****************************************************************************** * * * Please note that these results DO NOT INCLUDE: * * * * * Course sections taught by a TA * * * Discussion, Laboratory, Independent Study, Practicum, or * * Residency course sections (results contain only LECTURES * * and SEMINARS) * * * Any course section with fewer than 5 evaluations returned * * * * Given for each item are the number responding (N), the percentage that * * strongly disagreed, the percentage that disagreed, the percentage that * * agreed, the percentage that strongly agreed, the mean, and the standard * * deviation (SD). * * * * To view a specific course or instructor, plese use the FIND feature on * * your web browser. * * * ****************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 222 002L1 DEVELOPMENT SOC WELFARE INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Amato-von Hemert, Katherin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 78.6 Sophomore 8 53.3 B 3 21.4 Junior 4 26.7 C 0 0.0 Senior 3 20.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 6.7 Studies Program 1 6.7 2 hours 7 46.7 Required by my major 12 80.0 3 hours 3 20.0 Other (e.g. elective) 2 13.3 4 - 5 hours 4 26.7 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 11.8 52.9 35.3 3.2 0.66 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 5.9 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.62 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 17 0.0 0.0 47.1 52.9 3.5 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 17.6 29.4 52.9 3.4 0.79 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 5.9 0.0 47.1 47.1 3.4 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 5.9 0.0 29.4 64.7 3.5 0.80 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 5.9 5.9 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.86 14. Encouraged class participation 17 5.9 0.0 35.3 58.8 3.5 0.80 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 6.3 43.8 50.0 3.4 0.63 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 6.3 37.5 56.3 3.5 0.63 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 12.5 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.73 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 16 6.3 6.3 31.3 56.3 3.4 0.89 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 17 0.0 11.8 35.3 52.9 3.4 0.71 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 0.0 29.4 64.7 3.5 0.80. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 19 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 89.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 730 001L1 ADV SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY AND SERVICES I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Amato-von Hemert, Katherin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 75.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 25.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 3 37.5 Required by my major 8 100.0 3 hours 3 37.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 12.5 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 1 12.5 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 14.3 0.0 85.7 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 3.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 9 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 88.9 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 400 001L1 SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anderson, Dinah ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 47.1 Sophomore 1 5.9 B 7 41.2 Junior 7 41.2 C 1 5.9 Senior 9 52.9 D 1 5.9 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 5.9 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 2 11.8 Required by my major 17 100.0 3 hours 6 35.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 6 35.3 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 2 11.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 17 0.0 5.9 76.5 17.6 3.1 0.49 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 5.6 16.7 44.4 33.3 3.1 0.87 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 5.6 27.8 38.9 27.8 2.9 0.90 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 27.8 38.9 33.3 3.1 0.80 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 5.6 0.0 50.0 44.4 3.3 0.77 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 44.4 55.6 3.6 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 5.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.79 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 5.6 22.2 33.3 38.9 3.1 0.94 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 5.6 27.8 66.7 3.6 0.61 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 11.1 55.6 33.3 3.2 0.65 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 11.1 38.9 50.0 3.4 0.70 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 17 0.0 11.8 41.2 47.1 3.4 0.70 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 5.6 16.7 33.3 44.4 3.2 0.92 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 5.6 22.2 38.9 33.3 3.0 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 5.9 17.6 41.2 35.3 3.1 0.90. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 2.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 3.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 18 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 720 001L1 SW PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Anderson, Dinah ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 3 42.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 4 57.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 7 100.0 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 71.4 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 14.3 0.0 42.9 42.9 3.1 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 28.6 28.6 28.6 14.3 2.3 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 2.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 7 0.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 3.0 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 3.3 . 11. Was available for consultation 4 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 7 0.0 0.0 85.7 14.3 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . 14. Encouraged class participation 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 7 0.0 14.3 42.9 42.9 3.3 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 7 0.0 14.3 57.1 28.6 3.1 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 7 0.0 28.6 28.6 42.9 3.1 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 7 14.3 14.3 28.6 42.9 3.0 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 7 0.0 28.6 57.1 14.3 2.9 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 8 Number of forms scanned = 7 Number of forms with at least one student response = 7 Percent completed = 87.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 700 201L1 ADV GENERALIST SOC WRK PRACT I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Badger, Karen ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 18 72.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 7 28.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 4.0 2 hours 2 8.0 Required by my major 24 96.0 3 hours 8 32.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 11 44.0 6 - 7 hours 2 8.0 8 or more hours 2 8.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 15 0.0 0.0 46.7 53.3 3.5 0.52 5. Grading was fair and consistent 24 0.0 0.0 45.8 54.2 3.5 0.51 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 25 0.0 0.0 52.0 48.0 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 24 0.0 0.0 12.5 87.5 3.9 0.34 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 12.0 88.0 3.9 0.33 11. Was available for consultation 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 0.0 24.0 76.0 3.8 0.44 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 0.0 36.0 64.0 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.41 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 24 0.0 0.0 54.2 45.8 3.5 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 24 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 24 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 0.0 44.0 56.0 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 12.0 52.0 36.0 3.2 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.49 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 28 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 89.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 445 003O1 EDUCATIONAL PRACTICUM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Barnett, Carol J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 9 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 1 11.1 Required by my major 9 100.0 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 7 77.8 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 9 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 10 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 0.42 11. Was available for consultation 9 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 3.8 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 14. Encouraged class participation 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 10 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.48 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 10 0.0 10.0 40.0 50.0 3.4 0.70 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32 21. Overall quality of teaching 10 0.0 0.0 10.0 90.0 3.9 0.32. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 10 Percent completed = 83.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 750 201L1 RESEARCH DESIGN & IMPLE- MENTATION IN SW PRACT I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Beckman, DeAnna A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 90.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 9.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 22 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 9.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 23.8 Required by my major 21 100.0 3 hours 8 38.1 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 19.0 6 - 7 hours 2 9.5 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 21 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 20.0 80.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 20 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 36.8 63.2 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 22 0.0 0.0 31.8 68.2 3.7 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 22 0.0 0.0 22.7 77.3 3.8 0.43 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 8.7 34.8 56.5 3.5 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.49 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 34.8 65.2 3.7 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 8.7 52.2 39.1 3.3 0.63 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 4.3 34.8 60.9 3.6 0.59 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 8.7 39.1 47.8 3.3 0.82 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 4.8 4.8 38.1 52.4 3.4 0.80 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 3.4 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 21.7 39.1 34.8 3.0 0.88 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 13.0 47.8 39.1 3.3 0.69 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 8.7 26.1 65.2 3.6 0.66. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 88.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 420 001L1 HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bender, Brenda C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 5 29.4 Sophomore 2 11.1 B 8 47.1 Junior 10 55.6 C 4 23.5 Senior 6 33.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 18 100.0 3 hours 4 22.2 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 27.8 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 19 0.0 21.1 47.4 31.6 3.1 0.74 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 19 0.0 5.3 57.9 36.8 3.3 0.58 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 19 0.0 10.5 63.2 26.3 3.2 0.60 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 16.7 61.1 22.2 3.1 0.64 5. Grading was fair and consistent 19 0.0 31.6 63.2 5.3 2.7 0.56 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 19 0.0 0.0 68.4 31.6 3.3 0.48 8. Graded assignments included comments 19 5.3 31.6 36.8 26.3 2.8 0.90 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 19 10.5 26.3 47.4 15.8 2.7 0.89 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 19 0.0 15.8 57.9 26.3 3.1 0.66 11. Was available for consultation 19 0.0 0.0 78.9 21.1 3.2 0.42 12. Satisfact answered class questions 19 5.3 10.5 73.7 10.5 2.9 0.66 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 19 5.3 21.1 57.9 15.8 2.8 0.76 14. Encouraged class participation 19 5.3 15.8 57.9 21.1 2.9 0.78 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 19 0.0 15.8 63.2 21.1 3.1 0.62 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 5.6 11.1 66.7 16.7 2.9 0.73 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 5.6 16.7 61.1 16.7 2.9 0.76 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 19 0.0 5.3 73.7 21.1 3.2 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 19 0.0 26.3 57.9 15.8 2.9 0.66 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 27.8 55.6 16.7 2.9 0.68 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 11.8 35.3 41.2 11.8 2.5 0.87. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 21 Number of forms scanned = 20 Number of forms with at least one student response = 19 Percent completed = 90.5 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 741 202O1 ADVANCED GRADUATE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICUM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Bowling, Linda ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 10 90.9 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 1 9.1 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 11 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 2 18.2 2 hours 2 18.2 Required by my major 9 81.8 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 4 36.4 8 or more hours 3 27.3 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 12 0.0 8.3 25.0 66.7 3.6 0.67 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 8. Graded assignments included comments 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 10.0 10.0 80.0 3.7 0.67 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 9.1 9.1 81.8 3.7 0.65 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 14. Encouraged class participation 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 12 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 12 0.0 0.0 41.7 58.3 3.6 0.51 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 12 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 12 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.39. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 28. Guided student report preparation 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 29. Students free to express opinions 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 3 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 13 Number of forms scanned = 13 Number of forms with at least one student response = 12 Percent completed = 92.3 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 730 201L1 ADV SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY AND SERVICES I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Christiansen, David C ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 23 92.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 8.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 25 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 25 100.0 3 hours 6 24.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 10 40.0 6 - 7 hours 4 16.0 8 or more hours 5 20.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 4. Exams reflected what was taught 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 5. Grading was fair and consistent 25 0.0 16.0 48.0 36.0 3.2 0.71 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 24 8.3 37.5 29.2 25.0 2.7 0.95 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 25 0.0 4.0 56.0 40.0 3.4 0.57 8. Graded assignments included comments 25 4.0 32.0 36.0 28.0 2.9 0.88 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 25 0.0 0.0 60.0 40.0 3.4 0.50 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 25 0.0 0.0 28.0 72.0 3.7 0.46 11. Was available for consultation 22 0.0 0.0 72.7 27.3 3.3 0.46 12. Satisfact answered class questions 25 0.0 4.0 48.0 48.0 3.4 0.58 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 25 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 3.3 0.69 14. Encouraged class participation 25 0.0 8.0 36.0 56.0 3.5 0.65 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 25 0.0 12.0 36.0 52.0 3.4 0.71 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 25 0.0 4.0 40.0 56.0 3.5 0.59 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 25 0.0 8.0 48.0 44.0 3.4 0.64 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 25 0.0 8.0 44.0 48.0 3.4 0.65 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 25 0.0 20.0 48.0 32.0 3.1 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 24 0.0 8.3 54.2 37.5 3.3 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 24 0.0 4.2 45.8 50.0 3.5 0.59. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 25 Number of forms with at least one student response = 25 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 601 201L1 SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Conklin, Barbara A ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 8 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 2 28.6 2 hours 1 12.5 Required by my major 5 71.4 3 hours 5 62.5 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 25.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 8 0.0 0.0 62.5 37.5 3.4 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 8 12.5 50.0 37.5 0.0 2.3 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 7 0.0 0.0 57.1 42.9 3.4 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 8 0.0 25.0 37.5 37.5 3.1 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 14.3 28.6 57.1 3.4 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 8 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 3.3 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 7 0.0 28.6 42.9 28.6 3.0 . 11. Was available for consultation 6 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 3.3 . 12. Satisfact answered class questions 8 0.0 12.5 62.5 25.0 3.1 . 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 8 0.0 50.0 12.5 37.5 2.9 . 14. Encouraged class participation 8 0.0 37.5 37.5 25.0 2.9 . SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 8 0.0 50.0 12.5 37.5 2.9 . 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 8 0.0 25.0 62.5 12.5 2.9 . 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 8 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 2.8 . % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 8 12.5 37.5 37.5 12.5 2.5 . 21. Overall quality of teaching 8 0.0 50.0 37.5 12.5 2.6 . . % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 12 Number of forms scanned = 8 Number of forms with at least one student response = 8 Percent completed = 66.7 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 444 003O1 EDUCATIONAL PRACTICUM I INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Dawson, Steven H ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 11 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 11 100.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 18.2 Studies Program 1 9.1 2 hours 1 9.1 Required by my major 10 90.9 3 hours 0 0.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 8 72.7 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 4. Exams reflected what was taught 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 10 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 3.8 0.40 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 9.1 54.5 36.4 3.3 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 720 202L1 SW PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Elliott, Willie L ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 21 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 20 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 14.3 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 8 38.1 Required by my major 21 100.0 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 5 23.8 6 - 7 hours 1 4.8 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 8.7 13.0 52.2 26.1 3.0 0.88 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 17.4 39.1 30.4 13.0 2.4 0.94 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 23 8.7 17.4 60.9 13.0 2.8 0.80 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 11.8 17.6 47.1 23.5 2.8 0.95 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 4.3 4.3 73.9 17.4 3.0 0.64 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 4.3 8.7 56.5 30.4 3.1 0.76 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 4.3 65.2 30.4 3.3 0.54 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 8.7 30.4 34.8 26.1 2.8 0.95 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 8.7 34.8 26.1 30.4 2.8 1.00 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 65.2 34.8 3.3 0.49 11. Was available for consultation 23 4.3 0.0 69.6 26.1 3.2 0.65 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 8.7 4.3 52.2 34.8 3.1 0.87 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 8.7 26.1 34.8 30.4 2.9 0.97 14. Encouraged class participation 23 4.3 13.0 43.5 39.1 3.2 0.83 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 23 4.3 4.3 69.6 21.7 3.1 0.67 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 23 4.3 21.7 52.2 21.7 2.9 0.79 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 23 4.3 30.4 43.5 21.7 2.8 0.83 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 23 4.3 13.0 65.2 17.4 3.0 0.71 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 23 4.3 26.1 56.5 13.0 2.8 0.74 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 22 13.6 31.8 40.9 13.6 2.5 0.91 21. Overall quality of teaching 22 18.2 40.9 18.2 22.7 2.5 1.06. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 24 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 95.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 430 001L1 SOCIAL WELF POLCY:THRY & IMPLEMENTATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ersing, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 17 77.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 5 22.7 Junior 8 36.4 C 0 0.0 Senior 14 63.6 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 1 4.5 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 12 54.5 Required by my major 22 100.0 3 hours 9 40.9 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 23 4.3 17.4 39.1 39.1 3.1 0.87 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 4. Exams reflected what was taught 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 23 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6 3.8 0.39 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 23 0.0 0.0 43.5 56.5 3.6 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 23 0.0 0.0 47.8 52.2 3.5 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 23 0.0 0.0 30.4 69.6 3.7 0.47 11. Was available for consultation 21 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 3.9 0.36 12. Satisfact answered class questions 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 23 0.0 4.3 39.1 56.5 3.5 0.59 14. Encouraged class participation 23 0.0 0.0 21.7 78.3 3.8 0.42 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 22 0.0 0.0 40.9 59.1 3.6 0.50 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 22 0.0 0.0 27.3 72.7 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 22 4.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 3.3 0.78 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 23 0.0 0.0 26.1 73.9 3.7 0.45 21. Overall quality of teaching 23 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 3.9 0.29. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 25 Number of forms scanned = 23 Number of forms with at least one student response = 23 Percent completed = 92.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Faculty COURSE = SW 701 401L1 ADV GENERALIST SOC WRK PRACT II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Ersing, Robin ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 19 90.5 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 9.5 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 21 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 3 14.3 Studies Program 1 4.8 2 hours 10 47.6 Required by my major 20 95.2 3 hours 4 19.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 4 19.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 20 0.0 0.0 35.0 65.0 3.7 0.49 4. Exams reflected what was taught 4 0.0 0.0 25.0 75.0 3.8 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 21 0.0 4.8 33.3 61.9 3.6 0.60 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 8. Graded assignments included comments 21 0.0 9.5 33.3 57.1 3.5 0.68 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 21 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 0.00 11. Was available for consultation 20 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 3.7 0.47 12. Satisfact answered class questions 21 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.48 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 14. Encouraged class participation 21 0.0 0.0 23.8 76.2 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 21 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 21 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 0.46 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 21 0.0 14.3 38.1 47.6 3.3 0.73 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 21 0.0 0.0 38.1 61.9 3.6 0.50 21. Overall quality of teaching 21 0.0 4.8 4.8 90.5 3.9 0.48. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 26 Number of forms scanned = 21 Number of forms with at least one student response = 21 Percent completed = 80.8 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 741 201O1 ADVANCED GRADUATE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICUM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Erwin, Anne B ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 8 80.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 2 20.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 10 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 10.0 2 hours 1 10.0 Required by my major 9 90.0 3 hours 1 10.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 1 10.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 7 70.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 10 0.0 0.0 70.0 30.0 3.3 0.48 4. Exams reflected what was taught 8 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 11 0.0 0.0 54.5 45.5 3.5 0.52 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 8. Graded assignments included comments 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 10 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.53 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 11. Was available for consultation 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 12. Satisfact answered class questions 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 14. Encouraged class participation 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 11 0.0 0.0 36.4 63.6 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52 21. Overall quality of teaching 11 0.0 0.0 45.5 54.5 3.5 0.52. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 2 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 28. Guided student report preparation 5 0.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 3.6 . 29. Students free to express opinions 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 6 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 4 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 11 Number of forms scanned = 11 Number of forms with at least one student response = 11 Percent completed = 100.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 701 403L1 ADV GENERALIST SOC WRK PRACT II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Faragher, Teri M ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 14 82.4 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 17.6 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 18 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 2 11.1 Studies Program 1 5.6 2 hours 7 38.9 Required by my major 17 94.4 3 hours 6 33.3 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 2 11.1 6 - 7 hours 1 5.6 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 4. Exams reflected what was taught 18 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 0.51 5. Grading was fair and consistent 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 18 0.0 0.0 11.1 88.9 3.9 0.32 8. Graded assignments included comments 18 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 3.9 0.24 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 18 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 3.8 0.38 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 6.3 25.0 68.8 3.6 0.62 12. Satisfact answered class questions 18 0.0 0.0 27.8 72.2 3.7 0.46 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 14. Encouraged class participation 18 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 3.7 0.49 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 18 0.0 0.0 55.6 44.4 3.4 0.51 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 18 0.0 5.6 44.4 50.0 3.4 0.62 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 18 0.0 0.0 38.9 61.1 3.6 0.50 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 18 0.0 5.6 61.1 33.3 3.3 0.57 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 18 0.0 5.6 38.9 55.6 3.5 0.62 21. Overall quality of teaching 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 18 Number of forms with at least one student response = 18 Percent completed = 90.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 430 401L1 SOCIAL WELF POLCY:THRY & IMPLEMENTATION INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Fox, S ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 13 81.3 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 3 18.8 Junior 7 43.8 C 0 0.0 Senior 9 56.3 D 0 0.0 Graduate 0 0.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 7 43.8 Studies Program 0 0.0 2 hours 5 31.3 Required by my major 16 100.0 3 hours 4 25.0 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 0 0.0 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 7 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 2.4 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 4. Exams reflected what was taught 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 5. Grading was fair and consistent 17 0.0 0.0 11.8 88.2 3.9 0.33 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 17 0.0 5.9 29.4 64.7 3.6 0.62 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 16 0.0 0.0 56.3 43.8 3.4 0.51 8. Graded assignments included comments 17 0.0 0.0 58.8 41.2 3.4 0.51 SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively 17 0.0 0.0 41.2 58.8 3.6 0.51 10. Had good knowledge of subject matte 17 0.0 0.0 5.9 94.1 3.9 0.24 11. Was available for consultation 16 0.0 12.5 56.3 31.3 3.2 0.66 12. Satisfact answered class questions 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 13. Stimulated interest of the subject 17 0.0 0.0 35.3 64.7 3.6 0.49 14. Encouraged class participation 17 0.0 0.0 23.5 76.5 3.8 0.44 SECTION D - LEARNING OUTCOMES 15. Learned respect different viewpoint 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 16. Inc my abil to analyze & evaluate 16 0.0 0.0 37.5 62.5 3.6 0.50 17. Course helped abil to solve problem 16 0.0 0.0 43.8 56.3 3.6 0.51 18. Gained undrstnd of concepts & prin. 17 0.0 0.0 29.4 70.6 3.7 0.47 19. Course stimulated me to read furthe 17 0.0 11.8 58.8 29.4 3.2 0.64 % % % % N Poor Fair Good Excellent Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION E - SUMMARY ITEMS 20. Overall value of the course 16 0.0 0.0 18.8 81.3 3.8 0.40 21. Overall quality of teaching 16 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 3.9 0.25. % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION F - UNIVERSITY STUDIES PROGRAM COURSES ONLY 22. USSC/ understand scientific inquiry 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 23. Saw how discipline relates to other 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 24. Writing assign helps understand sub 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 25. Cross-Cult/understand other culture 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 26. Cross-Discipline/ links were eviden 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . SECTION G - GRADUATE SEMINARS ONLY 27. Feedback on oral presentations 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 28. Guided student report preparation 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 29. Students free to express opinions 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 30. Discussions broadened my knowledge 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . 31. Developed abil to conduct research 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 4.0 . SECTION H - LABORATORY & DISCUSSION SECTIONS ONLY 32. Clarified lecture material 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 33. Amount of work appropriate 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 34. Instructor explained expectations 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 35. Instructor helped with my problems 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 36. Lab equipment use satis explained 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . % answering item N --------------------------------- Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) SECTION I - OPTIONAL ITEMS *** No Optional Questions were answered *** Number of forms preslugged = 20 Number of forms scanned = 17 Number of forms with at least one student response = 17 Percent completed = 85.0 % For help with interpretation of the results, refer to your copy of "STUDENT RATINGS OF TEACHING - INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES AND OBSERVATIONS." If a copy is not attached, see your department chairperson. An electronic copy is also available at our UK web page for Assessment & Instituttional Data. ****************************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************************** UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - SPRING 2000 TEACHER AND COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS COLLEGE = Social Work DEPARTMENT = Social Work FACULTY TYPE = Part-time instructors COURSE = SW 741 401O1 ADVANCED GRADUATE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICUM II INSTRUCTOR EVALUATED = Gannon, Kelley J ----------------------------------------------------- SECTION A - STUDENT INFORMATION Classification Number Percent Expected grade Number Percent Freshman 0 0.0 A 6 100.0 Sophomore 0 0.0 B 0 0.0 Junior 0 0.0 C 0 0.0 Senior 0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Graduate 7 100.0 E/Fail 0 0.0 Professional 0 0.0 I 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Pass or Audit 0 0.0 Reason for taking course Number Percent Hrs/week spent Number Percent Required by University 1 hour or less 0 0.0 Studies Program 1 14.3 2 hours 0 0.0 Required by my major 6 85.7 3 hours 2 28.6 Other (e.g. elective) 0 0.0 4 - 5 hours 0 0.0 6 - 7 hours 0 0.0 8 or more hours 5 71.4 % % Strongly % % Strongly N Disagree Disagree Agree Agree Mean SD (1) (2) (3) (4) SECTION B - COURSE ITEMS 1. Outlined course material and grading 7 0.0 0.0 28.6 71.4 3.7 . 2. Textbook contributed to understandin 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 3. Suppl read & assign helped understan 8 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 3.5 . 4. Exams reflected what was taught 1 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 3.0 . 5. Grading was fair and consistent 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 6. Assignments were distributed evenly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 7. Graded assignments returned promptly 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . 8. Graded assignments included comments 7 0.0 0.0 42.9 57.1 3.6 . SECTION C - INSTRUCTOR ITEMS 9. Presented material effectively