****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 350 401L1 TOPICS IN SOCIOLOGY: JURY RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 50.0 Sophomore 2 7.1 B 10 35.7 Junior 6 21.4 C 3 10.7 Senior 19 67.9 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 3.6 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 18 64.3 Studies Program 1 3.6 2 hours 7 25.0 Required by my major 3 10.7 3 hours 3 10.7 Other (e.g. elective) 24 85.7 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 29 3.4 17.2 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 28 7.1 3.6 53.6 35.7 3.2 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 27 3.7 7.4 63.0 25.9 3.1 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 28 3.6 14.3 46.4 35.7 3.1 0.80 5. Grading was fair and consistent 29 3.4 17.2 48.3 31.0 3.1 0.80 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 28 0.0 3.6 67.9 28.6 3.3 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 29 0.0 3.4 55.2 41.4 3.4 0.56 8. Graded assignments included comments 27 0.0 29.6 48.1 22.2 2.9 0.73 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 29 10.3 13.8 55.2 20.7 2.9 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 29 0.0 3.4 65.5 31.0 3.3 0.53 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 3.8 61.5 34.6 3.3 0.55 12. Satisfact answered class questions 29 0.0 20.7 55.2 24.1 3.0 0.68 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 29 10.3 31.0 31.0 27.6 2.8 0.99 14. Encouraged class participation 27 3.7 7.4 59.3 29.6 3.1 0.72 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 4.2 12.5 54.2 29.2 3.1 0.78 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 27 3.7 14.8 55.6 25.9 3.0 0.76 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 8.0 16.0 52.0 24.0 2.9 0.86 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 27 3.7 11.1 59.3 25.9 3.1 0.73 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 7.7 26.9 42.3 23.1 2.8 0.90 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 27 11.1 22.2 40.7 25.9 2.8 0.96 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 8.0 28.0 36.0 28.0 2.8 0.94. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 29 Percent completed = 60.4 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 418 401L1 SOCIAL CHANGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Abbott, Walter F ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 42.9 Sophomore 3 10.7 B 10 35.7 Junior 12 42.9 C 4 14.3 Senior 12 42.9 D 1 3.6 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 3.6 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 21 75.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 17.9 Required by my major 3 10.7 3 hours 2 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 25 89.3 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 3.3 13.3 53.3 30.0 3.1 0.76 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 15 20.0 6.7 46.7 26.7 2.8 1.08 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 4.3 13.0 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 10.0 23.3 46.7 20.0 2.8 0.90 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 6.7 10.0 60.0 23.3 3.0 0.79 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 4.8 14.3 57.1 23.8 3.0 0.77 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 4.0 0.0 60.0 36.0 3.3 0.68 8. Graded assignments included comments 20 0.0 5.0 80.0 15.0 3.1 0.45 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 10.0 23.3 40.0 26.7 2.8 0.95 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 3.3 0.0 36.7 60.0 3.5 0.68 11. Was available for consultation 25 4.0 4.0 48.0 44.0 3.3 0.75 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 6.7 0.0 50.0 43.3 3.3 0.79 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 20.0 10.0 43.3 26.7 2.8 1.07 14. Encouraged class participation 30 6.7 23.3 46.7 23.3 2.9 0.86 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 8.3 4.2 62.5 25.0 3.0 0.81 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 8.0 12.0 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.81 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 8.3 16.7 54.2 20.8 2.9 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 28 7.1 14.3 60.7 17.9 2.9 0.79 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 27 18.5 25.9 33.3 22.2 2.6 1.05 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 3.3 36.7 33.3 26.7 2.8 0.87 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 24.1 31.0 41.4 3.1 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 48 Number of forms scanned = 30 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 62.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 409 001L1 THE FAMILY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 12 52.2 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 10 43.5 Junior 2 8.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 20 87.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 1 4.3 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 4.3 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 11 45.8 Required by my major 6 25.0 3 hours 7 29.2 Other (e.g. elective) 18 75.0 4 - 5 hours 1 4.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 7.7 11.5 38.5 42.3 3.2 0.92 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 0.0 3.8 30.8 65.4 3.6 0.57 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 0.0 34.6 65.4 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 0.0 3.8 26.9 69.2 3.7 0.56 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 0.0 23.1 76.9 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 0.0 7.7 34.6 57.7 3.5 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 0.0 11.5 88.5 3.9 0.33 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 4.2 33.3 62.5 3.6 0.58 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 7.7 30.8 61.5 3.5 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 0.0 15.4 30.8 53.8 3.4 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 25 4.0 4.0 36.0 56.0 3.4 0.77 21. Overall quality of teaching 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 33 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 78.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 772 001S1 TOP SEM IN SOCIOLOGY: MOTHERHOOD INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badagliacco, Joanna M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 4 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 0 0.0 3 hours 2 40.0 Other (e.g. elective) 4 100.0 4 - 5 hours 2 40.0 6 - 7 hours 1 20.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 5 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 380 001L1 DEVEL NON-WEST SOCIETIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Burmeister, Larry L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 20.8 Sophomore 2 8.0 B 10 41.7 Junior 6 24.0 C 9 37.5 Senior 17 68.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 20.8 Studies Program 13 52.0 2 hours 5 20.8 Required by my major 5 20.0 3 hours 6 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 7 28.0 4 - 5 hours 6 25.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.3 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 26 3.8 0.0 46.2 50.0 3.4 0.70 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 26 3.8 3.8 53.8 38.5 3.3 0.72 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 26 3.8 15.4 46.2 34.6 3.1 0.82 4. Exams reflected what was taught 26 3.8 7.7 65.4 23.1 3.1 0.69 5. Grading was fair and consistent 26 3.8 11.5 57.7 26.9 3.1 0.74 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 26 0.0 15.4 57.7 26.9 3.1 0.65 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 26 23.1 26.9 38.5 11.5 2.4 0.98 8. Graded assignments included comments 26 0.0 15.4 53.8 30.8 3.2 0.67 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 26 11.5 11.5 57.7 19.2 2.8 0.88 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 26 0.0 3.8 34.6 61.5 3.6 0.58 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 26 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 3.4 0.64 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 26 15.4 19.2 46.2 19.2 2.7 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 26 0.0 23.1 57.7 19.2 3.0 0.66 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 8.7 8.7 65.2 17.4 2.9 0.79 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 8.0 20.0 52.0 20.0 2.8 0.85 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 20 10.0 15.0 65.0 10.0 2.8 0.79 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 26 0.0 19.2 61.5 19.2 3.0 0.63 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 26 26.9 26.9 42.3 3.8 2.2 0.91 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 26 7.7 26.9 50.0 15.4 2.7 0.83 21. Overall quality of teaching 26 7.7 19.2 46.2 26.9 2.9 0.89. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 6 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 9 0.0 11.1 66.7 22.2 3.1 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 9 11.1 11.1 44.4 33.3 3.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 11.1 44.4 44.4 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 38 Number of forms scanned = 26 Number of forms with at least one student response = 26 Percent completed = 68.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 260 001L1 POPULAT, RESOURC & CHNGE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Garkovich, Lorraine E ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 2 6.1 A 14 43.8 Sophomore 8 24.2 B 16 50.0 Junior 12 36.4 C 1 3.1 Senior 11 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 14 42.4 Studies Program 12 36.4 2 hours 11 33.3 Required by my major 16 48.5 3 hours 6 18.2 Other (e.g. elective) 5 15.2 4 - 5 hours 2 6.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 34 0.0 2.9 47.1 50.0 3.5 0.56 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 34 0.0 11.8 64.7 23.5 3.1 0.59 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 0.0 2.9 60.0 37.1 3.3 0.54 4. Exams reflected what was taught 35 0.0 0.0 48.6 51.4 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 35 0.0 5.7 42.9 51.4 3.5 0.61 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 2.9 0.0 37.1 60.0 3.5 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 35 2.9 2.9 45.7 48.6 3.4 0.69 8. Graded assignments included comments 35 0.0 2.9 45.7 51.4 3.5 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 35 2.9 0.0 37.1 60.0 3.5 0.66 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 35 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 11. Was available for consultation 26 0.0 0.0 42.3 57.7 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 35 0.0 0.0 31.4 68.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 35 0.0 8.6 42.9 48.6 3.4 0.65 14. Encouraged class participation 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 34 2.9 0.0 50.0 47.1 3.4 0.66 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 34 2.9 0.0 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.65 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 33 3.0 3.0 66.7 27.3 3.2 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 34 0.0 2.9 52.9 44.1 3.4 0.56 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 32 6.3 12.5 53.1 28.1 3.0 0.82 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 35 2.9 2.9 51.4 42.9 3.3 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 35 0.0 2.9 31.4 65.7 3.6 0.55. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 6 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 35 Number of forms with at least one student response = 35 Percent completed = 74.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 101 003L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 4 26.7 A 11 78.6 Sophomore 7 46.7 B 2 14.3 Junior 2 13.3 C 0 0.0 Senior 2 13.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 7.1 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 53.3 Studies Program 11 78.6 2 hours 5 33.3 Required by my major 2 14.3 3 hours 2 13.3 Other (e.g. elective) 1 7.1 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.90 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 52.9 41.2 3.4 0.61 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 8. Graded assignments included comments 16 0.0 0.0 31.3 68.8 3.7 0.48 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 11.1 16.7 72.2 3.6 0.70 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 17 0.0 0.0 17.6 82.4 3.8 0.39 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 17 0.0 11.8 47.1 41.2 3.3 0.69 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 17 0.0 17.6 35.3 47.1 3.3 0.77 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 15 0.0 20.0 33.3 46.7 3.3 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 17.6 41.2 41.2 3.2 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 5.9 17.6 76.5 3.7 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 6 0.0 16.7 33.3 50.0 3.3 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 30 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 60.0 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 439 001L1 SP TOP CRIME & DELIN: SOCIOLOGY OF LAW INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gran, Brian ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 77.8 Sophomore 1 5.6 B 3 16.7 Junior 2 11.1 C 0 0.0 Senior 15 83.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 5.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 5 27.8 3 hours 7 38.9 Other (e.g. elective) 13 72.2 4 - 5 hours 1 5.6 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.6 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 10.5 21.1 68.4 3.6 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 0.0 26.3 73.7 3.7 0.45 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 0.0 15.8 84.2 3.8 0.37 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 21.1 78.9 3.8 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 3.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 0.43 21. Overall quality of teaching 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 27 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 70.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 420 001L1 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Greider, T ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 92.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 7.1 Junior 5 35.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 64.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 5 35.7 Studies Program 1 7.1 2 hours 7 50.0 Required by my major 7 50.0 3 hours 1 7.1 Other (e.g. elective) 6 42.9 4 - 5 hours 1 7.1 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 14 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 15 0.0 0.0 53.3 46.7 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 12.5 37.5 50.0 3.4 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 15 0.0 0.0 26.7 73.3 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 15 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 15 0.0 0.0 13.3 86.7 3.9 0.35 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 15 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 13 0.0 0.0 38.5 61.5 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 15 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 15 0.0 6.7 26.7 66.7 3.6 0.63 21. Overall quality of teaching 14 0.0 0.0 21.4 78.6 3.8 0.43. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 16 Number of forms with at least one student response = 15 Percent completed = 57.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 635 001S1 SEMINAR IN SOCIAL INEQUALITIES INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Harris, R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 60.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 40.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 4 80.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 0.0 0.0 80.0 20.0 3.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 4 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 603 001L1 SEM IN TEACHING SOC INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hatch, Laurie R ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 5 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 5 100.0 3 hours 1 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 20.0 6 - 7 hours 2 40.0 8 or more hours 1 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 0.0 33.3 0.0 66.7 3.3 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 302 401L1 SOCIO RESEARCH METHS I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 26.3 Sophomore 2 10.5 B 6 31.6 Junior 7 36.8 C 6 31.6 Senior 9 47.4 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 1 5.3 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 2 10.5 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.3 Studies Program 1 5.3 2 hours 8 42.1 Required by my major 13 68.4 3 hours 4 21.1 Other (e.g. elective) 5 26.3 4 - 5 hours 5 26.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 5.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 5.3 5.3 52.6 36.8 3.2 0.79 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 10.5 10.5 26.3 52.6 3.2 1.03 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 15.8 5.3 47.4 31.6 2.9 1.03 4. Exams reflected what was taught 19 5.3 10.5 52.6 31.6 3.1 0.81 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 5.3 15.8 52.6 26.3 3.0 0.82 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 10.5 15.8 36.8 36.8 3.0 1.00 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 5.3 10.5 42.1 42.1 3.2 0.85 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 10.5 5.3 42.1 42.1 3.2 0.96 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 15.8 15.8 31.6 36.8 2.9 1.10 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 5.3 5.3 31.6 57.9 3.4 0.84 11. Was available for consultation 19 5.3 5.3 47.4 42.1 3.3 0.81 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 5.3 42.1 47.4 3.3 0.82 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 17.6 23.5 29.4 29.4 2.7 1.10 14. Encouraged class participation 19 10.5 10.5 31.6 47.4 3.2 1.01 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 16.7 16.7 55.6 11.1 2.6 0.92 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 2.8 0.94 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 11.8 17.6 58.8 11.8 2.7 0.85 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 11.1 16.7 33.3 38.9 3.0 1.03 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 25.0 37.5 25.0 12.5 2.3 1.00 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 19 26.3 5.3 36.8 31.6 2.7 1.19 21. Overall quality of teaching 19 21.1 15.8 21.1 42.1 2.8 1.21. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 19 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 73.1 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 342 001L1 ORGANIZATIONS IN SOCIETY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Hougland Jr, James G ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 15 42.9 Sophomore 3 8.8 B 15 42.9 Junior 5 14.7 C 2 5.7 Senior 26 76.5 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 3 8.6 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 15 42.9 Studies Program 15 42.9 2 hours 12 34.3 Required by my major 9 25.7 3 hours 6 17.1 Other (e.g. elective) 11 31.4 4 - 5 hours 2 5.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 40 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 40 2.5 5.0 47.5 45.0 3.4 0.70 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 40 0.0 2.5 50.0 47.5 3.5 0.55 4. Exams reflected what was taught 40 0.0 7.5 32.5 60.0 3.5 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 40 0.0 2.5 40.0 57.5 3.6 0.55 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 40 0.0 0.0 47.5 52.5 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 40 0.0 5.0 55.0 40.0 3.4 0.58 8. Graded assignments included comments 39 0.0 7.7 46.2 46.2 3.4 0.63 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 40 2.5 2.5 42.5 52.5 3.5 0.68 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 40 0.0 0.0 32.5 67.5 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 36 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 40 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 40 0.0 12.5 50.0 37.5 3.3 0.67 14. Encouraged class participation 40 0.0 0.0 42.5 57.5 3.6 0.50 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 38 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.47 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 40 0.0 5.0 62.5 32.5 3.3 0.55 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 39 0.0 20.5 53.8 25.6 3.1 0.69 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 40 0.0 0.0 52.5 47.5 3.5 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 40 0.0 27.5 47.5 25.0 3.0 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 39 0.0 5.1 59.0 35.9 3.3 0.57 21. Overall quality of teaching 39 0.0 5.1 38.5 56.4 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 28 0.0 14.3 53.6 32.1 3.2 0.67 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 32 0.0 0.0 65.6 34.4 3.3 0.48 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 33 3.0 0.0 60.6 36.4 3.3 0.64 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 9 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 19 0.0 5.3 42.1 52.6 3.5 0.61 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 60 Number of forms scanned = 40 Number of forms with at least one student response = 40 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 442G001L1 SOCIOLOGY OF WORK AND OCCUPATIONS INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 16 61.5 Sophomore 1 3.7 B 9 34.6 Junior 11 40.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 13 48.1 D 0 0.0 Graduate 2 7.4 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 1 3.8 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 11 40.7 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 29.6 Required by my major 8 29.6 3 hours 6 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 19 70.4 4 - 5 hours 2 7.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 30 0.0 6.7 53.3 40.0 3.3 0.61 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 29 10.3 13.8 62.1 13.8 2.8 0.82 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 5. Grading was fair and consistent 30 0.0 3.3 53.3 43.3 3.4 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 30 3.3 0.0 56.7 40.0 3.3 0.66 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 30 0.0 3.3 63.3 33.3 3.3 0.53 8. Graded assignments included comments 30 0.0 3.3 56.7 40.0 3.4 0.56 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 30 10.0 13.3 50.0 26.7 2.9 0.91 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 30 0.0 3.3 50.0 46.7 3.4 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 30 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 30 0.0 6.7 50.0 43.3 3.4 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 30 10.0 16.7 46.7 26.7 2.9 0.92 14. Encouraged class participation 29 0.0 10.3 58.6 31.0 3.2 0.62 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 28 0.0 3.6 71.4 25.0 3.2 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 28 7.1 3.6 53.6 35.7 3.2 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 29 6.9 3.4 65.5 24.1 3.1 0.75 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 29 3.4 0.0 69.0 27.6 3.2 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 29 13.8 13.8 48.3 24.1 2.8 0.97 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 30 10.0 13.3 36.7 40.0 3.1 0.98 21. Overall quality of teaching 29 3.4 20.7 37.9 37.9 3.1 0.86. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 47 Number of forms scanned = 31 Number of forms with at least one student response = 30 Percent completed = 63.8 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SOC 680 001L1 METHS SOCIAL INVESTIGATN INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Janoski, Thomas ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 2 66.7 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 33.3 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 4 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 3 75.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 1 25.0 4 - 5 hours 2 50.0 6 - 7 hours 1 25.0 8 or more hours 1 25.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 5 20.0 20.0 0.0 60.0 3.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 5 0.0 20.0 40.0 40.0 3.2 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 5 0.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 3.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 5 40.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 2.8 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 5 40.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 2.8 . 11. Was available for consultation 5 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . 14. Encouraged class participation 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 4 25.0 0.0 75.0 0.0 2.5 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 5 40.0 0.0 40.0 20.0 2.4 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 5 40.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 2.6 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 66.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 2.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 4 50.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 2.3 . 29. Students free to express opinions 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 5 40.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 2.2 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 5 40.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 2.2 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 7 Number of forms scanned = 5 Number of forms with at least one student response = 5 Percent completed = 71.4 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 006L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 31 70.5 A 18 40.9 Sophomore 6 13.6 B 20 45.5 Junior 6 13.6 C 5 11.4 Senior 1 2.3 D 1 2.3 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 25 56.8 Studies Program 33 75.0 2 hours 9 20.5 Required by my major 7 15.9 3 hours 7 15.9 Other (e.g. elective) 4 9.1 4 - 5 hours 2 4.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 2.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 44 0.0 4.5 70.5 25.0 3.2 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 44 2.3 18.2 54.5 25.0 3.0 0.73 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 35 2.9 14.3 60.0 22.9 3.0 0.71 4. Exams reflected what was taught 43 4.7 2.3 53.5 39.5 3.3 0.73 5. Grading was fair and consistent 44 0.0 6.8 56.8 36.4 3.3 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 35 5.7 8.6 57.1 28.6 3.1 0.78 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 41 0.0 0.0 53.7 46.3 3.5 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 8.0 44.0 24.0 24.0 2.6 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 44 9.1 20.5 56.8 13.6 2.8 0.81 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 44 0.0 6.8 63.6 29.5 3.2 0.57 11. Was available for consultation 38 0.0 7.9 60.5 31.6 3.2 0.59 12. Satisfact answered class questions 43 2.3 4.7 67.4 25.6 3.2 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 42 7.1 33.3 47.6 11.9 2.6 0.79 14. Encouraged class participation 42 2.4 19.0 61.9 16.7 2.9 0.68 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 42 0.0 0.0 76.2 23.8 3.2 0.43 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 41 2.4 19.5 63.4 14.6 2.9 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 38 2.6 26.3 60.5 10.5 2.8 0.66 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 42 0.0 9.5 69.0 21.4 3.1 0.55 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 42 7.1 33.3 52.4 7.1 2.6 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 44 2.3 31.8 52.3 13.6 2.8 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 44 6.8 29.5 54.5 9.1 2.7 0.75. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 0.0 25.0 56.3 18.8 2.9 0.68 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 25 0.0 12.0 72.0 16.0 3.0 0.54 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 17 0.0 17.6 64.7 17.6 3.0 0.61 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 14 0.0 7.1 71.4 21.4 3.1 0.53 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 13 7.7 7.7 69.2 15.4 2.9 0.76 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 74 Number of forms scanned = 46 Number of forms with at least one student response = 44 Percent completed = 59.5 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 008L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Kidanemariam, Ande ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 20 46.5 A 16 39.0 Sophomore 14 32.6 B 19 46.3 Junior 8 18.6 C 5 12.2 Senior 1 2.3 D 1 2.4 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 24 57.1 Studies Program 27 62.8 2 hours 14 33.3 Required by my major 8 18.6 3 hours 4 9.5 Other (e.g. elective) 8 18.6 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 49 2.0 6.1 71.4 20.4 3.1 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 49 4.1 8.2 65.3 22.4 3.1 0.69 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 41 9.8 7.3 73.2 9.8 2.8 0.74 4. Exams reflected what was taught 49 4.1 10.2 63.3 22.4 3.0 0.71 5. Grading was fair and consistent 47 4.3 6.4 66.0 23.4 3.1 0.69 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 42 7.1 11.9 66.7 14.3 2.9 0.74 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 46 2.2 2.2 71.7 23.9 3.2 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 32 12.5 31.3 43.8 12.5 2.6 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 49 6.1 18.4 55.1 20.4 2.9 0.80 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 49 2.0 2.0 63.3 32.7 3.3 0.60 11. Was available for consultation 38 2.6 21.1 57.9 18.4 2.9 0.71 12. Satisfact answered class questions 49 4.1 4.1 63.3 28.6 3.2 0.69 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 49 8.2 24.5 51.0 16.3 2.8 0.83 14. Encouraged class participation 48 4.2 12.5 64.6 18.8 3.0 0.70 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 47 6.4 8.5 68.1 17.0 3.0 0.72 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 46 6.5 21.7 56.5 15.2 2.8 0.78 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 46 6.5 37.0 43.5 13.0 2.6 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 48 2.1 6.3 70.8 20.8 3.1 0.59 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 46 6.5 41.3 43.5 8.7 2.5 0.75 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 49 6.1 26.5 53.1 14.3 2.8 0.78 21. Overall quality of teaching 47 8.5 25.5 42.6 23.4 2.8 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 16 6.3 25.0 56.3 12.5 2.8 0.77 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 22 4.5 18.2 54.5 22.7 3.0 0.79 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 15 13.3 6.7 60.0 20.0 2.9 0.92 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 11 9.1 18.2 54.5 18.2 2.8 0.87 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 11 9.1 9.1 63.6 18.2 2.9 0.83 SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 77 Number of forms scanned = 49 Number of forms with at least one student response = 49 Percent completed = 63.6 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Arts and Sciences DEPARTMENT = Sociology FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SOC 101 401L1 INTRODUCTORY SOCIOLOGY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Leedham, Cynthia A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 12 54.5 A 9 40.9 Sophomore 2 9.1 B 9 40.9 Junior 5 22.7 C 2 9.1 Senior 1 4.5 D 2 9.1 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 2 9.1 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 8 36.4 Studies Program 17 77.3 2 hours 7 31.8 Required by my major 3 13.6 3 hours 3 13.6 Other (e.g. elective) 2 9.1 4 - 5 hours 4 18.2 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 0.0 8.7 73.9 17.4 3.1 0.51 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 0.0 13.0 43.5 43.5 3.3 0.70 4. Exams reflected what was taught 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 56.5 34.8 3.3 0.62 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 13.0 87.0 3.9 0.34 11. Was available for consultation 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 22 4.5 18.2 40.9 36.4 3.1 0.87 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 47.8 47.8 3.4 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 4.8 57.1 38.1 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 13.6 54.5 31.8 3.2 0.66 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 28.6 38.1 33.3 3.0 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 4.5 59.1 36.4 3.3 0.57 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 14.3 28.6 42.9 14.3 2.6 0.93 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 4.5 13.6 54.5 27.3 3.0 0.79 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 0.0 4.5 45.5 50.0 3.5 0.60. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 10 0.0 10.0 80.0 10.0 3.0 0.47 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 12 0.0 0.0 75.0 25.0 3.3 0.45 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 13 0.0 0.0 61.5 38.5 3.4 0.51 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 3 0.0 33.3 66.7 0.0 2.7 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 35 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 65.7 % *********************************************************************** * WARNING: THE RESPONSE RATE FOR THIS CLASS WAS LESS THAN 66.7%. * * Research shows that results may not be valid if more than a third * * of the class is absent or does not respond. * *********************************************************************** For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** *****************************************