****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 235 002L1 WORLD POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 3 21.4 A 5 38.5 Sophomore 1 7.1 B 7 53.8 Junior 5 35.7 C 1 7.7 Senior 5 35.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 42.9 Studies Program 4 28.6 2 hours 3 21.4 Required by my major 5 35.7 3 hours 3 21.4 Other (e.g. elective) 5 35.7 4 - 5 hours 2 14.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 7.7 0.0 53.8 38.5 3.2 0.83 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 6.7 0.0 33.3 60.0 3.5 0.83 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 7.1 0.0 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.84 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 12.5 25.0 37.5 25.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 11. Was available for consultation 15 6.7 0.0 46.7 46.7 3.3 0.82 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 6.7 6.7 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 6.7 6.7 33.3 53.3 3.3 0.90 14. Encouraged class participation 15 6.7 0.0 40.0 53.3 3.4 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 14 7.1 0.0 35.7 57.1 3.4 0.85 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 7.1 0.0 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.84 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 9.1 9.1 36.4 45.5 3.2 0.98 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 7.1 0.0 42.9 50.0 3.4 0.84 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 6.7 20.0 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0 3.2 0.86 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 6.7 6.7 26.7 60.0 3.4 0.91. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 16.7 0.0 50.0 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 3 33.3 0.0 66.7 0.0 2.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 67 Number of forms scanned = 67 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 22.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 439G001L1 CONTEMP INTERNATL PROBS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bartilow, Horace A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 93.8 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 1 6.3 Junior 4 22.2 C 0 0.0 Senior 7 38.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 33.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 22.2 Required by my major 9 52.9 3 hours 2 11.1 Other (e.g. elective) 8 47.1 4 - 5 hours 9 50.0 6 - 7 hours 2 11.1 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 5. Grading was fair and consistent 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 22 0.0 4.5 18.2 77.3 3.7 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 13.6 86.4 3.9 0.35 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 14. Encouraged class participation 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 9.5 90.5 3.9 0.30 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 19.0 81.0 3.8 0.40 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 4.0 0.21. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 41 Number of forms scanned = 41 Number of forms with at least one student response = 22 Percent completed = 53.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 566 001L1 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Canon, Bradley C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 40.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 40.0 Junior 2 10.0 C 2 10.0 Senior 18 90.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 20.0 Required by my major 6 30.0 3 hours 4 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 14 70.0 4 - 5 hours 8 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 10.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 20 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 33.3 55.6 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 20 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.68 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = at least 24 Number of forms scanned = 24 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 271 001L1 INTRO POLITICAL BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 27.6 A 8 27.6 Sophomore 7 24.1 B 16 55.2 Junior 9 31.0 C 3 10.3 Senior 4 13.8 D 2 6.9 Graduate 1 3.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 34.5 Studies Program 2 6.9 2 hours 11 37.9 Required by my major 17 58.6 3 hours 6 20.7 Other (e.g. elective) 10 34.5 4 - 5 hours 1 3.4 6 - 7 hours 1 3.4 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 30 6.7 16.7 60.0 16.7 2.9 0.78 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 30 0.0 13.3 66.7 20.0 3.1 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 20.7 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 29 3.4 13.8 48.3 34.5 3.1 0.79 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 0.0 73.3 26.7 3.3 0.45 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 3.3 36.7 33.3 26.7 2.8 0.87 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 0.0 13.3 53.3 33.3 3.2 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 30 3.3 0.0 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.67 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 0.0 33.3 46.7 20.0 2.9 0.73 14. Encouraged class participation 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 37.0 44.4 18.5 2.8 0.74 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 30 0.0 6.7 56.7 36.7 3.3 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 30 6.7 30.0 43.3 20.0 2.8 0.86 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 6.7 10.0 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.74 21. Overall quality of teaching 30 3.3 10.0 63.3 23.3 3.1 0.69. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 5 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 2.6 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 37 Number of forms scanned = 36 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 81.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 538 001L1 CONFLICT/COOPERATION IN LATIN AMERICAN RELATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Davis, Charles L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 42.1 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 8 42.1 Junior 6 31.6 C 3 15.8 Senior 6 31.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 36.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 10.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 15.8 Required by my major 12 63.2 3 hours 8 42.1 Other (e.g. elective) 7 36.8 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 10.0 55.0 35.0 3.3 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 45.0 45.0 3.4 0.67 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 5.0 70.0 25.0 3.2 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 55.0 45.0 3.5 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 5.0 60.0 35.0 3.3 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 11.1 61.1 27.8 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 5.3 52.6 42.1 3.4 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 10.0 60.0 30.0 3.2 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 20 0.0 10.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 29 Number of forms scanned = 29 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 69.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 731 001S1 INTERNATIONAL SECURITY/ CONFLICT ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Desch, Michael ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 16.7 Required by my major 4 66.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 33.3 4 - 5 hours 3 50.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 16.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 3.5 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 16.7 33.3 33.3 16.7 2.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 10 Number of forms scanned = 10 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 489G001L1 ANALYSIS PUBLIC POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fording, Richard C. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 47.4 Sophomore 2 10.5 B 6 31.6 Junior 7 36.8 C 4 21.1 Senior 10 52.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 15.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 36.8 Required by my major 15 78.9 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 21.1 4 - 5 hours 4 21.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 20 0.0 0.0 65.0 35.0 3.4 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 73.7 26.3 3.3 0.45 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 20 0.0 10.0 65.0 25.0 3.2 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 10.0 75.0 15.0 3.1 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 20 0.0 5.0 50.0 45.0 3.4 0.60 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 47.4 52.6 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 20 0.0 0.0 45.0 55.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 20 0.0 10.0 35.0 55.0 3.5 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 19 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.54 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 64.3 28.6 3.2 0.58 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 20 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.47 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 20 Percent completed = 60.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 003L1 SP TOP IN PS: SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gabel, Matthew ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 40.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 80.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 3 60.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 16.7 66.7 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS 44. Question 44 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 4.0 . Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 75.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 235 003L1 WORLD POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gibler, Douglas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 8 42.1 A 10 52.6 Sophomore 5 26.3 B 7 36.8 Junior 4 21.1 C 2 10.5 Senior 2 10.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 6 31.6 Studies Program 5 26.3 2 hours 4 21.1 Required by my major 8 42.1 3 hours 5 26.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 31.6 4 - 5 hours 3 15.8 6 - 7 hours 1 5.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 22 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 52.2 47.8 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 4.3 21.7 73.9 3.7 0.56 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 20 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 4.5 50.0 45.5 3.4 0.59 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 0.0 21.7 47.8 30.4 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 23.8 71.4 3.7 0.58. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 36 Number of forms scanned = 34 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 63.9 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 001L1 SP TOP IN PS: CAUSES OF WAR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gibler, Douglas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 53.6 Sophomore 3 10.3 B 11 39.3 Junior 14 48.3 C 2 7.1 Senior 12 41.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 18.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 20 76.9 3 hours 9 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 23.1 4 - 5 hours 4 14.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 3.1 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.56 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 0.0 3.1 43.8 53.1 3.5 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 3.1 3.1 46.9 46.9 3.4 0.71 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 32 0.0 3.1 53.1 43.8 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 3.1 0.0 50.0 46.9 3.4 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 0.0 40.6 59.4 3.6 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 9.4 90.6 3.9 0.30 11. Was available for consultation 32 0.0 3.1 31.3 65.6 3.6 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 3.1 0.0 34.4 62.5 3.6 0.67 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 6.3 31.3 62.5 3.6 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 32 3.1 0.0 28.1 68.8 3.6 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 32 0.0 0.0 53.1 46.9 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 0.0 18.8 34.4 46.9 3.3 0.77 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 3.1 37.5 59.4 3.6 0.56 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 40 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 750 001S1 POL PARTIES/ELECTNS AMER INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gross, Donald A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 66.7 3 hours 1 16.7 Other (e.g. elective) 2 33.3 4 - 5 hours 2 33.3 6 - 7 hours 1 16.7 8 or more hours 2 33.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 480G001L1 GOVERNMENT & THE ECONOMY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 31.0 Sophomore 4 13.3 B 17 58.6 Junior 11 36.7 C 3 10.3 Senior 14 46.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 9 30.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 30.0 Required by my major 20 64.5 3 hours 10 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 11 35.5 4 - 5 hours 1 3.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 9.4 46.9 43.8 3.3 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 12.1 54.5 33.3 3.2 0.65 4. Exams reflected what was taught 33 0.0 0.0 60.6 39.4 3.4 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 33 0.0 6.1 51.5 42.4 3.4 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 32 0.0 3.1 59.4 37.5 3.3 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 33 3.0 3.0 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.64 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 0.0 12.1 60.6 27.3 3.2 0.62 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 33 0.0 9.1 45.5 45.5 3.4 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 33 0.0 0.0 30.3 69.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 55.2 44.8 3.4 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 33 0.0 0.0 60.6 39.4 3.4 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 33 0.0 9.1 66.7 24.2 3.2 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 33 0.0 0.0 57.6 42.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 27 0.0 3.7 77.8 18.5 3.1 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 30 0.0 6.7 80.0 13.3 3.1 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 6.9 86.2 6.9 3.0 0.38 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 32 0.0 6.3 71.9 21.9 3.2 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 31 6.5 16.1 64.5 12.9 2.8 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 33 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 0.0 9.1 36.4 54.5 3.5 0.67. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 47 Number of forms with at least one student response = 33 Percent completed = 70.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 685 401S1 PROSEM PUB ADMIN & POLIC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hager, Gregory L. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 70.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 29.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 8.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 19 82.6 3 hours 8 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 4 17.4 4 - 5 hours 5 20.8 6 - 7 hours 1 4.2 8 or more hours 3 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 27 0.0 7.4 48.1 44.4 3.4 0.63 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 27 7.4 7.4 55.6 29.6 3.1 0.83 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 7.4 3.7 55.6 33.3 3.1 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 27 0.0 7.4 51.9 40.7 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 15.4 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.75 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 27 0.0 7.4 44.4 48.1 3.4 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 27 0.0 0.0 51.9 48.1 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 3.7 11.1 48.1 37.0 3.2 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 27 11.1 3.7 59.3 25.9 3.0 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 48.0 52.0 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 27 7.4 7.4 44.4 40.7 3.2 0.88 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 27 14.8 7.4 51.9 25.9 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 7.4 37.0 51.9 3.4 0.79 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 3.8 11.5 53.8 30.8 3.1 0.77 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 26 7.7 11.5 57.7 23.1 3.0 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 7.7 19.2 50.0 23.1 2.9 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 7.7 15.4 50.0 26.9 3.0 0.87 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 15.4 19.2 42.3 23.1 2.7 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 14.8 3.7 51.9 29.6 3.0 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 27 11.1 11.1 40.7 37.0 3.0 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 32 Number of forms scanned = 32 Number of forms with at least one student response = 27 Percent completed = 84.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 431G001L1 NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kaufman, Stuart ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 40.6 Sophomore 1 3.1 B 16 50.0 Junior 10 31.3 C 3 9.4 Senior 20 62.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.1 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 12.5 Studies Program 1 3.2 2 hours 13 40.6 Required by my major 26 83.9 3 hours 9 28.1 Other (e.g. elective) 4 12.9 4 - 5 hours 5 15.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 3.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 2.9 60.0 37.1 3.3 0.54 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 60.0 37.1 3.3 0.54 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 11.4 45.7 40.0 3.2 0.77 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 11.4 60.0 28.6 3.2 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 34 2.9 8.8 67.6 20.6 3.1 0.65 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 5.7 2.9 68.6 22.9 3.1 0.70 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 14.3 14.3 62.9 8.6 2.7 0.84 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 2.9 17.6 55.9 23.5 3.0 0.74 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 8.6 5.7 48.6 37.1 3.1 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 35 0.0 5.7 48.6 45.7 3.4 0.60 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 2.9 5.7 54.3 37.1 3.3 0.70 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 8.6 8.6 48.6 34.3 3.1 0.89 14. Encouraged class participation 35 5.7 2.9 42.9 48.6 3.3 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 0.0 2.9 79.4 17.6 3.1 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 33 0.0 6.1 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 0.0 6.9 69.0 24.1 3.2 0.54 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 2.9 2.9 58.8 35.3 3.3 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 35 5.7 11.4 45.7 37.1 3.1 0.85 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 2.9 8.6 54.3 34.3 3.2 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 33 12.1 6.1 42.4 39.4 3.1 0.98. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 46 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 76.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 674 001S1 PROSEM THEOR INTNTL POLI INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kaufman, Stuart ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 1 16.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 66.7 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 6 100.0 E/Fail 1 16.7 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 16.7 6 - 7 hours 2 33.3 8 or more hours 3 50.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 6 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 6 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 14. Encouraged class participation 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 6 Percent completed = 85.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 390 001S1 SEM POLITICAL SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 94.1 Sophomore 5 27.8 B 0 0.0 Junior 10 55.6 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 16.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 4 25.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 12 75.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 15 93.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 23.5 58.8 17.6 2.9 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 16.7 55.6 27.8 3.1 0.68 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 14.3 14.3 57.1 14.3 2.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7 3.1 0.64 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 6 0.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 33.3 61.1 3.6 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 11.8 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.71 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 0.72 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 5.6 88.9 3.8 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 16.7 22.2 61.1 3.4 0.78. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 94.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 557 001L1 KY GOVT & POLITICS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Miller, Pennie ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 56.3 Sophomore 3 18.8 B 5 31.3 Junior 7 43.8 C 2 12.5 Senior 5 31.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 6.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 10 62.5 3 hours 6 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 37.5 4 - 5 hours 4 25.0 6 - 7 hours 1 6.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 16 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 16 0.0 12.5 25.0 62.5 3.5 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 4. Exams reflected what was taught 16 0.0 6.3 56.3 37.5 3.3 0.60 5. Grading was fair and consistent 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 16 0.0 0.0 81.3 18.8 3.2 0.40 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 18.8 68.8 12.5 2.9 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 15 0.0 33.3 60.0 6.7 2.7 0.59 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 16 0.0 12.5 68.8 18.8 3.1 0.57 14. Encouraged class participation 16 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 13 0.0 23.1 61.5 15.4 2.9 0.64 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 35.7 35.7 28.6 2.9 0.83 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 35.7 50.0 14.3 2.8 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 6.3 68.8 25.0 3.2 0.54 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 25.0 50.0 18.8 2.8 0.83 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 18.8 50.0 31.3 3.1 0.72 21. Overall quality of teaching 15 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.62. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 16 Percent completed = 84.2 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 491 005L1 SP TOP IN PS: NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 60.0 Sophomore 1 10.0 B 3 30.0 Junior 3 30.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 6 60.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 10.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 50.0 Required by my major 5 50.0 3 hours 5 50.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 50.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 9 11.1 11.1 33.3 44.4 3.1 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 3.9 0.30 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 61.1 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Political Science FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PS 711 004S1 TOP SEM IN PS: NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Pringle, Robert ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 81.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 18.2 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0