****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 107 001L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ades, Harriet F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 73 73.0 A 28 27.7 Sophomore 18 18.0 B 31 30.7 Junior 9 9.0 C 31 30.7 Senior 0 0.0 D 10 9.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 12 11.9 Studies Program 10 10.0 2 hours 22 21.8 Required by my major 87 87.0 3 hours 24 23.8 Other (e.g. elective) 3 3.0 4 - 5 hours 29 28.7 6 - 7 hours 7 6.9 8 or more hours 7 6.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 114 2.6 9.6 69.3 18.4 3.0 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 115 7.0 12.2 59.1 21.7 3.0 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 114 4.4 15.8 60.5 19.3 2.9 0.73 4. Exams reflected what was taught 114 14.0 31.6 47.4 7.0 2.5 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 113 3.5 15.0 67.3 14.2 2.9 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 114 2.6 5.3 78.9 13.2 3.0 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 107 2.8 8.4 65.4 23.4 3.1 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 75 40.0 50.7 8.0 1.3 1.7 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 115 29.6 35.7 30.4 4.3 2.1 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 114 9.6 14.0 60.5 15.8 2.8 0.81 11. Was available for consultation 108 3.7 2.8 74.1 19.4 3.1 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 114 23.7 24.6 45.6 6.1 2.3 0.91 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 113 44.2 36.3 17.7 1.8 1.8 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 109 32.1 37.6 27.5 2.8 2.0 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 79 15.2 40.5 40.5 3.8 2.3 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 109 11.9 23.9 57.8 6.4 2.6 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 109 11.0 19.3 59.6 10.1 2.7 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 111 11.7 20.7 55.9 11.7 2.7 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 108 37.0 40.7 18.5 3.7 1.9 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 114 20.2 40.4 33.3 6.1 2.3 0.85 21. Overall quality of teaching 114 43.9 29.8 21.1 5.3 1.9 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 16.7 20.8 50.0 12.5 2.6 0.93 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 13.0 39.1 43.5 4.3 2.4 0.78 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 55.6 33.3 0.0 2.2 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 280 Number of forms scanned = 267 Number of forms with at least one student response = 115 Percent completed = 41.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 001A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 11 84.6 A 4 30.8 Sophomore 2 15.4 B 6 46.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 15.4 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 11 84.6 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 15.4 4 - 5 hours 5 38.5 6 - 7 hours 4 30.8 8 or more hours 3 23.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 74 1.4 5.4 71.6 21.6 3.1 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 73 2.7 11.0 65.8 20.5 3.0 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 74 1.4 20.3 60.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 74 2.7 24.3 58.1 14.9 2.9 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 74 8.1 28.4 52.7 10.8 2.7 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 74 0.0 9.5 66.2 24.3 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 74 4.1 9.5 51.4 35.1 3.2 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 71 8.5 26.8 50.7 14.1 2.7 0.82 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 13 7.7 23.1 53.8 15.4 2.8 0.83 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 7.1 0.0 35.7 57.1 3.4 0.85 11. Was available for consultation 12 8.3 0.0 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.87 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 8.3 8.3 33.3 50.0 3.3 0.97 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 9.1 18.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 12 8.3 33.3 33.3 25.0 2.8 0.97 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 60 1.7 31.7 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 71 0.0 7.0 69.0 23.9 3.2 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 72 0.0 15.3 62.5 22.2 3.1 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 73 1.4 4.1 72.6 21.9 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 72 20.8 41.7 33.3 4.2 2.2 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 4.8 23.8 52.4 19.0 2.9 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 5.3 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 72 5.6 33.3 47.2 13.9 2.7 0.78 33. Amount of work appropriate 72 18.1 29.2 45.8 6.9 2.4 0.87 34. Instructor explained expectations 71 5.6 35.2 52.1 7.0 2.6 0.71 35. Instructor helped with my problems 69 5.8 39.1 43.5 11.6 2.6 0.77 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 71 2.8 7.0 67.6 22.5 3.1 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 94 Number of forms scanned = 94 Number of forms with at least one student response = 74 Percent completed = 78.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 002A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 22 44.0 A 20 40.8 Sophomore 17 34.0 B 24 49.0 Junior 6 12.0 C 5 10.2 Senior 5 10.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 2.0 Studies Program 8 16.0 2 hours 4 8.2 Required by my major 41 82.0 3 hours 6 12.2 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.0 4 - 5 hours 26 53.1 6 - 7 hours 8 16.3 8 or more hours 4 8.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 77 1.3 5.2 59.7 33.8 3.3 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 75 1.3 13.3 62.7 22.7 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 77 0.0 11.7 67.5 20.8 3.1 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 77 0.0 20.8 59.7 19.5 3.0 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 77 6.5 13.0 61.0 19.5 2.9 0.77 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 77 6.5 6.5 62.3 24.7 3.1 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 77 2.6 2.6 58.4 36.4 3.3 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 76 6.6 17.1 51.3 25.0 2.9 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 12.5 31.3 37.5 18.8 2.6 0.96 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 33.3 53.3 6.7 2.6 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 40.0 40.0 13.3 2.6 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 57 3.5 24.6 63.2 8.8 2.8 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 76 0.0 3.9 63.2 32.9 3.3 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 76 1.3 3.9 67.1 27.6 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 76 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 76 18.4 36.8 40.8 3.9 2.3 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 20.0 73.3 6.7 2.9 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 26.7 60.0 13.3 2.9 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 73 1.4 21.9 67.1 9.6 2.8 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 73 12.3 28.8 50.7 8.2 2.5 0.82 34. Instructor explained expectations 72 4.2 25.0 61.1 9.7 2.8 0.68 35. Instructor helped with my problems 71 4.2 28.2 53.5 14.1 2.8 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 73 4.1 8.2 61.6 26.0 3.1 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 91 Number of forms scanned = 89 Number of forms with at least one student response = 77 Percent completed = 84.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 003A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 44.4 A 4 23.5 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 7 41.2 Junior 3 16.7 C 5 29.4 Senior 1 5.6 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 5.6 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 23.5 6 - 7 hours 3 17.6 8 or more hours 2 11.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 71 0.0 8.5 67.6 23.9 3.2 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 70 0.0 12.9 68.6 18.6 3.1 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 70 1.4 7.1 78.6 12.9 3.0 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 70 1.4 18.6 72.9 7.1 2.9 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 70 2.9 20.0 64.3 12.9 2.9 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 71 1.4 9.9 69.0 19.7 3.1 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 71 0.0 7.0 60.6 32.4 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 70 12.9 20.0 51.4 15.7 2.7 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 57 0.0 33.3 59.6 7.0 2.7 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 68 0.0 5.9 72.1 22.1 3.2 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 69 1.4 5.8 73.9 18.8 3.1 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 69 0.0 2.9 76.8 20.3 3.2 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 68 11.8 47.1 33.8 7.4 2.4 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 13 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 2.6 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 67 0.0 22.4 65.7 11.9 2.9 0.58 33. Amount of work appropriate 67 9.0 29.9 53.7 7.5 2.6 0.76 34. Instructor explained expectations 67 0.0 19.4 70.1 10.4 2.9 0.54 35. Instructor helped with my problems 66 4.5 24.2 54.5 16.7 2.8 0.76 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 67 3.0 6.0 71.6 19.4 3.1 0.61 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 90 Number of forms scanned = 90 Number of forms with at least one student response = 71 Percent completed = 78.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 115 004A2 GENERAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botha, Francois ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 29 74.4 A 9 25.7 Sophomore 8 20.5 B 21 60.0 Junior 1 2.6 C 4 11.4 Senior 0 0.0 D 1 2.9 Graduate 1 2.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 5.4 2 hours 5 14.3 Required by my major 34 91.9 3 hours 8 22.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 11 31.4 6 - 7 hours 8 22.9 8 or more hours 3 8.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 73 4.1 8.2 65.8 21.9 3.1 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 72 4.2 8.3 59.7 27.8 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 73 1.4 17.8 63.0 17.8 3.0 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 71 7.0 14.1 69.0 9.9 2.8 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 73 9.6 23.3 49.3 17.8 2.8 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 73 0.0 8.2 67.1 24.7 3.2 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 73 1.4 4.1 53.4 41.1 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 68 7.4 20.6 50.0 22.1 2.9 0.84 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 6.3 0.0 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 13.3 6.7 40.0 40.0 3.1 1.03 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 20.0 40.0 33.3 3.0 0.93 14. Encouraged class participation 13 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 3.1 0.95 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 60 3.3 30.0 56.7 10.0 2.7 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 73 0.0 6.8 71.2 21.9 3.2 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 73 0.0 13.7 60.3 26.0 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 73 1.4 6.8 65.8 26.0 3.2 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 72 18.1 44.4 34.7 2.8 2.2 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 20.0 20.0 60.0 0.0 2.4 0.84. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 70 12.9 14.3 61.4 11.4 2.7 0.84 33. Amount of work appropriate 70 10.0 18.6 64.3 7.1 2.7 0.75 34. Instructor explained expectations 70 12.9 17.1 60.0 10.0 2.7 0.83 35. Instructor helped with my problems 69 5.8 26.1 52.2 15.9 2.8 0.78 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 70 0.0 7.1 67.1 25.7 3.2 0.55 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 92 Number of forms scanned = 88 Number of forms with at least one student response = 73 Percent completed = 79.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 548 001L1 PRIN OF PHYSICAL CHEM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Butterfield, D. Allan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 63.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 36.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 3 27.3 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 7 63.6 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 3 30.0 8 or more hours 3 30.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 41.7 50.0 8.3 2.7 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 16.7 33.3 50.0 0.0 2.3 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 8.3 8.3 83.3 3.8 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 535 001L1 SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Grossman, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 37.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 62.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 44.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 55.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 11.1 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 55.6 3 hours 1 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 33.3 4 - 5 hours 5 55.6 6 - 7 hours 3 33.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 18.2 72.7 9.1 2.9 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 20.0 50.0 10.0 20.0 2.3 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 27.3 72.7 0.0 2.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 3.2 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 9.1 72.7 18.2 3.1 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 81.8 9.1 3.0 0.45 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 33.3 55.6 11.1 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.42 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 27.3 45.5 18.2 2.7 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 14 Number of forms scanned = 14 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 001L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 26 56.5 A 12 26.1 Sophomore 15 32.6 B 17 37.0 Junior 3 6.5 C 10 21.7 Senior 1 2.2 D 6 13.0 Graduate 1 2.2 E/Fail 1 2.2 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 11.1 Studies Program 8 18.2 2 hours 11 24.4 Required by my major 35 79.5 3 hours 12 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.3 4 - 5 hours 13 28.9 6 - 7 hours 2 4.4 8 or more hours 2 4.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 52 1.9 0.0 53.8 44.2 3.4 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 3.8 11.5 55.8 28.8 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 50 4.0 6.0 48.0 42.0 3.3 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 52 3.8 11.5 48.1 36.5 3.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 1.9 3.8 53.8 40.4 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 51 0.0 3.9 58.8 37.3 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 50 2.0 2.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 8. Graded assignments included comments 36 22.2 41.7 22.2 13.9 2.3 0.97 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 51 3.9 15.7 60.8 19.6 3.0 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 52 1.9 3.8 30.8 63.5 3.6 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 48 4.2 4.2 56.3 35.4 3.2 0.72 12. Satisfact answered class questions 52 5.8 5.8 55.8 32.7 3.2 0.78 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 50 10.0 26.0 42.0 22.0 2.8 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 52 3.8 17.3 55.8 23.1 3.0 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 5.3 31.6 44.7 18.4 2.8 0.82 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 49 4.1 14.3 63.3 18.4 3.0 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 4.0 10.0 64.0 22.0 3.0 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 51 3.9 9.8 62.7 23.5 3.1 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 50 12.0 36.0 44.0 8.0 2.5 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 52 7.7 21.2 55.8 15.4 2.8 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 7.7 19.2 40.4 32.7 3.0 0.92. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 20 10.0 0.0 75.0 15.0 3.0 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 20 10.0 10.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.85 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 124 Number of forms scanned = 123 Number of forms with at least one student response = 52 Percent completed = 41.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 105 002L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Holler, F. James ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 57 62.0 A 25 27.8 Sophomore 15 16.3 B 43 47.8 Junior 10 10.9 C 19 21.1 Senior 6 6.5 D 2 2.2 Graduate 3 3.3 E/Fail 1 1.1 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 5.4 Studies Program 15 16.5 2 hours 17 18.5 Required by my major 68 74.7 3 hours 32 34.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 8.8 4 - 5 hours 25 27.2 6 - 7 hours 9 9.8 8 or more hours 4 4.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 97 1.0 2.1 51.5 45.4 3.4 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 96 3.1 10.4 49.0 37.5 3.2 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 96 1.0 2.1 44.8 52.1 3.5 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 97 1.0 5.2 51.5 42.3 3.4 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 97 0.0 1.0 55.7 43.3 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 97 0.0 4.1 46.4 49.5 3.5 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 89 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 56 10.7 42.9 25.0 21.4 2.6 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 96 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 96 1.0 1.0 33.3 64.6 3.6 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 88 0.0 2.3 56.8 40.9 3.4 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 96 3.1 8.3 47.9 40.6 3.3 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 96 7.3 24.0 44.8 24.0 2.9 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 92 4.3 21.7 50.0 23.9 2.9 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 68 1.5 33.8 44.1 20.6 2.8 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 90 3.3 14.4 56.7 25.6 3.0 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 94 1.1 6.4 61.7 30.9 3.2 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 95 3.2 7.4 56.8 32.6 3.2 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 92 10.9 39.1 32.6 17.4 2.6 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 95 2.1 16.8 53.7 27.4 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 95 2.1 16.8 36.8 44.2 3.2 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 26 0.0 11.5 69.2 19.2 3.1 0.56 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 30.4 52.2 17.4 2.9 0.69 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 8.3 33.3 50.0 8.3 2.6 0.79 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 262 Number of forms scanned = 258 Number of forms with at least one student response = 97 Percent completed = 37.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 230 001L1 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Meier, Mark S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 1.9 A 16 30.2 Sophomore 26 48.1 B 20 37.7 Junior 22 40.7 C 16 30.2 Senior 3 5.6 D 1 1.9 Graduate 1 1.9 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 5.5 Studies Program 1 1.9 2 hours 10 18.2 Required by my major 47 87.0 3 hours 16 29.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 11.1 4 - 5 hours 17 30.9 6 - 7 hours 7 12.7 8 or more hours 2 3.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 70 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 70 0.0 1.4 45.7 52.9 3.5 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 58 1.7 5.2 53.4 39.7 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 69 2.9 10.1 50.7 36.2 3.2 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 69 0.0 1.4 53.6 44.9 3.4 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 53 0.0 5.7 52.8 41.5 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 68 0.0 1.5 41.2 57.4 3.6 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 57 3.5 21.1 47.4 28.1 3.0 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 70 0.0 1.4 32.9 65.7 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 70 0.0 0.0 18.6 81.4 3.8 0.39 11. Was available for consultation 68 0.0 1.5 42.6 55.9 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 70 0.0 0.0 37.1 62.9 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 69 0.0 11.6 29.0 59.4 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 70 0.0 2.9 37.1 60.0 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 44 2.3 9.1 54.5 34.1 3.2 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 65 0.0 4.6 56.9 38.5 3.3 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 67 0.0 4.5 61.2 34.3 3.3 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 67 0.0 3.0 52.2 44.8 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 1.5 30.8 41.5 26.2 2.9 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 69 0.0 1.4 56.5 42.0 3.4 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 69 0.0 1.4 21.7 76.8 3.8 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 193 Number of forms scanned = 185 Number of forms with at least one student response = 70 Percent completed = 36.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 441G002A2 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LAB INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Oei, Djong-Gie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 31.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 31.8 Junior 10 47.6 C 7 31.8 Senior 11 52.4 D 1 4.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 18.2 6 - 7 hours 4 18.2 8 or more hours 12 54.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 18.2 36.4 36.4 9.1 2.4 0.90 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 27.3 36.4 36.4 0.0 2.1 0.81 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 38.1 33.3 28.6 0.0 1.9 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 52.2 30.4 17.4 0.0 1.7 0.78 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 8.7 69.6 17.4 3.0 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 8.7 34.8 52.2 4.3 2.5 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 17.4 34.8 43.5 4.3 2.3 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 19.0 28.6 52.4 0.0 2.3 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 19 10.5 10.5 73.7 5.3 2.7 0.73 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 21.1 73.7 5.3 2.8 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 26.3 52.6 21.1 0.0 1.9 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 33.3 50.0 16.7 2.8 0.71 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 20.0 13.3 66.7 0.0 2.5 0.83 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 31.8 40.9 22.7 2.8 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 4.8 33.3 47.6 14.3 2.7 0.78 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 57.1 23.8 19.0 0.0 1.6 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 43.5 43.5 8.7 4.3 1.7 0.81 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 4.3 56.5 39.1 0.0 2.3 0.57. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 11 54.5 36.4 9.1 0.0 1.5 0.69 33. Amount of work appropriate 14 71.4 14.3 14.3 0.0 1.4 0.76 34. Instructor explained expectations 14 35.7 28.6 35.7 0.0 2.0 0.88 35. Instructor helped with my problems 14 14.3 21.4 57.1 7.1 2.6 0.85 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 14 28.6 50.0 21.4 0.0 1.9 0.73 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 33 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 69.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 2.2 A 28 60.9 Sophomore 23 50.0 B 15 32.6 Junior 19 41.3 C 3 6.5 Senior 3 6.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 6.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 23.9 Required by my major 46 100.0 3 hours 18 39.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 10 21.7 6 - 7 hours 4 8.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 56 0.0 1.8 51.8 46.4 3.4 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 56 5.4 8.9 64.3 21.4 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 0.0 3.6 61.8 34.5 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 53 1.9 3.8 54.7 39.6 3.3 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 0.0 9.6 59.6 30.8 3.2 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 0.0 5.5 60.0 34.5 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 2.3 7.0 60.5 30.2 3.2 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 40 2.5 7.5 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 56 0.0 3.6 48.2 48.2 3.4 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 56 0.0 0.0 44.6 55.4 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 54 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 56 0.0 1.8 53.6 44.6 3.4 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 0.0 15.1 52.8 32.1 3.2 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 53 1.9 17.0 50.9 30.2 3.1 0.74 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 37 0.0 13.5 62.2 24.3 3.1 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 54 0.0 1.9 66.7 31.5 3.3 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 53 0.0 7.5 64.2 28.3 3.2 0.57 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 67.3 32.7 3.3 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 50 8.0 28.0 46.0 18.0 2.7 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 0.0 5.5 69.1 25.5 3.2 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 55 0.0 7.3 41.8 50.9 3.4 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 47 0.0 4.3 59.6 36.2 3.3 0.56 33. Amount of work appropriate 47 0.0 12.8 63.8 23.4 3.1 0.60 34. Instructor explained expectations 47 0.0 8.5 55.3 36.2 3.3 0.62 35. Instructor helped with my problems 43 0.0 4.7 55.8 39.5 3.3 0.57 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 46 4.3 13.0 63.0 19.6 3.0 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 66 Number of forms with at least one student response = 56 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 231 002A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 30 69.8 Sophomore 19 42.2 B 12 27.9 Junior 19 42.2 C 1 2.3 Senior 6 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.2 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 8.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 28.9 Required by my major 42 93.3 3 hours 14 31.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 6.7 4 - 5 hours 8 17.8 6 - 7 hours 3 6.7 8 or more hours 3 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 53 0.0 0.0 54.7 45.3 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 0.0 5.8 73.1 21.2 3.2 0.50 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 53 0.0 0.0 66.0 34.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 50 0.0 8.0 50.0 42.0 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 51 0.0 2.0 60.8 37.3 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 0.0 1.9 50.0 48.1 3.5 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 0.0 8.3 56.3 35.4 3.3 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 42 2.4 21.4 54.8 21.4 3.0 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 53 0.0 3.8 45.3 50.9 3.5 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 53 0.0 0.0 37.7 62.3 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 49 2.0 2.0 51.0 44.9 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 53 0.0 1.9 54.7 43.4 3.4 0.53 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 1.9 15.1 54.7 28.3 3.1 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 51 2.0 9.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 45 0.0 20.0 57.8 22.2 3.0 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 53 0.0 0.0 69.8 30.2 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 0.0 3.9 62.7 33.3 3.3 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 52 0.0 0.0 63.5 36.5 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 3.8 32.7 46.2 17.3 2.8 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 53 0.0 1.9 69.8 28.3 3.3 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 52 0.0 3.8 42.3 53.8 3.5 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 49 0.0 6.1 55.1 38.8 3.3 0.59 33. Amount of work appropriate 50 0.0 10.0 54.0 36.0 3.3 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 50 0.0 0.0 54.0 46.0 3.5 0.50 35. Instructor helped with my problems 43 0.0 11.6 48.8 39.5 3.3 0.67 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 50 2.0 4.0 58.0 36.0 3.3 0.64 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 66 Number of forms scanned = 65 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 001A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 43.2 Sophomore 15 40.5 B 21 56.8 Junior 10 27.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 29.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 16.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 15 40.5 Required by my major 32 86.5 3 hours 9 24.3 Other (e.g. elective) 5 13.5 4 - 5 hours 5 13.5 6 - 7 hours 2 5.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 8.6 51.4 40.0 3.3 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 39 7.7 17.9 46.2 28.2 2.9 0.89 5. Grading was fair and consistent 38 0.0 13.2 57.9 28.9 3.2 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 36 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 25.0 47.2 27.8 3.0 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 3.1 31.3 46.9 18.8 2.8 0.78 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 0.0 59.0 41.0 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 43.6 56.4 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 47.2 52.8 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 35.1 37.8 24.3 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 16.7 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.67 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 33.3 41.7 25.0 2.9 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 39 0.0 5.1 48.7 46.2 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 5.1 53.8 41.0 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 2.6 53.8 43.6 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 8.1 51.4 29.7 10.8 2.4 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 7.7 15.4 64.1 12.8 2.8 0.76 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 5.1 53.8 41.0 3.4 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 21 0.0 19.0 47.6 33.3 3.1 0.73 33. Amount of work appropriate 21 9.5 9.5 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.79 34. Instructor explained expectations 21 0.0 19.0 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.63 35. Instructor helped with my problems 19 0.0 15.8 47.4 36.8 3.2 0.71 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 21 14.3 14.3 52.4 19.0 2.8 0.94 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 51 Number of forms scanned = 48 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 76.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 002A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 26 53.1 Sophomore 16 32.7 B 17 34.7 Junior 17 34.7 C 6 12.2 Senior 16 32.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 10.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 18.4 Required by my major 37 75.5 3 hours 18 36.7 Other (e.g. elective) 12 24.5 4 - 5 hours 11 22.4 6 - 7 hours 4 8.2 8 or more hours 2 4.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 5.5 67.3 27.3 3.2 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 16.0 16.0 60.0 8.0 2.6 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 51 3.9 5.9 74.5 15.7 3.0 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 54 9.3 16.7 61.1 13.0 2.8 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 52 1.9 15.4 65.4 17.3 3.0 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 52 1.9 13.5 67.3 17.3 3.0 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 48 2.1 16.7 66.7 14.6 2.9 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 2.6 23.1 53.8 20.5 2.9 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 55 3.6 16.4 58.2 21.8 3.0 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 55 0.0 3.6 45.5 50.9 3.5 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 47 0.0 4.3 57.4 38.3 3.3 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 0.0 7.3 67.3 25.5 3.2 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 7.3 38.2 47.3 7.3 2.5 0.74 14. Encouraged class participation 53 1.9 26.4 62.3 9.4 2.8 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 39 2.6 15.4 66.7 15.4 2.9 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 53 1.9 7.5 54.7 35.8 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 2.0 7.8 54.9 35.3 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 53 1.9 7.5 62.3 28.3 3.2 0.64 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 52 15.4 40.4 34.6 9.6 2.4 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 5.5 16.4 60.0 18.2 2.9 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 55 3.6 12.7 54.5 29.1 3.1 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 33 3.0 12.1 45.5 39.4 3.2 0.78 33. Amount of work appropriate 33 12.1 15.2 45.5 27.3 2.9 0.96 34. Instructor explained expectations 29 0.0 10.3 62.1 27.6 3.2 0.60 35. Instructor helped with my problems 32 3.1 15.6 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 33 6.1 21.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.80 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 71 Number of forms scanned = 71 Number of forms with at least one student response = 55 Percent completed = 77.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 233 003A2 ORGANIC CHEMISTRY LAB II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 29 70.7 Sophomore 22 52.4 B 11 26.8 Junior 10 23.8 C 1 2.4 Senior 9 21.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 2.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 16.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 17 40.5 Required by my major 38 90.5 3 hours 9 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 9.5 4 - 5 hours 7 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 52.3 47.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 42.9 47.6 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 42 0.0 2.4 61.9 35.7 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 20.9 53.5 25.6 3.0 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 44 0.0 4.5 61.4 34.1 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 42 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 38 2.6 7.9 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 45 0.0 4.4 48.9 46.7 3.4 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 45 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 44 2.3 4.5 50.0 43.2 3.3 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 45 0.0 2.2 55.6 42.2 3.4 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 4.5 15.9 45.5 34.1 3.1 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 44 2.3 15.9 43.2 38.6 3.2 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 33 0.0 18.2 51.5 30.3 3.1 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 43 0.0 4.7 46.5 48.8 3.4 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 41 0.0 9.8 41.5 48.8 3.4 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 43 0.0 2.3 55.8 41.9 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 2.4 26.2 47.6 23.8 2.9 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 45 2.2 8.9 57.8 31.1 3.2 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 45 2.2 4.4 42.2 51.1 3.4 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 40 2.5 7.5 55.0 35.0 3.2 0.70 33. Amount of work appropriate 40 7.5 5.0 55.0 32.5 3.1 0.82 34. Instructor explained expectations 40 2.5 5.0 67.5 25.0 3.2 0.62 35. Instructor helped with my problems 37 0.0 10.8 62.2 27.0 3.2 0.60 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 40 2.5 10.0 65.0 22.5 3.1 0.66 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 59 Number of forms scanned = 59 Number of forms with at least one student response = 45 Percent completed = 76.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CHE 236 001L1 SURVEY OF ORGANIC CHEM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Patwardhan, Manjiri ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 31.7 Sophomore 9 22.0 B 12 29.3 Junior 18 43.9 C 12 29.3 Senior 13 31.7 D 4 9.8 Graduate 1 2.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 24.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 22.0 Required by my major 33 80.5 3 hours 13 31.7 Other (e.g. elective) 8 19.5 4 - 5 hours 4 9.8 6 - 7 hours 4 9.8 8 or more hours 1 2.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 42 0.0 0.0 54.8 45.2 3.5 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 42 2.4 19.0 42.9 35.7 3.1 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 39 2.6 15.4 51.3 30.8 3.1 0.75 4. Exams reflected what was taught 42 0.0 11.9 42.9 45.2 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 42 4.8 2.4 57.1 35.7 3.2 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 7.7 7.7 50.0 34.6 3.1 0.86 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 4.9 58.5 36.6 3.3 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 0.0 18.8 53.1 28.1 3.1 0.69 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 42 0.0 7.1 50.0 42.9 3.4 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 41 0.0 0.0 39.0 61.0 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 41 0.0 0.0 46.3 53.7 3.5 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 41 7.3 34.1 31.7 26.8 2.8 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 41 0.0 2.4 58.5 39.0 3.4 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 19.2 50.0 26.9 3.0 0.80 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 2.6 5.3 68.4 23.7 3.1 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 2.6 5.3 68.4 23.7 3.1 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 41 0.0 4.9 65.9 29.3 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 18.9 37.8 27.0 16.2 2.4 0.98 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 42 2.4 14.3 54.8 28.6 3.1 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 42 0.0 4.8 50.0 45.2 3.4 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 64 Number of forms scanned = 62 Number of forms with at least one student response = 42 Percent completed = 65.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 580 003L1 TOPICS IN CHEMISTRY: ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Robertson, J David ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 53.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 2 13.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 73.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 13.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 26.7 Required by my major 9 60.0 3 hours 6 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 6 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 6.3 0.0 50.0 43.8 3.3 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 9.1 90.9 0.0 2.9 0.30 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 53.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CHE 107 003L1 GEN COLLEGE CHEMISTRY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Selegue, John P ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 27 64.3 A 6 14.0 Sophomore 11 26.2 B