****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 311 001L1 LEARNING AND COGNITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 24 40.7 Sophomore 1 1.7 B 28 47.5 Junior 29 49.2 C 5 8.5 Senior 28 47.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 3.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 16 27.1 Studies Program 2 3.4 2 hours 23 39.0 Required by my major 46 78.0 3 hours 16 27.1 Other (e.g. elective) 11 18.6 4 - 5 hours 3 5.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 60 0.0 0.0 38.3 61.7 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 59 1.7 13.6 57.6 27.1 3.1 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 59 0.0 3.4 59.3 37.3 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 60 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 60 0.0 1.7 43.3 55.0 3.5 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 0.0 0.0 43.3 56.7 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 60 0.0 3.3 45.0 51.7 3.5 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 54 0.0 3.7 57.4 38.9 3.4 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 60 0.0 3.3 55.0 41.7 3.4 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 60 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 50 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 60 0.0 1.7 38.3 60.0 3.6 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 60 0.0 20.0 48.3 31.7 3.1 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 60 0.0 1.7 51.7 46.7 3.5 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 52 1.9 9.6 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 59 0.0 8.5 54.2 37.3 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 54 1.9 13.0 55.6 29.6 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 60 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 60 3.3 28.3 50.0 18.3 2.8 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 60 1.7 5.0 55.0 38.3 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 60 0.0 5.0 41.7 53.3 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 67 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 60 Percent completed = 89.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 311 002L1 LEARNING AND COGNITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 55.6 Sophomore 3 6.7 B 17 37.8 Junior 26 57.8 C 2 4.4 Senior 16 35.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 35.6 Required by my major 36 80.0 3 hours 14 31.1 Other (e.g. elective) 9 20.0 4 - 5 hours 5 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 2.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 45 0.0 0.0 42.2 57.8 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 45 0.0 8.9 46.7 44.4 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 4.7 48.8 46.5 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 0.0 2.2 51.1 46.7 3.4 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 45 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 45 2.2 0.0 44.4 53.3 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 45 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 2.4 4.8 52.4 40.5 3.3 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 2.2 4.4 44.4 48.9 3.4 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 0.0 0.0 31.1 68.9 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 40 0.0 0.0 47.5 52.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 45 0.0 20.0 51.1 28.9 3.1 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 45 0.0 4.4 44.4 51.1 3.5 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 7.9 68.4 23.7 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 42 0.0 9.5 54.8 35.7 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 37 0.0 10.8 51.4 37.8 3.3 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 45 0.0 0.0 48.9 51.1 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 44 6.8 22.7 45.5 25.0 2.9 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 0.0 11.1 51.1 37.8 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 76.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 002L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 51.6 Sophomore 1 3.1 B 13 41.9 Junior 12 37.5 C 2 6.5 Senior 18 56.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 34.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 28.1 Required by my major 21 67.7 3 hours 11 34.4 Other (e.g. elective) 10 32.3 4 - 5 hours 1 3.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 36 0.0 2.8 61.1 36.1 3.3 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 34 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 36 2.8 0.0 41.7 55.6 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 2.8 41.7 55.6 3.5 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 23.3 40.0 33.3 3.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 36 0.0 2.8 50.0 47.2 3.4 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 36 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 36 0.0 5.6 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 34 2.9 2.9 61.8 32.4 3.2 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 31 0.0 12.9 51.6 35.5 3.2 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 0.0 8.8 52.9 38.2 3.3 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 30 0.0 10.0 53.3 36.7 3.3 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 0.0 13.9 47.2 38.9 3.3 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 36 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 11.4 31.4 57.1 3.5 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 50 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 36 Percent completed = 72.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 312 001L1 BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 21.7 Sophomore 2 8.7 B 12 52.2 Junior 10 43.5 C 5 21.7 Senior 11 47.8 D 1 4.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 26.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 21.7 Required by my major 20 87.0 3 hours 11 47.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 43.5 52.2 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 46.2 15.4 38.5 2.9 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 4.3 56.5 39.1 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 21.7 34.8 43.5 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 54.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 001L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 37.5 Sophomore 1 4.2 B 12 50.0 Junior 8 33.3 C 3 12.5 Senior 13 54.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 37.5 Required by my major 10 43.5 3 hours 12 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 56.5 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 10.7 50.0 39.3 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 3.6 64.3 32.1 3.3 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 3.6 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 0.0 57.1 39.3 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 28 3.6 25.0 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 3.6 60.7 35.7 3.3 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 43 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 50.0 Junior 6 60.0 C 1 10.0 Senior 3 30.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 10.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 20.0 Required by my major 2 20.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 1 10.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 18.2 27.3 54.5 3.4 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 0.0 36.4 54.5 3.4 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 9.1 9.1 27.3 54.5 3.3 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 17 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 64.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 002L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 4.8 A 27 42.2 Sophomore 39 61.9 B 28 43.8 Junior 11 17.5 C 9 14.1 Senior 7 11.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 3.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 29 46.0 Studies Program 13 20.6 2 hours 19 30.2 Required by my major 23 36.5 3 hours 13 20.6 Other (e.g. elective) 27 42.9 4 - 5 hours 2 3.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 67 0.0 1.5 64.2 34.3 3.3 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 66 1.5 9.1 65.2 24.2 3.1 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 9.3 72.1 18.6 3.1 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 67 0.0 1.5 58.2 40.3 3.4 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 0.0 0.0 63.1 36.9 3.4 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 47 0.0 6.4 53.2 40.4 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 66 0.0 3.0 57.6 39.4 3.4 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 21.2 66.7 12.1 2.9 0.58 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 67 1.5 1.5 59.7 37.3 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 67 1.5 0.0 47.8 50.7 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 55 1.8 0.0 65.5 32.7 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 67 1.5 1.5 56.7 40.3 3.4 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 1.5 4.5 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.60 14. Encouraged class participation 65 1.5 1.5 61.5 35.4 3.3 0.58 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 63 0.0 12.7 71.4 15.9 3.0 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 64 0.0 10.9 67.2 21.9 3.1 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 53 0.0 26.4 56.6 17.0 2.9 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 65 0.0 1.5 70.8 27.7 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 1.5 21.5 60.0 16.9 2.9 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 66 1.5 1.5 63.6 33.3 3.3 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 66 1.5 6.1 45.5 47.0 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 119 Number of forms scanned = 114 Number of forms with at least one student response = 67 Percent completed = 56.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 38.1 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 9 42.9 Junior 8 38.1 C 4 19.0 Senior 7 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 9.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 47.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 10 47.6 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 52.4 4 - 5 hours 5 23.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 0.0 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 4.8 0.0 52.4 42.9 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 10.5 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 12.5 43.8 37.5 3.1 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 4.8 19.0 47.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 72.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 778 001S1 TOP SEM DEVELOPMNTL PSY: EARLY PERC/COGNIT DEVEL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 62.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 37.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 87.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 12.5 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 3 42.9 3 hours 2 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 57.1 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 331 001L1 PSYCHOLOGY OF ADJUSTMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Tamara ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 33.3 Sophomore 1 2.6 B 19 48.7 Junior 19 48.7 C 5 12.8 Senior 19 48.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 28.2 Studies Program 2 5.1 2 hours 12 30.8 Required by my major 10 25.6 3 hours 12 30.8 Other (e.g. elective) 27 69.2 4 - 5 hours 4 10.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 40.5 59.5 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 0.0 0.0 46.5 53.5 3.5 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 43 0.0 4.7 48.8 46.5 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 18.6 46.5 34.9 3.2 0.72 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 4.7 9.3 37.2 48.8 3.3 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 43 0.0 2.3 41.9 55.8 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 4.7 53.5 41.9 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 43 0.0 14.0 58.1 27.9 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 43 0.0 11.6 32.6 55.8 3.4 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 43 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 0.0 41.5 58.5 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 0.0 7.0 41.9 51.2 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 43 0.0 11.6 37.2 51.2 3.4 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 43 0.0 0.0 32.6 67.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 4.8 50.0 45.2 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 7.5 52.5 40.0 3.3 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 16.7 38.9 44.4 3.3 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 4.8 54.8 40.5 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 41 0.0 24.4 34.1 41.5 3.2 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 43 0.0 7.0 48.8 44.2 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 2.3 11.4 27.3 59.1 3.4 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 55 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 25 30.9 Sophomore 45 55.6 B 46 56.8 Junior 21 25.9 C 9 11.1 Senior 13 16.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.2 Pass or Audit 1 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 20 24.7 Studies Program 4 5.1 2 hours 30 37.0 Required by my major 32 40.5 3 hours 21 25.9 Other (e.g. elective) 43 54.4 4 - 5 hours 7 8.6 6 - 7 hours 3 3.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 86 0.0 0.0 16.3 83.7 3.8 0.37 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 87 0.0 2.3 35.6 62.1 3.6 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 78 0.0 1.3 37.2 61.5 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 0.0 3.4 24.1 72.4 3.7 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 86 0.0 0.0 22.1 77.9 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 81 0.0 3.7 23.5 72.8 3.7 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 83 0.0 2.4 15.7 81.9 3.8 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 5.0 30.0 25.0 40.0 3.0 0.96 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 86 0.0 0.0 8.1 91.9 3.9 0.28 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 86 0.0 0.0 3.5 96.5 4.0 0.18 11. Was available for consultation 79 0.0 0.0 17.7 82.3 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 86 0.0 0.0 9.3 90.