****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 655 003O1 SP STUDY SYSTEMATIC GEO: QUALITATIVE METHODS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bacchetta, Paola ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 2 40.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 28. Guided student report preparation 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 29. Students free to express opinions 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 160 402L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bailey, Keiron D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 18.2 A 8 38.1 Sophomore 5 22.7 B 10 47.6 Junior 6 27.3 C 3 14.3 Senior 6 27.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.5 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 21.7 Studies Program 21 91.3 2 hours 9 39.1 Required by my major 1 4.3 3 hours 6 26.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 4.3 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 8.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 26.1 21.7 39.1 13.0 2.4 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 7.7 61.5 30.8 3.2 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 12.0 68.0 20.0 3.1 0.57 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 19.2 65.4 15.4 3.0 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 3.8 19.2 42.3 34.6 3.1 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 50.0 46.2 3.4 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 13.6 45.5 40.9 3.3 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 3.8 7.7 57.7 30.8 3.2 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 20.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 8.0 52.0 40.0 3.3 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 25.0 45.8 29.2 3.0 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 39.1 43.5 17.4 2.8 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 17.4 47.8 34.8 3.2 0.72 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 16.0 20.0 48.0 16.0 2.6 0.95 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 15.4 19.2 50.0 15.4 2.7 0.94 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 23.1 34.6 38.5 3.1 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 9 0.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 16 6.3 12.5 56.3 25.0 3.0 0.82 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 17 0.0 5.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 66.7 0.0 0.0 1.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 67 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 38.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 542 001L1 POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brunn, Stanley D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 35.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 50.0 Junior 1 7.1 C 2 14.3 Senior 9 64.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 28.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 21.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 7.1 Required by my major 6 42.9 3 hours 7 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 57.1 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 2 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 14.3 50.0 35.7 3.2 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 28.6 50.0 21.4 2.9 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 21.4 64.3 14.3 2.9 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 28.6 28.6 35.7 2.9 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 14 14.3 21.4 28.6 35.7 2.9 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 7.7 7.7 46.2 38.5 3.2 0.90 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 23.1 38.5 38.5 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 13 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 13 7.7 23.1 30.8 38.5 3.0 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 21.4 7.1 42.9 28.6 2.8 1.12 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 14.3 14.3 35.7 35.7 2.9 1.07. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 42.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 509 001L1 APPLICATIONS OF GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harvey, Francis ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 50.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 50.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 3 50.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 28.6 0.0 71.4 0.0 2.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 14.3 0.0 85.7 0.0 2.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 57.1 42.9 0.0 2.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 85.7 0.0 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 71.4 0.0 2.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 28.6 57.1 0.0 2.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 14.3 42.9 42.9 0.0 2.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 160 401L1 LNDS/PEOPLE NON-WEST WLD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Jones, Jeffery ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 13 34.2 A 16 40.0 Sophomore 9 23.7 B 20 50.0 Junior 9 23.7 C 3 7.5 Senior 5 13.2 D 1 2.5 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 5.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 22 55.0 Studies Program 34 87.2 2 hours 7 17.5 Required by my major 3 7.7 3 hours 7 17.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 5.1 4 - 5 hours 4 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 0.0 2.0 38.8 59.2 3.6 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 48 4.2 20.8 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 37 5.4 13.5 45.9 35.1 3.1 0.84 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 0.0 2.0 38.8 59.2 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 49 0.0 0.0 40.8 59.2 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 7.5 5.0 37.5 50.0 3.3 0.88 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 49 2.0 0.0 32.7 65.3 3.6 0.61 8. Graded assignments included comments 31 6.5 19.4 35.5 38.7 3.1 0.93 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 2.0 0.0 38.8 59.2 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 0.0 0.0 24.5 75.5 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 42 0.0 4.8 42.9 52.4 3.5 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 0.0 0.0 40.8 59.2 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 48 2.1 8.3 43.8 45.8 3.3 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 48 0.0 4.2 52.1 43.8 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 44 0.0 13.6 56.8 29.5 3.2 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 35 2.9 22.9 42.9 31.4 3.0 0.82 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 47 4.3 0.0 51.1 44.7 3.4 0.70 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 6.5 32.6 32.6 28.3 2.8 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 47 4.3 8.5 44.7 42.6 3.3 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 0.0 2.1 27.7 70.2 3.7 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 23 0.0 13.0 65.2 21.7 3.1 0.60 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 8 0.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 75 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 65.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 409G001L1 INTRO TO GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 46.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 46.7 Junior 1 6.7 C 1 6.7 Senior 13 86.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 6.7 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 6 40.0 Required by my major 9 60.0 3 hours 7 46.7 Other (e.g. elective) 6 40.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 1 6.