****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 001S1 PROSEMINAR IN MFT: GENDER ISSUES IN MFT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 2 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 16.7 66.7 16.7 0.0 2.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 2.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 003S1 PROSEMINAR IN MFT: FAMILY PLAY THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 1 14.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 28.6 6 - 7 hours 3 42.9 8 or more hours 1 14.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 20.0 0.0 20.0 60.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 57.1 28.6 14.3 2.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 33.3 50.0 0.0 16.7 2.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 2.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 12.5 75.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 787 001L1 SUPERVISED EXP PRACTICE OF MARRIAGE/FAM THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Botkin, Darla R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 83.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 16.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 6 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 6 Number of forms scanned = 6 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 686 001L1 THEORY/METHS IN MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brock, Gregory W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 3 42.9 6 - 7 hours 1 14.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 77.8 22.2 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 9 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 9 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 9 0.0 11.1 22.2 66.7 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 9 Number of forms with at least one student response = 9 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 776 002S1 PROSEM IN MFT: FAMILY VIOLENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brock, Gregory W ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 25.0 Studies Program 1 12.5 2 hours 2 25.0 Required by my major 5 62.5 3 hours 1 12.5 Other (e.g. elective) 2 25.0 4 - 5 hours 3 37.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 9 0.0 11.1 11.1 77.8 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 10 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.63 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 3.5 0.71 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 90.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 251 201L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 70.0 Sophomore 2 10.0 B 4 20.0 Junior 8 40.0 C 1 5.0 Senior 7 35.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 5.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 10.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 25.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 60.0 Required by my major 12 60.0 3 hours 2 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 8 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 68.8 31.3 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 399 201L1 PRAC IN FAM STUDIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 3 23.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 76.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 12 92.3 3 hours 1 7.7 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.7 4 - 5 hours 1 7.7 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 6 46.2 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 38.5 53.8 3.5 0.66 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 13 0.0 0.0 30.8 69.2 3.7 0.48 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 7.1 0.0 35.7 57.1 3.4 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 7.1 0.0 35.7 57.1 3.4 0.85 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 0.0 26.7 66.7 3.5 0.83 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 7.1 0.0 28.6 64.3 3.5 0.85 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 8.3 0.0 25.0 66.7 3.5 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 486 201O1 FIELD EXPER IN FAMILY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 4 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 25.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 4 100.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 55.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 499 201O1 INTERNSHIP IN FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Durbin, Ellie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 5 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 40.0 Studies Program 1 20.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 20.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 3 60.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 25.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 3.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 20.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 3.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 41.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 251 001L1 PERSONAL/FAMILY FINANCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 7.5 A 13 24.5 Sophomore 16 30.2 B 24 45.3 Junior 18 34.0 C 13 24.5 Senior 14 26.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.9 Pass or Audit 3 5.7 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 32.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 21 39.6 Required by my major 24 45.3 3 hours 9 17.0 Other (e.g. elective) 29 54.7 4 - 5 hours 3 5.7 6 - 7 hours 2 3.8 8 or more hours 1 1.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 54 0.0 0.0 57.4 42.6 3.4 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 52 1.9 5.8 55.8 36.5 3.3 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 54 0.0 1.9 64.8 33.3 3.3 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 54 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 54 1.9 1.9 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 54 0.0 1.9 63.0 35.2 3.3 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 54 1.9 11.1 70.4 16.7 3.0 0.60 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 3.8 26.4 58.5 11.3 2.8 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 54 0.0 1.9 46.3 51.9 3.5 0.54 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 54 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 2.1 47.9 50.0 3.5 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 54 0.0 0.0 46.3 53.7 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 53 1.9 5.7 52.8 39.6 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 54 0.0 7.4 59.3 33.3 3.3 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 46 2.2 19.6 63.0 15.2 2.9 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 52 0.0 7.7 65.4 26.9 3.2 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 0.0 7.8 66.7 25.5 3.2 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 54 0.0 1.9 64.8 33.3 3.3 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 54 0.0 20.4 55.6 24.1 3.0 0.67 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 54 0.0 5.6 42.6 51.9 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 119 Number of forms scanned = 93 Number of forms with at least one student response = 54 Percent completed = 45.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 304 201L1 PERSONAL AND FAMILY RISK MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 33.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 38.9 Junior 2 11.1 C 5 27.8 Senior 16 88.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 38.9 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 6 33.3 Required by my major 13 72.2 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 4 22.2 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 15.8 52.6 31.6 3.2 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 31.6 68.4 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 15.0 85.0 3.9 0.37 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 0.0 0.0 78.6 21.4 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 5.0 15.0 45.0 35.0 3.1 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 5.0 40.0 55.0 3.5 0.61 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 563 001L1 FAMILIES, LEGISLATION & PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Forgue, Raymond E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 44.0 Sophomore 2 8.0 B 10 40.0 Junior 4 16.0 C 4 16.0 Senior 16 64.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 12.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.0 Studies Program 1 4.0 2 hours 11 44.0 Required by my major 11 44.0 3 hours 5 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 13 52.0 4 - 5 hours 3 12.0 6 - 7 hours 1 4.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 3.7 40.7 55.6 3.5 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 3.7 55.6 40.7 3.4 0.56 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 3.7 0.0 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.69 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 59.3 40.7 3.4 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 65.4 34.6 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 0.0 0.0 18.5 81.5 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 27 0.0 3.7 48.1 48.1 3.4 0.58 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 0.0 0.0 40.7 59.3 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 0.0 11.1 51.9 37.0 3.3 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 27 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 0.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 11.1 70.4 18.5 3.1 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 0.0 3.7 63.0 33.3 3.3 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 30.8 42.3 26.9 3.0 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 44 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 61.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 557 401L1 INFANT DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gnatuk, Carol ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 35.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 11 64.7 Junior 4 23.5 C 0 0.0 Senior 10 58.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 3 17.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 5.9 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 12 70.6 3 hours 5 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 4 23.5 4 - 5 hours 5 29.4 6 - 7 hours 3 17.6 8 or more hours 1 5.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 0.0 64.7 35.3 3.4 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 23.5 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 70.6 29.4 3.3 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 0.0 52.9 47.1 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 68.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 668 401L1 ALLOCATION-FAM RESOURCES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hayhoe, Celia ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 36.4 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 1 9.1 Other (e.g. elective) 1 9.1 4 - 5 hours 5 45.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 58.3 41.7 3.4 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 8.3 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.79 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 12 0.0 25.0 58.3 16.7 2.9 0.67 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.47 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 8.3 66.7 25.0 3.2 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 8.3 33.3 41.7 16.7 2.7 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 11. Was available for consultation 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 25.0 33.3 33.3 8.3 2.3 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 18.2 45.5 36.4 3.2 0.75 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 10.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 2.6 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 27.3 63.6 0.0 2.5 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 18.2 63.6 18.2 3.0 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 50.0 25.0 16.7 8.3 1.8 1.03 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 25.0 33.3 25.0 16.7 2.3 1.07 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 8.3 41.7 33.3 16.7 2.6 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 27 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 44.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 253 001L1 HUMAN SEXUALITY: DEVELOP BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 21 25.6 A 27 33.3 Sophomore 26 31.7 B 42 51.9 Junior 20 24.4 C 7 8.6 Senior 14 17.