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 85 0.0 0.0 14.1 85.9 3.9 0.35 14. Encouraged class participation 86 0.0 3.5 29.1 67.4 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 81 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 82 0.0 2.4 35.4 62.2 3.6 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 78 0.0 0.0 39.7 60.3 3.6 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 86 0.0 0.0 24.4 75.6 3.8 0.43 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 85 1.2 2.4 38.8 57.6 3.5 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 86 0.0 0.0 16.3 83.7 3.8 0.37 21. Overall quality of teaching 86 0.0 0.0 7.0 93.0 3.9 0.26. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 117 Number of forms scanned = 88 Number of forms with at least one student response = 87 Percent completed = 74.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 629 001O1 INTRO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOG INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 57.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 28.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 0.0 57.1 28.6 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 302 001L1 PSYCHOLOGY IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 38.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 15 44.1 Junior 9 26.5 C 4 11.8 Senior 25 73.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 35.3 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 10 29.4 Required by my major 8 23.5 3 hours 10 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 25 73.5 4 - 5 hours 1 2.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 37 2.7 2.7 59.5 35.1 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 0.0 43.2 54.1 3.5 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 5.4 56.8 37.8 3.3 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 37 0.0 2.7 59.5 37.8 3.4 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 37 0.0 0.0 59.5 40.5 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 5.7 51.4 42.9 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 2.7 56.8 40.5 3.4 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 31 0.0 0.0 61.3 38.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 0.0 62.2 37.8 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 10.8 54.1 35.1 3.2 0.64 14. Encouraged class participation 37 0.0 10.8 59.5 29.7 3.2 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 0.0 6.3 65.6 28.1 3.2 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 6.1 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 36 0.0 2.8 58.3 38.9 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 0.0 22.9 40.0 37.1 3.1 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 5.4 51.4 43.2 3.4 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 5.4 37.8 56.8 3.5 0.61. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 60 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 61.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 424 001L1 HUMAN SENSES & PERCEPTN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 6 28.6 Junior 4 19.0 C 1 4.8 Senior 16 76.2 D 1 4.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 28.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 11 52.4 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 10 47.6 4 - 5 hours 7 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 20.8 37.5 41.7 3.2 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 4.2 16.7 79.2 3.8 0.53 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 4.2 95.8 4.0 0.20 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 4.5 40.9 54.5 3.5 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 0.0 18.2 22.7 59.1 3.4 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 70.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 312 002L1 BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fillmore, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 40.7 Sophomore 1 3.7 B 15 55.6 Junior 10 37.0 C 1 3.7 Senior 16 59.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 33.3 Studies Program 1 3.7 2 hours 7 25.9 Required by my major 20 74.1 3 hours 8 29.6 Other (e.g. elective) 6 22.2 4 - 5 hours 3 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 11.8 11.8 35.3 41.2 3.1 1.03 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 39.3 60.7 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 3.6 7.1 42.9 46.4 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 4.8 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 5.0 5.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 16.0 36.0 44.0 3.2 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 7.1 39.3 53.6 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 43 Number of forms scanned = 38 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 65.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 017L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 53.8 A 5 41.7 Sophomore 4 30.8 B 7 58.3 Junior 1 7.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 46.2 Studies Program 8 61.5 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 3 23.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 23.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 15.4 15.4 38.5 30.8 2.8 1.07 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 13 7.7 0.0 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.88 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 50.0 0.0 37.5 2.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 12. Satisfact answered class questions 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 23.1 61.5 3.5 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 15.4 23.1 30.8 30.8 2.8 1.09 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 7.7 0.0 15.4 76.9 3.6 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 33.3 22.2 44.4 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 13 Percent completed = 52.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 018L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 14 73.7 A 6 31.6 Sophomore 3 15.8 B 7 36.8 Junior 1 5.3 C 6 31.6 Senior 1 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 26.3 Studies Program 13 68.4 2 hours 6 31.6 Required by my major 4 21.1 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.5 4 - 5 hours 1 5.3 6 - 7 hours 2 10.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 27.8 33.3 33.3 5.6 2.2 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 14.3 35.7 35.7 14.3 2.5 0.94 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 5.9 11.8 64.7 17.6 2.9 0.75 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 11.1 61.1 22.2 3.0 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 21.1 42.1 26.3 2.8 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 5.3 21.1 73.7 3.7 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 100 019L1 INTRO TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Golding, Jonathan M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 100.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 3 50.0 2 hours 2 28.6 Required by my major 3 50.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 57.1 28.6 0.0 2.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 40.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 16.7 0.0 16.7 66.7 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 28.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENT