****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 102 002L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BEATTIE, RUTH ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 43 48.9 A 23 26.4 Sophomore 30 34.1 B 42 48.3 Junior 10 11.4 C 22 25.3 Senior 5 5.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 34 38.6 Studies Program 83 94.3 2 hours 30 34.1 Required by my major 5 5.7 3 hours 17 19.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 5.7 6 - 7 hours 2 2.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 92 1.1 0.0 40.2 58.7 3.6 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 92 4.3 17.4 60.9 17.4 2.9 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 92 3.3 6.5 60.9 29.3 3.2 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 92 2.2 17.4 57.6 22.8 3.0 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 92 2.2 13.0 57.6 27.2 3.1 0.70 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 92 0.0 3.3 58.7 38.0 3.3 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 92 0.0 7.6 50.0 42.4 3.3 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 90 6.7 32.2 51.1 10.0 2.6 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 92 3.3 4.3 53.3 39.1 3.3 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 91 0.0 2.2 33.0 64.8 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 86 0.0 4.7 60.5 34.9 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 92 0.0 1.1 48.9 50.0 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 89 6.7 24.7 47.2 21.3 2.8 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 88 2.3 39.8 44.3 13.6 2.7 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 77 2.6 10.4 62.3 24.7 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 83 3.6 13.3 63.9 19.3 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 80 3.8 20.0 55.0 21.3 2.9 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 92 1.1 5.4 63.0 30.4 3.2 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 91 7.7 42.9 35.2 14.3 2.6 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 92 3.3 14.1 59.8 22.8 3.0 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 92 2.2 13.0 50.0 34.8 3.2 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 85 1.2 3.5 74.1 21.2 3.2 0.52 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 83 0.0 14.5 65.1 20.5 3.1 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 84 2.4 11.9 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 41 2.4 7.3 56.1 34.1 3.2 0.69 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 43 0.0 2.3 72.1 25.6 3.2 0.48 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 293 Number of forms scanned = 95 Number of forms with at least one student response = 92 Percent completed = 31.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = BIO 102 001L1 HUMAN ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = BURKE, WILLIAM ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 83 62.4 A 57 43.2 Sophomore 34 25.6 B 56 42.4 Junior 9 6.8 C 19 14.4 Senior 7 5.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 66 50.0 Studies Program 117 89.3 2 hours 39 29.5 Required by my major 11 8.4 3 hours 21 15.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 2.3 4 - 5 hours 5 3.8 6 - 7 hours 1 0.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 146 0.0 1.4 41.1 57.5 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 145 0.7 9.7 51.7 37.9 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 134 1.5 6.7 61.2 30.6 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 146 0.0 2.7 39.7 57.5 3.5 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 145 0.7 1.4 42.8 55.2 3.5 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 138 0.7 2.9 44.9 51.4 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 143 1.4 3.5 40.6 54.5 3.5 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 97 5.2 26.8 33.0 35.1 3.0 0.91 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 146 1.4 4.1 41.1 53.4 3.5 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 145 0.0 0.7 34.5 64.8 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 135 2.2 4.4 45.2 48.1 3.4 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 146 0.0 3.4 39.7 56.8 3.5 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 144 2.1 16.7 39.6 41.7 3.2 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 145 0.0 2.1 39.3 58.6 3.6 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 141 0.7 5.7 56.0 37.6 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 143 0.7 9.1 52.4 37.8 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 134 0.7 14.9 50.0 34.3 3.2 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 144 0.7 3.5 49.3 46.5 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 144 4.9 29.2 38.2 27.8 2.9 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 145 2.1 4.1 51.0 42.8 3.3 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 145 3.4 3.4 30.3 62.8 3.5 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 113 0.9 1.8 59.3 38.1 3.3 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 111 0.9 5.4 58.6 35.1 3.3 0.61 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 108 2.8 3.7 59.3 34.3 3.3 0.66 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 33 3.0 3.0 54.5 39.4 3.3 0.68 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 33 0.0 9.1 51.5 39.4 3.3 0.64 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 298 Number of forms scanned = 153 Number of forms with at least one student response = 146 Percent completed = 49.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 152 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baskin, C C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 29 21.6 A 73 54.9 Sophomore 61 45.5 B 49 36.8 Junior 28 20.9 C 10 7.5 Senior 12 9.0 D 1 0.8 Graduate 1 0.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 3 2.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 38 28.1 Studies Program 13 9.7 2 hours 53 39.3 Required by my major 110 82.1 3 hours 24 17.8 Other (e.g. elective) 11 8.2 4 - 5 hours 15 11.1 6 - 7 hours 4 3.0 8 or more hours 1 0.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 140 0.7 0.0 54.3 45.0 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 136 8.8 30.1 50.7 10.3 2.6 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 95 6.3 10.5 57.9 25.3 3.0 0.79 4. Exams reflected what was taught 141 1.4 0.7 39.0 58.9 3.6 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 139 1.4 0.0 43.2 55.4 3.5 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 92 3.3 4.3 46.7 45.7 3.3 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 133 0.8 0.0 40.6 58.6 3.6 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 62 3.2 30.6 43.5 22.6 2.9 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 140 1.4 6.4 43.6 48.6 3.4 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 140 0.7 0.7 37.9 60.7 3.6 0.55 11. Was available for consultation 115 1.7 0.0 53.9 44.3 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 139 1.4 1.4 45.3 51.8 3.5 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 138 3.6 13.0 48.6 34.8 3.1 0.78 14. Encouraged class participation 133 0.8 15.8 48.9 34.6 3.2 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 99 0.0 11.1 58.6 30.3 3.2 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 123 0.0 10.6 61.0 28.5 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 106 1.9 16.0 57.5 24.5 3.0 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 135 0.7 3.7 58.5 37.0 3.3 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 127 4.7 26.0 49.6 19.7 2.8 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 137 1.5 3.6 56.9 38.0 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 137 1.5 3.6 39.4 55.5 3.5 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 23 4.3 0.0 60.9 34.8 3.3 0.69 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 4.5 9.1 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 14.3 14.3 42.9 28.6 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 204 Number of forms scanned = 148 Number of forms with at least one student response = 142 Percent completed = 69.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 001L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 46.6 A 9 16.1 Sophomore 17 29.3 B 22 39.3 Junior 12 20.7 C 20 35.7 Senior 1 1.7 D 5 8.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 8.8 Studies Program 3 5.2 2 hours 17 29.8 Required by my major 49 84.5 3 hours 12 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 10.3 4 - 5 hours 17 29.8 6 - 7 hours 5 8.8 8 or more hours 1 1.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 64 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 64 1.6 1.6 62.5 34.4 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 64 6.3 14.1 53.1 26.6 3.0 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 64 20.3 25.0 42.2 12.5 2.5 0.96 5. Grading was fair and consistent 64 0.0 9.4 67.2 23.4 3.1 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 64 0.0 7.8 57.8 34.4 3.3 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 64 0.0 1.6 56.3 42.2 3.4 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 59 8.5 40.7 40.7 10.2 2.5 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 64 4.7 10.9 57.8 26.6 3.1 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 64 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 56 1.8 0.0 66.1 32.1 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 62 0.0 1.6 61.3 37.1 3.4 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 62 12.9 25.8 40.3 21.0 2.7 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 63 0.0 17.5 60.3 22.2 3.0 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 49 4.1 16.3 63.3 16.3 2.9 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 60 3.3 20.0 53.3 23.3 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 56 3.6 28.6 48.2 19.6 2.8 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 64 3.1 6.3 64.1 26.6 3.1 0.66 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 61 11.5 32.8 41.0 14.8 2.6 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 63 6.3 25.4 42.9 25.4 2.9 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 63 6.3 22.2 38.1 33.3 3.0 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 33 0.0 3.0 72.7 24.2 3.2 0.48 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 36 0.0 11.1 72.2 16.7 3.1 0.53 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 36 5.6 11.1 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 13 0.0 23.1 69.2 7.7 2.8 0.55 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 0.0 13.3 73.3 13.3 3.0 0.53 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 176 Number of forms scanned = 65 Number of forms with at least one student response = 64 Percent completed = 36.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 150 002L1 PRIN OF BIOLOGY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beattie, Ruth ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 38 45.2 A 21 25.3 Sophomore 24 28.6 B 39 47.0 Junior 16 19.0 C 19 22.9 Senior 4 4.8 D 3 3.6 Graduate 1 1.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.2 Pass or Audit 1 1.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 20.2 Studies Program 8 9.6 2 hours 23 27.4 Required by my major 69 83.1 3 hours 25 29.8 Other (e.g. elective) 6 7.2 4 - 5 hours 18 21.4 6 - 7 hours 1 1.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 88 0.0 1.1 47.7 51.1 3.5 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 88 1.1 12.5 60.2 26.1 3.1 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 88 0.0 21.6 58.0 20.5 3.0 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 88 9.1 29.5 51.1 10.2 2.6 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 86 4.7 8.1 62.8 24.4 3.1 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 87 0.0 10.3 60.9 28.7 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 87 0.0 2.3 44.8 52.9 3.5 0.55 8. Graded assignments included comments 84 0.0 57.1 35.7 7.1 2.5 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 88 2.3 6.8 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 87 0.0 0.0 35.6 64.4 3.6 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 85 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 85 0.0 0.0 61.2 38.8 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 86 4.7 33.7 47.7 14.0 2.7 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 86 1.2 15.1 67.4 16.3 3.0 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 74 2.7 23.0 63.5 10.8 2.8 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 86 1.2 19.8 64.0 15.1 2.9 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 82 2.4 28.0 61.0 8.5 2.8 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 87 0.0 6.9 72.4 20.7 3.1 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 86 10.5 44.2 34.9 10.5 2.5 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 87 1.1 24.1 58.6 16.1 2.9 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 87 2.3 18.4 50.6 28.7 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 40 5.0 2.5 80.0 12.5 3.0 0.60 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 41 4.9 0.0 80.5 14.6 3.0 0.59 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 41 4.9 24.4 61.0 9.8 2.8 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 2.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 0.42 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 229 Number of forms scanned = 88 Number of forms with at least one student response = 88 Percent completed = 38.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 007S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR:TOPICS ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Birge, Wesley J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 85.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 14.3 Junior 2 28.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 42.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 42.9 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 16.7 0.0 33.3 50.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 0.0 28.6 57.1 3.3 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 542 001L1 HISTOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 36.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 31.6 Junior 1 5.0 C 2 10.5 Senior 16 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.0 Pass or Audit 4 21.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 10.5 Required by my major 4 21.1 3 hours 6 31.6 Other (e.g. elective) 15 78.9 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 3 15.8 8 or more hours 4 21.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 4.5 68.2 27.3 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 18.2 50.0 31.8 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 19.0 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 4.5 22.7 54.5 18.2 2.9 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 9.1 50.0 40.9 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 65.0 30.0 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 14.3 47.6 38.1 3.2 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 27.3 45.5 27.3 3.0 0.76 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 30.0 55.0 15.0 2.9 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 15.4 61.5 23.1 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 4.8 47.6 47.6 3.4 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 13.6 31.8 54.5 3.4 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 22.7 27.3 50.0 3.3 0.83. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 542 002L1 HISTOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bonner, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 26.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 1 7.1 C 2 13.3 Senior 12 85.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 7.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 13.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 5 35.7 Other (e.g. elective) 14 100.0 4 - 5 hours 3 21.4 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 2 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 43.8 37.5 12.5 2.6 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 6.3 25.0 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 6.3 6.3 75.0 12.5 2.9 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 18.8 75.0 6.3 2.9 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 26.7 66.7 6.7 2.8 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 33.3 53.3 13.3 2.8 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 6.3 6.3 68.8 18.8 3.0 0.73. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 61.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 001L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 55.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 44.4 Junior 1 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 33.3 Required by my major 8 88.9 3 hours 4 44.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 11.1 4 - 5 hours 1 11.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 10.0 30.0 40.0 20.0 2.7 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 44.4 33.3 22.2 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 30.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 2.3 1.16 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 30.0 40.0 30.0 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 2.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 38.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 002L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 62.5 Sophomore 3 37.5 B 1 12.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 25.0 Senior 5 62.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 5 62.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 11.1 22.2 55.6 11.1 2.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 11.1 33.3 55.6 0.0 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 22.2 66.7 11.1 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 22.2 44.4 33.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 44.4 44.4 11.1 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 31.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 304 003L1 PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 5 38.5 C 3 23.1 Senior 8 61.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 7.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 38.5 Required by my major 13 100.0 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 30.8 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 21.4 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 7.1 57.1 35.7 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 33.3 16.7 33.3 16.7 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 84.6 15.4 3.2 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 21.4 71.4 7.1 2.9 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 42.9 35.7 7.1 2.4 0.84 14. Encouraged class participation 14 21.4 50.0 21.4 7.1 2.1 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 10.0 10.0 70.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 13 7.7 7.7 76.9 7.7 2.8 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 8.3 0.0 83.3 8.3 2.9 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 8.3 0.0 83.3 8.3 2.9 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 25.0 41.7 25.0 8.3 2.2 0.94 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 14.3 14.3 50.0 21.4 2.8 0.97 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 46.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 004S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR: TOXIC PLANTS AND ANIMALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 81.8 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 12.5 0.0 50.0 37.5 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 425 005S1 BIOLOGY SEMINAR: TOXIC PLANTS AND ANIMALS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Clark, Jimmy D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 1 9.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 90.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 81.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 11 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 10 0.0 20.0 50.0 30.0 3.1 0.74 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 315 001L1 INTRO TO CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 29.3 Sophomore 9 22.0 B 13 31.7 Junior 19 46.3 C 14 34.1 Senior 12 29.3 D 2 4.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.4 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 9.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 17.1 Required by my major 36 87.8 3 hours 13 31.7 Other (e.g. elective) 5 12.2 4 - 5 hours 9 22.0 6 - 7 hours 5 12.2 8 or more hours 3 7.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 6.8 63.6 29.5 3.2 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 45 0.0 2.2 55.6 42.2 3.4 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 10.3 13.8 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 45 15.6 31.1 44.4 8.9 2.5 0.87 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 9.1 11.4 65.9 13.6 2.8 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 7.1 67.9 25.0 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 2.3 9.3 67.4 20.9 3.1 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 30.0 43.3 23.3 3.3 2.0 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 17.8 42.2 28.9 11.1 2.3 0.90 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 0.0 2.2 53.3 44.4 3.4 0.54 11. Was available for consultation 38 2.6 10.5 57.9 28.9 3.1 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 4.9 14.6 58.5 22.0 3.0 0.76 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 22.7 34.1 29.5 13.6 2.3 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 44 9.1 31.8 50.0 9.1 2.6 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 32 12.5 34.4 50.0 3.1 2.4 0.76 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 12.5 22.5 55.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 12.8 23.1 56.4 7.7 2.6 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 11.6 9.3 62.8 16.3 2.8 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 19.0 33.3 33.3 14.3 2.4 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 6.7 33.3 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 26.7 35.6 24.4 13.3 2.2 1.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 108 Number of forms scanned = 45 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 41.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 410 001L2 LAB IN GENETICS AND CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 1 16.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 50.0 Required by my major 1 16.7 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 83.3 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 410 002L2 LAB IN GENETICS AND CELL BIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Cohen, William S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 37.5 Sophomore 1 12.5 B 3 37.5 Junior 1 12.5 C 2 25.0 Senior 6 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 2 25.0 3 hours 4 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 12.5 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 0.0 77.8 11.1 2.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 22.2 22.2 55.6 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 325 004L1 INTRODUCTORY ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crowley, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 63.6 Sophomore 2 18.2 B 1 9.1 Junior 5 45.5 C 2 18.2 Senior 4 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 9.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 45.5 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 4 36.4 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.97 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 33.3 41.7 3.2 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 50.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = BIO 325 005L1 INTRODUCTORY ECOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Crowley, Philip H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 11.1 Sophomore 2 22.2 B 5 55.6 Junior 3 33.3 C 3 33.3 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 44.4 Required by my major 6 66.7 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 11.1 0.0 55.6 33.3 3.1 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 11.1 11.1 77.8 0.0 2.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 88.9 0.0 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 11.1 0.0 77.8 11.1 2.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 44.4 55.6 0.0 2.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 44.4 55.6 0.0 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 33.3 33.3 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0