****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 401L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: JURY RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 57.9 Sophomore 1 5.3 B 8 42.1 Junior 6 31.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 57.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 26.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 57.9 Required by my major 6 31.6 3 hours 3 15.8 Other (e.g. elective) 13 68.4 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 4.2 4.2 37.5 54.2 3.4 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 16.7 37.5 45.8 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 8.7 39.1 52.2 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 8.7 30.4 60.9 3.5 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 14.3 33.3 47.6 3.2 0.89 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 13.0 26.1 56.5 3.3 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 13.0 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 33.3 Sophomore 2 8.3 B 12 50.0 Junior 7 29.2 C 1 4.2 Senior 15 62.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 12.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 70.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 2 8.3 3 hours 2 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 22 91.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 0.0 52.6 42.1 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 0.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 3.8 11.5 42.3 42.3 3.2 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 3.8 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.76 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 18.2 40.9 40.9 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 3.8 46.2 46.2 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 19.2 80.8 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 12.0 8.0 28.0 52.0 3.2 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 32.0 60.0 3.5 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 3.1 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 3.8 7.7 30.8 57.7 3.4 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 0.0 7.7 26.9 65.4 3.6 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 39 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 235 002L1 INEQUALITY IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 39.3 Sophomore 11 39.3 B 13 46.4 Junior 11 39.3 C 4 14.3 Senior 6 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 46.4 Studies Program 3 10.7 2 hours 8 28.6 Required by my major 9 32.1 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 16 57.1 4 - 5 hours 3 10.7 6 - 7 hours 1 3.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 3.6 25.0 35.7 35.7 3.0 0.88 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 3.3 6.7 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.66 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 3.3 6.7 56.7 33.3 3.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 10.3 55.2 34.5 3.2 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 10.0 53.3 36.7 3.3 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 6.7 33.3 36.7 23.3 2.8 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 26 3.8 0.0 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 6.7 20.0 43.3 30.0 3.0 0.89 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 17.2 31.0 27.6 24.1 2.6 1.05 14. Encouraged class participation 29 6.9 6.9 41.4 44.8 3.2 0.87 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 29 0.0 13.8 55.2 31.0 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 12.0 56.0 32.0 3.2 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 13.8 37.9 24.1 24.1 2.6 1.02 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 29 3.4 41.4 37.9 17.2 2.7 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 13.8 27.6 37.9 20.7 2.7 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 002L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 3 17.6 B 6 37.5 Junior 6 35.3 C 5 31.3 Senior 7 41.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 10 58.8 3 hours 8 47.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 41.2 4 - 5 hours 2 11.8 6 - 7 hours 2 11.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 11.8 5.9 58.8 23.5 2.9 0.90 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 11.1 11.1 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.90 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 16.7 33.3 38.9 11.1 2.4 0.92 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 11.1 5.6 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 11.1 16.7 61.1 11.1 2.7 0.83 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 16.7 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 5.6 0.0 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 11.1 16.7 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 11.1 16.7 55.6 16.7 2.8 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 11.1 27.8 50.0 11.1 2.6 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 5.6 16.7 72.2 5.6 2.8 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 11.1 72.2 11.1 2.9 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 5.9 17.6 64.7 11.8 2.8 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 5.6 16.7 55.6 22.2 2.9 0.80 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 17.6 11.8 58.8 11.8 2.6 0.93 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 17.6 11.8 47.1 23.5 2.8 1.03. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 62.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 002L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Johanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 46.7 Sophomore 1 3.4 B 12 40.0 Junior 2 6.9 C 4 13.3 Senior 26 89.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 30.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 43.3 Required by my major 5 16.7 3 hours 5 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 25 83.3 4 - 5 hours 3 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 3.3 66.7 30.0 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 13.3 30.0 43.3 13.3 2.6 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 26.7 56.7 16.7 2.9 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 34.5 44.8 20.7 2.9 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 16.7 63.3 20.0 3.0 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 0.0 10.0 76.7 13.3 3.0 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 3.3 26.7 56.7 13.3 2.8 0.71 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 6.7 76.7 16.7 3.1 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 3.3 40.0 33.3 23.3 2.8 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 56.7 23.3 20.0 2.6 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 62.1 34.5 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 0.0 25.9 55.6 18.5 2.9 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 37.5 50.0 12.5 2.8 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 0.0 0.0 82.8 17.2 3.2 0.38 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 3.6 46.4 35.7 14.3 2.6 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 6.7 26.7 46.7 20.0 2.8 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 34.5 27.6 34.5 2.9 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 452G001L1 CONTEMPORA SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Billings, Dwight B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 33.3 Junior 3 14.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 18 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 14.3 Studies Program 1 5.0 2 hours 6 28.6 Required by my major 17 85.0 3 hours 6 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 10.0 4 - 5 hours 4 19.0 6 - 7 hours 2 9.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 53.6 46.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 3.6 3.6 46.4 46.4 3.4 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 7.1 0.0 39.3 53.6 3.4 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 7.1 53.6 39.3 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 3.6 7.1 25.0 64.3 3.5 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 3.6 32.1 64.3 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 7.1 3.6 32.1 57.1 3.4 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 17.9 39.3 42.9 3.3 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 15.4 50.0 34.6 3.2 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 10.7 35.7 50.0 3.3 0.82 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 25.0 32.1 35.7 3.0 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 17.9 35.7 46.4 3.3 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 3.6 7.1 21.4 67.9 3.5 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 650 001L1 CONCEPTS/THEORIES IN SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 75.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 80.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dyk, P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 61.9 Sophomore 1 4.8 B 6 28.6 Junior 7 33.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 12 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 7 33.3 3 hours 7 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 14 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 15.0 30.0 55.0 3.4 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 001L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 44.0 A 20 83.3 Sophomore 7 28.0 B 4 16.7 Junior 2 8.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 58.3 Studies Program 20 83.3 2 hours 3 12.5 Required by my major 3 12.5 3 hours 4 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.2 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 2 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 12.0 60.0 28.0 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 0.0 0.0 16.0 84.0 3.8 0.37 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 4.0 32.0 64.0 3.6 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 8.0 20.0 72.0 3.6 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 32.0 40.0 28.0 3.0 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 8.0 32.0 60.0 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 4.0 24.0 72.0 3.7 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 13 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 439 001L1 SP TOP CRIME & DELIN: SOCIOLOGY OF LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 73.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 13.3 Junior 6 40.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 13.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 13.3 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 2 13.3 Required by my major 1 6.7 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 86.7 4 - 5 hours 3 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 6.7 93.3 3.9 0.26 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 691 001S1 STRUCTURE OF U.S. AGRI INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 735 001L1 TOP SEM IN SOC INEQUAL: AGING,INEQUALITIES&SOCIE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 75.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 25.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 100.0 4 - 5 hours 1 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 50.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 50.0 Sophomore 1 4.2 B 8 33.3 Junior 3 12.5 C 3 12.5 Senior 20 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 33.3 Studies Program 3 12.5 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 7 29.2 3 hours 5 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 14 58.3 4 - 5 hours 3 12.5 6 - 7 hours 3 12.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 4.2 58.3 37.5 3.3 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 8.3 33.3 45.8 12.5 2.6 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 20.8 62.5 16.7 3.0 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 62.5 29.2 3.2 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 4.2 33.3 41.7 20.8 2.8 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 4.2 29.2 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 12.5 33.3 25.0 29.2 2.7 1.04 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 26.1 52.2 21.7 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 36.4 40.9 22.7 2.9 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 38.1 42.9 19.0 2.8 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 25.0 33.3 25.0 16.7 2.3 1.05 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 8.3 33.3 37.5 20.8 2.7 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 4.2 29.2 29.2 37.5 3.0 0.93. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 0.84 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 7.7 38.5 30.8 23.1 2.7 0.95 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 33.3 16.7 33.3 16.7 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 47.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 002L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 33.3 Junior 3 14.