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 1.2 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 5 6.2 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 28 34.6 Studies Program 38 46.3 2 hours 31 38.3 Required by my major 12 14.6 3 hours 16 19.8 Other (e.g. elective) 32 39.0 4 - 5 hours 5 6.2 6 - 7 hours 1 1.2 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 92 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.5 3.4 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 88 2.3 4.5 46.6 46.6 3.4 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 89 2.2 16.9 55.1 25.8 3.0 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 91 1.1 4.4 52.7 41.8 3.4 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 91 0.0 4.4 51.6 44.0 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 90 2.2 5.6 55.6 36.7 3.3 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 92 3.3 10.9 55.4 30.4 3.1 0.73 8. Graded assignments included comments 70 5.7 32.9 45.7 15.7 2.7 0.80 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 92 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 92 0.0 0.0 31.5 68.5 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 75 2.7 2.7 58.7 36.0 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 91 0.0 0.0 50.5 49.5 3.5 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 91 0.0 4.4 54.9 40.7 3.4 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 84 1.2 26.2 54.8 17.9 2.9 0.69 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 88 0.0 3.4 58.0 38.6 3.4 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 80 1.3 10.0 60.0 28.8 3.2 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 74 1.4 17.6 60.8 20.3 3.0 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 89 0.0 2.2 60.7 37.1 3.3 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 89 0.0 22.5 47.2 30.3 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 92 1.1 5.4 47.8 45.7 3.4 0.64 21. Overall quality of teaching 91 2.2 2.2 35.2 60.4 3.5 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 26 3.8 0.0 84.6 11.5 3.0 0.53 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 35 0.0 5.7 80.0 14.3 3.1 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 36 2.8 11.1 72.2 13.9 3.0 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 21 0.0 4.8 66.7 28.6 3.2 0.54 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 26 0.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.59 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 174 Number of forms scanned = 93 Number of forms with at least one student response = 92 Percent completed = 52.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 360 001L1 INTRO FAM INTERVEN: WORK W/FAMILIES & INDIVID INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 59.1 Sophomore 2 8.3 B 9 40.9 Junior 2 8.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 3 13.0 2 hours 10 45.5 Required by my major 20 87.0 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 0.0 0.0 25.9 74.1 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 0.0 3.7 25.9 70.4 3.7 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 39.3 57.1 3.5 0.58 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 28 0.0 3.6 46.4 50.0 3.5 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 7.4 40.7 51.9 3.4 0.64 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 28 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 39.1 60.9 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 28 0.0 0.0 32.1 67.9 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 28 0.0 0.0 46.4 53.6 3.5 0.51 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 28 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 21. Overall quality of teaching 28 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 28 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = FAM 475 201L1 SP TOPS IN IFDE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Nolan, Bill ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 1 5.0 A 16 80.0 Sophomore 1 5.0 B 2 10.0 Junior 9 45.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 45.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 40.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 35.0 Required by my major 5 25.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 15 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 47.6 52.4 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 52.4 47.6 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 6.7 40.0 53.3 3.5 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 0.0 61.1 38.9 3.4 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 77.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 390 001L1 INTRO TO RESEARCH IN FAM INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 25.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 12 50.0 Junior 4 16.7 C 6 25.0 Senior 20 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 29.2 Studies Program 1 4.2 2 hours 11 45.8 Required by my major 23 95.8 3 hours 4 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 8.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 7.4 7.4 55.6 29.6 3.1 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 14.8 11.1 51.9 22.2 2.8 0.96 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 7.4 22.2 48.1 22.2 2.9 0.86 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 14.8 7.4 48.1 29.6 2.9 1.00 5. Grading was fair and consistent 27 7.4 11.1 51.9 29.6 3.0 0.85 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 7.4 3.7 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 7.4 3.7 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.80 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 16.0 48.0 28.0 3.0 0.89 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 7.4 18.5 51.9 22.2 2.9 0.85 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 27 7.4 3.7 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.88 11. Was available for consultation 25 8.0 0.0 64.0 28.0 3.1 0.78 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 11.1 7.4 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.90 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 14.8 33.3 33.3 18.5 2.6 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 27 7.4 11.1 63.0 18.5 2.9 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 8.7 13.0 65.2 13.0 2.8 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 7.4 18.5 55.6 18.5 2.9 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 7.4 14.8 63.0 14.8 2.9 0.77 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 7.4 14.8 63.0 14.8 2.9 0.77 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 11.5 42.3 38.5 7.7 2.4 0.81 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 3.7 25.9 55.6 14.8 2.8 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 7.4 22.2 44.4 25.9 2.9 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 34 Number of forms scanned = 27 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 79.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Human Environmental Sciences DEPARTMENT = Family Studies FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = FAM 544 001L1 CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN AMER CHILDREN & FAMILIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = O'Malley, Angela ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade N