****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 780 401S1 SPEC TOPS COM: CRITICAL & SOCIAL THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 20.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 80.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 3 60.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 0.0 88.9 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 2.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 625 001L1 PROSEM IN ORG COMM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Knuf, Joachim M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 3 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 11.1 0.0 88.9 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 81.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = CJT 631 001S1 PROSEM INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Morgan, Susan E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 7 63.6 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 4 36.4 4 - 5 hours 2 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 18.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 9.1 36.4 27.3 27.3 2.7 1.01 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 9.1 9.1 45.5 36.4 3.1 0.94 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 8 25.0 25.0 12.5 37.5 2.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 11.1 11.1 33.3 44.4 3.1 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 91.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 665 001L1 COM RES METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Palmgreen, Philip C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 91.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 8.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 12 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 16.7 Studies Program 1 8.3 2 hours 3 25.0 Required by my major 11 91.7 3 hours 1 8.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 33.3 6 - 7 hours 2 16.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7 3.6 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 36.4 63.6 0.0 2.6 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 719 001L1 SEM INTERNAT'L/CULT COM: COMM AND INFO IN AMER 2 INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rush, Ramona R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 2.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication/Graduate FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = CJT 645 401L1 PROSEM MASS COMM THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Van Tubergen, G Norman ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 25.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 351 001L1 INTRO COMMUNICATION THRY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baseheart, John R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 15.4 Sophomore 1 3.8 B 16 61.5 Junior 6 23.1 C 4 15.4 Senior 19 73.1 D 2 7.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 3.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 11.5 Required by my major 26 100.0 3 hours 5 19.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 8 30.8 6 - 7 hours 6 23.1 8 or more hours 3 11.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 14.8 33.3 48.1 3.7 2.4 0.80 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 3.7 14.8 74.1 7.4 2.9 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 22.2 63.0 14.8 0.0 1.9 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 18.5 48.1 29.6 3.7 2.2 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 44.4 33.3 18.5 3.7 1.8 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 11.1 22.2 63.0 3.7 2.6 0.75 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 22.2 29.6 44.4 3.7 2.3 0.87 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 29.6 48.1 22.2 0.0 1.9 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 59.3 40.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 14.8 37.0 29.6 18.5 2.5 0.98 11. Was available for consultation 26 7.7 38.5 38.5 15.4 2.6 0.85 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 51.9 37.0 11.1 0.0 1.6 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 40.7 55.6 3.7 0.0 1.6 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 27 22.2 33.3 44.4 0.0 2.2 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 16.7 45.8 37.5 0.0 2.2 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 20.8 70.8 8.3 0.0 1.9 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 20.0 72.0 8.0 0.0 1.9 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 40.7 40.7 18.5 0.0 1.8 0.75 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 33.3 51.9 11.1 3.7 1.9 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 59.3 29.6 11.1 0.0 1.5 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 73.1 26.9 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.45. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 001L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 10.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 5 25.0 B 3 15.0 Junior 4 20.0 C 3 15.0 Senior 9 45.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 70.0 Studies Program 4 20.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 15 75.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 61.9 28.6 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 61.9 38.1 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 23.8 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.71 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 5.3 15.8 63.2 15.8 2.9 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 7.1 28.6 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 45.0 30.0 20.0 2.7 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 19.0 52.4 28.6 3.1 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 7.1 42.9 42.9 7.1 2.5 0.76 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 22 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 84.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 002L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.8 A 15 71.4 Sophomore 9 42.9 B 5 23.8 Junior 7 33.3 C 1 4.8 Senior 4 19.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 61.9 Studies Program 5 23.8 2 hours 7 33.3 Required by my major 15 71.4 3 hours 1 4.8 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 9.5 28.6 61.9 3.5 0.68 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 9.5 9.5 61.9 19.0 2.9 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 4.8 0.0 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.72 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 9.5 57.1 33.3 3.2 0.62 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 4.8 4.8 47.6 42.9 3.3 0.78 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 4.8 52.4 42.9 3.4 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 0.0 66.7 26.7 3.1 0.74 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 4.8 0.0 52.4 42.9 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 16.7 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 9.5 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 15.0 60.0 25.0 3.1 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 25.0 55.0 20.0 3.0 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 31.6 57.9 10.5 2.8 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 76.2 19.0 3.1 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 47.4 31.6 10.5 2.4 0.84 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 10.0 15.0 55.0 20.0 2.9 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 5.0 5.0 35.0 55.0 3.4 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 401L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.8 A 15 88.2 Sophomore 8 47.1 B 2 11.8 Junior 5 29.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 11.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 58.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 35.3 Required by my major 16 94.1 3 hours 1 5.9 Other (e.g. elective) 1 5.9 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 35.3 47.1 5.9 2.5 0.80 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 17.6 76.5 5.9 2.9 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 11.8 76.5 11.8 3.0 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 31.3 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 21.4 78.6 0.0 2.8 0.43 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 17.6 70.6 11.8 2.9 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 50.0 37.5 6.3 2.4 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 35.3 47.1 17.6 2.8 0.73 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 11.8 17.6 70.6 3.6 0.71. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 199 402L1 PRESENTATIONAL COM SKILL INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 70.6 Sophomore 10 62.5 B 3 17.6 Junior 1 6.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 25.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.3 Pass or Audit 2 11.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 76.5 Studies Program 6 35.3 2 hours 4 23.5 Required by my major 9 52.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 11.8 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 57.9 31.6 3.2 0.63 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 5.3 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 17.6 47.1 35.3 3.2 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 77.8 16.7 3.1 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 22.2 61.1 11.1 2.8 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 22 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 86.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 252 005L2 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Charles ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 9.5 A 5 25.0 Sophomore 3 14.3 B 14 70.0 Junior 1 4.8 C 1 5.0 Senior 15 71.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 18 85.7 2 hours 13 61.9 Required by my major 1 4.8 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.5 4 - 5 hours 2 9.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 33.3 42.9 23.8 2.9 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 13.3 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 19.0 66.7 14.3 3.0 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 9.5 71.4 19.0 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 4.8 19.0 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 9.5 23.8 47.6 19.0 2.8 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 4.8 61.9 33.3 3.3 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 72.2 27.8 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 14.3 66.7 19.0 3.0 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 19.0 38.1 33.3 9.5 2.3 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 21 4.8 4.8 52.4 38.1 3.2 0.77 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 10.5 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 4.8 14.3 61.9 19.0 3.0 0.74 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 19.0 52.4 23.8 3.0 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 4.8 71.4 23.8 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 14.3 42.9 38.1 4.8 2.3 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 14.3 23.8 52.4 9.5 2.6 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 9.5 9.5 52.4 28.6 3.0 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 10 0.0 50.0 40.0 10.0 2.6 0.70 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 45.5 27.3 27.3 2.8 0.87 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 252 010L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 29.4 A 15 88.2 Sophomore 9 52.9 B 2 11.8 Junior 2 11.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 13 76.5 2 hours 8 47.1 Required by my major 4 23.5 3 hours 7 41.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 5.0 35.0 60.0 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 5.0 30.0 65.0 3.6 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.31 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 5.0 95.0 4.0 0.22 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 5.0 45.0 50.0 3.5 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 20.0 55.0 25.0 3.1 0.69 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 15.0 80.0 3.8 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 252 012L1 INTRO INTERPERSONAL COM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 7 33.3 A 21 100.0 Sophomore 10 47.6 B 0 0.0 Junior 3 14.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 4.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 33.3 Studies Program 12 57.1 2 hours 9 42.9 Required by my major 8 38.1 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.8 4 - 5 hours 1 4.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 4.2 50.0 45.8 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 0.0 4.2 37.5 58.3 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 21.7 43.5 34.8 3.1 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 002L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 8.3 A 15 65.2 Sophomore 12 50.0 B 8 34.8 Junior 8 33.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 8.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.3 Studies Program 11 45.8 2 hours 4 16.7 Required by my major 13 54.2 3 hours 8 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 16.7 6 - 7 hours 3 12.5 8 or more hours 3 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 4.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 8.0 40.0 52.0 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 20.0 28.0 52.0 3.3 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 4.0 0.0 44.0 52.0 3.4 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 8.7 47.8 43.5 3.3 0.65 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 32.0 68.0 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 0.0 22.2 66.7 3.4 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 89.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 281 004L1 COMM IN SMALL GROUPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bryant, Rosemary B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 5 19.2 A 19 73.1 Sophomore 7 26.9 B 6 23.1 Junior 12 46.2 C 1 3.8 Senior 2 7.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 12.0 Studies Program 14 56.0 2 hours 4 16.0 Required by my major 11 44.0 3 hours 3 12.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 11 44.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 16.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 3.8 42.3 26.9 26.9 2.8 0.91 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 11.5 30.8 57.7 3.5 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 23.1 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 26.9 73.1 3.7 0.45 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 32.0 40.0 24.0 2.8 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 15.4 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 15.4 30.8 50.0 3.3 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 8 0.0 12.5 87.5 0.0 2.9 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 13 0.0 7.7 84.6 7.7 3.0 0.41 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.39 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = COM 591 001L1 SPEC TOPS IN COM: CAREER COUNSELING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Childs, Sharon A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 90.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 9.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 90.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 11 100.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 36.4 45.5 18.2 2.8 0.75 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 10.0 70.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 2.9 0.88 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 9.1 9.1 27.3 54.5 3.3 1.01 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 001L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 44 64.7 A 31 45.6 Sophomore 14 20.6 B 29 42.6 Junior 6 8.8 C 7 10.3 Senior 4 5.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 35.3 Studies Program 36 53.7 2 hours 22 32.4 Required by my major 14 20.9 3 hours 18 26.5 Other (e.g. elective) 17 25.4 4 - 5 hours 4 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 73 0.0 1.4 35.6 63.0 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 70 8.6 47.1 31.4 12.9 2.5 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 73 1.4 6.8 54.8 37.0 3.3 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 73 0.0 2.7 38.4 58.9 3.6 0.55 5. Grading was fair and consistent 73 1.4 6.8 41.1 50.7 3.4 0.68 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 73 0.0 4.1 42.5 53.4 3.5 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 72 0.0 6.9 54.2 38.9 3.3 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 71 0.0 16.9 59.2 23.9 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 73 1.4 0.0 28.8 69.9 3.7 0.55 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 73 0.0 1.4 26.0 72.6 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 65 0.0 1.5 49.2 49.2 3.5 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 73 1.4 0.0 37.0 61.6 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 73 1.4 1.4 28.8 68.5 3.6 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 73 1.4 2.7 35.6 60.3 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 72 1.4 1.4 41.7 55.6 3.5 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 71 0.0 4.2 43.7 52.1 3.5 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 64 0.0 15.6 39.1 45.3 3.3 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 73 0.0 1.4 39.7 58.9 3.6 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 70 1.4 17.1 38.6 42.9 3.2 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 73 0.0 4.1 23.3 72.6 3.7 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 73 1.4 4.1 9.6 84.9 3.8 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 22 4.5 0.0 54.5 40.9 3.3 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 29 0.0 3.4 34.5 62.1 3.6 0.57 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 99 Number of forms scanned = 74 Number of forms with at least one student response = 73 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Communications & Info Studies DEPARTMENT = Communication FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = COM 101 002L1 INTRO TO COMMUNICATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = DeSantis, Alan ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 20.5 A 29 39.7 Sophomore 34 46.6 B 29 39.7 Junior 14 19.2 C 12 16.4 Senior 10 13.7 D 2 2.7 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 38.4 Studies Program 26 36.1 2 hours 22 30.1 Required by my major 28 38.9 3 hours 19 26.0 Other (e.g. elective) 18 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 4.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 1.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 81 2.5 1.2 35.8 60.5 3.5 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 77 18.2 32.5 24.7 24.7 2.6 1.06 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 80 0.0 5.0 51.3 43.8 3.4 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 81 1.2 2.5 33.3 63.0 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 81 2.5 3.7 38.3 55.6 3.5 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 81 1.2 7.4 38.3 53.1 3.4 0.69 7. Graded assignmen