UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Aerospace Studies DEPARTMENT = ROTC SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 15.5 A 44 52.4 Sophomore 19 22.6 B 8 9.5 Junior 24 28.6 C 1 1.2 Senior 27 32.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 31 36.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 40 47.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 16 19.0 Required by my major 3 3.6 3 hours 15 17.9 Other (e.g. elective) 80 96.4 4 - 5 hours 4 4.8 6 - 7 hours 3 3.6 8 or more hours 6 7.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 94 0.0 0.0 26.6 73.4 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 73 1.4 0.0 30.1 68.5 3.7 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 85 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 87 0.0 0.0 26.4 73.6 3.7 0.44 5. Grading was fair and consistent 93 2.2 0.0 26.9 71.0 3.7 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 89 1.1 0.0 28.1 70.8 3.7 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 85 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 88 1.1 0.0 31.8 67.0 3.6 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 93 1.1 1.1 21.5 76.3 3.7 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 92 1.1 1.1 19.6 78.3 3.8 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 93 0.0 0.0 19.4 80.6 3.8 0.40 12. Satisfact answered class questions 93 0.0 1.1 23.7 75.3 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 93 1.1 1.1 22.6 75.3 3.7 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 93 1.1 1.1 20.4 77.4 3.7 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 85 1.2 1.2 29.4 68.2 3.6 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 88 0.0 2.3 27.3 70.5 3.7 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 88 0.0 1.1 27.3 71.6 3.7 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 91 1.1 1.1 23.1 74.7 3.7 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 89 1.1 1.1 23.6 74.2 3.7 0.55 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 91 0.0 2.2 18.7 79.1 3.8 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 90 1.1 0.0 14.4 84.4 3.8 0.46. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 113 Number of forms scanned = 111 Number of forms with at least one student response = 94 Percent completed = 83.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Biotechnology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 33.3 Sophomore 7 18.9 B 16 44.4 Junior 11 29.7 C 7 19.4 Senior 19 51.4 D 1 2.8 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 8.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 24.3 Required by my major 36 97.3 3 hours 10 27.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 2.7 4 - 5 hours 9 24.3 6 - 7 hours 2 5.4 8 or more hours 4 10.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 39 0.0 0.0 53.8 46.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 2.9 8.6 68.6 20.0 3.1 0.64 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 2.7 10.8 62.2 24.3 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 68.2 31.8 3.3 0.48 5. Grading was fair and consistent 39 0.0 7.7 71.8 20.5 3.1 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 39 0.0 5.1 69.2 25.6 3.2 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 39 5.1 5.1 59.0 30.8 3.2 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 5.1 59.0 35.9 3.3 0.57 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 39 0.0 12.8 66.7 20.5 3.1 0.58 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 39 0.0 0.0 48.7 51.3 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 33 0.0 3.0 54.5 42.4 3.4 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 39 0.0 5.1 59.0 35.9 3.3 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 2.7 13.5 51.4 32.4 3.1 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 39 0.0 0.0 51.3 48.7 3.5 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 3.4 75.9 20.7 3.2 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 37 0.0 2.7 59.5 37.8 3.4 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 2.8 61.1 36.1 3.3 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 39 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 36 5.6 38.9 27.8 27.8 2.8 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 0.0 12.8 46.2 41.0 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 13 7.7 30.8 53.8 7.7 2.6 0.77 34. Instructor explained expectations 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 35. Instructor helped with my problems 13 0.0 7.7 69.2 23.1 3.2 0.55 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 18 0.0 5.6 50.0 44.4 0.0 3.4 0.61 38. Question 38 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 3.3 0.69 39. Question 39 18 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 0.0 3.3 0.69 40. Question 40 18 11.1 38.9 22.2 27.8 0.0 2.7 1.03 41. Question 41 18 44.4 27.8 16.7 11.1 0.0 1.9 1.06 42. Question 42 18 33.3 38.9 27.8 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.80 43. Question 43 18 44.4 27.8 16.7 11.1 0.0 1.9 1.06 44. Question 44 18 16.7 11.1 50.0 22.2 0.0 2.8 1.00 45. Question 45 18 66.7 22.2 11.1 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.70 46. Question 46 17 23.5 29.4 23.5 23.5 0.0 2.5 1.12 47. Question 47 9 11.1 11.1 33.3 44.4 0.0 3.1 . 48. Question 48 16 12.5 37.5 18.8 31.3 0.0 2.7 1.08 49. Question 49 18 11.1 11.1 22.2 27.8 27.8 3.5 1.34 Number of forms preslugged = at least 45 Number of forms scanned = 39 Number of forms with at least one student response = 39 Percent completed = 86.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Economics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 18 4.5 A 169 42.0 Sophomore 44 10.9 B 170 42.3 Junior 112 27.7 C 55 13.7 Senior 173 42.8 D 4 1.0 Graduate 55 13.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 0.5 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 4 1.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 87 21.7 Studies Program 67 16.8 2 hours 134 33.4 Required by my major 211 52.8 3 hours 96 23.9 Other (e.g. elective) 122 30.5 4 - 5 hours 61 15.2 6 - 7 hours 12 3.0 8 or more hours 11 2.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 420 0.0 2.4 44.0 53.6 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 374 3.2 15.8 53.2 27.8 3.1 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 418 0.5 1.9 45.0 52.6 3.5 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 418 0.0 4.3 49.3 46.4 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 421 0.2 5.0 47.3 47.5 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 420 0.2 3.1 54.5 42.1 3.4 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 411 1.5 3.4 45.7 49.4 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 412 0.2 6.8 50.0 43.0 3.4 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 420 0.2 5.2 44.3 50.2 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 420 0.2 0.0 32.9 66.9 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 395 0.0 2.5 43.3 54.2 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 418 0.2 1.7 42.3 55.7 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 419 2.4 8.4 43.4 45.8 3.3 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 420 0.2 3.1 39.5 57.1 3.5 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 386 0.3 5.7 54.4 39.6 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 416 0.5 4.8 46.4 48.3 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 415 0.2 6.0 48.7 45.1 3.4 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 416 0.5 2.4 49.3 47.8 3.4 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 411 4.4 16.1 46.0 33.6 3.1 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 418 1.0 7.9 39.2 51.9 3.4 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 418 1.0 4.3 30.9 63.9 3.6 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 55 5.5 20.0 52.7 21.8 2.9 0.80 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 67 0.0 7.5 61.2 31.3 3.2 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 63 0.0 7.9 57.1 34.9 3.3 0.60 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 22 0.0 13.6 59.1 27.3 3.1 0.64 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 39 10.3 28.2 41.0 20.5 2.7 0.92 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 28. Guided student report preparation 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 16 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 34. Instructor explained expectations 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 35. Instructor helped with my problems 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 542 Number of forms scanned = 421 Number of forms with at least one student response = 421 Percent completed = 77.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Agricultural Education SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 52 81.3 Sophomore 6 9.4 B 9 14.1 Junior 12 18.8 C 2 3.1 Senior 17 26.6 D 1 1.6 Graduate 28 43.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 1.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 26.6 Studies Program 3 4.7 2 hours 20 31.3 Required by my major 48 75.0 3 hours 4 6.3 Other (e.g. elective) 13 20.3 4 - 5 hours 4 6.3 6 - 7 hours 3 4.7 8 or more hours 16 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 66 0.0 3.0 28.8 68.2 3.7 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 10.0 0.0 50.0 40.0 3.2 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 64 3.1 3.1 42.2 51.6 3.4 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 31 3.2 9.7 45.2 41.9 3.3 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 63 0.0 3.2 44.4 52.4 3.5 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 65 1.5 0.0 46.2 52.3 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 61 3.3 9.8 45.9 41.0 3.2 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 63 1.6 3.2 46.0 49.2 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 66 3.0 7.6 33.3 56.1 3.4 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 65 0.0 0.0 24.6 75.4 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 64 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 12. Satisfact answered class questions 65 1.5 1.5 29.2 67.7 3.6 0.60 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 66 6.1 4.5 24.2 65.2 3.5 0.85 14. Encouraged class participation 65 0.0 6.2 21.5 72.3 3.7 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 63 1.6 4.8 34.9 58.7 3.5 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 63 0.0 6.3 38.1 55.6 3.5 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 63 3.2 4.8 36.5 55.6 3.4 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 65 0.0 3.1 23.1 73.8 3.7 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 65 4.6 4.6 38.5 52.3 3.4 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 66 3.0 6.1 24.2 66.7 3.5 0.75 21. Overall quality of teaching 65 3.1 7.7 18.5 70.8 3.6 0.77. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 73 Number of forms scanned = 66 Number of forms with at least one student response = 66 Percent completed = 90.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Animal Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 5.5 A 142 52.2 Sophomore 19 7.0 B 89 32.7 Junior 83 30.4 C 29 10.7 Senior 110 40.3 D 6 2.2 Graduate 46 16.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 6 2.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 57 21.0 Studies Program 3 1.1 2 hours 72 26.6 Required by my major 181 66.5 3 hours 85 31.4 Other (e.g. elective) 88 32.4 4 - 5 hours 44 16.2 6 - 7 hours 8 3.0 8 or more hours 5 1.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 293 0.3 1.7 50.5 47.4 3.5 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 154 4.5 16.9 44.8 33.8 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 278 0.0 4.7 53.2 42.1 3.4 0.57 4. Exams reflected what was taught 282 0.4 5.3 47.2 47.2 3.4 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 292 0.7 3.8 46.9 48.6 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 279 0.0 5.0 47.7 47.3 3.4 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 287 1.0 3.5 50.5 44.9 3.4 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 286 0.3 7.0 50.3 42.3 3.3 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 289 1.0 6.9 41.5 50.5 3.4 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 288 0.0 1.4 29.5 69.1 3.7 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 281 0.0 1.8 41.3 56.9 3.6 0.53 12. Satisfact answered class questions 292 1.0 3.4 39.4 56.2 3.5 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 288 1.7 7.6 43.4 47.2 3.4 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 292 0.7 3.4 45.9 50.0 3.5 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 251 0.8 4.8 60.6 33.9 3.3 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 284 0.4 4.2 53.2 42.3 3.4 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 274 0.4 6.6 56.9 36.1 3.3 0.60 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 290 0.7 2.1 49.0 48.3 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 281 2.5 12.8 46.3 38.4 3.2 0.76 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 291 0.3 5.5 38.5 55.7 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 289 0.3 7.3 31.5 60.9 3.5 0.65. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 11 9.1 0.0 54.5 36.4 3.2 0.87 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 11 9.1 0.0 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.90 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 12 8.3 0.0 33.3 58.3 3.4 0.90 29. Students free to express opinions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 11 9.1 0.0 27.3 63.6 3.5 0.93 31. Developed abil to conduct research 12 8.3 0.0 41.7 50.0 3.3 0.89 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 82 1.2 9.8 47.6 41.5 3.3 0.69 33. Amount of work appropriate 82 2.4 4.9 50.0 42.7 3.3 0.69 34. Instructor explained expectations 82 2.4 11.0 45.1 41.5 3.3 0.75 35. Instructor helped with my problems 78 2.6 11.5 48.7 37.2 3.2 0.74 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 72 1.4 2.8 55.6 40.3 3.3 0.61 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 345 Number of forms scanned = 297 Number of forms with at least one student response = 293 Percent completed = 84.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Biosystems and Ag Engineering SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 56 67.5 Sophomore 1 1.2 B 25 30.1 Junior 49 58.3 C 1 1.2 Senior 21 25.0 D 1 1.2 Graduate 13 15.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 37 44.0 Studies Program 2 2.4 2 hours 23 27.4 Required by my major 59 70.2 3 hours 16 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 23 27.4 4 - 5 hours 6 7.1 6 - 7 hours 1 1.2 8 or more hours 1 1.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 86 1.2 2.3 57.0 39.5 3.3 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 61 1.6 23.0 45.9 29.5 3.0 0.77 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 85 0.0 7.1 51.8 41.2 3.3 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 82 1.2 2.4 56.1 40.2 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 85 1.2 3.5 50.6 44.7 3.4 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 86 2.3 1.2 46.5 50.0 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 85 3.5 8.2 51.8 36.5 3.2 0.74 8. Graded assignments included comments 85 1.2 9.4 55.3 34.1 3.2 0.66 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 86 3.5 8.1 53.5 34.9 3.2 0.73 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 86 5.8 1.2 39.5 53.5 3.4 0.79 11. Was available for consultation 84 1.2 1.2 48.8 48.8 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 85 3.5 5.9 47.1 43.5 3.3 0.74 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 86 2.3 16.3 48.8 32.6 3.1 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 86 0.0 2.3 51.2 46.5 3.4 0.54 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 66 1.5 4.5 63.6 30.3 3.2 0.60 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 82 0.0 6.1 53.7 40.2 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 81 0.0 6.2 56.8 37.0 3.3 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 83 0.0 2.4 54.2 43.4 3.4 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 80 2.5 20.0 48.8 28.8 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 85 1.2 11.8 50.6 36.5 3.2 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 85 2.4 9.4 44.7 43.5 3.3 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 8 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 111 Number of forms scanned = 87 Number of forms with at least one student response = 87 Percent completed = 78.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Entomology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 8.9 A 55 54.5 Sophomore 11 10.9 B 29 28.7 Junior 22 21.8 C 13 12.9 Senior 38 37.6 D 2 2.0 Graduate 19 18.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 2.0 Pass or Audit 2 2.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 27.7 Studies Program 21 20.8 2 hours 36 35.6 Required by my major 47 46.5 3 hours 21 20.8 Other (e.g. elective) 33 32.7 4 - 5 hours 10 9.9 6 - 7 hours 4 4.0 8 or more hours 2 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 106 0.0 0.9 50.9 48.1 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 70 1.4 15.7 42.9 40.0 3.2 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 102 0.0 2.0 60.8 37.3 3.4 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 101 1.0 6.9 42.6 49.5 3.4 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 104 1.0 4.8 46.2 48.1 3.4 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 98 1.0 4.1 49.0 45.9 3.4 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 101 0.0 2.0 46.5 51.5 3.5 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 101 0.0 15.8 44.6 39.6 3.2 0.71 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 107 1.9 10.3 34.6 53.3 3.4 0.75 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 107 0.9 2.8 19.6 76.6 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 102 1.0 2.0 41.2 55.9 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 107 1.9 7.5 34.6 56.1 3.4 0.72 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 105 4.8 8.6 42.9 43.8 3.3 0.81 14. Encouraged class participation 106 2.8 11.3 47.2 38.7 3.2 0.76 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 81 2.5 4.9 71.6 21.0 3.1 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 99 3.0 7.1 63.6 26.3 3.1 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 95 3.2 11.6 62.1 23.2 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 105 1.9 4.8 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 103 2.9 23.3 49.5 24.3 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 104 3.8 10.6 41.3 44.2 3.3 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 105 3.8 9.5 26.7 60.0 3.4 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 24 0.0 4.2 70.8 25.0 3.2 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 24 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.56 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 22 0.0 4.5 54.5 40.9 3.4 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 33. Amount of work appropriate 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 34. Instructor explained expectations 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 35. Instructor helped with my problems 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 149 Number of forms scanned = 109 Number of forms with at least one student response = 107 Percent completed = 71.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Forestry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 0.8 A 77 65.3 Sophomore 3 2.5 B 33 28.0 Junior 30 25.2 C 4 3.4 Senior 66 55.5 D 1 0.8 Graduate 19 16.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 2.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 33 28.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 36 30.5 Required by my major 76 64.4 3 hours 26 22.0 Other (e.g. elective) 42 35.6 4 - 5 hours 15 12.7 6 - 7 hours 2 1.7 8 or more hours 6 5.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 132 1.5 0.8 35.6 62.1 3.6 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 74 5.4 8.1 54.1 32.4 3.1 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 122 2.5 1.6 41.0 54.9 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 93 2.2 2.2 29.0 66.7 3.6 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 121 3.3 3.3 38.0 55.4 3.5 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 128 1.6 2.3 39.8 56.3 3.5 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 119 5.0 3.4 40.3 51.3 3.4 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 115 5.2 8.7 40.9 45.2 3.3 0.83 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 124 3.2 3.2 33.1 60.5 3.5 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 128 1.6 0.8 21.1 76.6 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 130 5.4 2.3 33.8 58.5 3.5 0.79 12. Satisfact answered class questions 127 1.6 1.6 34.6 62.2 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 129 2.3 4.7 35.7 57.4 3.5 0.70 14. Encouraged class participation 128 1.6 5.5 35.2 57.8 3.5 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 117 2.6 5.1 43.6 48.7 3.4 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 128 1.6 3.1 50.0 45.3 3.4 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 126 1.6 5.6 50.0 42.9 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 130 1.5 1.5 39.2 57.7 3.5 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 126 2.4 6.3 46.8 44.4 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 131 0.0 2.3 29.0 68.7 3.7 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 129 2.3 8.5 15.5 73.6 3.6 0.74. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 45 6.7 0.0 44.4 48.9 3.4 0.80 33. Amount of work appropriate 46 4.3 0.0 45.7 50.0 3.4 0.72 34. Instructor explained expectations 46 4.3 0.0 43.5 52.2 3.4 0.72 35. Instructor helped with my problems 46 4.3 0.0 45.7 50.0 3.4 0.72 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 41 2.4 0.0 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.63 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 191 Number of forms scanned = 134 Number of forms with at least one student response = 134 Percent completed = 70.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = ZAgriculture GENERAL and CEX SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 104 26.5 A 283 72.2 Sophomore 117 29.8 B 102 26.0 Junior 68 17.3 C 7 1.8 Senior 104 26.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 160 40.9 Studies Program 36 9.3 2 hours 114 29.2 Required by my major 298 77.2 3 hours 66 16.9 Other (e.g. elective) 52 13.5 4 - 5 hours 34 8.7 6 - 7 hours 9 2.3 8 or more hours 8 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 417 1.0 4.3 49.2 45.6 3.4 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 295 5.1 21.0 44.4 29.5 3.0 0.84 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 404 1.5 5.9 56.9 35.6 3.3 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 281 0.4 5.0 55.2 39.5 3.3 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 405 1.0 6.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 414 1.0 5.6 54.6 38.9 3.3 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 394 4.8 13.7 49.7 31.7 3.1 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 395 2.3 7.6 49.9 40.3 3.3 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 412 1.0 5.8 54.1 39.1 3.3 0.63 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 411 0.5 1.9 40.6 56.9 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 376 0.3 1.9 48.1 49.7 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 412 0.2 2.7 49.5 47.6 3.4 0.56 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 410 2.2 9.8 49.0 39.0 3.2 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 416 0.2 1.2 39.4 59.1 3.6 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 404 0.2 2.5 50.2 47.0 3.4 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 407 0.5 5.4 48.6 45.5 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 393 1.0 8.7 50.9 39.4 3.3 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 410 0.2 2.2 51.2 46.3 3.4 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 401 3.5 16.2 44.6 35.7 3.1 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 414 4.6 11.8 46.6 37.0 3.2 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 412 0.7 7.5 39.1 52.7 3.4 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 39 2.6 10.3 53.8 33.3 3.2 0.72 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 52 1.9 3.8 59.6 34.6 3.3 0.63 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 50 4.0 2.0 62.0 32.0 3.2 0.68 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 24 4.2 0.0 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.72 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 22 4.5 9.1 40.9 45.5 3.3 0.83 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 29. Students free to express opinions 13 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.44 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 31. Developed abil to conduct research 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 519 Number of forms scanned = 420 Number of forms with at least one student response = 418 Percent completed = 80.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = LAAR SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 15 11.6 A 54 43.2 Sophomore 14 10.9 B 62 49.6 Junior 38 29.5 C 9 7.2 Senior 53 41.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 0.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 4 3.1 I 0 0.0 Other 4 3.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 18.8 Studies Program 1 0.8 2 hours 16 12.5 Required by my major 116 90.6 3 hours 14 10.9 Other (e.g. elective) 11 8.6 4 - 5 hours 15 11.7 6 - 7 hours 5 3.9 8 or more hours 54 42.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 141 0.0 3.5 53.9 42.6 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 95 2.1 16.8 54.7 26.3 3.1 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 125 0.0 3.2 55.2 41.6 3.4 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 80 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 134 0.7 7.5 52.2 39.6 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 128 0.8 3.1 64.1 32.0 3.3 0.56 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 128 1.6 16.4 52.3 29.7 3.1 0.72 8. Graded assignments included comments 128 0.0 7.8 53.9 38.3 3.3 0.61 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 141 0.7 5.0 51.8 42.6 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 141 0.0 1.4 34.0 64.5 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 134 0.0 3.0 41.0 56.0 3.5 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 141 0.0 4.3 45.4 50.4 3.5 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 140 0.0 7.9 42.9 49.3 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 139 0.0 6.5 49.6 43.9 3.4 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 136 0.0 4.4 58.8 36.8 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 140 0.7 1.4 55.0 42.9 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 135 0.7 3.0 56.3 40.0 3.4 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 141 0.0 0.7 52.5 46.8 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 138 0.0 8.7 48.6 42.8 3.3 0.63 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 144 0.7 4.2 43.8 51.4 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 142 0.7 7.0 35.2 57.0 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 178 Number of forms scanned = 144 Number of forms with at least one student response = 144 Percent completed = 80.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant and Soil Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 23 6.3 A 158 43.6 Sophomore 35 9.6 B 160 44.2 Junior 71 19.4 C 32 8.8 Senior 120 32.8 D 4 1.1 Graduate 108 29.5 E/Fail 1 0.3 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 9 2.5 Pass or Audit 7 1.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 90 24.7 Studies Program 44 12.2 2 hours 108 29.7 Required by my major 227 63.1 3 hours 77 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 89 24.7 4 - 5 hours 41 11.3 6 - 7 hours 20 5.5 8 or more hours 28 7.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 398 2.3 4.0 55.5 38.2 3.3 0.65 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 279 9.0 18.3 47.0 25.8 2.9 0.89 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 362 4.1 11.3 54.1 30.4 3.1 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 360 3.9 9.2 55.0 31.9 3.2 0.74 5. Grading was fair and consistent 371 5.7 9.2 52.3 32.9 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 348 4.3 8.3 56.6 30.7 3.1 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 357 4.8 7.6 53.8 33.9 3.2 0.76 8. Graded assignments included comments 347 6.6 10.7 54.2 28.5 3.0 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 398 5.0 11.6 47.5 35.9 3.1 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 399 1.5 2.5 38.3 57.6 3.5 0.63 11. Was available for consultation 383 2.3 1.8 50.7 45.2 3.4 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 397 2.8 6.8 49.6 40.8 3.3 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 395 4.6 17.5 46.1 31.9 3.1 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 396 3.3 7.8 51.3 37.6 3.2 0.73 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 325 2.8 8.9 63.1 25.2 3.1 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 375 2.7 8.8 60.8 27.7 3.1 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 373 2.7 13.7 58.2 25.5 3.1 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 394 1.8 6.6 57.9 33.8 3.2 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 386 6.0 24.6 44.6 24.9 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 392 5.9 18.6 40.8 34.7 3.0 0.88 21. Overall quality of teaching 391 6.1 14.6 36.1 43.2 3.2 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 63 0.0 7.9 60.3 31.7 3.2 0.59 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 65 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.58 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 64 0.0 6.3 59.4 34.4 3.3 0.58 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 38 0.0 2.6 63.2 34.2 3.3 0.53 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 42 0.0 4.8 59.5 35.7 3.3 0.56 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 28. Guided student report preparation 12 0.0 8.3 33.3 58.3 3.5 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 31. Developed abil to conduct research 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 118 5.1 7.6 58.5 28.8 3.1 0.75 33. Amount of work appropriate 122 9.0 16.4 48.4 26.2 2.9 0.89 34. Instructor explained expectations 121 7.4 5.8 61.2 25.6 3.0 0.78 35. Instructor helped with my problems 114 7.9 7.9 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.84 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 103 3.9 2.9 64.1 29.1 3.2 0.67 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 46 6.5 15.2 34.8 39.1 4.3 3.2 0.98 38. Question 38 46 6.5 2.2 34.8 47.8 8.7 3.5 0.94 39. Question 39 49 4.1 6.1 34.7 46.9 8.2 3.5 0.89 40. Question 40 50 0.0 4.0 42.0 40.0 14.0 3.6 0.78 41. Question 41 46 8.7 30.4 34.8 21.7 4.3 2.8 1.02 42. Question 42 50 10.0 18.0 36.0 26.0 10.0 3.1 1.12 43. Question 43 49 16.3 18.4 36.7 22.4 6.1 2.8 1.14 44. Question 44 47 2.1 21.3 34.0 36.2 6.4 3.2 0.94 45. Question 45 50 12.0 28.0 20.0 14.0 26.0 3.1 1.40 46. Question 46 50 6.0 18.0 26.0 36.0 14.0 3.3 1.12 47. Question 47 50 6.0 4.0 48.0 32.0 10.0 3.4 0.94 48. Question 48 41 9.8 26.8 36.6 26.8 0.0 2.8 0.95 49. Question 49 41 7.3 12.2 39.0 36.6 4.9 3.2 0.98 Number of forms preslugged = at least 543 Number of forms scanned = 403 Number of forms with at least one student response = 400 Percent completed = 73.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Plant Pathology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 23.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 31 52.5 Junior 13 20.3 C 10 16.9 Senior 11 17.2 D 3 5.1 Graduate 40 62.5 E/Fail 1 1.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 1.6 Studies Program 5 7.8 2 hours 5 7.9 Required by my major 56 87.5 3 hours 22 34.9 Other (e.g. elective) 3 4.7 4 - 5 hours 26 41.3 6 - 7 hours 6 9.5 8 or more hours 3 4.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 62 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 0.0 14.6 60.4 25.0 3.1 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 61 0.0 4.9 49.2 45.9 3.4 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 57 1.8 7.0 47.4 43.9 3.3 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 56 0.0 1.8 57.1 41.1 3.4 0.53 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 53 0.0 3.8 58.5 37.7 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 56 0.0 0.0 60.7 39.3 3.4 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 0.0 7.5 60.4 32.1 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 62 1.6 4.8 54.8 38.7 3.3 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 62 0.0 0.0 29.0 71.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 59 0.0 5.1 42.4 52.5 3.5 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 64 1.6 0.0 45.3 53.1 3.5 0.59 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 62 1.6 1.6 48.4 48.4 3.4 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 63 0.0 3.2 52.4 44.4 3.4 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 58 0.0 0.0 58.6 41.4 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 63 0.0 1.6 54.0 44.4 3.4 0.53 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 62 0.0 0.0 58.1 41.9 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 63 0.0 1.6 49.2 49.2 3.5 0.53 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 64 1.6 7.8 45.3 45.3 3.3 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 64 0.0 4.7 45.3 50.0 3.5 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 64 0.0 4.7 34.4 60.9 3.6 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 33. Amount of work appropriate 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 34. Instructor explained expectations 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 35. Instructor helped with my problems 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 22 0.0 4.5 27.3 68.2 3.6 0.58 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 73 Number of forms scanned = 64 Number of forms with at least one student response = 64 Percent completed = 87.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Agriculture DEPARTMENT = Veterinary Science SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 43.8 Sophomore 6 18.8 B 12 37.5 Junior 9 28.1 C 5 15.6 Senior 16 50.0 D 1 3.1 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 15.2 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 13 39.4 Required by my major 12 36.4 3 hours 7 21.2 Other (e.g. elective) 21 63.6 4 - 5 hours 7 21.2 6 - 7 hours 1 3.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 2.9 64.7 32.4 3.3 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 3.4 75.9 20.7 3.2 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 34 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 0.0 6.9 69.0 24.1 3.2 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 0.0 0.0 57.6 42.4 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 3.2 19.4 51.6 25.8 3.0 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 34 0.0 5.9 44.1 50.0 3.4 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 34 0.0 0.0 32.4 67.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.45 12. Satisfact answered class questions 34 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 2.9 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.56 14. Encouraged class participation 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 0.0 57.6 42.4 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 34 0.0 2.9 61.8 35.3 3.3 0.53 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 34 0.0 2.9 35.3 61.8 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 34 0.0 5.9 38.2 55.9 3.5 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 39 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 34 Percent completed = 87.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = ZMisc. Arts and Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 1.6 A 105 58.3 Sophomore 27 14.8 B 58 32.2 Junior 30 16.5 C 3 1.7 Senior 84 46.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 38 20.9 E/Fail 1 0.6 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 13 7.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 13.9 Studies Program 37 20.7 2 hours 65 36.1 Required by my major 29 16.2 3 hours 40 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 113 63.1 4 - 5 hours 23 12.8 6 - 7 hours 11 6.1 8 or more hours 16 8.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 196 1.0 3.6 39.3 56.1 3.5 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 172 1.2 5.2 43.0 50.6 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 192 0.5 5.2 40.1 54.2 3.5 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 138 0.0 1.4 41.3 57.2 3.6 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 181 0.0 5.0 44.8 50.3 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 184 0.5 4.3 44.0 51.1 3.5 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 178 0.6 9.0 42.1 48.3 3.4 0.67 8. Graded assignments included comments 182 0.0 2.7 45.1 52.2 3.5 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 193 0.0 6.2 36.3 57.5 3.5 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 195 0.0 1.5 23.1 75.4 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 178 0.0 1.1 44.4 54.5 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 194 0.0 2.6 35.6 61.9 3.6 0.54 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 192 0.0 3.1 35.4 61.5 3.6 0.55 14. Encouraged class participation 196 0.0 5.1 32.7 62.2 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 183 0.0 2.7 39.3 57.9 3.6 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 187 0.0 6.4 46.5 47.1 3.4 0.61 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 163 0.0 11.7 45.4 42.9 3.3 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 190 0.0 3.2 37.9 58.9 3.6 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 192 0.0 8.3 44.8 46.9 3.4 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 196 1.0 8.2 33.7 57.1 3.5 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 195 0.5 6.7 29.2 63.6 3.6 0.64. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 0.0 0.0 56.0 44.0 3.4 0.51 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 27 3.7 0.0 51.9 44.4 3.4 0.69 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 28. Guided student report preparation 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 29. Students free to express opinions 34 0.0 0.0 20.6 79.4 3.8 0.41 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 34 2.9 2.9 11.8 82.4 3.7 0.67 31. Developed abil to conduct research 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 250 Number of forms scanned = 199 Number of forms with at least one student response = 197 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Anthropology SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 108 10.7 A 468 47.1 Sophomore 325 32.1 B 445 44.8 Junior 297 29.3 C 70 7.0 Senior 229 22.6 D 1 0.1 Graduate 51 5.0 E/Fail 1 0.1 Professional 2 0.2 I 0 0.0 Other 2 0.2 Pass or Audit 8 0.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 453 45.0 Studies Program 652 64.9 2 hours 296 29.4 Required by my major 209 20.8 3 hours 141 14.0 Other (e.g. elective) 143 14.2 4 - 5 hours 68 6.8 6 - 7 hours 28 2.8 8 or more hours 20 2.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 1,080 0.4 1.9 55.0 42.8 3.4 0.55 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 994 3.9 11.7 52.1 32.3 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,070 2.3 10.7 54.5 32.4 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 993 1.3 5.7 56.5 36.5 3.3 0.63 5. Grading was fair and consistent 1,073 1.1 4.9 55.5 38.4 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1,069 0.6 3.6 57.2 38.5 3.3 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 1,067 0.5 4.6 57.1 37.9 3.3 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,035 2.5 13.1 49.0 35.4 3.2 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,082 1.5 9.7 49.6 39.2 3.3 0.69 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,083 0.5 1.8 41.9 55.9 3.5 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 983 0.7 3.7 54.5 41.1 3.4 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,072 1.2 4.4 51.0 43.4 3.4 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,076 5.7 18.6 42.0 33.7 3.0 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 1,070 2.0 8.4 47.2 42.4 3.3 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,042 1.2 3.9 55.7 39.3 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 1,041 1.4 11.9 55.1 31.5 3.2 0.68 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 959 1.5 19.3 52.9 26.4 3.0 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 1,067 1.1 4.8 56.1 38.0 3.3 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,052 8.4 26.0 40.5 25.1 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,080 5.2 14.7 47.4 32.7 3.1 0.82 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,076 2.4 10.9 40.5 46.2 3.3 0.76. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 416 3.6 18.8 63.2 14.4 2.9 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 544 3.7 10.5 64.5 21.3 3.0 0.68 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 535 3.6 13.5 60.4 22.6 3.0 0.71 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 493 3.0 3.0 54.8 39.1 3.3 0.67 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 315 4.4 11.7 56.8 27.0 3.1 0.75 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 110 0.0 3.6 41.8 54.5 3.5 0.57 28. Guided student report preparation 110 0.0 1.8 48.2 50.0 3.5 0.54 29. Students free to express opinions 118 0.0 2.5 21.2 76.3 3.7 0.50 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 118 0.8 0.8 30.5 67.8 3.7 0.55 31. Developed abil to conduct research 109 0.9 0.9 47.7 50.5 3.5 0.57 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 220 5.0 16.8 47.7 30.5 3.0 0.82 33. Amount of work appropriate 222 2.3 8.6 60.8 28.4 3.2 0.66 34. Instructor explained expectations 222 4.5 11.7 51.8 32.0 3.1 0.78 35. Instructor helped with my problems 208 5.8 11.5 51.4 31.3 3.1 0.81 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 105 3.8 9.5 49.5 37.1 3.2 0.76 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 1484 Number of forms scanned = 1096 Number of forms with at least one student response = 1089 Percent completed = 73.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Biological Sciences SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 516 22.6 A 969 43.1 Sophomore 553 24.2 B 868 38.6 Junior 465 20.4 C 293 13.0 Senior 650 28.5 D 34 1.5 Graduate 71 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 28 1.2 Pass or Audit 85 3.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 619 27.3 Studies Program 419 18.5 2 hours 628 27.7 Required by my major 1,395 61.8 3 hours 589 25.9 Other (e.g. elective) 445 19.7 4 - 5 hours 295 13.0 6 - 7 hours 83 3.7 8 or more hours 56 2.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,413 0.6 2.6 50.2 46.6 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2,226 6.5 14.8 50.3 28.4 3.0 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2,150 2.7 9.7 57.2 30.5 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2,250 5.5 13.6 48.2 32.8 3.1 0.82 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,368 1.8 5.6 53.3 39.3 3.3 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,184 1.3 5.3 53.9 39.5 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,332 0.9 5.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,921 5.3 22.2 43.9 28.6 3.0 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 2,398 4.8 11.1 45.5 38.6 3.2 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2,426 0.9 2.1 41.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 11. Was available for consultation 2,157 1.3 3.4 52.5 42.7 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 2,418 1.4 5.6 46.8 46.2 3.4 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2,389 5.4 20.1 41.6 32.8 3.0 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 2,388 2.4 11.1 45.1 41.4 3.3 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,893 2.1 13.2 54.8 30.0 3.1 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,294 1.6 10.1 55.7 32.7 3.2 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,160 2.1 14.5 53.4 30.0 3.1 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,375 1.7 5.6 55.6 37.1 3.3 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 2,313 6.4 27.8 41.5 24.4 2.8 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 2,413 3.8 14.9 47.6 33.8 3.1 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 2,402 5.7 11.6 36.2 46.5 3.2 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 570 1.8 5.1 59.3 33.9 3.3 0.63 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 563 1.1 11.4 58.1 29.5 3.2 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 471 3.4 11.5 58.2 27.0 3.1 0.72 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 171 3.5 15.2 48.5 32.7 3.1 0.78 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 193 1.6 12.4 56.5 29.5 3.1 0.68 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 122 1.6 4.9 37.7 55.7 3.5 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 123 1.6 4.9 38.2 55.3 3.5 0.67 29. Students free to express opinions 133 0.0 2.3 28.6 69.2 3.7 0.52 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 132 1.5 2.3 32.6 63.6 3.6 0.62 31. Developed abil to conduct research 107 2.8 10.3 44.9 42.1 3.3 0.76 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 745 3.9 11.8 50.3 34.0 3.1 0.77 33. Amount of work appropriate 764 3.1 7.3 58.1 31.4 3.2 0.69 34. Instructor explained expectations 763 3.1 8.3 50.5 38.1 3.2 0.73 35. Instructor helped with my problems 745 3.4 9.0 47.9 39.7 3.2 0.75 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 620 2.4 8.4 51.3 37.9 3.2 0.71 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 29 10.3 3.4 3.4 0.0 82.8 4.4 1.35 38. Question 38 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 3.5 . 45. Question 45 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.7 . 46. Question 46 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.7 . 47. Question 47 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 4429 Number of forms scanned = 2520 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2458 Percent completed = 55.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Chemistry SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 584 33.3 A 661 38.5 Sophomore 495 28.2 B 709 41.3 Junior 374 21.3 C 277 16.1 Senior 249 14.2 D 64 3.7 Graduate 41 2.3 E/Fail 5 0.3 Professional 1 0.1 I 0 0.0 Other 9 0.5 Pass or Audit 1 0.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 142 8.1 Studies Program 129 7.4 2 hours 345 19.8 Required by my major 1,476 85.1 3 hours 461 26.4 Other (e.g. elective) 130 7.5 4 - 5 hours 436 25.0 6 - 7 hours 204 11.7 8 or more hours 158 9.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 2,082 2.0 5.9 56.7 35.4 3.3 0.66 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1,920 4.1 11.7 54.3 29.9 3.1 0.76 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 1,996 3.3 9.6 58.5 28.6 3.1 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1,949 4.5 16.2 54.5 24.8 3.0 0.77 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2,106 6.2 12.6 52.9 28.3 3.0 0.81 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 2,019 1.6 6.0 61.9 30.5 3.2 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2,042 2.7 7.5 53.9 35.8 3.2 0.70 8. Graded assignments included comments 1,766 10.6 23.0 43.1 23.3 2.8 0.92 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 1,872 7.3 13.4 45.1 34.2 3.1 0.87 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 1,888 2.9 5.9 42.5 48.7 3.4 0.72 11. Was available for consultation 1,747 2.6 4.9 52.3 40.2 3.3 0.68 12. Satisfact answered class questions 1,876 6.0 11.6 44.3 38.1 3.1 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 1,827 11.3 26.9 37.7 24.1 2.7 0.95 14. Encouraged class participation 1,769 6.4 14.9 48.2 30.5 3.0 0.84 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 1,516 3.4 23.4 55.1 18.1 2.9 0.73 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 2,027 1.9 9.8 57.7 30.6 3.2 0.67 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 2,023 2.1 10.2 57.6 30.1 3.2 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 2,052 2.2 8.9 58.8 30.2 3.2 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 1,988 16.0 36.8 34.4 12.8 2.4 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 1,896 8.0 19.0 52.7 20.3 2.9 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 1,893 9.5 15.9 35.8 38.9 3.0 0.96. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 207 6.3 13.0 59.9 20.8 3.0 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 200 6.0 21.0 53.5 19.5 2.9 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 115 7.8 19.1 56.5 16.5 2.8 0.80 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 42 9.5 26.2 45.2 19.0 2.7 0.89 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 53 3.8 15.1 56.6 24.5 3.0 0.75 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 23 0.0 13.0 52.2 34.8 3.2 0.67 28. Guided student report preparation 19 10.5 10.5 52.6 26.3 2.9 0.91 29. Students free to express opinions 27 0.0 3.7 74.1 22.2 3.2 0.48 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 26 0.0 19.2 53.8 26.9 3.1 0.69 31. Developed abil to conduct research 26 0.0 19.2 61.5 19.2 3.0 0.63 SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 861 4.6 17.1 55.6 22.6 3.0 0.76 33. Amount of work appropriate 877 11.2 16.4 54.5 17.9 2.8 0.86 34. Instructor explained expectations 864 6.6 15.5 55.6 22.3 2.9 0.80 35. Instructor helped with my problems 846 5.4 18.9 48.6 27.1 3.0 0.82 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 871 5.1 11.1 58.9 24.9 3.0 0.75 % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = at least 3676 Number of forms scanned = 3600 Number of forms with at least one student response = 2200 Percent completed = 59.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Classics SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 31 21.2 A 67 46.9 Sophomore 34 23.3 B 53 37.1 Junior 24 16.4 C 18 12.6 Senior 30 20.5 D 3 2.1 Graduate 22 15.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 5 3.4 Pass or Audit 2 1.4 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 19.0 Studies Program 54 37.5 2 hours 23 15.6 Required by my major 54 37.5 3 hours 27 18.4 Other (e.g. elective) 36 25.0 4 - 5 hours 26 17.7 6 - 7 hours 24 16.3 8 or more hours 19 12.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 156 2.6 4.5 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 155 9.0 5.8 39.4 45.8 3.2 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 150 6.0 9.3 39.3 45.3 3.2 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 154 4.5 7.1 42.2 46.1 3.3 0.79 5. Grading was fair and consistent 154 7.1 7.1 38.3 47.4 3.3 0.88 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 152 1.3 5.9 46.1 46.7 3.4 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 154 16.9 9.7 27.9 45.5 3.0 1.11 8. Graded assignments included comments 147 6.1 14.3 38.1 41.5 3.1 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 155 5.2 9.7 38.7 46.5 3.3 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 157 1.3 0.6 26.8 71.3 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 142 2.1 1.4 39.4 57.0 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 157 2.5 5.7 41.4 50.3 3.4 0.71 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 155 7.7 11.0 37.4 43.9 3.2 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 155 3.9 9.0 26.5 60.6 3.4 0.81 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 113 8.0 8.8 50.4 32.7 3.1 0.86 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 138 5.8 7.2 44.2 42.8 3.2 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 118 8.5 15.3 35.6 40.7 3.1 0.95 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 147 4.8 6.1 44.2 44.9 3.3 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 145 11.0 10.3 40.7 37.9 3.1 0.96 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 152 8.6 13.2 32.9 45.4 3.2 0.95 21. Overall quality of teaching 151 7.9 12.6 29.8 49.7 3.2 0.95. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 15 20.0 6.7 53.3 20.0 2.7 1.03 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 30 13.3 13.3 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.97 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 28 7.1 7.1 53.6 32.1 3.1 0.83 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 15 6.7 6.7 40.0 46.7 3.3 0.88 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 15 26.7 6.7 26.7 40.0 2.8 1.26 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 242 Number of forms scanned = 162 Number of forms with at least one student response = 157 Percent completed = 64.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = French SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 63 19.8 A 154 49.2 Sophomore 69 21.7 B 121 38.7 Junior 73 23.0 C 24 7.7 Senior 89 28.0 D 7 2.2 Graduate 23 7.2 E/Fail 2 0.6 Professional 1 0.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 1.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 64 20.4 Studies Program 67 21.6 2 hours 81 25.8 Required by my major 177 57.1 3 hours 86 27.4 Other (e.g. elective) 66 21.3 4 - 5 hours 59 18.8 6 - 7 hours 19 6.1 8 or more hours 5 1.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 343 0.3 0.9 37.0 61.8 3.6 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 342 11.4 11.7 35.4 41.5 3.1 0.99 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 343 0.9 6.1 38.2 54.8 3.5 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 324 0.0 3.7 40.4 55.9 3.5 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 340 0.6 5.3 37.6 56.5 3.5 0.63 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 344 0.9 6.4 39.5 53.2 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 337 1.5 4.7 36.2 57.6 3.5 0.66 8. Graded assignments included comments 336 1.2 4.5 37.2 57.1 3.5 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 346 0.6 6.6 28.6 64.2 3.6 0.64 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 347 0.3 1.2 19.6 79.0 3.8 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 322 0.6 2.2 31.4 65.8 3.6 0.56 12. Satisfact answered class questions 345 0.6 4.9 28.4 66.1 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 345 2.0 10.7 27.2 60.0 3.5 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 345 0.3 2.6 23.2 73.9 3.7 0.53 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 275 1.1 10.2 45.1 43.6 3.3 0.70 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 288 2.1 8.3 46.2 4