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 18 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 61.9 Studies Program 10 47.6 2 hours 2 9.5 Required by my major 5 23.8 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 28.6 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 8.0 24.0 40.0 28.0 2.9 0.93 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 4.0 4.0 56.0 36.0 3.2 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 4.0 12.0 48.0 36.0 3.2 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 16.7 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 16.0 52.0 24.0 2.9 0.86 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 8.0 24.0 52.0 16.0 2.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 20.0 24.0 40.0 16.0 2.5 1.00 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 25.0 50.0 20.8 2.9 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 32.0 40.0 24.0 2.8 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 8.3 33.3 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.94 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 4.0 8.0 60.0 28.0 3.1 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 32.0 32.0 16.0 20.0 2.2 1.13 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 8.0 32.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.89 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 4.0 32.0 36.0 28.0 2.9 0.88. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 6.3 43.8 37.5 12.5 2.6 0.81 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 19 0.0 15.8 68.4 15.8 3.0 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 19 0.0 10.5 73.7 15.8 3.1 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 12 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 0.85 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 13.3 33.3 33.3 20.0 2.6 0.99 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 49.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 436 001L1 SOC OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 27 44.3 Sophomore 3 4.9 B 31 50.8 Junior 18 29.5 C 1 1.6 Senior 38 62.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.6 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.6 Pass or Audit 2 3.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 36.7 Studies Program 3 5.0 2 hours 18 30.0 Required by my major 22 36.7 3 hours 12 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 35 58.3 4 - 5 hours 6 10.0 6 - 7 hours 1 1.7 8 or more hours 1 1.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 64 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 66 1.5 1.5 56.1 40.9 3.4 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 64 0.0 4.7 53.1 42.2 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 66 0.0 1.5 37.9 60.6 3.6 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 65 1.5 0.0 43.1 55.4 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 60 0.0 1.7 45.0 53.3 3.5 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 63 0.0 4.8 49.2 46.0 3.4 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 46 0.0 19.6 43.5 37.0 3.2 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 66 1.5 1.5 45.5 51.5 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 66 0.0 1.5 43.9 54.5 3.5 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 63 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 66 0.0 0.0 43.9 56.1 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 1.5 4.5 45.5 48.5 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 65 0.0 10.8 53.8 35.4 3.2 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 60 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 62 0.0 1.6 54.8 43.5 3.4 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 56 1.8 0.0 62.5 35.7 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 65 0.0 0.0 50.8 49.2 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 64 1.6 12.5 43.8 42.2 3.3 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 66 1.5 3.0 42.4 53.0 3.5 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 64 0.0 0.0 32.8 67.2 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 134 Number of forms scanned = 68 Number of forms with at least one student response = 66 Percent completed = 49.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 630 001L1 PROSEMINAR DEVIANT BEHAV INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hunt, Scott A. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 442G001L1 SOCIOLOGY OF WORK AND OCCUPATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 71.4 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 3 21.4 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 57.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 35.7 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 71.4 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 20.0 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.88 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 7.1 35.7 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 14.3 35.7 50.0 3.4 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 31 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 48.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 443 001L1 SOCIAL CONFLICT AND COOPERATION AT WORK INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 68.2 Sophomore 1 4.5 B 3 13.6 Junior 5 22.7 C 4 18.2 Senior 14 63.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 9.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 22.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 40.9 Required by my major 5 22.7 3 hours 7 31.8 Other (e.g. elective) 17 77.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 13.6 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 4.5 22.7 68.2 4.5 2.7 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 4.5 9.1 72.7 13.6 3.0 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 4.5 72.7 22.7 3.2 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 9.1 68.2 22.7 3.1 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 19.0 57.1 19.0 2.9 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 9.1 13.6 68.2 9.1 2.8 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 4.5 18.2 54.5 22.7 3.0 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 27.3 45.5 22.7 2.9 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 22 4.5 9.1 68.2 18.2 3.0 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 4.8 14.3 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 22.7 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 4.5 18.2 59.1 18.2 2.9 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 36.4 54.5 4.5 2.6 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 9.1 27.3 50.0 13.6 2.7 0.84 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 9.1 22.7 40.9 27.3 2.9 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - FALL 1999 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 002L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent