.8 6.3 0.0 1.8 0.98 47. Question 47 16 0.0 25.0 31.3 43.8 0.0 3.2 0.83 48. Question 48 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 3.5 0.52 49. Question 49 15 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.00 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 251 201L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 6.7 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 2 13.3 B 5 33.3 Junior 3 20.0 C 1 6.7 Senior 9 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 9 60.0 3 hours 5 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 6.3 18.8 43.8 31.3 3.0 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 25.0 43.8 31.3 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 37.5 31.3 31.3 2.9 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 75.0 18.8 3.1 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 18.8 18.8 37.5 25.0 2.7 1.08 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 399 201L1 PRAC IN FAM STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 80.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 486 201O1 FIELD EXPER IN FAMILY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 75.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 47. Question 47 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 49. Question 49 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 250 001L1 CONSUMER ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 29.9 Sophomore 17 22.1 B 42 54.5 Junior 29 37.7 C 11 14.3 Senior 31 40.3 D 1 1.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 26.0 Studies Program 4 5.2 2 hours 28 36.4 Required by my major 72 93.5 3 hours 19 24.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 1.3 4 - 5 hours 7 9.1 6 - 7 hours 2 2.6 8 or more hours 1 1.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 83 0.0 3.6 38.6 57.8 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 81 1.2 4.9 60.5 33.3 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 83 1.2 3.6 48.2 47.0 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 83 2.4 6.0 50.6 41.0 3.3 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 81 1.2 0.0 49.4 49.4 3.5 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 83 3.6 7.2 51.8 37.3 3.2 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 80 2.5 8.8 60.0 28.8 3.2 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 83 1.2 3.6 31.3 63.9 3.6 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 83 0.0 0.0 20.5 79.5 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 77 0.0 2.6 41.6 55.8 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 83 1.2 3.6 22.9 72.3 3.7 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 83 1.2 9.6 38.6 50.6 3.4 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 82 1.2 2.4 42.7 53.7 3.5 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 75 2.7 2.7 60.0 34.7 3.3 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 81 1.2 3.7 56.8 38.3 3.3 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 80 2.5 6.3 57.5 33.8 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 83 2.4 3.6 51.8 42.2 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 81 2.5 17.3 56.8 23.5 3.0 0.72 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 83 3.6 6.0 39.8 50.6 3.4 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 83 2.4 4.8 22.9 69.9 3.6 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 163 Number of forms scanned = 85 Number of forms with at least one student response = 83 Percent completed = 50.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 251 001L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 10.0 A 17 35.4 Sophomore 15 30.0 B 17 35.4 Junior 19 38.0 C 11 22.9 Senior 11 22.0 D 1 2.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 25.0 Studies Program 3 6.1 2 hours 19 39.6 Required by my major 19 38.8 3 hours 13 27.1 Other (e.g. elective) 27 55.1 4 - 5 hours 2 4.2 6 - 7 hours 1 2.1 8 or more hours 1 2.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 0.0 1.9 46.2 51.9 3.5 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 1.9 1.9 59.6 36.5 3.3 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 52 0.0 5.8 48.1 46.2 3.4 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 51 0.0 9.8 41.2 49.0 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 3.8 46.2 50.0 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 1.9 46.2 51.9 3.5 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 52 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 51 2.0 23.5 41.2 33.3 3.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 52 1.9 3.8 46.2 48.1 3.4 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 0.0 0.0 28.8 71.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 44 2.3 6.8 43.2 47.7 3.4 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 2.0 8.0 36.0 54.0 3.4 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 52 0.0 11.5 44.2 44.2 3.3 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 43 0.0 18.6 62.8 18.6 3.0 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 51 2.0 2.0 64.7 31.4 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 4.0 6.0 58.0 32.0 3.2 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 52 1.9 3.8 48.1 46.2 3.4 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 1.9 17.3 44.2 36.5 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 51 0.0 5.9 31.4 62.7 3.6 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 51 0.0 7.8 31.4 60.8 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 95 Number of forms scanned = 52 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 54.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 463 001L1 CONCEPTS OF PERSONAL AND FAMILY MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 40.9 Junior 2 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 90.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 45.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 18 81.8 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 4 18.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 4.3 95.7 4.0 0.21 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 4.3 30.4 65.2 3.6 0.58 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 60.9 39.1 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 22 9.1 22.7 40.9 27.3 0.0 2.9 0.94 38. Question 38 22 0.0 9.1 31.8 54.5 4.5 3.5 0.74 39. Question 39 21 4.8 19.0 38.1 33.3 4.8 3.1 0.96 40. Question 40 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 3.8 0.59 41. Question 41 22 9.1 45.5 36.4 9.1 0.0 2.5 0.80 42. Question 42 22 9.1 40.9 36.4 9.1 4.5 2.6 0.96 43. Question 43 22 4.5 27.3 22.7 40.9 4.5 3.1 1.04 44. Question 44 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 0.0 3.3 0.57 45. Question 45 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 50.0 9.1 3.7 0.65 46. Question 46 21 52.4 9.5 28.6 9.5 0.0 2.0 1.12 47. Question 47 21 9.5 23.8 28.6 33.3 4.8 3.0 1.10 48. Question 48 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 36.4 4.5 3.5 0.60 49. Question 49 15 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.98 Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 82.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 554 001L1 WORKING WITH PARENTS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = GNATUK, CAROL ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 87.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 12.9 Junior 3 9.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 26 81.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 9.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 16.1 Studies Program 2 6.3 2 hours 13 41.9 Required by my major 29 90.6 3 hours 8 25.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 3.1 4 - 5 hours 2 6.5 6 - 7 hours 3 9.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 17.1 40.0 42.9 3.3 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 0.0 54.3 45.7 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 2.9 48.6 48.6 3.5 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 2.9 42.9 54.3 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 8.6 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 8.6 45.7 45.7 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 25.7 74.3 3.7 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 2.9 45.7 51.4 3.5 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 35 2.9 2.9 37.1 57.1 3.5 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 5.7 57.1 37.1 3.3 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 5.7 28.6 65.7 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 710 401L1 CURRENT TRENDS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCA & CARE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = GNATUK, CAROL ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 88.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 11.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 18.2 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 3 27.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 18.2 9.1 63.6 9.1 2.6 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 45.5 54.5 0.0 2.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 18.2 45.5 27.3 9.1 2.3 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 9.1 18.2 63.6 9.1 2.7 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 54.5 27.3 9.1 2.4 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 20.0 20.0 50.0 10.0 2.5 0.97 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 2.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 27.3 36.4 18.2 18.2 2.3 1.10 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 36.4 36.4 0.0 27.3 2.2 1.25. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 552 401L1 ADMIN & SUPERVISION IN EARLY CHILDHOOD ED PROGS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gilbert, Jaesook ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 1 7.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 21.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 6 42.9 Required by my major 12 85.7 3 hours 2 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 402 001L1 FAM ECO & MGT ISSUES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hayhoe, Celia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 10.0 A 2 22.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 55.6 Junior 1 10.0 C 2 22.2 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 22.2 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 2 22.2 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 44.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 77.8 11.1 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 90.0 10.0 3.1 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 90.0 0.0 2.9 0.32 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 3.0 0.82 38. Question 38 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 0.0 3.0 0.47 39. Question 39 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 40. Question 40 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 3.7 0.48 41. Question 41 10 10.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 0.0 2.5 0.85 42. Question 42 10 10.0 70.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.57 43. Question 43 10 10.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 0.0 2.4 0.84 44. Question 44 10 0.0 30.0 50.0 20.0 0.0 2.9 0.74 45. Question 45 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 3.4 0.52 46. Question 46 10 30.0 10.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 2.4 1.07 47. Question 47 10 10.0 40.0 40.0 10.0 0.0 2.5 0.85 48. Question 48 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 3.4 0.52 49. Question 49 9 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 654 002L1 LIFESPAN HUMAN DEV/BEHAV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = McCulloch, Bethany J. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 62.5 4 - 5 hours 4 50.0 6 - 7 hours 2 25.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 12.5 12.5 50.0 25.0 2.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 2.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 12.5 25.0 50.0 12.5 2.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 57.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 253 001L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY: DEVELOP BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 6 12.2 A 12 24.5 Sophomore 17 34.7 B 24 49.0 Junior 16 32.7 C 11 22.4 Senior 10 20.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 4.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 26.5 Studies Program 20 41.7 2 h