****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 311 001L1 LEARNING AND COGNITION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Akins, Chana K. ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 28 52.8 Sophomore 7 13.2 B 18 34.0 Junior 17 32.1 C 6 11.3 Senior 28 52.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 1 1.9 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.9 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 13 24.5 Studies Program 2 3.8 2 hours 20 37.7 Required by my major 40 75.5 3 hours 19 35.8 Other (e.g. elective) 11 20.8 4 - 5 hours 1 1.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 57 0.0 0.0 22.8 77.2 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 57 1.8 7.0 47.4 43.9 3.3 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 55 0.0 1.8 50.9 47.3 3.5 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 57 0.0 1.8 57.9 40.4 3.4 0.53 5. Grading was fair and consistent 57 0.0 0.0 38.6 61.4 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 57 0.0 0.0 38.6 61.4 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 57 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 57 0.0 8.8 42.1 49.1 3.4 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 57 0.0 3.5 36.8 59.6 3.6 0.57 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 57 0.0 1.8 38.6 59.6 3.6 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 56 0.0 3.6 42.9 53.6 3.5 0.57 12. Satisfact answered class questions 57 1.8 3.5 36.8 57.9 3.5 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 7.3 41.8 50.9 3.4 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 57 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 51 0.0 3.9 60.8 35.3 3.3 0.55 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 55 0.0 3.6 52.7 43.6 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 51 0.0 2.0 60.8 37.3 3.4 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 0.0 0.0 50.9 49.1 3.5 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 1.9 18.9 43.4 35.8 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 55 0.0 9.1 38.2 52.7 3.4 0.66 21. Overall quality of teaching 54 0.0 1.9 29.6 68.5 3.7 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 77 Number of forms scanned = 75 Number of forms with at least one student response = 57 Percent completed = 74.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 636 001L1 SYSTEMS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Baer, Ruth A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 80.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 627 001S1 PROSEM PHYSIOLOG PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 63.6 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 36.4 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 45.5 3 hours 5 45.5 Other (e.g. elective) 6 54.5 4 - 5 hours 4 36.4 6 - 7 hours 1 9.1 8 or more hours 1 9.1 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.29 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 12 8.3 16.7 25.0 50.0 3.2 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 12 0.0 16.7 41.7 41.7 3.3 0.75 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 3.2 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 12 0.0 25.0 41.7 33.3 3.1 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 8 0.0 0.0 87.5 12.5 3.1 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 10.0 90.0 0.0 2.9 0.32 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 8.3 41.7 50.0 3.4 0.67 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 12 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 8.3 50.0 41.7 3.3 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 15 Number of forms scanned = 15 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 80.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 767 001S1 TOPICAL SEMINAR IN BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bardo, Michael T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 20.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 20.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 002L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 40.0 Sophomore 2 6.7 B 13 43.3 Junior 16 53.3 C 5 16.7 Senior 6 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 16.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 10.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 36.7 Required by my major 18 60.0 3 hours 8 26.7 Other (e.g. elective) 12 40.0 4 - 5 hours 7 23.3 6 - 7 hours 1 3.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 35 0.0 0.0 25.7 74.3 3.7 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 2.9 5.7 25.7 65.7 3.5 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 0.0 37.1 62.9 3.6 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 5.7 31.4 62.9 3.6 0.61 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 0.0 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 8. Graded assignments included comments 34 0.0 2.9 58.8 38.2 3.4 0.54 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 0.0 5.7 31.4 62.9 3.6 0.61 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 11.4 88.6 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 29 0.0 0.0 37.9 62.1 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 34 0.0 8.8 32.4 58.8 3.5 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 34 5.9 8.8 47.1 38.2 3.2 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 29 0.0 6.9 37.9 55.2 3.5 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 31 0.0 3.2 58.1 38.7 3.4 0.55 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 35 0.0 0.0 25.7 74.3 3.7 0.44 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 33 0.0 12.1 39.4 48.5 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 34.3 62.9 3.6 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 44 Number of forms scanned = 43 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 79.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 632 001L1 CLINICAL METHODOLOGY II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Berry, David T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 1 14.3 Required by my major 6 85.7 3 hours 3 42.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 14.3 6 - 7 hours 2 28.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 14.3 14.3 71.4 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 001L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 9 20.5 A 20 45.5 Sophomore 21 47.7 B 18 40.9 Junior 4 9.1 C 5 11.4 Senior 9 20.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 2.3 Pass or Audit 1 2.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 17 38.6 Studies Program 3 6.8 2 hours 18 40.9 Required by my major 27 61.4 3 hours 6 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 14 31.8 4 - 5 hours 2 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 0.0 52.3 47.7 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 43 2.3 16.3 55.8 25.6 3.0 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 3.4 6.9 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 0.0 4.7 44.2 51.2 3.5 0.59 5. Grading was fair and consistent 43 2.3 2.3 48.8 46.5 3.4 0.66 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 34 5.9 5.9 41.2 47.1 3.3 0.84 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 43 0.0 0.0 39.5 60.5 3.6 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 11.1 38.9 22.2 27.8 2.7 1.03 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 0.0 6.8 56.8 36.4 3.3 0.59 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 37 0.0 0.0 56.8 43.2 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 44 0.0 2.3 47.7 50.0 3.5 0.55 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 44 4.5 11.4 50.0 34.1 3.1 0.80 14. Encouraged class participation 44 0.0 2.3 45.5 52.3 3.5 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 5.3 68.4 26.3 3.2 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 38 0.0 10.5 52.6 36.8 3.3 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 36 0.0 11.1 58.3 30.6 3.2 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 44 0.0 4.5 52.3 43.2 3.4 0.58 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 43 2.3 25.6 44.2 27.9 3.0 0.80 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 0.0 13.6 43.2 43.2 3.3 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 2.3 15.9 34.1 47.7 3.3 0.82. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 145 Number of forms scanned = 145 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 30.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 401L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bhatt, Ramesh ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 11.8 A 7 41.2 Sophomore 3 17.6 B 8 47.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 2 11.8 Senior 8 47.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 11.8 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 11.8 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 64.7 Studies Program 2 12.5 2 hours 3 17.6 Required by my major 2 12.5 3 hours 2 11.8 Other (e.g. elective) 12 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 5.9 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 52.6 47.4 3.5 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 70.6 23.5 3.2 0.53 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 13 0.0 7.7 76.9 15.4 3.1 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 10.5 36.8 52.6 3.4 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 5.3 47.4 47.4 3.4 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 42.1 57.9 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 29.4 52.9 17.6 2.9 0.70 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 0.0 5.3 63.2 31.6 3.3 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 11. Was available for consultation 14 0.0 0.0 64.3 35.7 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 0.0 73.7 21.1 3.1 0.66 14. Encouraged class participation 19 0.0 0.0 57.9 42.1 3.4 0.51 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 0.0 76.5 23.5 3.2 0.44 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 83.3 16.7 3.2 0.38 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 11.8 70.6 17.6 3.1 0.56 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 0.0 63.2 36.8 3.4 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 10.5 21.1 57.9 10.5 2.7 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 72.2 22.2 3.2 0.51 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 5.6 55.6 38.9 3.3 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 28 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 67.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 331 001L1 PSYCHOLOGY OF ADJUSTMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Tamara ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 44.2 Sophomore 5 9.6 B 24 46.2 Junior 17 32.7 C 2 3.8 Senior 30 57.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 5.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 34.6 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 18 34.6 Required by my major 11 21.6 3 hours 10 19.2 Other (e.g. elective) 40 78.4 4 - 5 hours 6 11.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 55 0.0 0.0 38.2 61.8 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 55 3.6 3.6 38.2 54.5 3.4 0.74 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 54 0.0 3.7 59.3 37.0 3.3 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 55 0.0 10.9 43.6 45.5 3.3 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 55 0.0 10.9 45.5 43.6 3.3 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 55 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 55 0.0 7.3 45.5 47.3 3.4 0.63 8. Graded assignments included comments 53 0.0 13.2 34.0 52.8 3.4 0.72 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 55 0.0 0.0 32.7 67.3 3.7 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 55 0.0 0.0 30.9 69.1 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 48 0.0 0.0 39.6 60.4 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 55 0.0 3.6 34.5 61.8 3.6 0.57 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 55 0.0 1.8 45.5 52.7 3.5 0.54 14. Encouraged class participation 55 0.0 0.0 21.8 78.2 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 55 0.0 1.8 70.9 27.3 3.3 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 55 1.8 9.1 63.6 25.5 3.1 0.64 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 50 2.0 12.0 66.0 20.0 3.0 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 55 1.8 0.0 54.5 43.6 3.4 0.60 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 53 0.0 28.3 50.9 20.8 2.9 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 54 0.0 1.9 51.9 46.3 3.4 0.54 21. Overall quality of teaching 53 0.0 1.9 22.6 75.5 3.7 0.49. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 25.0 0.0 50.0 25.0 2.8 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 70 Number of forms scanned = 69 Number of forms with at least one student response = 55 Percent completed = 78.6 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 331 401L1 PSYCHOLOGY OF ADJUSTMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Brown, Tamara ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 39.1 Sophomore 1 4.3 B 10 43.5 Junior 10 43.5 C 3 13.0 Senior 11 47.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 4.3 Pass or Audit 1 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 30.4 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 9 39.1 Required by my major 4 17.4 3 hours 5 21.7 Other (e.g. elective) 19 82.6 4 - 5 hours 1 4.3 6 - 7 hours 1 4.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 24 0.0 4.2 41.7 54.2 3.5 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 12.5 41.7 45.8 3.3 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 4.2 54.2 41.7 3.4 0.58 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 24 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 24 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 24 0.0 0.0 20.8 79.2 3.8 0.41 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 24 0.0 0.0 29.2 70.8 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 4.3 60.9 30.4 3.2 0.72 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 4.5 9.1 50.0 36.4 3.2 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 13.0 52.2 30.4 3.1 0.79 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 4.2 29.2 66.7 3.6 0.58 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 3.9 0.28. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 61 Number of forms scanned = 60 Number of forms with at least one student response = 24 Percent completed = 39.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 223 002L1 DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 41 41.8 A 27 27.8 Sophomore 35 35.7 B 56 57.7 Junior 12 12.2 C 14 14.4 Senior 9 9.2 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 1.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 27 28.1 Studies Program 14 14.7 2 hours 30 31.3 Required by my major 39 41.1 3 hours 23 24.0 Other (e.g. elective) 42 44.2 4 - 5 hours 15 15.6 6 - 7 hours 1 1.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 103 0.0 0.0 31.1 68.9 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 103 1.0 3.9 35.0 60.2 3.5 0.62 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 89 1.1 1.1 48.3 49.4 3.5 0.58 4. Exams reflected what was taught 103 1.0 5.8 33.0 60.2 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 103 0.0 1.9 31.1 67.0 3.7 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 78 0.0 2.6 41.0 56.4 3.5 0.55 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 96 0.0 1.0 36.5 62.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 55 1.8 18.2 36.4 43.6 3.2 0.81 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 103 0.0 1.9 19.4 78.6 3.8 0.47 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 103 0.0 0.0 15.5 84.5 3.8 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 98 0.0 3.1 29.6 67.3 3.6 0.54 12. Satisfact answered class questions 103 0.0 1.0 15.5 83.5 3.8 0.41 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 103 1.0 0.0 19.4 79.6 3.8 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 102 0.0 1.0 29.4 69.6 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 98 0.0 3.1 37.8 59.2 3.6 0.56 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 98 0.0 3.1 36.7 60.2 3.6 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 93 0.0 6.5 36.6 57.0 3.5 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 100 0.0 0.0 27.0 73.0 3.7 0.45 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 99 0.0 5.1 32.3 62.6 3.6 0.59 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 102 0.0 2.9 27.5 69.6 3.7 0.53 21. Overall quality of teaching 102 1.0 2.0 11.8 85.3 3.8 0.50. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 12 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.52 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 168 Number of forms scanned = 114 Number of forms with at least one student response = 103 Percent completed = 61.3 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 710 002S1 TOP SEM IN CLINICAL PSY: PSYCHOPHYS FATIGUE,PAIN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carlson, Charles R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 2 40.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 3 60.0 4 - 5 hours 3 60.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 0.0 80.0 3.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 623 001S1 PROSEM SENSATION AND PERCEPTION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 40.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 20.0 0.0 60.0 20.0 2.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 2.8 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 25.0 75.0 0.0 2.8 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 0.0 20.0 80.0 0.0 2.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 2.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 780 004S1 PROBLEMS IN PSYCHOLOGY: HUMAN FACTORS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Carswell, Catherine M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 60.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 40.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 5 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 20.0 20.0 60.0 3.4 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 312 001L1 BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fillmore, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 43.3 Sophomore 1 3.3 B 15 50.0 Junior 19 63.3 C 2 6.7 Senior 9 30.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 3.3 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 13.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 40.0 Required by my major 24 80.0 3 hours 10 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 6 20.0 4 - 5 hours 4 13.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 32 0.0 3.1 46.9 50.0 3.5 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 32 0.0 15.6 53.1 31.3 3.2 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 63.6 36.4 3.4 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 32 3.1 0.0 40.6 56.3 3.5 0.67 5. Grading was fair and consistent 31 0.0 0.0 41.9 58.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 31 0.0 0.0 38.7 61.3 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 10.5 42.1 42.1 3.2 0.85 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 32 0.0 0.0 46.9 53.1 3.5 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 32 0.0 0.0 28.1 71.9 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 56.7 43.3 3.4 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 32 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 32 0.0 18.8 34.4 46.9 3.3 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 31 0.0 9.7 51.6 38.7 3.3 0.64 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 8.0 56.0 36.0 3.3 0.61 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 3.2 54.8 41.9 3.4 0.56 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 26 0.0 11.5 46.2 42.3 3.3 0.68 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 31 0.0 0.0 51.6 48.4 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 3.1 18.8 43.8 34.4 3.1 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 32 0.0 12.5 43.8 43.8 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 32 0.0 0.0 34.4 65.6 3.7 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 65 Number of forms scanned = 63 Number of forms with at least one student response = 32 Percent completed = 49.2 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 535 001L1 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fillmore, Mark ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 7 53.8 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 38.5 Junior 4 30.8 C 1 7.7 Senior 7 53.8 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 15.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 4 30.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 4 30.8 Required by my major 2 15.4 3 hours 2 15.4 Other (e.g. elective) 11 84.6 4 - 5 hours 2 15.4 6 - 7 hours 1 7.7 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 4. Exams reflected what was taught 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 5. Grading was fair and consistent 14 0.0 0.0 35.7 64.3 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 8. Graded assignments included comments 13 0.0 7.7 23.1 69.2 3.6 0.65 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 14 0.0 7.1 28.6 64.3 3.6 0.65 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 14 0.0 0.0 7.1 92.9 3.9 0.27 11. Was available for consultation 13 0.0 0.0 15.4 84.6 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 14 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 13 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.77 14. Encouraged class participation 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 14 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 14 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 14 0.0 7.1 35.7 57.1 3.5 0.65 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 7.1 21.4 71.4 3.6 0.63. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 14 Percent completed = 70.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 533 001L1 ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Giancola, Peter ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 48.6 Sophomore 3 8.6 B 14 40.0 Junior 15 42.9 C 3 8.6 Senior 15 42.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 5.7 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 2.9 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 10 29.4 Studies Program 1 2.9 2 hours 12 35.3 Required by my major 13 37.1 3 hours 10 29.4 Other (e.g. elective) 21 60.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 1 2.9 8 or more hours 1 2.9 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 37 0.0 0.0 29.7 70.3 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 35 0.0 2.9 22.9 74.3 3.7 0.52 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 33 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 37 0.0 2.7 29.7 67.6 3.6 0.54 5. Grading was fair and consistent 36 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 36 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.44 8. Graded assignments included comments 33 3.0 6.1 33.3 57.6 3.5 0.75 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 37 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 37 0.0 0.0 21.6 78.4 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 34 2.9 0.0 23.5 73.5 3.7 0.64 12. Satisfact answered class questions 37 0.0 2.7 18.9 78.4 3.8 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 37 0.0 0.0 24.3 75.7 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 36 0.0 2.8 44.4 52.8 3.5 0.56 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 4.0 44.0 52.0 3.5 0.59 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 31 0.0 0.0 48.4 51.6 3.5 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 27 0.0 3.7 66.7 29.6 3.3 0.53 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 37 0.0 0.0 35.1 64.9 3.6 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 37 0.0 8.1 21.6 70.3 3.6 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 37 0.0 2.7 18.9 78.4 3.8 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 37 0.0 2.7 2.7 94.6 3.9 0.36. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 3 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 53 Number of forms scanned = 37 Number of forms with at least one student response = 37 Percent completed = 69.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 624 001S1 PROSEM IN SOCIAL PSY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kern, Monica J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 9 90.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 1 10.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 60.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 40.0 4 - 5 hours 2 20.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 8 80.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 4. Exams reflected what was taught 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 20.0 30.0 50.0 3.3 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 14. Encouraged class participation 9 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 10.0 20.0 70.0 3.6 0.70 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Psychology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = PSY 195 004L1 ORIENTATION TO PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kim, Sunghee ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 26.7 A 0 0.0 Sophomore 7 46.7 B 0 0.0 Junior 3 20.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 1 6.7 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 15 100.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University