****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 213 007L1 CALCULUS III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adams, David R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.3 A 7 30.4 Sophomore 12 52.2 B 13 56.5 Junior 10 43.5 C 2 8.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 4.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.7 Studies Program 1 4.3 2 hours 5 21.7 Required by my major 22 95.7 3 hours 7 30.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 7 30.4 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 1 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 57.7 42.3 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 0.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.68 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 34.6 57.7 7.7 2.7 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 3.8 15.4 53.8 26.9 3.0 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 56.0 36.0 8.0 2.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 57.7 38.5 3.8 2.5 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 3.8 73.1 23.1 3.2 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 12.5 54.2 16.7 16.7 2.4 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 15.4 53.8 26.9 3.0 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 7.7 61.5 26.9 3.1 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 213 008L1 CALCULUS III INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adams, David R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 20.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 3 60.0 B 4 80.0 Junior 1 20.0 C 1 20.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 20.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 60.0 0.0 20.0 2.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 19.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 481G001L1 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Adams, David R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 58.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 23.5 Junior 1 5.9 C 2 11.8 Senior 1 5.9 D 1 5.9 Graduate 15 88.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 11.8 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 9 52.9 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 6 35.3 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 3 17.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 5.9 5.9 58.8 29.4 3.1 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 18.8 56.3 25.0 3.1 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 77.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 261 001L1 INTRO TO NUMBER THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beidleman, James C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 18.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 25.0 Junior 3 18.8 C 4 25.0 Senior 13 81.3 D 4 25.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 6.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 13 81.3 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 3 18.8 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 12.5 81.3 6.3 2.9 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 6.3 87.5 0.0 2.8 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 31.3 62.5 6.3 2.8 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 12.5 25.0 56.3 6.3 2.6 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 93.8 6.3 3.1 0.25 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 25.0 68.8 6.3 2.8 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 25.0 18.8 37.5 18.8 2.5 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 93.3 6.7 3.1 0.26 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 20.0 26.7 40.0 13.3 2.5 0.99 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 37.5 18.8 25.0 18.8 2.3 1.18 14. Encouraged class participation 16 6.3 12.5 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 60.0 10.0 2.8 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 6.7 20.0 60.0 13.3 2.8 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 26.7 46.7 20.0 2.8 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 12.5 18.8 56.3 12.5 2.7 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 43.8 18.8 12.5 2.2 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 31.3 43.8 18.8 2.8 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 25.0 31.3 18.8 25.0 2.4 1.15. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 59.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 002L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brennan, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 10 100.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 22.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 22.2 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 11.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 3 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 11.1 8 or more hours 1 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 9.1 72.7 9.1 2.8 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 9.1 9.1 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 45.5 45.5 9.1 2.6 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 10.0 50.0 40.0 0.0 2.3 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 54.5 27.3 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 18.2 36.4 36.4 3.0 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 4 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 3.0 . 38. Question 38 4 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . 39. Question 39 4 25.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.8 . 40. Question 40 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 3.3 . Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 45.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 003L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brennan, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 61.1 A 7 41.2 Sophomore 6 33.3 B 5 29.4 Junior 1 5.6 C 3 17.6 Senior 0 0.0 D 2 11.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 33.3 Studies Program 4 22.2 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 14 77.8 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 11.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 16.7 11.1 44.4 27.8 2.8 1.04 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 26.3 36.8 31.6 2.9 0.91 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 26.3 47.4 26.3 3.0 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 20.0 20.0 46.7 13.3 2.5 0.99 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 35.3 29.4 23.5 11.8 2.1 1.05 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 10.5 31.6 47.4 10.5 2.6 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 31.6 63.2 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 10.5 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 26.3 52.6 15.8 2.8 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 10.5 42.1 31.6 15.8 2.5 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 3.0 0.82 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 26.3 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 11.8 52.9 23.5 11.8 2.4 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 10.5 21.1 52.6 15.8 2.7 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 15.8 31.6 31.6 21.1 2.6 1.02. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 6 33.3 16.7 16.7 33.3 0.0 2.5 . 38. Question 38 11 9.1 27.3 0.0 36.4 27.3 3.5 1.44 39. Question 39 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 2.2 . 40. Question 40 11 36.4 18.2 27.3 18.2 0.0 2.3 1.19 Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 214 002L1 CALCULUS IV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brennan, James E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.9 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 5 29.4 Junior 5 29.4 C 3 17.6 Senior 3 17.6 D 3 17.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 14 82.4 3 hours 4 23.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 31.6 31.6 36.8 0.0 2.1 0.85 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 16.7 22.2 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.92 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 21.1 52.6 26.3 3.1 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 31.6 36.8 31.6 3.0 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 5.9 5.9 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 44.4 27.8 27.8 2.8 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 36.8 47.4 15.8 2.8 0.71 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 18 5.6 0.0 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 10.5 21.1 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 31.3 50.0 18.8 2.9 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 36.8 47.4 5.3 2.5 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 26.3 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 15.8 31.6 26.3 26.3 2.6 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 70.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 019L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 16 80.0 A 5 25.0 Sophomore 4 20.0 B 9 45.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 5 25.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 5.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 3 15.0 Required by my major 17 85.0 3 hours 5 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 4 20.0 8 or more hours 3 15.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 4.8 9.5 61.9 23.8 3.0 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 4.8 9.5 42.9 42.9 3.2 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 4.8 4.8 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 4.8 0.0 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 4.8 0.0 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 9.5 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 23.8 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 4.8 0.0 42.9 52.4 3.4 0.75 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 0.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 9.5 28.6 42.9 19.0 2.7 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 14.3 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 19.0 38.1 42.9 3.2 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 9.5 42.9 33.3 14.3 2.5 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 9.5 9.5 42.9 38.1 3.1 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 4.8 9.5 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 72.7 18.2 4.0 0.77 38. Question 38 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 9.1 81.8 4.6 0.92 39. Question 39 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 4.0 0.77 40. Question 40 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 4.5 0.52 Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 113 020L1 CALCULUS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 68.8 A 4 25.0 Sophomore 2 12.5 B 7 43.8 Junior 2 12.5 C 3 18.8 Senior 1 6.3 D 1 6.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 6.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 2 13.3 2 hours 4 25.0 Required by my major 11 73.3 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 2 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 22.2 38.9 38.9 3.2 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 11.1 27.8 61.1 3.5 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 33.3 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 16.7 27.8 55.6 3.4 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 11.1 22.2 27.8 38.9 2.9 1.06 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 11.8 47.1 23.5 17.6 2.5 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 5.6 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 22.2 61.1 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 4.3 0.87 38. Question 38 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 4.8 0.45 39. Question 39 12 0.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0 4.0 1.21 40. Question 40 12 0.0 8.3 16.7 8.3 66.7 4.3 1.07 Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 773 001L1 SEL TOPS IN ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Russell ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 1 9.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 90.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 8 72.7 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 27.3 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 5 45.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 0.0 18.2 72.7 3.5 0.93 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 90.9 3.8 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 18.2 27.3 45.5 3.1 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 11.1 33.3 44.4 11.1 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 9.1 27.3 54.5 3.3 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 73.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 123 404L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Campbell, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 70.6 A 3 17.6 Sophomore 2 11.8 B 8 47.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 3 17.6 Senior 3 17.6 D 3 17.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 29.4 Studies Program 6 37.5 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 10 62.5 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 26.3 42.1 26.3 2.9 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 10.5 26.3 31.6 31.6 2.8 1.01 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 10.5 15.8 42.1 31.6 2.9 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 17 11.8 23.5 41.2 23.5 2.8 0.97 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 22.2 22.2 38.9 16.7 2.5 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 19 10.5 15.8 52.6 21.1 2.8 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 16.7 50.0 27.8 3.0 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 5.3 15.8 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 5.3 10.5 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.81 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 21.1 42.1 26.3 10.5 2.3 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 15.8 15.8 52.6 15.8 2.7 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 10.5 26.3 26.3 36.8 2.9 1.05. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 35.3 23.5 3.8 0.90 38. Question 38 17 5.9 0.0 17.6 35.3 41.2 4.1 1.09 39. Question 39 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 29.4 17.6 3.5 0.94 40. Question 40 17 5.9 11.8 29.4 23.5 29.4 3.6 1.23 41. Question 41 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 63.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 123 405L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Campbell, Bruce ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 45.5 A 2 18.2 Sophomore 3 27.3 B 3 27.3 Junior 1 9.1 C 3 27.3 Senior 2 18.2 D 2 18.2 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 9.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 5 71.4 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 2 28.6 3 hours 3 27.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 8.3 16.7 33.3 41.7 3.1 1.00 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 8.3 41.7 25.0 25.0 2.7 0.98 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 3.1 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 16.7 33.3 16.7 33.3 2.7 1.15 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 44.4 22.2 22.2 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 41.7 25.0 33.3 2.9 0.90 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 18.2 54.5 18.2 9.1 2.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 25.0 25.0 16.7 33.3 2.6 1.24 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 25.0 8.3 16.7 50.0 2.9 1.31. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 50.0 12.5 37.5 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 4.6 0.52 38. Question 38 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 4.7 0.47 39. Question 39 10 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 3.6 1.58 40. Question 40 11 0.0 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 4.5 0.93 Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 40.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 123 010L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carey, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 41.2 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 5 29.4 B 6 35.3 Junior 4 23.5 C 3 17.6 Senior 1 5.9 D 2 11.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.8 Studies Program 9 56.3 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 7 43.8 3 hours 3 17.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.9 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 17.6 29.4 52.9 3.4 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 29.4 47.1 23.5 2.9 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 6.7 53.3 33.3 6.7 2.4 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 35.3 41.2 17.6 5.9 1.9 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 75.0 16.7 3.1 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 11.8 23.5 58.8 5.9 2.6 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 35.3 41.2 23.5 0.0 1.9 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 17 17.6 35.3 47.1 0.0 2.3 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 18.2 45.5 27.3 9.1 2.3 0.90 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 41.2 58.8 0.0 2.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 35.3 64.7 0.0 2.6 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 17.6 17.6 58.8 5.9 2.5 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 50.0 42.9 7.1 0.0 1.6 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 17.6 41.2 35.3 5.9 2.3 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 23.5 41.2 29.4 5.9 2.2 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 2.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 63.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 214 005L1 CALCULUS IV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carey, Richard W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 62.5 Sophomore 6 40.0 B 4 25.0 Junior 6 40.0 C 2 12.5 Senior 3 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 33.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 13.3 Required by my major 14 93.3 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 6.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 29.4 41.2 17.6 2.6 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 11.1 16.7 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 11.1 50.0 38.9 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 66.7 27.8 3.2 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 16.7 33.3 38.9 11.1 2.4 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 17.6 23.5 23.5 35.3 2.8 1.15 14. Encouraged class participation 18 16.7 22.2 38.9 22.2 2.7 1.03 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 25.0 16.7 50.0 8.3 2.4 1.00 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 12.5 6.3 62.5 18.8 2.9 0.89 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 6.7 0.0 80.0 13.3 3.0 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 12.5 12.5 56.3 18.8 2.8 0.91 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 12.5 31.3 37.5 18.8 2.6 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 110 003L1 ANALYTIC GEOMETRY AND TRIGONOMETRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 93.1 A 9 31.0 Sophomore 2 6.9 B 13 44.8 Junior 0 0.0 C 7 24.1 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 34.5 Studies Program 7 25.9 2 hours 5 17.2 Required by my major 16 59.3 3 hours 5 17.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 14.8 4 - 5 hours 8 27.6 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 13.8 65.5 20.7 3.1 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 3.4 48.3 44.8 3.3 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 3.4 58.6 37.9 3.3 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 35.7 50.0 10.7 2.7 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 80.8 19.2 3.2 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 7.1 28.6 46.4 17.9 2.8 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 28 7.1 32.1 42.9 17.9 2.7 0.85 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 30.4 52.2 17.4 2.9 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 10.7 60.7 28.6 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 44.4 40.7 11.1 2.6 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 3.4 69.0 27.6 3.2 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 85.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 123 002L1 ELEM CALC & ITS APPLICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 68.4 A 8 44.4 Sophomore 4 21.1 B 4 22.2 Junior 2 10.5 C 5 27.8 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 5.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 13 72.2 2 hours 8 44.4 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 7 38.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 14.3 4.8 71.4 9.5 2.8 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 9.1 0.0 63.6 27.3 3.1 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 19.0 28.6 33.3 19.0 2.5 1.03 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 22.7 50.0 22.7 4.5 2.1 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 9.1 40.9 50.0 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 18.2 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 40.9 31.8 22.7 2.7 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 21 9.5 38.1 47.6 4.8 2.5 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 40.0 53.3 6.7 2.7 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 14.3 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 10.0 60.0 30.0 0.0 2.2 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 4.3 21.7 43.5 30.4 3.0 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 13.0 34.8 47.8 3.3 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 7.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 3.0 0.82 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 28.6 64.3 7.1 2.8 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 37.5 62.5 0.0 2.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 17 17.6 17.6 11.8 29.4 23.5 3.2 1.48 38. Question 38 17 0.0 5.9 5.9 29.4 58.8 4.4 0.87 39. Question 39 17 23.5 17.6 11.8 23.5 23.5 3.1 1.56 40. Question 40 16 6.3 0.0 12.5 18.8 62.5 4.3 1.14 Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 64.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = MA 322 002L1 MATRIX ALGEBRA & APPLS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Chapman, Thomas A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 55.6 Sophomore 3 16.7 B 7 38.9 Junior 5 27.8 C 1 5.6 Senior 10 55.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 38.9 Studies Program 2 11.1 2 hours 5 27.8 Required by my major 10 55.6 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 33.3 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 20.0 65.0 15.0 3.0 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 21.1 52.6 21.1 2.9 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 37.5 31.3 25.0 2.8 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 64.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Mathematics FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = MA 108R402L1 INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cooley, Paul ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 61.5 A 6 42.9 Sophomore 1 7.7 B 5 35.7 Junior 2 15.4 C 2 14.3 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 7.7 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 15.4 Studies Program 9 64.3 2 hours 2 15.4 Required by my major 1 7.1 3 hours 6 46.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 28.6 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 29.4 23.5 47.1 3.2 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 29.4 23.5 47.1 3.2 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 6.7 26.7 60.0 3.4 0.91 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 6.3 6.3 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 18.8 37.5 43.8 3.3 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 6.3 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 6.3 6.3 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.86 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 18.8 18.8 25.0 37.5 2.8 1.17 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 6.3 6.3 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 6.3 25.0 62.5 3.4 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 24.