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 7.1 21.4 42.9 28.6 2.9 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 40.0 46.7 13.3 2.7 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 0.41 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 66.7 26.7 3.2 0.56. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 465 401L1 SPEC TOPS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY:GIS/GPS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kennedy, Michael D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 70.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 2 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 8 80.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 10.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 1 10.0 3 hours 4 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 80.0 4 - 5 hours 3 30.0 6 - 7 hours 1 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 91.7 8.3 3.1 0.29 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 16.7 25.0 50.0 8.3 2.5 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 8.3 8.3 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.39 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.0 2.9 0.29 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 16.7 83.3 0.0 2.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 25.0 16.7 58.3 0.0 2.3 0.89 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 70.0 30.0 0.0 2.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 25.0 41.7 33.3 0.0 2.1 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 50.0 40.0 10.0 2.6 0.70 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 41.7 41.7 16.7 2.8 0.75 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 27.3 63.6 9.1 2.8 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 20.0 70.0 10.0 2.9 0.57 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 16.7 75.0 8.3 2.9 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 33.3 58.3 8.3 2.8 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 8.3 25.0 58.3 8.3 2.7 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 75.0 16.7 0.0 2.1 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 4 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 1.8 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 4 0.0 75.0 25.0 0.0 2.3 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 12 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 700 001L1 ADV ANALYTIC METH IN GEO INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leinbach, Thomas R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 66.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 25.0 3 hours 1 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 3 75.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = GEO 130 401L1 EARTH'S PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Dell, Gary ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 17.4 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 5 21.7 B 11 47.8 Junior 3 13.0 C 3 13.0 Senior 11 47.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 43.5 Studies Program 13 56.5 2 hours 5 21.7 Required by my major 7 30.4 3 hours 4 17.4 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.0 4 - 5 hours 3 13.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 4.2 12.5 58.3 25.0 3.0 0.75 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 4.2 8.3 54.2 33.3 3.2 0.76 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 8.3 45.8 45.8 3.4 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 16.7 58.3 25.0 3.1 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 20.8 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.74 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 24 12.5 16.7 58.3 12.5 2.7 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 17.4 60.9 21.7 3.0 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 5.3 10.5 84.2 0.0 2.8 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 4.2 29.2 45.8 20.8 2.8 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 40.9 50.0 9.1 2.7 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 24 12.5 16.7 58.3 12.5 2.7 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 20.8 45.8 33.3 3.1 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.68. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 14 0.0 14.3 78.6 7.1 2.9 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 0.55 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 14 7.1 14.3 71.4 7.1 2.8 0.70 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 65 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 36.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 707 001S1 SEM DEVEL OF GEO THOUGHT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pickles, John ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 50.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 50.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 20.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 1 33.3 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 66.7 4 - 5 hours 1 33.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 66.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 415 001L1 MAP INTERPRETATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Raitz, K B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 43.8 Sophomore 1 6.3 B 6 37.5 Junior 1 6.3 C 3 18.8 Senior 14 87.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 12.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 6.3 Required by my major 8 50.0 3 hours 7 43.8 Other (e.g. elective) 8 50.0 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 11.8 5.9 52.9 29.4 3.0 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 13 7.7 7.7 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.86 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 5.6 16.7 38.9 38.9 3.1 0.90 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 7.7 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 22.2 50.0 27.8 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 585 001L1 AGING AND ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Rowles, Graham D ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 6 40.0 Junior 2 13.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 26.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 46.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 2 13.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 5 33.3 3 hours 4 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 66.7 4 - 5 hours 2 13.3 6 - 7 hours 1 6.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3 3.2 0.60 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 6.3 81.3 12.5 3.1 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 6.3 6.3 18.8 68.8 3.5 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 50.0 43.8 3.4 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 0.0 6.3 62.5 31.3 3.3 0.58 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 13.3 80.0 3.7 0.59 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 37. Question 37 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 38. Question 38 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 39. Question 39 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 40. Question 40 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 41. Question 41 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 42. Question 42 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 43. Question 43 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 45. Question 45 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 46. Question 46 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 47. Question 47 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 48. Question 48 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . 49. Question 49 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 5.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 76.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 172 001L1 HUMAN GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 4.5 A 10 45.5 Sophomore 5 22.7 B 7 31.8 Junior 7 31.8 C 4 18.2 Senior 8 36.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.5 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 31.8 Studies Program 9 40.9 2 hours 11 50.0 Required by my major 10 45.5 3 hours 2 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 3 13.6 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 68.0 32.0 3.3 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 3.8 65.4 30.8 3.3 0.53 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 46.2 53.8 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 0.0 20.0 52.0 28.0 3.1 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 57.7 38.5 3.3 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 59.1 40.9 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 4.0 4.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 3.8 53.8 42.3 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 21.7 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 28.0 52.0 20.0 2.9 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 22.7 54.5 22.7 3.0 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 72.0 28.0 3.3 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 4.0 24.0 40.0 32.0 3.0 0.87 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 0.0 19.2 26.9 53.8 3.3 0.80 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 3.8 0.0 26.9 69.2 3.6 0.70. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 14.3 57.1 3.3 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 72.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 300 001L1 GEOGRAPHIC RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Schein, Richard H. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 3 12.0 B 11 47.8 Junior 7 28.0 C 3 13.0 Senior 15 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 36.4 Required by my major 21 91.3 3 hours 5 22.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 8.7 4 - 5 hours 5 22.7 6 - 7 hours 1 4.5 8 or more hours 1 4.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 11.1 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 17.9 64.3 17.9 3.0 0.61 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 28 0.0 17.9 60.7 21.4 3.0 0.64 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 7.1 14.3 53.6 25.0 3.0 0.84 5. Grading was fair and consistent 28 7.1 10.7 57.1 25.0 3.0 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 10.7 71.4 17.9 3.1 0.54 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 14.3 64.3 21.4 3.1 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 28 3.6 28.6 50.0 17.9 2.8 0.77 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 7.1 10.7 53.6 28.6 3.0 0.84 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 69.2 30.8 3.3 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 7.1 17.9 39.3 35.7 3.0 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 3.6 50.0 46.4 3.4 0.57 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 72.0 20.0 3.1 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 7.1 60.7 32.1 3.3 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 14.3 60.7 25.0 3.1 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 3.6 0.0 57.1 39.3 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 7.1 17.9 53.6 21.4 2.9 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 35.7 28.6 35.7 3.0 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 7.1 17.9 28.6 46.4 3.1 0.97. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 75.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 326 001L1 GEOGRAPHY OF EUROPE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shannon, Gary W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 57.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 28.6 Junior 6 46.2 C 1 7.1 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 35.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 28.6 Required by my major 4 28.6 3 hours 4 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 10 71.4 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 21.4 35.7 35.7 7.1 2.3 0.91 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 15 13.3 13.3 60.0 13.3 2.7 0.88 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 13.3 53.3 26.7 3.0 0.85 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 6.7 73.3 20.0 3.1 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 0.0 6.7 60.0 33.3 3.3 0.59 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.92 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 8.3 58.3 33.3 3.3 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 0.0 60.0 33.3 3.2 0.77 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 46.7 26.7 20.0 2.6 0.91 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 26.7 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 25.0 66.7 8.3 2.8 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 21.4 57.1 14.3 2.8 0.80 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 7.7 38.5 46.2 7.7 2.5 0.78 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 6.7 20.0 53.3 20.0 2.9 0.83 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 28.6 21.4 28.6 21.4 2.4 1.16 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 13.3 20.0 40.0 26.7 2.8 1.01 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 13.3 20.0 40.0 26.7 2.8 1.01. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 475G001L1 MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Shannon, Gary W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 31.3 Sophomore 1 6.3 B 9 56.3 Junior 3 18.8 C 1 6.3 Senior 12 75.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 1 6.3 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 1 6.3 2 hours 6 37.5 Required by my major 6 37.5 3 hours 5 31.3 Other (e.g. elective) 9 56.3 4 - 5 hours 3 18.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 6.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 11.8 23.5 64.7 3.5 0.72 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 5.9 23.5 70.6 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.63 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 11.8 29.4 58.8 3.5 0.72 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 5.9 41.2 52.9 3.5 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 7.1 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 6.7 46.7 46.7 3.4 0.63 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 17.6 29.4 52.9 3.4 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Geography FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = GEO 544 001L1 HUMAN POPULATION DYNAMIC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Watkins, John F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 9 60.0 Junior 3 18.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 81.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 20.0 Required by my major 8 53.3 3 hours 8 53.3 Other (e.g. elective) 7 46.7 4 - 5 hours 1 6.7 6 - 7 hours 2 13.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 5.3 5.3 68.4 21.1 3.1 0.71 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 5.3 10.5 36.8 47.4 3.3 0.87 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 0.0 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.73 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 5.3 0.0 31.6 63.2 3.5 0.77 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 10.5 26.3 63.2 3.5 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 5.3 21.1 47.4 26.3 2.9 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 79.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************