****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 280 001L1 ISSUES IN PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 44.4 Sophomore 3 33.3 B 3 33.3 Junior 3 33.3 C 2 22.2 Senior 3 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 2 22.2 6 - 7 hours 2 22.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 44.4 22.2 33.3 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 11.1 0.0 33.3 55.6 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 11.1 0.0 44.4 44.4 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 12.5 0.0 25.0 62.5 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 433G001L1 POL INTERNTNL ECON RELAT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 52.6 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 8 42.1 Junior 2 10.5 C 1 5.3 Senior 13 68.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 15.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 25.0 Required by my major 14 70.0 3 hours 7 35.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 30.0 4 - 5 hours 5 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 5.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 0.0 45.5 50.0 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 4.5 13.6 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1 3.3 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 18.2 36.4 45.5 0.0 2.3 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 18.2 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 22.7 59.1 18.2 3.0 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 18.2 59.1 22.7 3.0 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 31.8 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 19.0 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 9.5 66.7 23.8 3.1 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 36.4 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 13.6 18.2 50.0 18.2 2.7 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 461G001L1 CIVIL LIBERTIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 36.7 Sophomore 1 3.3 B 16 53.3 Junior 14 46.7 C 3 10.0 Senior 15 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 16.7 Studies Program 1 3.4 2 hours 5 16.7 Required by my major 21 72.4 3 hours 10 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 24.1 4 - 5 hours 5 16.7 6 - 7 hours 5 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 31 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 0.0 6.5 38.7 54.8 3.5 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 6.5 12.9 48.4 32.3 3.1 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 31 0.0 6.5 51.6 41.9 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 74.2 25.8 3.3 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 16.7 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.76 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 31 3.2 16.1 51.6 29.0 3.1 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 31 0.0 0.0 35.5 64.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 41.4 58.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 31 0.0 9.7 48.4 41.9 3.3 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 31 0.0 16.1 45.2 38.7 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 16.1 29.0 54.8 3.4 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 58.6 34.5 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 3.4 6.9 51.7 37.9 3.2 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 3.2 48.4 48.4 3.5 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 0.0 12.9 58.1 29.0 3.2 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 31 0.0 9.7 41.9 48.4 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 31 3.2 16.1 25.8 54.8 3.3 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 31 Percent completed = 62.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 428G001L1 LATIN AMER GOVT/POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 52.5 Sophomore 5 12.5 B 16 40.0 Junior 10 25.0 C 3 7.5 Senior 20 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 12.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 27.5 Studies Program 6 15.0 2 hours 14 35.0 Required by my major 24 60.0 3 hours 9 22.5 Other (e.g. elective) 10 25.0 4 - 5 hours 5 12.5 6 - 7 hours 1 2.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 2.3 61.4 36.4 3.3 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 2.3 11.4 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 11.9 69.0 19.0 3.1 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 44 0.0 2.3 56.8 40.9 3.4 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 2.4 69.0 28.6 3.3 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 2.3 11.6 48.8 37.2 3.2 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 2.3 65.1 32.6 3.3 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 44 0.0 11.4 54.5 34.1 3.2 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 9.1 56.8 34.1 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 2.3 34.1 63.6 3.6 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 4.7 46.5 48.8 3.4 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 6.8 18.2 45.5 29.5 3.0 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 13.6 47.7 38.6 3.3 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 0.0 7.7 66.7 25.6 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 3.0 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 34 2.9 14.7 67.6 14.7 2.9 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 0.0 78.0 22.0 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 7.1 19.0 54.8 19.0 2.9 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 0.0 7.0 69.8 23.3 3.2 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 4.8 4.8 54.8 35.7 3.2 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 88.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 711 001S1 TOP SEM IN PS:STATISTICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 20.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 80.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 1.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 25.0 50.0 25.0 0.0 2.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 1.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 1.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 775 001S1 SEMINAR IN PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 37.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 5 62.5 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 3 37.5 8 or more hours 3 37.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 28.6 0.0 71.4 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 439G001L1 CONTEMP INTERNATL PROBS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 27.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 54.5 Junior 9 39.1 C 4 18.2 Senior 9 39.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 21.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 27.3 Required by my major 15 65.2 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 8 34.8 4 - 5 hours 3 13.6 6 - 7 hours 3 13.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 4.3 0.0 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 18.2 77.3 4.5 2.9 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 4.5 4.5 31.8 59.1 3.5 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 13.6 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 4.3 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 52.4 33.3 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 69.6 30.4 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 21.7 60.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 60.9 26.1 3.1 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 50 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 46.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 671 001S1 STRATGS OF INQUIRY IN PS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 4 57.1 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 42.9 28.6 28.6 2.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 235 001L1 WORLD POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gibler, Douglas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 32.1 A 13 46.4 Sophomore 6 21.4 B 12 42.9 Junior 11 39.3 C 3 10.7 Senior 2 7.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 32.1 Studies Program 9 32.1 2 hours 10 35.7 Required by my major 13 46.4 3 hours 8 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 21.4 4 - 5 hours 1 3.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 0.0 6.9 55.2 37.9 3.3 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 13.8 48.3 37.9 3.2 0.69 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 3.4 0.0 44.8 51.7 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 0.0 6.9 37.9 55.2 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 17.2 41.4 41.4 3.2 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 10.7 64.3 25.0 3.1 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 0.0 10.3 37.9 51.7 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 0.0 17.2 82.8 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 3.4 37.9 58.6 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 0.0 10.3 41.4 48.3 3.4 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 0.0 48.3 51.7 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 10.3 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 13.8 55.2 31.0 3.2 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 0.0 24.1 58.6 17.2 2.9 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 3.4 44.8 48.3 3.4 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 6.9 20.7 72.4 3.7 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 65.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 430G001L1 CONDUCT AMER FOREIGN REL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gibler, Douglas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 40.0 Sophomore 2 5.9 B 20 57.1 Junior 8 23.5 C 1 2.9 Senior 21 61.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 8.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 28.6 Required by my major 29 85.3 3 hours 10 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 5 14.7 4 - 5 hours 4 11.4 6 - 7 hours 4 11.4 8 or more hours 2 5.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 5.6 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 36 0.0 2.8 63.9 33.3 3.3 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 2.8 2.8 58.3 36.1 3.3 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 5.7 60.0 34.3 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 2.8 38.9 58.3 3.6 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 30.6 69.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 5.6 30.6 63.9 3.6 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 2.8 25.0 72.2 3.7 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 35 0.0 5.7 65.7 28.6 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 36 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 0.0 2.8 52.8 44.4 3.4 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 0.0 52.8 47.2 3.5 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 36 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 470G001L1 AMERIC POLITICAL PARTIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 2 6.9 B 12 42.9 Junior 10 34.5 C 1 3.6 Senior 15 51.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 6.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 31.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 31.0 Required by my major 22 75.9 3 hours 10 34.5 Other (e.g. elective) 7 24.1 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 3.3 60.0 36.7 3.3 0.55 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 0.0 51.7 48.3 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 23.3 76.7 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 3.3 43.3 53.3 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 3.4 6.9 27.6 62.1 3.5 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 3.3 36.7 60.0 3.6 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 3.6 7.1 67.9 21.4 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 13.8 62.1 24.1 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 3.7 11.1 51.9 33.3 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 0.0 6.7 36.7 56.7 3.5 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 680 001S1 PROSEM POL INSTS PROC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 28.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 71.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 1 14.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 71.4 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 3 42.9 8 or more hours 2 28.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 210 001L1 INTRO EURO POL:EAST/WEST INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Irvin, Cynthia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.9 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 4 23.5 B 7 41.2 Junior 9 52.9 C 4 23.5 Senior 3 17.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 2 11.8 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 10 58.8 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 29.4 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 4.3 52.2 43.5 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 13.0 30.4 56.5 3.4 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 17.4 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 3.4 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 17.4 26.1 56.5 3.4 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 21.7 69.6 3.6 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 411G001L1 COMP GOVT-PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Irvin, Cynthia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 68.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 21.1 Junior 9 47.4 C 2 10.5 Senior 9 47.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 57.9 Required by my major 16 84.2 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 15.8 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 9.5 14.3 57.1 19.0 2.9 0.85 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 14.3 33.3 28.6 23.8 2.6 1.02 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 9.5 9.5 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 9.5 19.0 47.6 23.8 2.9 0.91 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 9.5 4.8 61.9 23.8 3.0 0.84 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 4.8 0.0 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 14.3 23.8 42.9 19.0 2.7 0.97 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 9.5 9.5 61.9 19.0 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 23.8 19.0 38.1 19.0 2.5 1.08 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 20 5.0 5.0 65.0 25.0 3.1 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 9.5 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 14.3 23.8 28.6 33.3 2.8 1.08 14. Encouraged class participation 21 9.5 4.8 52.4 33.3 3.1 0.89 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 9.5 9.5 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.89 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 19.0 4.8 57.1 19.0 2.8 1.00 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 22.2 11.1 50.0 16.7 2.6 1.04 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 19.0 9.5 47.6 23.8 2.8 1.04 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 19.0 14.3 33.3 33.3 2.8 1.12 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 20.0 5.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 1.06 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 30.0 10.0 30.0 30.0 2.6 1.23. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 72.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 479 001L1 WOMEN AND POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 41.2 Sophomore 2 5.7 B 18 52.9 Junior 11 31.4 C 2 5.9 Senior 22 62.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 14 41.2 Required by my major 20 57.1 3 hours 10 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 15 42.9 4 - 5 hours 5 14.7 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 2 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 45.7 54.3 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 5.7 45.7 48.6 3.4 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 2.9 20.0 40.0 37.1 3.1 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 20.6 61.8 17.6 3.0 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 5.7 54.3 40.0 3.3 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 26.5 55.9 14.7 2.8 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 8.6 57.1 34.3 3.3 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 0.0 51.4 48.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 11.8 38.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 2.9 55.9 41.2 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 16.1 48.4 35.5 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 2.9 17.6 38.2 41.2 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 17.1 37.1 45.7 3.3 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 11.8 38.2 50.0 3.4 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 473G001L1 PUBLIC OPINION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffley, Mark A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 4 16.7 B 12 48.0 Junior 8 33.3 C 2 8.0 Senior 11 45.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 36.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 28.0 Required by my major 15 62.5 3 hours 4 16.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 37.5 4 - 5 hours 4 16.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 4.0 4.0 76.0 16.0 3.0 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 16.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 16.0 64.0 20.0 3.0 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 8.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 12.0 68.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 4.0 16.0 68.0 12.0 2.9 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 0.0 80.0 16.0 3.1 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 4.3 8.7 65.2 21.7 3.0 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 8.0 16.0 56.0 20.0 2.9 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 8.0 28.0 40.0 24.0 2.8 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 4.2 79.2 12.5 3.0 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 21.1 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 12.5 29.2 41.7 16.7 2.6 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 20.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 8.0 4.0 40.0 48.0 3.3 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 42 Number of forms scanned = 42 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 59.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 475G001L1 POLITICS & MASS MEDIA INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Peffley, Mark A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 40.0 Junior 11 36.7 C 3 10.0 Senior 14 46.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 16.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 26.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 14 46.7 3 hours 7 23.3 Other (e.g. elective) 16 53.3 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 6.7 63.3 30.0 3.2 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 0.0 3.3 70.0 26.7 3.2 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 10.0 73.3 16.7 3.1 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 3.3 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 16.7 60.0 23.3 3.1 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 13.3 70.0 16.7 3.0 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 16.7 53.3 23.3 2.9 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 6.7 36.7 56.7 3.5 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 3.3 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 6.7 13.3 43.3 36.7 3.1 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 36.7 56.7 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 7.1 78.6 14.3 3.1 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 3.3 13.3 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 3.3 0.0 66.7 30.0 3.2 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 6.7 20.0 40.0 33.3 3.0 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 3.3 13.3 43.3 40.0 3.2 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 76.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = PS 429G001L1 GOVT/POLITICS IN RUSSIA & THE POST-SOVIET STATES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 53.8 Sophomore 1 3.8 B 11 42.3 Junior 6 23.1 C 1 3.8 Senior 12 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 26.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 18.5 Required by my major 18 66.7 3 hours 10 37.0 Other (e.g. elective) 9 33.3 4 - 5 hours 6 22.2 6 - 7 hours 2 7.4 8 or more hours 1 3.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 6.7 0.0 16.7 76.7 3.6 0.81 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 3.3 0.0 13.3 83.3 3.8 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 0.0 30.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 3.3 0.0 16.7 80.0 3.7 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 0.0 23.3 73.3 3.7 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 3.3 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.73 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 0.0 30.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 0.0 30.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 0.0 10.0 86.7 3.8 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 0.0 3.3 93.3 3.9 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 30 3.3 0.0 20.0 76.7 3.7 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 3.3 0.0 6.7 90.0 3.8 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 3.3 0.0 6.7 90.0 3.8 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 30 3.3 0.0 13.3 83.3 3.8 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 3.4 0.0 37.9 58.6 3.5 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 3.6 0.0 32.1 64.3 3.6 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 4.0 0.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.71 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 3.4 0.0 13.8 82.8 3.8 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 3.4 0.0 10.3 86.2 3.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 4.0 0.19 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 45 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 456G001L1 APPALACHIAN POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Reid, Herbert G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 58.3 Junior 2 15.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 84.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent